Closed
Consultation Paper on the Proposed AIFC Stablecoin Framework
Introduction
Why are we issuing this Consultation Paper (CP)?
1. The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has issued this Consultation Paper to seek suggestions from the market on the policy paper and proposed AIFC stablecoin framework.
Who should read this CP?
2. The proposals in this paper will be of interest to current and potential AIFC participants involved in stablecoin-related activities, as well as to market participants and other interested parties.
Terminology
3. Defined terms have the initial letter of the word capitalised, or of each word in a phrase. Definitions are set out in the AIFC Glossary (GLO). Unless the context otherwise requires, where capitalisation of the initial letter is not used, the expression has its natural meaning.
What are the next steps?
4. We invite comments from interested stakeholders on the proposed framework. All comments should be in writing and sent to the address or email specified below. If sending your comments by email, please use “Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2023-0005” in the subject line. You may, if relevant, identify the organisation you represent when providing your comments. The AFSA reserves the right to publish, including on its website, any comments you provide, unless you expressly request otherwise. Comments supported by reasoning and evidence will be given more weight by the AFSA.
5. The deadline for providing comments on the proposed framework is 15 September 2023. Once we receive your comments, we shall consider if any refinements are required to this proposal.
6. AFSA prefers to receive comments by email at consultation@afsa.kz or posted to:
Policy and Strategy Division
Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA)
55/17 Mangilik El, building C3.2, Kazakhstan
Structure of this CP
Part I – Background;
Part II – Proposals;
Part III – Public Consultation Questions;
Annex 1 – Draft Rules Applicable to Authorised Firms Providing Money Services in relation to Digital Assets and Issuance of Fiat Stablecoins.
Background
1. The proposed stablecoin framework focuses on the issuance of Fiat stablecoins based on the recommendations of standard-setting bodies and jurisdictional analysis.
2. Regarding service provision activities in relation to stablecoins, AFSA has developed Rules applicable to Digital Asset Service Providers (“DASP”) and Digital Asset Trading Facility operators that include specific requirements for stablecoins.
3. According to the Financial Stability Board, stablecoin is defined as “a crypto-asset that aims to maintain a stable value relative to a specified asset, or a pool or basket of assets”. The AIFC Glossary defines the following stablecoins: Fiat stablecoin, Commodity stablecoin and Algorithmic stablecoin.
4. Currently, there are seven crypto exchanges in the AIFC sandbox. The trading volume of stablecoins constitutes the majority of overall trading of Digital Assets.
Proposals
5. Algorithmic stablecoins are designed to achieve price stability by balancing the circulating supply of the Digital Asset. This usually entails behind-the-scenes corrections to the supply and demand inputs to arrive at higher or lower equilibrium points. These mechanisms are not immediately transparent to users, markets, and regulators. Therefore, AFSA proposes to prohibit Algorithmic stablecoins meaning that no person may provide any Financial Service with Algorithmic stablecoins in or from the AIFC.
6. Regarding the issuance of a stablecoin, the issuer must be an Authorised Person.
7. According to the AIFC General Rules, the Regulated Activity of Providing Money Services, among others, includes issuing payment instruments and issuing stored value. Therefore, AFSA proposes requiring issuers of stablecoins to hold a Providing Money Services license.
8. AFSA proposes that the Authorised Person can issue a Fiat stablecoin backed by a single currency.
9. AFSA proposes only to allow the issuance of stablecoins pegged to Tenge and the Group of Ten (“G10”) currencies. The G10 currencies are the Australian Dollar, British Pound Sterling, Canadian Dollar, Euro, Japanese Yen, New Zealand Dollar, Norwegian Krone, Swedish Krona, Swiss Franc and United States Dollar. This considers the availability of high-quality liquid assets that would be fundamental to providing a strong backing for stablecoins.
10. A fiat stablecoin issuer accepts fiat from Clients in exchange for giving them stablecoins. The fiat currency held by the issuer would be considered as Client Money, which can be redeemed by Clients on presentation of the stablecoin. So, the Fiat stablecoin issuer would need to comply with the Client Money provisions (which include Client Reporting, Reconciliation and Recordkeeping) in the AIFC Conduct of Business Rules.
11. According to Recommendation 15 of International Organisation of Securities Commissions (“IOSCO”), the issuer and DASPs should conduct regular and frequent reconciliation of Client Money on a client-by-client basis to identify and resolve any discrepancies in a timely manner. AFSA proposes that the issuer must be able to show that the Fiat stablecoin is backed 1:1 through monthly reconciliation. The frequency and manner of the reconciliation is a matter that may be further refined in the course of the public consultation.
12. Minimum capital requirements for stablecoin issuers are typically determined by their license type. Therefore, it is proposed to establish a base capital requirement of USD 200,000 for stablecoin issuers, aligning with the AIFC Banking Business Prudential Rules applicable to Authorised Firms Providing Money Services. Considering the jurisdictional analysis and incorporating feedback from the FinTech Office, it is necessary to supplement the base capital requirement with a risk-based capital requirement. The risk-based capital requirement is proposed to be set at 2% of the average outstanding value of stablecoins.
13. Considering standard-setting bodies recommendations, AFSA proposes that issuers of stablecoins shall at all times constitute and maintain a reserve of assets.
14. IOSCO policy recommendations for crypto markets highlight that the risks relating to reserve assets are enhanced in stablecoin arrangements in which the reserve assets are not segregated. Therefore, AFSA proposes that the issuer of stablecoins shall ensure that the reserve of assets used to back the stablecoins in circulation is segregated from the issuer's estate and the reserve of assets of other Digital Assets.
15. The reserve of assets shall be composed and managed in such a way that the liquidity risks associated with the permanent redemption rights of the holders are addressed. Particularly, assets must be denominated in the same currency as the pegged currency. The value of the reserve assets should meet the value of the outstanding stablecoins at all times.
16. According to Recommendation 6 of the IOSCO, it is proposed that issuers of stablecoins shall have a clear and detailed policy describing the stabilisation mechanism of stablecoins.
17. Issuers of stablecoins shall establish, maintain and implement custody policies, procedures and contractual arrangements. A Person Providing Custody Services must be an Authorised Person different from the issuer of a Fiat stablecoin. The contractual arrangements between the issuers of stablecoins and the custodians shall ensure that the reserve assets held in custody are protected against claims of the custodians’ creditors.
18. The Financial Stability Board stresses that stablecoins referenced to a single fiat currency should have redemption rights that allow holders to redeem at par into fiat. In the European Union, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore and the United Kingdom, holders are entitled to a claim at par value. Therefore, AFSA proposes that issuers of stablecoins shall grant holders redemption rights at all times on the issuer of stablecoins. The issuer shall establish, maintain and implement clear, detailed policies and procedures on such rights.
19. Holders of Fiat stablecoins should always be granted a redemption right at par value with funds denominated in the official currency that the stablecoin is referencing.
20. Issuers of stablecoins should have independent third-party verification or checks carried out at least annually to verify that the amount and value of stablecoins and Client Money held in custody on behalf of Clients is correct and matches what the stablecoin Custodian is supposed to hold. The result of the audit is proposed to be notified to AFSA and be published on the website of the issuer.
21. Issuers of stablecoins shall, in a clear, accurate and transparent manner, disclose, on a publicly and easily accessible place on their website: (a) the amount of stablecoins in circulation, and the value and composition of the reserve assets; (b) any event that has or is likely to significantly affect the value of the stablecoins or the reserve assets. Such information shall be updated once a quarter.
22. AFSA proposes requiring issuers to publish a whitepaper where the information about the issuer, rights and obligations attached to the Fiat stablecoin, risks, reserve of assets, underlying technology, and the conditions and the procedure to purchase stablecoins and redeem such stablecoins against reserve assets must be disclosed.
23. A stablecoin arrangement in the AIFC could become systemic if any disruption to the stablecoin arrangement could cause further disruption to its users, cause systemic disruption to the financial system of Kazakhstan, or affect public confidence in the financial system of Kazakhstan. The considerations used to identify a systemic stablecoin arrangement include number, value and type of transactions processed by the stablecoin arrangement, value of stablecoins in circulation, number and type of users, markets served and market share of the stablecoin arrangement, interconnectedness and interdependencies with other financial market infrastructures and financial institutions.
24. At this point, based on the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s environmental scan, no stablecoin arrangement in Singapore is likely to qualify as systemic. Regarding the United Kingdom, general agreement was achieved that systemic stablecoin issuers should be subject to Bank of England regulation. For entities authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority and recognised under the Banking Act, the Bank of England will be the lead prudential authority. AFSA agrees that systemic stablecoin arrangement should be subject to higher regulatory and supervisory standards to safeguard financial stability risk and seeks comments relating regulatory approach towards systemic stablecoins.
Public Consultation Questions
In the course of public consultation, existing and potential market participants will be invited to comment on the following questions:
1. AFSA shall establish constraints on concentration, preventing the issuer from investing in more than a certain percentage of reserve assets issues by a single entity. What should the percentage be? Further should AFSA specify what type of assets may or may not be held by the issuer?
2. The AFSA’s proposals in relation to the investment of reserve assets are following. Comments are sought on the proposals and consultation questions:
a) Issuers of stablecoins that invest a part of the reserve of assets shall only invest in highly liquid financial instruments with minimal market risk, credit risk and concentration risk. The investments shall be capable of being liquidated rapidly with minimal adverse price effect. Should AFSA specify a minimum a percentage of assets that need to be held in highly liquid financial instruments?
b) The financial instruments in which the reserve of assets is invested shall be held in custody.
c) All profits or losses and any counterparty or operational risks that result from the investment of the reserve of assets shall be borne by the issuer of the stablecoins.
d) Issuers of stablecoins shall take all appropriate steps to identify, prevent, manage and disclose conflicts of interest arising from the management and investment of the reserve assets.
e) Issuers of stablecoins shall adopt policies and procedures that are sufficiently effective to ensure compliance with this Regulation. In particular, issuers of stablecoins shall establish, maintain and implement policies and procedures on arrangements with third-party entities for operating the reserve of assets, and for the investment of the reserve assets, the custody of the reserve assets, and, where applicable, the distribution of the stablecoins to the public.
f) If the reserve of assets includes investments, the risks posed by the investment policy on the reserve of assets, then issuers of stablecoins may be required to hold an amount of own funds which is up to 20 % higher than the capital requirement.
g) Where issuers of stablecoins invest a part of the reserve of assets, they must describe in detail the investment policy and contain an assessment of how that investment policy can affect the value of the reserve of assets.
3. AFSA is proposing to regulate stablecoin issuers under the activity of Providing Money Services, and as such, the AIFC Banking Business Prudential Rules are not directly applicable to such issuers. Should AFSA include in the AIFC stablecoin framework the approach that applies specific provisions of the AIFC Banking Business Prudential Rules to issuers of a specific type of stablecoins (e.g. systemic stablecoins) or to all stablecoin issuers?
4. Do you agree with proposed reference currencies that can be pegged to the stablecoin set out in section 4.7.1 of the Annex 1? If not, what are your concerns, and how should they be addressed?
5. Do you agree that Algorithmic stablecoins must be prohibited meaning that no person may provide any Financial Service with Algorithmic stablecoins in or from the AIFC?
6. AFSA proposes that the issuer must be able to show that the Fiat stablecoin is backed 1:1 through monthly reconciliation. Do you agree with the frequency and manner of the reconciliation?
7. Some jurisdictions (e.g. Dubai International Financial Center, Abu Dhabi Global Market) have adopted an approach that limits the types of Digital Assets that can be used in their jurisdictions. This means that any Person wanting to provide a Financial Service in or from the AIFC, in relation to stablecoins, will only be able to do so if the Digital Asset is an accepted stablecoin. Should the AFSA develop assessment criteria for stablecoins that will be included in the “Green list”, i.e. allowed for the use in the AIFC?
8. Do you agree with the prohibitions set out in the section 4.11.4 of the proposed stablecoin framework? If not, what are your concerns, and how should they be addressed?
9. AFSA seeks any other comments relating to the AFSA’s regulatory approach towards stablecoins and stablecoin-related activities, including any implementation issues that the AFSA should consider.
Annex 1
DRAFT RULES APPLICABLE TO AUTHORISED FIRMS PROVIDING MONEY SERVICES IN RELATION TO DIGITAL ASSETS AND ISSUANCE OF FIAT STABLECOINS
This Part 4 applies to a Digital Asset Service Provider which is an Authorised Person carrying on, in or from the AIFC, the Regulated Activity of Providing Money Services in relation to Digital Assets.
Guidance
An Authorised Firm Providing Money Services is a Centre Participant to which provisions of the following regulations and rules apply either directly or in respect of its officers and Employees who are Approved Individuals or Designated Individuals:
FSFR (in whole);
AML (in whole);
Chapter 3 (Communications with Clients and Financial Promotions) of the COB;
Chapter 4 (Key information and client agreement) of the COB;
Chapter 7 (Conflicts of interest) of the COB;
Chapter 8 (Client Assets) of the COB;
Chapter 15 (Complaints handling and dispute resolution) of the COB;
Chapter 2 (Controlled and Designated Functions) of the GEN;
Chapter 3 (Control of Authorised Persons) of the GEN;
Chapter 4 (Core Principles) of the GEN;
Chapter 5 (Systems and Controls) of the GEN;
Chapter 6 (Supervision) of the GEN; and
Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC.
4.1. Authorisation
A Person wishing to carry on the Regulated Activity of Providing Money Services in relation to Digital Assets in or from the AIFC must be an Authorised Firm licensed by the AFSA.
4.2. Requirements
The AFSA may not grant authorisation or variation of a Licence to carry on the Regulated Activity of Providing Money Services in relation to Digital Assets if:
(a) the applicant does not meet general authorisation requirements under the Framework Regulations and other applicable rules, and
(b) the applicant of USD 200,000. In case a Person applying for authorisation of the Regulated Activity of Providing Money Services in relation to Digital Assets conducts or is applying for a Licence to conduct another Regulated Activity for which the capital requirement is higher than USD 200,000, the highest amount applies.
(c) An Authorised Firm carrying on Regulated Activities, including Providing Money Services, in relation to Digital Assets cannot carry on Regulated Activities in relation to other Investments unless it obtains a written approval from the AFSA.
4.3. Mandatory appointments
In addition to the mandatory appointments required by GEN 2.1, an Authorised Person Providing Money Services in relation to Digital Assets must appoint a Chief Information Technology Officer, who is an individual responsible for its ongoing information technology (“IT”) operations, maintenance and security oversight to ensure that the Authorised Firm’s IT systems are reliable and adequately protected from external attack or incident.
4.4 Governance arrangements
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider must have robust governance arrangements, including a clear organisational structure with well-defined, transparent and consistent lines of responsibility, effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report the risks to which it is or might be exposed, and adequate internal control mechanisms, including sound administrative and accounting procedures.
(2) Members of the management body of the Digital Asset Service Provider must have sufficiently good repute and possess sufficient knowledge, experience, and skills to perform their duties. They must also demonstrate that they are capable of committing sufficient time to effectively perform their duties.
(3) Members of the management body of the Digital Asset Service Provider that issues a Fiat stablecoin (an “issuer of a Fiat stablecoin”) must ensure effective and prudent management of the reserve of assets. The issuers must ensure that issuance and redemption of a Fiat stablecoin is always matched by a corresponding increase or decrease of the reserve of assets.
4.5. Policies and procedures
Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must establish, maintain and implement policies and procedures on:
(a) the reserve of assets;
(b) the custody of the reserve assets, including the segregation of assets;
(c) the rights or the absence of rights granted to the holders of Fiat stablecoins, as specified in DAA 4.11.2;
(d) the mechanism through which Fiat stablecoins are issued and redeemed;
(e) the protocols for validating transactions in Fiat stablecoins;
(f) the functioning of the issuer’s proprietary DLT, where the Fiat stablecoins are issued, transferred and stored on such DLT or similar technology that is operated by the issuer or a third party acting on its behalf;
(g) the mechanisms to ensure the liquidity of Fiat stablecoins;
(h) the written consent of the issuer of the Fiat stablecoin given to Persons which may offer or admit to trading the Fiat stablecoin;
(i) the business continuity policy;
(j) the plan that ensures, in case of an interruption of its systems and procedures, the preservation of essential data and functions and the maintenance of its activities, or, where that is not possible, the timely recovery of such data and functions and the timely resumption of its activities;
(k) the stabilisation mechanism which must in particular:
(i) list the reference assets to which a Fiat stablecoin aims at stabilising its value and the composition of such reference assets; and
(ii) describe the type of assets and the precise allocation of assets that are included in the reserve of assets;
(iii) complaint handling; and
(iv) conflicts of interests.
4.6. Technology governance, controls and security
4.6.1. Systems, controls and procedures
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider must ensure that it implements systems and controls necessary to address the risks, including cybersecurity-related risks, to its business. The relevant systems and controls should take into account such factors that include but not limited to the nature, scale and complexity of the Digital Asset Service Provider’s business, the diversity of its operations, the volume and size of its transactions and the level of risk inherent with its business.
(2) A Digital Asset Service Provider must have adequate systems and controls to enable it to calculate and monitor its capital resources and its compliance with the requirements in DAA 4.2. The systems and controls must be in writing and must be appropriate for the nature, scale and complexity of the Digital Asset Service Provider’s business and its risk profile.
(3) A Digital Asset Service Provider must employ appropriate and proportionate systems, resources, and procedures to ensure the continued and regular performance of their services and activities.
(4) If the issuer of a Fiat stablecoin decides to discontinue providing services and activities, such as issuing the Fiat stablecoin, the issuer must present a plan to the AFSA for such discontinuation, for the AFSA’s approval.
(5) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must identify sources of operational risk and minimise those risks through the development of appropriate systems, controls and procedures.
(6) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must have internal control mechanisms and effective procedures for risk management.
4.6.2. Technology governance and risk assessment framework
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider must implement a technology governance and risk assessment framework which must be comprehensive and proportionate to the nature, scale, and complexity of the risks inherent in their business model.
(2) The technology governance and risk assessment framework must apply to all technologies relevant to a Digital Asset Service Provider’s business and clearly set out the Digital Asset Service Provider’s cybersecurity objectives.
(3) A Digital Asset Service Provider must ensure that its technology governance and risk assessment is capable of determining the necessary processes and controls that they must implement in order to adequately mitigate any risks identified.
(4) A Digital Asset Service Provider must ensure that its technology governance and risk assessment framework address appropriate governance policies and system development controls, such as a development, maintenance and testing process for technology systems and operations controls, back-up controls, capacity and performance planning and availability testing.
4.6.3. Cyber-security matters
A Digital Asset Service Provider must take reasonable steps to ensure that its IT systems are reliable and adequately protected from external attack or incident.
4.6.4. Cyber-security policy
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider must create and implement a policy which outlines their procedures for the protection of its electronic systems.
(2) A Digital Asset Service Provider must ensure that its cyber-security policy is reviewed at least on an annual basis by its Chief Information Technology Officer.
(3) The cyber-security policy must, as a minimum, address the following areas:
(a) information security;
(b) data governance and classification;
(с) access controls;
(d) business continuity and disaster recovery planning and resources;
(e) capacity and performance planning;
(f) systems operations and availability concerns;
(g) systems and network security, consensus protocol methodology, code and smart contract validation and audit processes;
(h) systems and application development and quality assurance;
(i) physical security and environmental controls, including but not limited to procedures around access to premises and systems;
(j) customer data privacy;
(i) procedures regarding their facilitation of Digital Asset transactions initiated by a Client including, but not limited to, considering multi-factor authentication or any better standard for Digital Asset transactions that—
(i) exceed transaction limits set by the Client, such as accumulative transaction limits over a period of time; and
(ii) are initiated after a change of personal details by the Client, such as the address of a Digital wallet;
(j) procedures regarding Client authentication and session controls including, but not limited to, the maximum incorrect attempts for entering a password, appropriate time-out controls and password validity periods;
(k) procedures establishing adequate authentication checks when a change to a Client’s account information or contact details is requested;
(l) vendor and third-party service provider management;
(m) monitoring and implementing changes to core protocols not directly controlled by the Digital Asset Service Provider, as applicable;
(n) incident response, including but not limited to, root cause analysis and rectification activities to prevent reoccurrence;
(o) governance framework and escalation procedures for effective decision-making and proper management and control of risks and emergency incidents, including but not limited to responses to ransomware and other forms of cyberattacks; and
(p) hardware and infrastructure standards, including but not limited to network lockdown, services/desktop security and firewall standards.
4.7. Reserve of assets
4.7.1. Requirements related to a reserve of assets
(1) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must make reserve assets available for examination and for verification of the issuer's disclosures on the AFSA’s request.
(2) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must fully back such stablecoin with reserve assets, meaning that the value of the reserve assets must at all times be at least equal to the nominal value of all outstanding units of the Fiat stablecoin.
(3) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must issue stablecoins whose reserve assets consist of only one of the following fiat currencies (“reference assets”):
(a) Kazakh tenge;
(b) Australian dollar;
(c) Euro;
(d) Japanese yen;
(e) New Zealand dollar;
(f) Norwegian krone;
(g) British pound sterling;
(h) Swedish krona;
(i) Swiss franc;
(j) Canadian dollar; or
(k) United States dollar.
(4) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must ensure that the reserve of assets is operationally segregated from the issuer’s proprietary assets and from the reserve of assets of other Fiat stablecoins.
(5) The reserve of assets must be composed and managed in such a way that the liquidity risks associated to the permanent redemption rights of the holders are addressed.
(6) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin that offers two or more categories of Fiat stablecoins to the public must operate and maintain segregated pools of reserves of assets for each category of Fiat stablecoins. Each of these pools of reserve of assets must be managed separately.
(7) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must determine the aggregate value of reserve assets by using market prices. Their aggregated value must be at least equal to the aggregate value of the claims on the issuer from holders of Fiat stablecoins in circulation.
(8) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must conduct monthly reconciliation of each Fiat stablecoin to demonstrate that the Fiat stablecoin is fully backed with reserve assets.
4.7.2. Independent audit
(1) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must mandate an independent audit of the reserve assets annually.
(2) The result of the audit conducted under (1) must be provided to the AFSA without delay, at the latest within four weeks of the reference date of the valuation. The result of the audit must be published within three weeks of the date of the provision of the result of the audit to the AFSA.
(3) The AFSA may instruct the issuer of a Fiat stablecoin to delay the publication of the result of the audit in the event that:
(a) the issuer has been required to implement recovery arrangement;
(b) the issuer has been required to implement a redemption plan;
(c) it is deemed necessary to protect the interests of holders of a Fiat stablecoin;
(d) it is deemed necessary to avoid a significant adverse effect on the financial system of the AIFC;
(e) the AFSA considers appropriate in pursuing the Regulatory Objectives.
(3) The valuation referred to in DAA 4.7.1 (7) at market prices must be made by using mark-to-market.
(4) When using mark- to-market:
(a) the reserve asset must be valued at the more prudent side of bid and offer unless the reserve asset can be closed out at mid-market; and
(b) only good quality market data must be used. Such data must be assessed on the basis of all of the following factors:
(i) the number and quality of the counterparties;
(ii) the volume and turnover in the market of the reserve asset; and
(iii) size of the reserve of assets.
(5) If use of mark-to-market is not possible or the market data is not of sufficient quality, a reserve asset must be valued conservatively by using mark-to-model.
(6) The mark-to-model must accurately estimate the intrinsic value of the reserve asset, based on all of the following up-to-date key factors:
(a) the volume and turnover in the market of that reserve asset;
(b) the size of the reserve of assets; and
(c) market risk, interest rate risk, credit risk attached to the reserve asset.
(7) When using mark-to-model, the amortised cost method, must not be used.
4.7.3. Custody of reserve assets
(1) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must establish, maintain and implement custody policies, procedures and contractual arrangements that ensure at all times that:
(a) the reserve assets are not encumbered nor pledged as Collateral;
(b) the reserve assets are held in custody;
(c) the issuer of a Fiat stablecoin has prompt access to the reserve assets to meet any redemption requests from the holders of Fiat stablecoins;
(d) concentration in the custodians of reserve assets are avoided; and
(e) concentration risks in the reserve assets are avoided.
(2) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin that issues two or more categories of Fiat stablecoins must have a custody policy for each pool of reserve of assets.
(3) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoins that has issued the same category of Fiat stablecoins must operate and maintain only one custody policy.
(4) The reserve assets must be held in custody by no later than 5 working days after the issuance of the Fiat stablecoins.
(5) A Person Providing Custody Services must be a Person different from the issuer of a Fiat stablecoin.
(6) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must ensure that the Digital Asset Service Provider appointed as a custodian of the reserve assets has the necessary expertise and market reputation to act as a custodian of such reserve assets, taking into account the accounting practices, safekeeping procedures and internal control mechanisms.
(7) The contractual arrangements between the issuer of a Fiat stablecoin and custodians must ensure that the reserve assets held in custody are protected against claims of the custodians’ creditors.
(8) The custody policies and procedures referred to in (1) must set out the selection criteria for the appointments of custodians of the reserve assets and the procedure to review such appointments.
4.8. White paper
4.8.1. Content and form of the white paper
(1) A Digital Asset white paper for a Fiat stablecoin must contain all of the following information:
(a) information about the issuer;
(b) information about the Fiat stablecoin;
(c) information on the rights and obligations attached to a Fiat stablecoin;
(d) information on the underlying technology;
(e) information on risks;
(f) information on the reserve of assets;
(g) the method and all factors used to calculate the value of reserve assets;
(h) the initial value and composition of the reserve assets;
(i) the conditions and the procedure to purchase stablecoins and redeem such stablecoins against reserve assets;
(j) details of the arrangements for custody and management of the reserve assets;
(k) the rights provided to holders of the stablecoin;
(l) a summary of the redemption policies; and
(m) any other information that the AFSA instructs to include.
(2) All information in the white paper referred to in (1):
(a) must be fair, clear and not misleading;
(b) must not contain material omissions; and
(c) must be presented in a concise and comprehensible form.
(3) The white paper must not contain any assertions on the future value of the Fiat stablecoin.
(4) The white paper must contain a clear and unambiguous statement that:
(a) the Fiat stablecoin may lose their value in part or in full;
(b) the Fiat stablecoin may not always be transferable; and
(c) the Fiat stablecoin may not be liquid;
(5) The white paper for a Fiat stablecoin must contain a statement from the management body of the issuer confirming that the white paper complies with the requirements of this Part and that, to the best knowledge of the management body, the information presented in the white paper:
(a) is in accordance with the facts; and
(b) that the white paper makes no omission likely to affect its import.
(6) The white paper must contain a summary that must in brief and non-technical language provide key information about the offer to the public of the Fiat stablecoins or about the intended admission of Fiat stablecoins to trading on a Digital Asset Trading Facility.
(7) The summary must be presented and laid out in easily understandable words and in a clear and comprehensive form, using characters of readable size.
(8) The format and content of the summary of the white paper must provide, in conjunction with the white paper, appropriate information about characteristics of the Fiat stablecoins concerned in order to help potential holders of the Fiat stablecoins to make an informed decision.
(9) The summary must indicate that:
(a) the holders of a Fiat stablecoin have a redemption right at any moment; and
(b) the conditions of redemption.
(10) The summary must contain a warning that:
(a) it should be read as an introduction to the white paper; and
(b) the potential holder should base any decision to purchase a Fiat stablecoin on the content of the whole white paper.
(11) Prior to the publication of the white paper no marketing communications or Financial Promotions can be made. This restriction does not affect the ability of the issuer of a Fiat stablecoin to conduct market soundings.
4.8.2. Modification of the white paper
(1) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must inform in writing the AFSA of any intended change of the issuer’s business model likely to have a significant influence on the purchase decision of any actual or potential holder of a Fiat stablecoin, which occurs after the authorisation or approval of the white paper. Such changes may include:
(a) the governance arrangements, including reporting lines to the management body and risk management framework;
(b) the reserve assets and the custody of the reserve assets;
(c) the rights granted to the holders of a Fiat stablecoin;
(d) the mechanism through which Fiat stablecoins are issued and redeemed;
(e) the protocols for validating the transactions in Fiat stablecoins;
(f) the functioning of the issuer’s proprietary DLT, where the Fiat stablecoins are issued, transferred and stored on such a DLT;
(g) the mechanisms to ensure the liquidity of Fiat stablecoins, including the liquidity management policy for issuers of Fiat stablecoins;
(h) the arrangements with third parties, including for managing the reserve assets and the investment of the reserve, the custody of reserve assets, and, where applicable, the distribution of Fiat stablecoins to the public;
(i) the complaint handling procedure; or
(j) the money laundering and terrorist financing risk assessment and general policies and procedures.
(2) The AFSA must be informed in writing 30 working days prior to the intended changes taking effect.
(3) The AFSA must grant its approval or refuse to approve the draft modified white paper within 30 working days following the acknowledgement of receipt.
(4) During the examination of the draft modified white paper, the AFSA may request an issuer of a Fiat stablecoin to provide any additional information, explanations or justifications on the draft modified white paper.
(5) If the AFSA requests additional information, the time limit of 30 working days must commence only when the AFSA has received the additional information requested.
(6) Where approving the modified white paper, the AFSA may request the issuer of Fiat stablecoins:
(a) to put in place mechanisms to ensure the protection of holders of Fiat stablecoins, when a potential modification of the issuer’s operations can have a material effect on the value, stability, or risks of the Fiat stablecoins or reserve assets;
(b) to take any appropriate corrective measures to address concerns related to financial stability, the smooth operation of payment systems, or market integrity.
4.8.3. Liability of issuers of Fiat stablecoins for the information given in the white paper
(1) If an issuer or its management or supervisory bodies has breached requirements set out in DAA 4.8.1(2), by providing in its white paper or in a modified white paper information which is not complete, fair or clear or by providing information which is misleading, a holder of such Fiat stablecoins may claim damages from that issuer of Fiat stablecoins or its bodies for damage caused to her or him due to that infringement.
(2) It must be the responsibility of the holders of Fiat stablecoins to present evidence indicating that the issuer of Fiat stablecoins has breached DAA 4.8.1(2) and that such breach had an impact on the holder’s decision to buy, sell or exchange the said Fiat stablecoin.
(3) A holder of Fiat stablecoins must not be able to claim damages for the information provided in a summary, including the translation thereof, except where:
(a) the summary is misleading, inaccurate or inconsistent when read together with the other parts of the white paper;
(b) the summary does not provide, when read together with the other parts of the white paper, key information in order to aid potential holders when considering whether to purchase such Fiat stablecoins.
4.8.4. Publication of the white paper
(1) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must publish on its website its approved white paper and, where applicable, its modified white paper.
(2) The approved white paper must be publicly accessible by no later than the starting date of the offer to the public of the Fiat stablecoins or the admission of those tokens to trading on a Digital Asset Trading Facility.
(3) The approved white paper, and, where applicable, the modified white paper must remain available on the issuer’s website for as long as the Fiat stablecoin is held by the public.
4.9. AFSA power to limit the amount of Fiat stablecoins
(1) The AFSA may limit the amount of Fiat stablecoins to be issued or impose a minimum denomination to the Fiat stablecoins when the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan issues an opinion that the Fiat stablecoins poses a serious threat to monetary policy transmission, smooth operation of payment systems or monetary sovereignty, and specify the applicable limit or minimum denomination amount.
(2) The AFSA may, at any time and in its sole discretion, prohibit or otherwise limit the issuance or use of a Fiat stablecoin before or after an issuer which has been approved issues such Fiat stablecoin, and may require that any such issuer delist, halt, or otherwise limit or curtail activity with respect to such Fiat stablecoin.
4.10. Monitoring of Fiat stablecoins
(1) If the AFSA considers it appropriate, it may require the issuer of the Fiat stablecoin to provide a report with the following information:
a. the customer base;
b. the value of the Fiat stablecoins issued and the size of the reserve of assets;
c. the average number and value of transactions per day; and
d. any other information the AFSA considers appropriate.
(2) Digital Asset Service Providers, which provide services on the Fiat stablecoins, must provide the issuer of a Fiat stablecoin with information necessary to prepare the report, including by reporting off chain transactions.
4.11. Miscellaneous
4.11.1. Ongoing information to holders of Fiat stablecoins
(1) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must in a clear, accurate and transparent manner disclose at least once a quarter, on a publicly and easily accessible place on its website, the amount of Fiat stablecoins in circulation, and the value and the composition of the reserve assets.
(2) The published information must demonstrate that the reserves:
(i) are at least equal in value to the notional value of outstanding Fiat stablecoins in circulation (that value is calculated by multiplying the number of Fiat stablecoins in circulation by the purported pegged Fiat Currency value);
(ii) include not more than 10% in high-quality liquid assets other than cash;
(iii) are denominated in the reference currency; and
(iv) are held in segregated accounts with properly regulated banks or custodians.
(3) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must publish as soon as possible on a publicly and easily accessible place on their website a brief, clear, accurate and transparent summary of the audit report and the full and unredacted audit report in relation to the reserve assets.
(4) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must as soon as possible and in a clear, accurate and transparent manner disclose on its website any event that has or is likely to have a significant effect on the value of the Fiat stablecoin, or on the reserve assets.
4.11.2. Rights on issuers of Fiat stablecoins
1. Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must grant holders redemption rights at all times on the issuer of Fiat stablecoins, and on the reserve assets when the issuer is not able to comply with its certain obligations.
2. Holders should be able to redeem their Fiat stablecoins at any moment and at par value to the referenced asset. Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must establish a policy on such permanent redemption right setting out:
(a) the conditions, including thresholds, periods and timeframes, for holders of a Fiat stablecoin to exercise this right;
(b) the mechanisms and procedures to ensure the redemption of the Fiat stablecoins;
(c) the valuation, or the principles of valuation, of the Fiat stablecoins and of the reserve assets when this right is exercised by the holder of a Fiat stablecoin;
(d) the settlement conditions when this right is exercised
(e) measures the issuer of a Fiat stablecoin is taking to adequately manage increases or decreases of the reserve, to avoid any adverse impacts on the market of the assets included in the reserve.
4.11.3. Ongoing capital
In addition to DAA 4.2(b), an issuer of a Fiat stablecoin must ensure that it maintains at all times ongoing capital resources in the amount of 2% of the average outstanding Fiat stablecoins issued by the issuer of a Fiat stablecoin.
4.11.4. Prohibitions
(1) Issuer of a Fiat stablecoin is prohibited to grant interest in relation to a Fiat stablecoin.
(2) For the purposes of this Rule, any remuneration or any other benefit related to the length of time during which a holder of a Fiat stablecoin holds such a Fiat stablecoin must be treated as interest.
(3) The interest includes net compensation or discount, with an equivalent effect of an interest received by the holder, directly from the issuer or through third parties, directly associated to the Fiat stablecoin or through the remuneration or pricing of other products.
(4) The issuance of stablecoins that aim or purport to maintain a stable value via protocols that provide for the increase or decrease of the supply of such stablecoins or other digital assets in response to changes in demand is prohibited.
Consultation paper on Proposed Regulatory Guidance on Assessment, Competency and Trainings for Controlled and Designated Functions
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation paper on Policy on the Enhancement of the AIFC Digital Asset Trading Facility Framework
Please, press "PDF" button above to download a Consultation Paper.
Consultation paper on the proposed AIFC Commodities Exchange Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper on Proposed Perimeter Guidance
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Introduction
Why are we issuing this Consultation Paper (CP)?
The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has issued this Consultation Paper to seek suggestions from the market on the proposed Perimeter Guidance.
Who should read this CP?
The proposals in this paper will be of interest to any person seeking or considering authorisation by the AFSA to perform regulated activities in the AIFC.
Terminology
Defined terms have the initial letter of the word capitalised or of each word in a phrase. Definitions are set out in the Glossary Rules (GLO). Unless the context otherwise requires, where capitalisation of the initial letter is not used, the expression has its natural meaning.
What are the next steps?
We invite comments from interested stakeholders on the proposed framework. All comments should be in writing and sent to the address or email specified below. If sending your comments by email, please use “Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2023-0003” in the subject line. You may, if relevant, identify the organisation you represent when providing your comments. The AFSA reserves the right to publish, including on its website, any comments you provide unless you expressly request otherwise. Comments supported by reasoning and evidence will be given more weight by the AFSA.
The deadline for providing comments on the proposed framework is 30 June 2023. Once we receive your comments, we shall consider if any refinements are required to this proposal.
AFSA prefers to receive comments by email at consultation@afsa.kz.
Comments may also be posted to:
Policy and Strategy Division
Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA)
55/17 Mangilik El, building C3.2, Kazakhstan
Structure of this CP
Part I – Background;
Part II – Key proposals;
Part III – Questions in this consultation paper;
Annex 1 – Proposed Perimeter Guidance.
Part I - Background
The AFSA is proposing to adopt Perimeter Guidance.
Currently, the AIFC legal framework does not contain a comprehensive guidance document on licensing requirements.
The purpose of PERG is to give guidance about the circumstances in which authorisation to perform the activities that are regulated under the AIFC Financial Services Framework Regulations (AIFC FSFR) is required, including applicability of any available exemptions or exclusions.
In addition to the regulatory perimeter PERG contains provisions on the AIFC currency perimeter, which sets boundaries for offering services to the residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan and is regulated by the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC (AIFC Currency Rules).
PERG is based on the relevant provisions of the AIFC FSFR, AIFC General Rules, AIFC Conduct of Business Rules and AIFC Currency Rules.
Part II - Key proposals
DRAFT PERIMETER GUIDANCE
Introduction
This chapter gives introduction on the application, purpose, overview and status of PERG, brief description on the acting Law of the AIFC, terms of updating PERG, defined terms and list of general guidance to be found in PERG.
Authorisation (Getting Regulated)
This chapter contains five big sections 2.1. - 2.5.
Section 2.1. gives description to general requirements and provisions related to becoming regulated by the AFSA:
2.1.1. Carrying activities by way of business
2.1.2. Regulated Activities, Market Activities or Ancillary Services
2.1.3. Carrying on activities in the AIFC
2.1.4. Exempt Activities
2.1.5. Excluded Activities
2.1.6. Recognition regime
2.1.7. Carrying activities without authorisation
2.1.8. Offering services to residents and non-residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan
2.1.9. Offering services to retail and Professional Clients
2.1.10. Variation of the Licence. Waivers and modifications.
Sections 2.3. – 2.5. contain description of activity, currency regulation implications, and possible exclusions for Regulated Activities, Ancillary Services, Market Activities and FinTech Lab activities.
Financial Promotion and Communication
This chapter describes the AFSA’s approach to financial promotion, gives examples of communications to be considered as financial promotion.
Currency Regulation
This chapter outlines the currency regulatory perimeter, currency residency, services and transactions of the AIFC participants and reporting on them.
Unregulated Activities
This chapter gives brief guidance about the AFSA’s approach to unregulated activities.
Miscellaneous
This chapter gives guidance on certain AML and CFT requirements applicable to firms if their activities constitute them being Designated Non-Financial Business and Profession.
AFSA PERIMETER GUIDANCE (PERG)
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Application
This Perimeter Guidance (PERG) applies to:
- (a) a Person who is considering carrying on activities in the AIFC which may fall within the scope of the AIFC Financial Services Framework Regulations (FSFR) and is seeking guidance on whether the Person needs to become an Authorised Person or an Ancillary Service Provider;
- (b) a Person who seeks to become an Authorised Person or an Ancillary Service Provider under the FSFR and who is, or is considering to, applying for authorisation to carry on regulated activities in the AIFC;
- (c) a Person who is seeking guidance on whether any communication the Person may be seeking to make or cause to be made will be a Financial Promotion and be subject to the restriction in section 27 of the FSFR (Prohibition relating to Financial Promotions); and
- (d) Persons generally.
1.2. Purpose
The purpose of PERG is to give guidance about the circumstances in which authorisation to perform the activities that are regulated under the FSFR is required, including applicability of any available exemptions or exclusions.
Activities that might be exempt include such Regulated Activities, Market Activities or Ancillary Services that are exempt from the General Prohibition set by section 24 of the FSFR. See below sections 2.1.4. and 2.1.5. of PERG where you can find examples of such exempt or excluded activities.
Activities that might be excluded include such activities that are not carried out “by way of business”, as described in Rule 1.1.9 of the AIFC General Rules (GEN) and are not regulated under the FSFR. See below section 2.1.1. of PERG where you can see explanation of “by way of business”.
1.3. Overview
The key and governing act under the Financial Services Framework is the FSFR adopted by the AFSA, which provide a legal basis for the regulation and supervision of financial services. Under this AIFC Act (the term AIFC Act refers to an act adopted by the AIFC Body) Persons are permitted by the AFSA to carry on various financial activities in the AIFC, which are subject to regulation (referred to as Regulated Activities, Market Activities or Ancillary Services).
For reference: AIFC Bodies are the AIFC Management Council, the Governor of the AIFC, the AIFC Authority, the Astana Financial Services Authority, the AIFC Court and the International Arbitration Centre (Article 9 of the Constitutional Statute on the AIFC).
The “regulatory perimeter” for the AIFC financial services regulation is set out in the FSFR and contains two key prohibitions underlying that perimeter:
- (1) the General Prohibition, which prohibits Persons from carrying on a Regulated Activity, Market Activity or Ancillary Service unless it is authorised to do so by the AFSA or is exempt; and
- (2) the Financial Promotion prohibition, which prohibits unauthorised Persons from communicating promotion of Investments or any Regulated Activity.
Regulated Activities, Market Activities and Ancillary Services are specified in GEN: for example, Accepting Deposits, Managing Investments, Effecting Contracts of Insurance, Dealing in Investments as Agent; Providing Legal Services, Providing Audit Services; Operating and Exchange, Operating a Clearing House, etc. (see Chapter 2 of PERG (Authorisation (Getting Regulated)).
In addition to the regulatory perimeter the AIFC legal framework also has a currency perimeter, which sets parameters for AIFC Participants offering services to the residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan through the services of Kazakhstan’s commercial banks (second tier banks) or AIFC Banks. The currency perimeter is regulated by the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC (AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation).
The FSFR, and the secondary legislation made under the FSFR (e.g., Rules), are complex. Although PERG gives guidance about Regulated Activities, Market Activities, or Ancillary Services and Financial Promotions, it does not aim to, nor can it, be exhaustive.
References have been made to relevant provisions in the FSFR and secondary legislation. However, since reproducing an entire statutory provision would sometimes require a lengthy quotation, or considerable further explanation, many provisions of the FSFR, or secondary legislation made under the FSFR, are cross-referred.
For the precise details of the legislation, readers of PERG should, therefore, refer to the FSFR and the secondary legislation itself, as well as PERG.
1.4. Acting Law of the AIFC
The Acting Law of the AIFC is based on the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan and consists of:
- (1) the Constitutional Statute on the AIFC (Constitutional Statute);
- (2) the AIFC Acts; and
- (3) the Acting Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan, which applies in part to matters not governed by the Constitutional Statute and AIFC Acts.
Constitutional Statute on the AIFC applies at all times.
Kazakhstan legislation applies as part of the Acting Law of the AIFC whenever the AIFC Acts do not displace that Kazakhstan legislation. Kazakhstan law does not apply at all in the AIFC if there has been a valid process of creation of law by an AIFC Act to displace the general law.
E.g., as part of the Acting law of Kazakhstan, criminal law and criminal procedure always apply in the AIFC. Another example would be the Republic’s tax law, though the Constitutional Statute makes provision for a beneficial tax exemptions for some activities in the AIFC. A third would be the law relating to activities in the AIFC territory which are not regulated by the AFSA: hotels, restaurants, sports etc. where the AIFC Acts are not applied, and thus the general law of Kazakhstan applies in full.
Examples of cases, where the AIFC Acts disapply the general law of Kazakhstan are Kazakhstan law on companies and other forms of a legal entity.
A boundary between application of the AIFC Acts and the legislation of Kazakhstan is prescribed further in the AIFC Acts. This is achieved under the AIFC Regulations on AIFC Acts, section 40:
40. Application (1) Because, by virtue of article 4 of the Constitutional Statute, AIFC legislation is able to apply in the AIFC despite any Acting Law of Kazakhstan on civil or commercial matters, the rights and liabilities between Persons in any civil or commercial matter are to be decided according to the relevant law for the time being in force in the Jurisdiction chosen in accordance with subsection (2). (2) The Jurisdiction chosen is to be the Jurisdiction first ascertained under the following paragraphs: (a) so far as there is a regulatory content, the AIFC Acts or any other law in force in the AIFC; failing which, (b) the law of any Jurisdiction other than the AIFC expressly applying under any AIFC Act; failing which, (c) the laws of a Jurisdiction as agreed between all the relevant Persons concerned in the matter; failing which, (d) the laws of any Jurisdiction that appears to the Court or Arbitrator to be the Jurisdiction most closely related to the facts of and the Persons concerned in the matter; failing which, (e) the Acting Law of Kazakhstan. |
Considering this structure of regulation, it is critical to recognise that the Constitutional Statute sets out the areas of economic activity which are considered as a priority to the AIFC. This include under Article 2.2 (2), (3), and (4) of the Constitutional Statute: 2) developing a securities market in the Republic of Kazakhstan and integrating it with international capital markets; 3) developing insurance markets, banking services, Islamic finance, financial technologies, digital assets, electronic commerce and innovative projects in the Republic of Kazakhstan; 4) developing financial and professional services based on international best practice.
1.5. Status
PERG has been prepared for information purposes and does not constitute an exhaustive list of requirements that might be applicable to the firm’s business operations or to individuals, since the application of the PERG depends on the nature, scale and complexity of the business.
PERG is a Regulatory Material (for example, guidance, modifications, rules, policy statements), adopted by the AFSA under an AIFC Act. In cases when the FSFR and the secondary legislation say otherwise they will override PERG.
1.6. Updating PERG
PERG will be amended from time to time in the light of changing circumstances, developing business practices, or case law with the actual version published on the website of the AFSA. The newer version will be identified by the date in the cover page of the document.
1.7. Defined terms
The terms with initial capital letters (other than proper nouns) have the meaning as defined in the AIFC Glossary.
GEN uses the terms Authorised Firm, Authorised Market Institution, Authorised Person, and Ancillary Service Provider.
Authorised Firm is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on one or more Regulated Activities.
Authorised Market Institution is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on one or more Market Activities.
Authorised Person is either an Authorised Firm or an Authorised Market Institution.
Ancillary Service Provider is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on one or more Ancillary Services.
1.8. List of general guidance to be found in PERG
Chapter: | Applicable to: | About |
2 AUTHORISATION (GETTING REGULATED) | an unauthorised Person wishing to find out whether it needs to be authorised or is exempt or excluded to perform certain activities in or from the AIFC an authorised Person wishing to know whether it needs to vary the scope of its Licence | the regulatory scope of the FSFR the Regulated Activities, Market Activities, Ancillary Services, FinTech Lab Activities in GEN the exemptions and exclusions available for Regulated Activities, Market Activities, Ancillary Services, FinTech Lab Activities |
3 FINANCIAL PROMOTION AND COMMUNICATION | any Person who needs to know whether its communications are Financial Promotions subject to the restriction in section 27 of the FSFR or whether its activities in making or helping others to make Financial Promotions are Regulated Activities | Examples of Financial Promotions, Exempt Financial Promotions and general requirements for communications |
4 CURRENCY REGULATION | a person who needs to know whether a particular transaction is subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation | the scope of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation |
5 UNREGULATED ACTIVITIES | any Person | the AFSA’s approach to unregulated activities |
6 MISCELLANNEOUS | any Person | miscellaneous provisions |
2. AUTHORISATION (GETTING REGULATED)
2.1.General requirements for becoming regulated
Under section 24 of the FSFR (the General Prohibition), a Centre Participant must not carry on a Regulated Activity, Market Activity or Ancillary Service unless it is licensed to do so by the AFSA.
In order for firms to establish whether their proposed business requires authorisation to carry on Regulated Activities, Market Activities or Ancillary Services they need to refer to Rules 1.1.1., 1.2. and 1.3.1. of GEN.
The applicants will be assessed against the following criteria:
- (a)business model: a Person will need to satisfy the AFSA that its business model is suitable for the activities that it wishes to undertake;
- (b)effective supervision: a Person must demonstrate that it is capable of being effectively supervised by the AFSA with respect to other entities in its Group or related persons on whom it may rely upon for certain functions;
- (c)location of operations: a Person’s arrangements will be assessed to qualify for criteria set in section 6 of the FSFR (Meaning of “in the AIFC”) to be considered as carrying on activities in or from the AIFC;
- (d)adequate and appropriate financial and non-financial resources: a Person must have suitable people, financial resources and systems to be able to undertake activities;
- (e)fitness and propriety: a Person will be assessed for fitness and propriety of the members of its Governing Body, Shareholders (Controllers), Connected Persons, and Approved Individuals; and
- (f)compliance: the Person will be assessed for adequate regulatory compliance arrangements.
- Any Person who is concerned that its proposed activities may require authorisation will need to consider the following questions:
- (a)Will I be carrying on my activities by way of business (applicable only to Regulated Activities)?
- (b)Will my activities be, or include, Regulated Activities, Market Activities or Ancillary Services?
- (c)If so, will I be carrying them on in the AIFC?
- (d)Whether my activities will or may be exempt?
- (e)If not, will my activities be outside the scope of regulation by the AFSA?
A Person may also apply to the AFSA for variation of the Licence.
Chapters 2, 3 and 5 of PERG provide high-level guidance on the above questions.
Chapter 4 explains currency perimeter related to offering services by the AIFC Participants to residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
2.1.1.Carrying activities by way of business
Rule 1.1.9 of GEN gives a description of what is understood as being carried on “by way of business”. Three criteria listed there do not contain the closed list of activities, and therefore whether an activity is carried by way of business or not is ultimately a question of judgment that may take into account several additional factors:
- (a)the degree of continuity;
- (b)the existence of a commercial element, for example is there direct or indirect financial benefit expected, which is not limited to profit;
- (c)the scale of the activity;
- (d)the proportion which the activity bears to other activities carried on by the same Person but which are not regulated;
- (e)the nature of the particular activity that is carried on; and
- (f)the existence of customers/clients.
If a Person can establish that the activities it is carrying on is not by way of business, and there are no applicable exclusions or exemptions, it follows that its activities do not require authorisation.
Further, if the activities are not undertaken by way of business, the AIFC Conduct of Business Rules will not be applicable, as those rules only apply to an Authorised Firm with respect to any Regulated Activity carried on by an Authorised Firm operating in the AIFC.
With regard to an individual, who works for a Person, the General Prohibition will not be applied on the ground that the individual is not carrying on its business in a personal capacity if the individual is working under an employment agreement or services agreement (contract of service, contract for service).
2.1.2. Regulated Activities, Market Activities or Ancillary Services
The list of Regulated Activities, Market Activities or Ancillary Services is available in GEN, respectively in Schedules 1, 4 and 2: https://afsa.orderly.kz/articles/general-rules.
The process of applying for authorisation is available on the AFSA website: https://afsa.aifc.kz/authorisation-process/.
The AFSA may arrange pre-application meetings to provide general information about the authorisation process and applicable requirements.
Arranging a pre-application meeting with a prospective applicant for Regulated or Market Activities is a general recommendation, rather than an option. Forms of pre-application meetings may vary occasionally and be interchanged with a conference call in case of impossibility to arrange a meeting. However, the purpose of such meetings is to provide a prospective applicant with an overview of regulations, information about the application process and requirements, rather than to perform preliminary assessment of the application, which is a part of the authorisation process.
Pre-application meetings with the AIFC Authority and the AFSA are an important starting point in respect of any application to obtain a licence where a holistic description of the project, the proposed nature of the financial services and expansion plans are discussed. The outcome of such meetings is to provide general information, rather than perform the initial review. A prospective applicant for Regulated and Market Activities may seek advice from legal and other professional advisers in relation to any application for licencing and relevant laws, regulations and rules that may apply. While an advisor is welcomed at the pre-application meeting, the AFSA officials expect a firm’s shareholder or prospective management to speak on the firm’s behalf.
Before selecting a name of the firm, the applicant needs to check sensitive business names. Pursuant to the AIFC Companies Regulations a firm must not use a name that, because of any fact, matter or circumstance, is, or is reasonably likely to become, misleading, deceptive or conflicting with another name (including an existing name of another Company or Recognised Company). The firm must not use the name indicating it is related to providing regulated financial services without being properly authorised to do so, for example, “Fund Management”, “Investment Management”, etc.
In order to register a firm providing regulated financial services the applicant needs to ensure that it has the required amount of regulatory capital, which will be different based on the requirements for each category or type of firm (see the relevant AIFC Prudential Rules). It is recommended that the applicant's initial capital exceeds the required base capital, where additional risk and operational capital are considered. The firm must have and maintain at all times Capital Resources and Liquid Assets in accordance with the relevant prudential rules.
The individuals that will be performing senior management roles like Approved and Designated Individuals need to undergo the Fit and Proper test (see the Regulatory Guidance on Fitness and Propriety and the Guidance on Competence Assessment).
2.1.3. Carrying on activities in the AIFC
Carrying on activities in the AIFC shall be dealt with in relation to activities in the territory of the Centre, and concerning the persons who can “use” the Centre. The heading of Article 3 of the Constitutional Statute mentions both of these, as the heading is “Activities conducted in the AIFC and by AIFC Participants”.
As to activities in the territory, Article 3(1) of the Constitutional Statute precludes “activities that may be conducted in the AIFC”. Thus, it enables AIFC Bodies to adopt AIFC Acts which define the permissible activities to be conducted inside the Centre. As to the people who can use the Centre, the focus switches to Article 4 of the Constitutional Statute. It empowers, at Article 4(3), AIFC Bodies, to “regulate relationships” between various persons. By a “relationships” the Constitutional Statute means, e.g., the relationship between an authorised Centre Participant and the AFSA. It imposes limits on these powers of the AIFC Bodies, by defining the “relationships” concerned. The main relationships are defined those as (a) between AIFC Participants, (b) between AIFC Bodies, and (c) between persons in (a) and (b). Employees of either persons are also included.
The words “in the AIFC” need to be considered as legal and regulatory construct, not solely geographical. It can be linked to the meaning ‘conducted under and in accordance with (valid) AIFC Law’, and not as having the literal, stricter, meaning limiting the activities to those having effects only withing geographical boundary of the AIFC.
Going further, section 6 of the FSFR envisages the circumstances when activities are deemed to be carried on “in the AIFC” for the purposes of the FSFR, thereby ensuring that the conduct falls within the remit of regulation by the AFSA:
6. Meaning “in the AIFC” (1) A Person will be deemed to be carrying on activities in the AIFC for the purposes of these Regulations if: (a) that Person is a Centre Participant and the day-to-day management of those activities (even if those activities are undertaken in whole or in part from outside the AIFC) is the responsibility of the Centre Participant in its capacity as such; or (b) that Person’s head office is outside the AIFC, but the activity is carried on from a branch maintained by it in the AIFC; or (c) the activities are conducted in circumstances that are deemed to amount to activities carried on in the AIFC under Rules made by the AFSA. (2) The AFSA may issue Rules and guidance as to the circumstances in which activities capable of having an effect in the AIFC are or are not to be regarded as conducted in the AIFC. |
Subsection 1(a) refers to an AIFC Participant carrying out activities for which it has either been registered or recognised and for which it is responsible for managing on a daily basis. The part "even if those activities are undertaken in whole or in part from outside the AIFC" clearly envisages that the activities being carried on will still fall "in" the AIFC for the purposes of this particular regulation even if they are carried on with persons outside the geographical limits of the AIFC.
Where subsection 1(b) applies, care needs to be taken not to read the word "in" in its geographical sense alone. Although the word "branch" clearly connotes a physical presence, it needs both to be physically within the area of the AIFC and "in" also, by way of recognition. This means that if a firm is recognised by the AFSA to operate as a Branch Office in the AIFC, any regulated activities that the firm carries on through that branch will fall "in the AIFC".
It is worth noting, of course, that if a firm has been successful in obtaining recognition through a Branch Office, this will be because the “Head Office” is governed by a system of financial regulation which is of sufficient quality and rigour to be recognised by the AFSA. The “Head Office” will not be able to use its branch’s AFSA authorisation other than through its Branch Office in the AIFC.
Finally, subsection 1(c) is aimed at enabling the AFSA to protect the integrity of the AIFC. It is a method by which the AFSA can bring potentially marginal activities by an AIFC Participant within the AIFC and therefore within its powers of regulation and enforcement. The AFSA, upon careful analysis of the activity proposed to be carried out and in accordance with the Rules and associated guidance, may "deem" that activity to fall within the AIFC and can thereafter take steps to regulate, prevent or curtail those activities.
For completeness, where activities are carried out in or from the AIFC which contravene the criminal laws of Kazakhstan, then the perpetrator of those activities will be subject to the criminal justice system of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Such a perpetrator may also face civil sanction within the AIFC arising from the same activities.
For reference: Requirements for having a registered office in the AIFC can be found in section 24 of the AIFC Companies Regulations.
In practice the AFSA may require some representatives of the management (CEO, compliance function, Directors) to be located in the AIFC.
Branches
When an entity desires to perform activities through a Branch Office, the threshold conditions, which are the minimum conditions for authorisation, apply to the international company as a whole and not just the AIFC branch, since a Branch Office is not a separate legal entity in its own right but an extension of a company incorporated outside of the AIFC. The AFSA requires companies to have an appropriate amount of liquidity and its quality, to have appropriate resources to monitor, measure, and manage the risks to which it is or may be exposed, to be fit and proper, to conduct their business prudently and to be capable of being effectively supervised by the AFSA.
For more details on the AFSA considerations for branch supervision of banks, insurers and investment companies see Supervisory Policy Statement on the AFSA’s approach to Branch supervision.
Representative Offices
When an entity desires to perform activities through a Representative Office, it shall not undertake a Regulated Activity outside the scope of its Licence.
The Scope of a Representative Office's Licence may include:
- (a)marketing activities of services or products;
- (b)activities that increase the profile, in the AIFC, of the Representative Office's head office;
- (c)activities that relate to correspondence with or the provision of information from the Representative Office's head office;
- (d)activities that relate to the provision of information to the Representative Office's head office relating to business trends, business opportunities and developments in the AIFC markets; and
- (e)any other activities that the AFSA determine may be suitable for a Representative Office to conduct.
For more details on description of activities see AIFC Representative Office Rules.
Substantial presence requirements for tax exemption purposes
For more details on substantial presence of the AIFC Participants applying tax exemptions see AIFC Rules on the Substantial Presence of the Astana International Financial Centre Participants Applying Tax Exemptions for the Payment of Corporate Income Tax, Value Added Tax (SPR).
The AFSA is in the process of drafting Guidance on the SPR, which is supposed to be adopted in May/June 2023 and will provide more detailed information on applying the SPR.
The SPR have been adopted for the purposes of implementation of the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action 5 and should be considered in addition to the "in the AIFC” requirement.
In general, under the SPR it is required to have adequate members of staff in the AIFC.
2.1.4. Exempt Activities
The FSFR envisages that certain AIFC Participants or categories of AIFC Participants may be exempted by an order or Rules from the General Prohibition in respect of Regulated Activities, or requirements of the criteria for granting of a Licence to carry on Regulated Activities.
Such exemptions are limited to certain Regulated Activities or specified circumstances, or subject to certain conditions and restrictions.
References to exemptions relate to Persons who are exempt from the need to apply for authorisation to carry on Regulated Activities, which means they can carry on Regulated Activities without breaching the General Prohibition.
Similar exemptions in the AIFC legal framework are also available to Authorised Market Institutions, who still need to be authorised to perform Market Activity but may be exempt from the General Prohibition in respect of any connected Regulated Activity.
Pursuant to section 39(1) of the FSFR an Authorised Investment Exchange is exempt from the General Prohibition in respect of any Regulated Activity:
- (a)which is carried on as a part of the Authorised Investment Exchange's business as an investment exchange; or
- (b)which is carried on for the purposes of, or in connection with, the provision by the Authorised Investment Exchange of services designed to facilitate the provision of clearing services by another Person.
Pursuant to section 39(2) of the FSFR an Authorised Clearing House is exempt from the General Prohibition in respect of any Regulated Activity:
- (a)which is carried on for the purposes of, or in connection with, the provision of clearing services by the Authorised Clearing House; or
- (b)which is carried on for the purposes of, or in connection with, the provision by the Authorised Clearing House of services designed to facilitate the provision of clearing services by another Person.
Pursuant to section 39(3) of the FSFR an Authorised Private E-currency Trading Facility is exempt from the General Prohibition in respect of any Regulated Activity:
- (a)which is carried on as a part of the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility's business as a Digital Asset trading facility; or
- (b)which is carried on for the purposes of, or in connection with, the provision by the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility of services designed to facilitate the provision of clearing services by another Person.
Pursuant to section 39(4) of the FSFR and subject to Rule 7.2 of the AIFC Authorised Market Institution Rules, an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform is exempt from the General Prohibition in respect of any Regulated Activity which is carried on as a part of the Authorised Crowdfunding Platform's business as a private crowdfunding platform.
2.1.5. Excluded Activities
References to exclusions relate to activities which, if applicable, would mean that the activity in question would not be considered as carrying on a Regulated Activity in breach of the General Prohibition.
Statutory exclusions, which, if complied with, may turn Regulated Activities into unregulated activities may apply to specified activities generally, and to several specified kinds of activity.
GEN contains the list of exclusions in respect of several activities:
No. | Name | Reference to exclusion |
1 | Dealing in Investments as Principal | GEN 1.1.10 |
2 | Acting as nominee | GEN 1.1.11 |
3 | Acting with or for Group companies | GEN 1.1.12 |
4 | Non-financial business | GEN 1.1.13 |
5 | Dealing in commodity derivatives | GEN 1.1.14 |
6 | Acquisition or disposal of a Body Corporate | GEN 1.1.15 |
7 | Acting as a trustee | GEN 1.1.16 |
8 | Single Family Offices | GEN 1.1.17 |
PERG will provide additional available exclusions where applicable throughout the text below.
2.1.6. Recognition regime
AIFC legal framework also envisages a recognition regime, which foresees entities established in foreign regulatory regimes where they may become members of an AMI in the AIFC on the basis that they are considered to be subject to a broadly equivalent level of regulation to those AMI members licensed by the AFSA to perform similar activities in or from the AIFC.
Non-AIFC Market Institutions
Recognition requirements for Recognised Non-AIFC Investment Exchanges and Recognised Non-AIFC Clearing Houses are listed in section 89(3) of the FSFR:
- (a)investors are afforded protection equivalent to that which they would be afforded if the body concerned were required to comply with the relevant requirements for the licensing of an Authorised Market Institution;
- (b)there are adequate procedures for dealing with a Person who is unable, or likely to become unable, to meet its obligations in respect of one or more Market Contracts connected with the investment exchange or clearing house;
- (c)the applicant is able to co‐operate with the AFSA by sharing information and in other ways;
- (d)adequate arrangements exist for co‐operation between the AFSA and those responsible for the supervision of the applicant in the country or territory in which the applicant or the applicant's head office is situated.
Non-AIFC Members
Recognition requirements for Recognised Non-AIFC Members are listed in section 91(3) of the FSFR:
- (a)the applicant is licensed or otherwise authorised to trade on or use the facilities of an exchange or clearing house in a jurisdiction acceptable to the AFSA;
- (b)the applicant is regulated in respect of trading in such jurisdiction by a regulator to a standard satisfactory to the AFSA;
- (c)the law and practice under which the applicant is licensed or otherwise authorised is broadly equivalent to the AFSA’s regulatory regime as it applies to a Member;
- (d)when using the facilities of an Authorised Investment Exchange or Authorised Clearing House, the applicant does not exceed the scope of the activities it is authorised to carry on by those responsible for the supervision of the applicant in the country or territory in which the applicant's head office is situated;
- (e)the applicant has agreed to cooperate with the AFSA and subject itself to such parts of the legal and regulatory framework administered by the AFSA as the AFSA may require.
For more details on recognition and supervision of recognised entities see AIFC Recognition Rules.
AFSA may publish notices on equivalent regulated exchanges from time to time.
2.1.7.Carrying activities without authorisation
For carrying on activities without authorisation all possible exemptions and exclusions must be reviewed.
2.1.8. Offering services to residents and non-residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Offering services to residents of Kazakhstan
The Acting Law of the AIFC may contain specific limitations for offering financial and professional services to residents and non-residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
When an AIFC Participant decides to offer financial services to residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC participants it needs to be aware of potential currency regulation implications.
The AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation use the definitions such as “financial services”, “related services” and “professional services”. GEN does not have the same differentiation. In fact, those definitions are used due to the wording provided in the Constitutional Statute and in the jurisdiction of the Republic of Kazakhstan. One could review them under GEN context in the following way:
AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation | GEN |
Financial services | Regulated Activity/Market Activity |
Related services | |
Professional services | Ancillary Services |
However, this should not be a straightforward approach, and each activity needs to be considered separately. The context of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation may set a different understanding of the name of the allowed service.
When an AIFC Participant decides to offer services to the residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants, he may do this only in accordance with Schedule 2 or Schedule 3 of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation:
- -Schedule 2 contains the list of permitted services and the type of allowed currency.
- -Schedule 3 contains the list of professional services that can be provided in any currency.
Sections 2.2., 2.3., 2.4. and 2.5. of PERG below contain brief guidance on currency regulatory implications of each activity.
The detailed currency implications of offering services by AIFC Participants to residents that are not AIFC Participants are presented in Chapter 4 of PERG.
Offering services to non-residents of Kazakhstan
An AIFC Participant may offer services to other AIFC Participants and non-residents of Kazakhstan within the scope of permitted activities under the Licence.
There may be restrictions to perform certain transactions using AIFC banks that are described in more details in Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.1.9. Offering services to retail and professional Clients
Firms when performing Regulated Activities must classify persons as:
- (a)a Retail Client;
- (b)a Professional Client; or
- (c)a Market Counterparty.
There are separate requirements to perform client classification. For more details see Chapter 2 of the AIFC Conduct of Business Rules (COB).
2.1.10. Variation of the Licence. Waivers and modifications
The AFSA may vary a Licence based on the application of the Authorised Firm. Terms and conditions of variation depend on the circumstances of each case and are decided individually.
The AFSA also may waive all or any part of its generally adopted requirements as to form and contents either in individual cases or generally, provided it is satisfied in either case that:
- (a)materially similar, up-to-date information is provided in other documentation already issued or completed by the applicant; or
- (b)such information is not necessary in the light of any registration or authorisation of the applicant in another jurisdiction; or
- (c)such information is not considered by the AFSA to be relevant in the context of any particular application.
2.2.Becoming regulated as an Authorised Firm
Currency regulatory perimeter is applicable to the provision of services by AIFC participants to the residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan and is presented in Chapter 4 of PERG. Thus, whatever a firm is licensed for, it must also operate in accordance with the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation when dealing with Kazakhstan persons and/or using the services of the Kazakhstan commercial or “second tier” banks for such business.
For currency regulation implications for the Banking Business and Islamic Banking Business in the AIFC see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.1.Dealing in Investments as Principal
2.2.1.1. General description
Dealing in Investments as Principal is listed in section 1 of Schedule 1 of GEN. The activity consists of:
- (a)buying;
- (b)selling;
- (c)subscribing for; or
- (d)underwriting
any Investment as principal.
The definition of Investment in Glossary includes the following: A Security, Unit, Derivative or a Digital Asset and a right or interest in the relevant Security, Unit, Derivative, Digital Asset or Environmental Instrument.
In order to be covered by the description, the principal must hold itself out as willing, as principal, to:
- (a)buy, sell, or subscribe for Investments at prices determined by the principal generally and continuously rather than in respect of each particular transaction;
- (b)engage in the business of buying Investments with a view to selling them;
- (c)engage in the business of underwriting Investments; or
- (d)regularly solicit members of the public with the purpose of inducing them, as principals or agents, to enter into a transaction.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Dealing in Investments as Principal is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Investment Firms.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | 1)Offering dealer services (making deals for own benefit) 2)Underwriting (placement of securities during IPO / SPO at the AIX, foreign stock exchanges) | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 1)3.2.1. 2)3.1.1. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | Quarterly (no later than the 10th day of the month following the reporting month) reports on securities to the AFSA in accordance with Annex 3 to Schedule 5. Transactional reporting may also be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.1.2.Exclusions
There are several exclusions for this activity:
- (1)A Person does not Deal in Investments as Principal merely by accepting an instrument, creating or acknowledging indebtedness in respect of any loan, credit, guarantee or other similar financial accommodation which that Person has made or provided.
- (2)When a Person issues or redeems Securities issued by that Person it does not fall into this category as well.
- (3)When a Person (not an Authorised Firm or an Authorised Market Institution) enters into a transaction with or through an Authorised Firm or a Regulated Financial Institution (meaning a Person authorised in other jurisdiction by another Financial Services Regulator).
The exclusion in (3) does not apply if the Person holds itself out as:
- (a)willing to enter into transactions in Investments of the kind to which the transaction relates; or
- (b)engaging in the business of buying, selling, subscribing for or underwriting Investments.
A Person may hold itself out as carrying on an activity by various means including, for example, on its webpage, in an advertisement or through representations made by its employees. However, merely placing orders for a person’s own account with a broker or on a market will not amount to holding out unless it offers to do so on behalf of other persons.
A Person who is an Authorised Firm, does not Deal in Investments as Principal if in the course of managing the assets of a Private Equity Fund:
- (a)the Person makes an initial subscription for Units of that Fund; and
- (b)the Units are held by that Person for a period of more than 12 months.
When a Person Deals in Investments for their own account, this will also be excluded from the scope of the Regulated Activity.
The additional condition for being considered a Regulated Activity is that a Person must hold themself out as making a market in the relevant specified Investments or as being in the business of Dealing in Investments, or they must regularly solicit members of the public with the purpose of inducing them to deal.
2.2.2.Dealing in Investments as Agent
2.2.2.1.General description
Dealing in Investments as Agent is listed in section 2 of Schedule 1 of GEN. The activity consists of:
- (a)buying;
- (b)selling;
- (c)subscribing for; or
- (d)underwriting
any Investment as agent (i.e. for and on behalf of another person or group).
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Dealing in Investments as Agent is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Investment Firms.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Brokerage services (conclusion of transactions in the interests of the client): 1)Brokerage services on international capital markets, at the Astana International Exchange Limited as related to securities issued under the Acting Law of the AIFC and foreign law 2)Brokerage services at the Astana International Exchange as related to Kazakhstani securities provided that the AIFC participant has relevant ARDFM* licence and (or) direct access to settlements in the Central Securities Depository JSC. * ARDFM – Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Regulation and Development of Financial Market. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 3.3. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.2.2.Exclusions
A Person does not Deal in Investments as Agent if the activity:
- (a)is carried on in the course of providing legal or accountancy services which do not otherwise consist of the carrying on of financial services;
- (b)may reasonably be regarded as a necessary part of any other services provided in the course of providing legal or accountancy services; and
- (c)is not remunerated separately from the other services.
A Person does not Deal in Investments as Agent if that Person:
- (a)is merely receiving and transmitting a Client order in respect of an Investment; and
- (b)does not execute the Client order for and on behalf of the Client or otherwise commit the Client to the transaction relating to the relevant Investment.
However, this may nevertheless amount to Arranging Deals in Investment.
An exchange does not Deal in Investments as Agent merely by taking action in accordance with its Default Rules.
2.2.3.Managing Investments
2.2.3.1.General description
Managing Investments is listed in section 3 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means managing on a discretionary basis the buying and selling of investment instruments belonging to another Person.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Managing Investments is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Investment Firms.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Managing Investment (including investment funds): 1)in relation to clients (investors) who are citizens and legal entities of the Republic of Kazakhstan investing in securities of the funds incorporated in the AIFC and managed by management companies licensed by ARDFM* 2)in relation to clients (investors) who are professional investors and have financial assets equivalent to not less than USD 150 000, when transferring the investments under the management or investing in securities of the funds incorporated in the AIFC or elsewhere and managed by a fund manager licensed by AFSA. * ARDFM – Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Regulation and Development of Financial Market. Note: Client classification in COB has different threshold for classifying individual clients as Assessed Professional Clients, for example the client needs to have net assets of at least USD 100 000. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 3.5. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.3.2.Exclusions
A Person who is not an Authorised Firm or an Authorised Market Institution does not Manage Investments if all day-to-day decisions relating to the Investments which are included in those assets are taken by an Authorised Firm or a Regulated Financial Institution.
2.2.4.Managing a Collective Investment Scheme
2.2.4.1.General description
Managing a Collective Investment Scheme is listed in section 4 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means:
- (a)establishing;
- (b)managing; or
- (c)otherwise operating; or
- (d)winding up
a Collective Investment Scheme.
In case any activity as indicated above constitutes Managing Assets, Providing Fund Administration, Dealing as Agent, Dealing as Principal, Arranging Deals in Investments, or Providing Custody, such a Regulated Activity is taken to be incorporated within Managing a Collective Investment Scheme.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Managing a Collective Investment Scheme is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Investment Firms.
A Collective Investment Scheme may only be established, promoted or marketed in the AIFC by a Person who is:
- (a)a Domestic Fund Manager;
- (b)a Foreign Fund Manager; or
- (c)another Centre Participant.
Foreign Fund Managers
A Foreign Fund Manager may manage a Domestic Fund in accordance with the AIFC Collective Investment Scheme Rules and Acting Law of the AIFC.
Domestic Fund Managers
Domestic Fund Manager may manage a Fund in other jurisdictions subject to the rules and regulations of that jurisdiction, AIFC Collective Investment Scheme Rules and Acting Law of the AIFC.
However, each foreign jurisdiction needs to be assessed first to ensure there is an adequate level of equivalence, and typically reciprocal arrangements would be expected to be in place.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Managing Investment (including investment funds): 1)in relation to clients (investors) who are citizens and legal entities of the Republic of Kazakhstan investing in securities of the funds incorporated in the AIFC and managed by management companies licensed by ARDFM* 2)in relation to clients (investors) who are professional investors and have financial assets equivalent to not less than USD 150 000, when transferring the investments under the management or investing in securities of the funds incorporated in the AIFC or elsewhere and managed by a fund manager licensed by AFSA. * ARDFM – Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Regulation and Development of Financial Market. Note: Client classification in COB has different threshold for classifying individual clients as Assessed Professional Clients, for example the client needs to have net assets of at least USD 100 000. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 3.5. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
2.2.4.2.Exclusions
Arrangements not amounting to a Collective Investment Scheme are specified in section 3 of the AIFC Collective Investment Scheme Rules.
Arrangement | Rule |
Schemes not operated by way of business | 3.3. |
Deposits | 3.4. |
Common accounts | 3.5. |
Commercial activities unrelated to Regulated Activities | 3.6. |
Group arrangements | 3.7. |
Franchise arrangements | 3.8. |
Clearing services | 3.9. |
Certificates or Options | 3.10. |
Time‐share and other 'property‐enjoyment' related arrangements | 3.11. |
Bodies corporate not undertaking investment management | 3.12. |
Debentures and Warrants of a single issuer | 3.13. |
Insurance | 3.14. |
Profit Sharing Investment Accounts (PSIAs) | 3.15. |
Discretionary Portfolio Accounts | 3.16. |
Close Relative accounts | 3.17. |
Sukuk | 3.18. |
Employee reward schemes | 3.19. |
Carried interest vehicles | 3.20. |
Other circumstances | 3.21. |
For requirements applicable to Foreign Fund Managers, i.e. Fund Managers not located in the AIFC see AIFC Collective Investment Scheme Rules.
Specific products or activities forming part of Islamic Financial Business are not regulated as Collective Investment Schemes due to their unique characteristics and the specific regulations applied to them.
Such Islamic Financial Business activities are expressly excluded from the remit of the AIFC Collective Investment Scheme Rules but may be considered as Islamic Investment Funds.
For applicable requirements to Islamic Investment Funds see AIFC Islamic Finance Rules.
2.2.5.Providing Custody
2.2.5.1.General description
Providing Custody is listed in section 5 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means safeguarding and administering Investments (Fund Property, Digital Assets) belonging to another Person.
Safeguarding and administering Investments consists of both of the following:
- (a)safeguarding of assets belonging to another, and
- (b)the administration of those assets.
Administering an Investment would include, for example, crediting income arising out of an Investment to the beneficiary's account; however, it is important that discretion is not exercised in the carrying out of the activities, otherwise the actions will fall within another regulated activity (that of Advising on Investments, or Managing Investments), and separate permission will be required.
Safeguarding an Investment is holding it in safe custody, e.g. looking after a share certificate.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Providing Custody is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Investment Firms.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Providing custody services (nominal holding, accounting and safeguarding of securities): 1)Providing custody of the securities issued in accordance with foreign legislation and Acting Law of the AIFC 2)Providing custody by the AIFC participant in respect to Kazakhstani securities provided that the AIFC participant has relevant ARDFM licence 3)Settlement depository or custodial services of the Astana International Exchange Central Securities Depository Limited in respect to all securities included in the official list of the Astana International Exchange Limited. * ARDFM – Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Regulation and Development of Financial Market. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 3.4. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.5.2.Exclusions
There are a number of exclusions applicable in certain circumstances:
- (a)while acting as personal representative;
- (b)in connection with the carrying on of a profession of a non-investment business;
- (c)in connection with the sale of goods or supply of services;
- (d)where they belong to a group member or participator in a joint enterprise;
- (e)in connection with an employee share scheme;
- (f)that involve the provision of information to policyholders or potential policyholders about contracts of insurance on an incidental basis; or
- (g)where they are acting as an insolvency practitioner.
2.2.6.Arranging Custody
2.2.6.1.General description
Arranging Custody is listed in section 6 of Schedule 1 of GEN and means arranging provision of custody for one or more Persons.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Arranging Custody is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Investment Firms.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Arranging Custody: intermediary consulting services, collecting and processing customer payments disclosure and settlement of agreement terms between the custodian and the person who receives the custody. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 1. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.6.2.Exclusions
A Person (an “introducer”) does not carry on the activity of Arranging Custody merely by introducing another Person to a custodian who is an Authorised Firm or a Regulated Financial Institution authorised to provide custody.
This exclusion does not apply if:
- (a)the custodian is a member of the same Group as the introducer;
- (b)the custodian is a part of the same legal entity as the introducer and, conducts custody services outside the AIFC; or
- (c)the introducer is remunerated for making the introduction by any Person, including by an entity referred to in (a) or (b).
An exchange does not Arrange Custody merely by making arrangements for, or taking steps that facilitate:
- (a)the safeguarding and administration of assets belonging to Members or other participants; or
- (b)the settlement by another Person of transactions entered into on a facility operated by the exchange.
2.2.7.Providing Trust Services
2.2.7.1.General description
Providing Trust Services is listed in section 6 of Schedule 1 of GEN and means:
- (a)the provision of services with respect to the creation of an express trust;
- (b)arranging for any Person to act as a trustee in respect of any express trust;
- (c)acting as trustee in respect of an express trust; or
- (d)acting as protector or enforcer in respect of an express trust.
Definition of an express trust is provided in the AIFC Trust Regulations and mean a trust created with the Settlor’s express intent declared in writing or a written declaration of trust by the trustee.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Providing Trust Services is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Investment Firms.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Trust services: trust services (provision of services related to express trust creation and management) without restrictions. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 3.6. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.7.2.Exclusions
A Person who is a Trustee does not carry on Dealing in Investments as Principal, Managing Investments and Providing Custody in circumstances where it is acting as a trustee.
A Person does not carry on Providing Trust Services by way of business where it is:
- (a)acting as enforcer or protector; or
- (b)where it is arranging for a Person to act as trustee, in respect of less than three (3) trusts.
A law firm, notary firm, or other independent legal business or an accounting firm, audit firm, or insolvency firm does not provide Trust Services where it only:
- (a)arranges for a Person to act as trustee in respect of an express trust; or
- (b)provides services with respect to the creation of an express trust; provided that:
- (i)the provision of such services is solely incidental to the practice of law or accounting as the case may be; and
- (ii)the DNFBP is not holding itself out as Providing Trust Services.
Acting as trustee, protector or enforcer are not activities incidental to the practice of law or accounting and require a Licence.
2.2.8.Providing Fund Administration
2.2.8.1.General description
Providing Fund Administration is listed in section 8 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means providing one or more of the following services in relation to a Fund (i.e. a Collective Investment Scheme):
- (a)processing dealing instructions including subscriptions, redemptions, stock transfers and arranging settlements;
- (b)valuing of assets and performing net asset value calculations;
- (c)maintaining the share register and Unitholder registration details;
- (d)performing anti money laundering requirements;
- (e)undertaking transaction monitoring and reconciliation functions;
- (f)performing administrative activities in relation to banking, cash management, treasury and foreign exchange;
- (g)producing financial statements, other than as the Fund’s registered auditor; or
- (h)communicating with participants, the Fund, the Fund Manager, and investment managers, the prime brokers, the Regulators and any other parties in relation to the administration of the Fund.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Providing Fund Administration is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Investment Firms.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Services of Providing Investment Fund Establishment and Administration: assets valuation and calculation of the value of assets, undertaking transactions monitoring and reconciliation of functions, communication with stakeholders. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 6. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.8.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.9.Acting as the Trustee of a Fund
2.2.9.1.General description
Acting as the Trustee of a Fund is listed in section 9 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means holding the assets of a Fund on trust for the Unitholders where the Fund is in the form of an Investment Trust.
To the extent that any activity indicated above constitutes Providing Fund Administration or Providing Custody, such a Financial Service is taken to be incorporated within Acting as the Trustee of a Fund.
A Trustee is not required to obtain additional authorisations for certain activities involving offering Financial Services that fall within the ordinary scope of the activity of Acting as the Trustee of a Fund.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Acting as a Trustee of a Fund is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Investment Firms.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Acting as Trustee of a fund: holding the assets of a Fund on trust for the unitholders. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 7. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.9.2.Exclusions
A Person is not Acting as the Trustee of a Fund merely because it is acting as an agent, employee or delegate of a Trustee.
2.2.10.Advising on Investments
2.2.10.1.General description
Advising on Investments is listed in section 10 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means giving advice to a Person:
- (a)in the capacity as an investor or potential investor; or
- (b)in the capacity as agent for an investor or a potential investor,
on the merits of his (i) buying, (ii) selling, (iii) holding, (iv) subscribing for or (v) underwriting a particular Investment (whether as principal or agent).
"Advice" includes a statement, opinion or report:
- (a)where the intention is to influence a Person, in making a decision, to select a particular Investment or an interest in a particular Investment; or
- (b)which could reasonably be regarded as being intended to have such an influence.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Advising on Investments is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Investment Firms.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | 1)Advising on Investments: giving advice to a person in his capacity as an investor or potential investor on the merits of his buying, selling, holding, subscribing for or underwriting a particular investment. 2)Investment banking services: financial consulting (M&A structuring, private equity, restructuring, hedging). | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 1)2. 2)3.1.2. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.10.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.11.Arranging Deals in Investments
2.2.11.1.General description
Arranging Deals in Investments is listed in section 11 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means making arrangements with a view to another Person (i) buying, (ii) selling, (iii) subscribing for or (iv) underwriting an Investment (whether that other Person is acting as principal or agent).
The above definition is also wider in cases where the arrangements would not bring about a particular transactions. For example, where the involvement in a chain of events leading to a transaction is of enough importance that without that involvement it would not take place.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Arranging Deals in Investments is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Investment Firms.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Arranging Deals in Investments Making arrangements with a view to another person buying, selling, subscribing for or underwriting an investment. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 3. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.11.2.Exclusions
Unless stated otherwise, the following specific exclusions apply to both arranging (bringing about) deals in Investments and making arrangements with a view to deals in Investments:
- (1)where a Person merely enables parties to communicate, the Person does not make arrangements with a view under section 11 of Schedule 1 of GEN - this is likely to apply mainly to Persons such as internet service providers, broadcasters or publishers if all they do is provide communication facilities. The word “merely” is crucial so that where a publisher, broadcaster or Internet service provider goes beyond what is necessary for them to provide a service of publishing, broadcasting or otherwise facilitating the issue of promotions, it may well bring them within the scope of section 11 of Schedule 1 of GEN.
- (2)where a Person is arranging a transaction to which they are a party.
- (3)arranging transactions connected to lending on the security of insurance contracts (but only where a Person is not carrying on insurance mediation or reinsurance mediation) (for further information on exclusions relating to insurance related activities, see relevant sections of PERG).
- (4)arranging for Debentures to be accepted in connection with the making of loans.
- (5)where a transaction for the sale or purchase of a contract of insurance consists of the mere provision of information about a potential policyholder to a relevant insurer or an insurance or reinsurance intermediary, or consists of the provision of information to a potential policyholder about a contract of insurance, or a relevant insurer or insurance or reinsurance intermediary. This exclusion is only available if the provider of the information does not take any step other than the provision of information to assist in the conclusion of a contract of insurance.
- (6)arrangements made by a firm for the issue of its own shares or share warrants or person issuing their own Debentures or Debenture warrants.
2.2.12.Managing a Restricted Profit Sharing Investment Account
2.2.12.1.General description
Managing a Restricted Profit Sharing Investment Account is listed in section 12 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means managing an account or portfolio which is a Restricted Profit Sharing Investment Account (RPSIA).
More detailed information about Restricted Profit Sharing Investment Account can be found in the AIFC Islamic Finance Rules and AIFC Islamic Banking Business Prudential Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Managing a restricted profit sharing investment account based on Islamic financial contract: managing an investment account (portfolio, fund), involving restriction of investments only within the Islamic Financial Contract with profit/loss sharing between the management company and the holder of the Islamic account (client). | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 8. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.12.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.13.Islamic Banking Business
2.2.13.1.General description
Islamic Banking Business is listed in section 13 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means providing financing or making Investments by entering as principal or agent into any Islamic Financial Contract while raising funds for those activities through either or both of the following:
- (a)raising, accepting and managing funds or money placements;
- (b)managing Unrestricted Profit Sharing Investment Accounts (UPSIA);
provided that all such activities are carried out in a Shari’ah-compliant manner.
The definition of an Islamic Financial Contract can be found in the AIFC Islamic Finance Rules and may include any of the following:
- (i)murabahah and its variations;
- (ii)salam and its variations;
- (iii)tawarruq and its variations;
- (iv)istisna and its variations;
- (v)ijarah and its variations;
- (vi)musharakah and its variations;
- (vii)mudarabah and its variations;
- (viii)qard;
- (ix)any other Islamic Financial Contract that is approved to be so by the relevant Authorised Firm’s Shari’ah Supervisory Board.
For more details on Islamic Banking Business see AIFC Islamic Banking Business Prudential Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Islamic banking and Islamic financing carried out by Islamic banks | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 1.1. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.13.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.14.Providing Islamic Financing
2.2.14.1.General description
Providing Islamic Financing is listed in section 14 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means providing financing in a Shari’ah-compliant manner by entering into any Islamic Financial Contract.
The definition of an Islamic Financial Contract can be found in the AIFC Islamic Finance Rules.
For more details on Providing Islamic Financing see AIFC Islamic Banking Business Prudential Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Islamic banking and Islamic financing carried out by Islamic banks | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 1.1. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.14.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.15.Insurance Intermediation
2.2.15.1.General description
Insurance Intermediation is listed in section 15 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means:
- (a)advising on a Contract of Insurance;
- (b)acting as agent for another Person in relation to the buying or selling of a Contract of Insurance for that other Person; or
- (c)making arrangements with a view to another Person, whether as principal or agent, buying a Contract of Insurance.
For further details about “advising” and “arrangements” see section 15 of GEN.
A Contract of Insurance is any enforceable contract under which a “provider” undertakes:
- (1)in consideration of one or more payments;
- (2)to pay money or provide a corresponding benefit (including in some cases services to be paid for by the provider) to a ‘recipient’;
- (3)in response to a defined event the occurrence of which is uncertain (either as to when it will occur or as to whether it will occur at all) and adverse to the interests of the recipient
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Insurance Intermediation is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Insurance Intermediaries and Insurance Managers.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Reinsurance broker’s activity: Kazakhstani insurers have the right to transfer insurance risks for reinsurance through the insurance broker - AIFC participant | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 2.3. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.15.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.16.Operating a Representative Office
2.2.16.1.General description
Operating a Representative Office is listed in section 16 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means the marketing, from an establishment in the AIFC, of one or more financial services or investments which are offered in a jurisdiction other than the AIFC.
For further details see GEN and AIFC Representative Office Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Subject to the general currency regulation legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
2.2.16.2.Exclusions
Any communication which amounts to marketing in respect of a Financial Service or Investment, which is issued by or on behalf of a Government or non‐commercial governmental entity, does not constitute marketing for the purposes of the general description. This does not include activity of a broker that is marketing or selling Government bonds to its Clients.
2.2.17.Accepting Deposits
2.2.17.1.General description
Accepting Deposits is listed in section 17 of Schedule 1 of GEN.
A Firm is accepting deposits if money or funds received as a Deposit:
- (a)is lent to other Persons, or
- (b)used to finance wholly, or partly, any other activity of the Person accepting the Deposit.
To the extent that any activity constitutes Opening and Operating Bank Accounts such a Regulated Activity is taken to be incorporated within Accepting Deposits.
A Deposit is a sum of money paid on terms:
- (a)under which it will be repaid, with or without interest or a premium, and either on demand or at a time or in circumstances agreed by or on behalf of the Person making the payment and the Person receiving it; and
- (b)which is not relevant to the provision of property (other than currency) or services or the giving of security.
- Money is paid on terms which are relevant to the provision of property or services or the giving of security if:
- (a)it is paid by way of advance or part payment under a contract for the sale, hire or other provision of property or services, and is repayable only in the event that the property or services are not in fact sold, hired or otherwise provided;
- (b)it is paid by way of security for the performance of a contract or by way of security in respect of loss which may result from the non-performance of a contract; or
- (c)without prejudice to (b), it is paid by way of security for the delivery of property, whether in a particular state of repair or otherwise.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Accepting Deposits is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Banking Business Prudential Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Accepting deposits from residents of Kazakhstan is prohibited. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | Not mentioned. The services cannot be offered to residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants. | |
Type of currency: | Not applicable | |
Transaction implications | Not applicable | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation do not apply. |
For details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.17.2.Exclusions
Whether or not Accepting Deposits is a Regulated Activity depends on the use to which the money is put.
The activity is caught if money received by way of Deposit is lent to others or if any other activity of the person accepting the Deposit is financed wholly (or to a material extent) out of the capital of, or interest on, money received by way of Deposit.
Anyone concerned that they may be carrying on the Regulated Activity of Accepting Deposits will need to work out whether the sum received is in fact a Deposit.
A sum is not a Deposit if it is paid:
- (a)by a Person in the course of carrying on a business consisting wholly or to a significant extent of lending money;
- (b)by one company to another at a time when both are members of the same Group;
- (c)by an Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the Regulated Activity of Accepting Deposits;
- (d)by a Person who is a close relative of the Person receiving it or who is a director, manager or Controller of that Person.
A sum is not a Deposit if it is received:
- (a)by a lawyer acting in a professional capacity;
- (b)by an accountant acting in a professional capacity;
- (c)by an Authorised Firm or an Authorised Market Institution authorised to carry on any one or more of the Regulated Activities defined in Schedule 1 of the GEN, except Accepting Deposits, in the course of or for the purpose of any such Regulated Activity disregarding any applicable exclusions; or
- (d)by a Person as consideration for the issue by the person of a Debenture.
2.2.18.Providing Credit
2.2.18.1.General description
Providing Credit is listed in section 18 of Schedule 1 of GEN.
It means providing a Credit Facility to another Person, i.e. providing any facility which includes any arrangement or agreement which extends monetary credit whether funded or unfunded to a Person including:
- (a)any loan or syndicated loan;
- (b)mortgage;
- (c)overdraft;
- (d)financial lease;
- (e)letter of credit;
- (f)financial guarantee;
- (g)trade finance;
- (h)transaction finance;
- (i)project finance; or
- (j)asset finance.
A Person does not carry on the Regulated Activity of Providing Credit if the Credit Facility is to be provided by the Authorised Person in the course of carrying on one or more of the following activities: (a) Dealing in Investments as Agent; (b) Arranging Deals in Investments; (c) Managing Investments; (d) Managing a Collective Investment Scheme; (e) Providing Custody.
An Authorised Firm is a Credit Provider if it is authorised to conduct the Regulated Activity of Providing Credit and it is not a Bank. Credit Providers may raise funds from capital markets or money markets using debt instruments of any type but must not accept Deposits.
Also see list of exclusions in 2.1.5. PERG.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Providing Credit is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Banking Business Prudential Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Provision of loans to legal entities of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Note: provision of loans to natural persons of the Republic of Kazakhstan is prohibited. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 1.2. | |
Type of currency: | Foreign currency | |
Transaction implications | Foreign currency transactions can be performed both via AIFC Banks and second-tier banks | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.18.2.Exclusions
A Person who is an Authorised Firm does not Provide Credit where the provision of the Credit Facility is incidental to or in connection with the trading of Investments, or conducting Insurance Business.
An operator of the Crowdfunding Platform does not Provide Credit to the extent that it Operates a Loan Crowdfunding Platform.
A Person does not Provide Credit to the extent that the Person operates a loyalty or rewards programme where a participant earns points or other monetary value from acquiring goods or services, which the participant can use to receive a discount on, or purchase, further goods or services.
2.2.19.Advising on a Credit Facility
2.2.19.1.General description
Advising on a Credit Facility is listed in section 19 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means giving advice to a Person in the person’s capacity as a borrower or a potential borrower, or as an agent for a borrower or a potential borrower, on the merits of entering into a particular Credit Facility.
For further details see GEN. The definition of a Credit Facility is given in the AIFC Glossary. The definition of advice is given in section 19(2) of Schedule 1 of GEN.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Advising on a Credit Facility is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Banking Business Prudential Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Advising on a Credit Facility: giving advice to a person in his capacity as a borrower or a potential borrower, on the merits of his entering into a particular credit facility. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 4. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.19.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.20.Arranging a Credit Facility
2.2.20.1.General description
Arranging a Credit Facility is listed in section 20 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means making arrangements for the provision of a Credit Facility by one or more Persons.
The definition of a Credit Facility is given in the AIFC Glossary.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Arranging a Credit Facility is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Banking Business Prudential Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Arranging a Credit Facility: collecting and processing commissions, fees, and other payments, assisting the lender in placing funds and the borrower in obtaining credit facility, agreement and settlement of the terms of the contractual relationship between the lender and the borrower, transmission of instructions or confirmations concerning credit facility. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 5. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.20.2.Exclusions
A Person does not carry on the Regulated Activity of Arranging a Credit Facility if the person:
- (a)is to be a party to the Provision of Credit Facilities in question; or
- (b)merely provides the means by which a Person providing a Credit Facility communicates with the Person to whom the Credit Facility is or is to be provided.
A Person does not carry on the Regulated Activity of Arranging a Credit Facility if the activity:
- (a)is carried on in the course of Providing Legal Services or Providing Accountancy Services, which does not otherwise consist of the carrying on of Financial Services;
- (b)may reasonably be regarded as a necessary part of any other services provided in the course of Providing Legal Services or Providing Accountancy Services; and
- (c)is not remunerated separately from the other services.
2.2.21.Providing Money Services
2.2.21.1.General description
Providing Money Services is listed in section 21 of Schedule 1 of GEN. This Regulated Activity means engaging in, among others, the following activities:
- (a)providing currency exchange;
- (b)selling or issuing payment instruments;
- (c)selling or issuing stored value;
- (d)execution of payment transactions, including transfers of funds on a settlement account, (including a bank account), with the user's payment service provider or with another payment service provider:
- (i)execution of direct debits, including one-off direct debits;
- (ii)execution of payment transactions through a payment card or a similar device; and
- (e)execution of payment transactions where the funds are covered by a credit line for a payment service user:
- (i)execution of direct debits, including one-off direct debits;
- (ii)execution of payment transactions through a payment card or a similar device; and
- (f)money remittance; and
- (g)execution of payment transactions where the consent of the payer to execute a payment transaction is given by means of any telecommunication, digital or IT device and the payment is made to the telecommunication, IT system or network operator, acting only as an intermediary between the payment service user and the supplier of the goods and services.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Providing Money Services is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Banking Business Prudential Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Receiving and making payments and (or) money transfers using current bank account (within the permitted types of services) | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 1.4. | |
Type of currency: | Foreign currency | |
Transaction implications | Foreign currency transactions can be performed both via AIFC Banks and second-tier banks | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.21.2.Exclusions
An Authorised Firm, does not Provide Money Services if it does so in relation to the carrying on of another financial service where Providing Money Services is in connection with and a necessary part of that other financial service, for example, money service activities carried on in connection with, and as a necessary part of, Providing Credit, Dealing in Investments (as principal or agent), Operating an Exchange or Clearing House, Managing Assets or Providing Custody.
A Person does not Provide Payment Services if the Person carries out a Payment Transaction for their own account.
2.2.22.Effecting Contracts of Insurance
2.2.22.1.General description
Effecting Contracts of Insurance is listed in section 22 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means effecting Contracts of Insurance as Principal, i.e. as a seller.
The ordinary meaning of “effect” is to cause something to happen or bring something about. “Effecting” a contract of insurance involves more than merely making the contract. It could also include the offering of insurance services and the negotiation of the terms of the contract, and steps necessary to conclude the insurance contract (for example, confirmation of the cover and policy issuance).
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Effecting Contracts of Insurance is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Insurance and Reinsurance Prudential Rules.
Different insurance categories are presented in the AIFC Insurance and Reinsurance Prudential Rules (General Insurance Business and Long-Term Insurance). P
Acting as principal implies exclusion of agents who act on behalf of insurers.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | (1)Direct voluntary insurance (a)air transport insurance (b)water transport insurance (c)space objects insurance (d)insurance of cargo related to air transport, water transport and space objects (e)legal liability insurance of air transport owners (f)legal liability insurance of water transport owners (g)legal liability insurance of space objects owners (2)Reinsurance activities (a)acceptance of all risks from Kazakhstani insurers for reinsurance (3)Additional types of insurance (a)insurance of guarantees and bails (b)insurance of court costs (c)title insurance (d)Islamic insurance (4)New types of specific risks insurance (a)catastrophe risks (b)climate related risks (c)cyber risks (d)terrorism related risks (e)political risks | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 2.1., 2.2., 2.4., 2.5. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.21.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.23.Carrying on Contracts of Insurance
2.2.23.1.General description
Carrying on Contracts of Insurance is listed in section 23 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means carrying on Contracts of Insurance as Principal.
Carrying out insurance contracts relates to the performance of obligations under contract after it has been entered into, such as:
- (a)collecting premiums;
- (b)the maintenance of records; and
- (c)handling and paying claims.
Acting as principal implies exclusion of agents who act on behalf of insurers.
A Person, who is an Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Carrying on Contracts of Insurance is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Insurance and Reinsurance Prudential Rules
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | (1)Direct voluntary insurance (h)air transport insurance (i)water transport insurance (j)space objects insurance (k)insurance of cargo related to air transport, water transport and space objects (l)legal liability insurance of air transport owners (m)legal liability insurance of water transport owners (n)legal liability insurance of space objects owners (2)Reinsurance activities (b)acceptance of all risks from Kazakhstani insurers for reinsurance (3)Additional types of insurance (e)insurance of guarantees and bails (f)insurance of court costs (g)title insurance (h)Islamic insurance (4)New types of specific risks insurance (f)catastrophe risks (g)climate related risks (h)cyber risks (i)terrorism related risks (j)political risks | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 2.1., 2.2., 2.4., 2.5. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.23.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.24.Insurance Management
2.2.24.1.General description
Insurance Management is listed in section 24 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means:
- (a)performing underwriting or administration functions for or on behalf of an insurer or Captive, for the purposes of that insurer effecting or carrying out a Contract of Insurance as principal; or
- (b)arranging reinsurance for and on behalf of an insurer or Captive for whom it is underwriting;
- (c)performing underwriting or administration functions for or on behalf of a Takaful Operator or a Captive Takaful Operator, for the purposes of that Takaful Operator effecting or carrying out a Takaful Contract as principal; or
- (d)arranging Retakaful for and on behalf of a Takaful Operator or Captive for whom it is underwriting.
For the meaning of “administration”, “underwriting”, “insurer” and “Takaful Operator” see section 24 of Schedule 1 of GEN.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry on the regulated activity of Insurance Management is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Prudential Rules for Insurance Intermediaries and Insurance Managers.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Offering Insurance Management to residents of Kazakhstan is prohibited. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | Not mentioned | |
Type of currency: | Not applicable | |
Transaction implications | Not applicable | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation do not apply. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.24.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.25.Takaful Business
2.2.25.1.General description
Takaful Business is listed in section 25 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means the business of conducting either or both of the following activities:
- (a)effecting Takaful Contracts as Principal;
- (b)carrying on Takaful Contracts as Principal.
For more details on Takaful Business see AIFC Takaful and Retakaful Prudential Rules.
A Person, who is an Authorised Firm authorised to carry out regulated activity of Takaful Business is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Takaful and Retakaful Prudential Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Islamic insurance | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 2.4.4. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.25.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.26.Opening and Operating Bank Accounts
2.2.26.1.General description
Opening and Operating Bank Accounts is listed in section 26 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means one or more of the following activities:
- (a)opening and operating Bank Accounts;
- (b)services enabling funds to be placed on a Bank Account as well as all the operations required for operating a Bank Account; and
- (c)services enabling funds withdrawals from a Bank Account as well as all the operations required for operating a Bank Account.
An Authorised Firm authorised to carry out regulated activity of Opening and Operating Bank Accounts is subject to prudential supervision and must comply with AIFC Banking Business Prudential Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Opening and maintaining current bank accounts for clients (for lending and investment banking services) | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 1.3. | |
Type of currency: | Foreign currency | |
Transaction implications | Foreign currency transactions can be performed via both AIFC Banks and second-tier banks | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.26.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.27.Operation of a Payment System
2.2.27.1.General description
Operation of a Payment System is listed in section 27 of Schedule 1 of GEN. It means operation of funds transfer system with formal and standardised arrangements and common rules for the processing, clearing or settlement of payment transactions.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Offering services of Operating a Payment System to Kazakhstan residents is prohibited. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | Not mentioned. | |
Type of currency: | Not applicable. | |
Transaction implications | Not applicable. | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2 of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.27.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.2.28.Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility
2.2.29.1.General description
Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility or “MTF” is listed in section 28 of Schedule 1 of GEN, where MTF means a system which brings together multiple third parties buying and selling Investments, rights or interests in Investments, in accordance with its non-discretionary rules, in a way that results in a contract in respect of such Investments.
For more details see AIFC Multilateral and Organised Trading Facilities Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | To be completed | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | - | |
Type of currency: | To be completed | |
Transaction implications | - | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2. of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation may apply (subject to the adoption of the proposal). |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.28.2.Exclusions
A Person does not operate a Trading Facility if it operates a facility which is an order routing system where buying and selling interests in, or orders for, financial instruments are merely transmitted but do not interact or consummate a trade.
2.2.29.Operating an Organised Trading Facility
2.2.29.1.General description
Operating an Organised Trading Facility or “OTF” is listed in section 29 of Schedule 1 of GEN, where OTF means a system which brings together multiple third parties buying and selling Investments, rights or interests in Investments, in accordance with its discretionary rules, in a way that results in a contract in respect of such Investments.
For more details see AIFC Multilateral and Organised Trading Facilities Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | To be completed | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | - | |
Type of currency: | To be completed | |
Transaction implications | Not applicable. | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2. of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation may apply (subject to the adoption of the proposal). |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.2.29.2.Exclusions
A Person does not operate a Trading Facility if it operates a facility which is an order routing system, where buying and selling interests in, or orders for, financial instruments are merely transmitted but do not interact or consummate a trade.
2.3.Becoming regulated as an Ancillary Service Provider
2.3.1.Providing Legal Services
2.3.1.1.General description
Providing Legal Services is listed in section 1 of Schedule 2 of GEN. It includes:
- (a)giving legal advice or counsel; or
- (b)drafting or completion of legal documents or agreements; or
- (c)representation in court proceedings or in an administrative adjudicative procedure in which legal pleadings are filed or a record is established as the basis for judicial review; or
- (d)negotiation of legal rights or responsibilities; but excluding acting as a lay representative authorised by an administrative agency or tribunal, serving as a judge, mediator, arbitrator, conciliator or facilitator; and participation in employment negotiations, arbitrations or conciliations.
Rule 1.3.3. of GEN establishes a statutory requirement on registration of at least one (1) employee as a Legal Adviser with the AIFC Legal Services Board for a Person to be eligible to receive a Licence from the AFSA to carry on an Ancillary Service of Providing Legal Services.
With the commencement of Rule 13.3 of COB on 3 May 2023, Ancillary Service Providers licensed to carry on an Ancillary Service of Providing Legal Services will be required at all times to employ at least one (1) Legal Adviser registered with the AIFC Legal Services Board to be eligible to maintain their Licence.
The regime of registration and regulation of Legal Advisers by the AIFC Legal Services Board operates in accordance with the AIFC Legal Services Regulations and Rules of the AIFC Legal Services Board. For more information follow the link: https://aifc.kz/en/legal-services-regulation.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Legal services | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 3 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 1. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a professional service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.4.1. of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.3.1.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.3.2.Providing Audit Services
2.3.2.1.General description
Providing Audit Services is listed in section 2 of Schedule 2 of GEN. It means:
- (a)performing audit, examination, verification, investigation, certification, presentation or review of financial transactions and accounting records; and
- (b)preparing or certifying reports on audits or examinations of books or records of account, balance sheets, and other financial, accounting and related documents.
For more details see AIFC Auditor Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Audit services | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 3 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 2 | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a professional service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.4.1. of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.3.2.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.3.3.Providing Accountancy Services
2.3.3.1.General description
Providing Accountancy Services is listed in section 3 of Schedule 2 of GEN. It includes:
- (a)advising on matters relating to accounting procedure; and
- (b)recording, presentation or certification of financial information or data, including financial information or data required by any law for the time being in force in the AIFC.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Accounting services | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 3 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 3 | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: only foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a professional service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.4.1. of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.3.3.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.3.4.Providing Consulting Services
2.3.4.1.General description
Providing Consultancy Services is listed in section 4 of Schedule 2 of GEN. It means providing expert knowledge or advice on a particular topic.
Consultancy Services may include the activity of Company service providers. For additional details on Company Service Providers see AIFC Glossary .
The Guidance on Providing Consultancy Services in the AIFC includes, by way of example the following list of services, which require obtaining authorisation from the AFSA:
- (1)Compliance, regulatory, due diligence and risk consultancy (including Shari’ah compliance consultancy);
- (2)Management and business consultancy (including market research) related to Financial Services;
- (3)Tax consultancy;
- (4)Company Service Provider
Currency regulation implications
Subject to the general currency regulation legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.3.4.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.3.5.Providing Credit Rating Services
2.3.5.1.General description
Providing Credit Rating Services is listed in section 5 of Schedule 2 of GEN. It means:
- (a)analysis or evaluation of information carried on with a view to issuing or reviewing a Credit Rating; or
- (b)issuing or reviewing a Credit Rating.
Credit Rating is an opinion regarding the creditworthiness of an entity, Security, debt or other financial obligation which is disseminated to the public or distributed to a Person by subscription and expressed using an established and defined ranking system regarding the creditworthiness of the rating subject.
Currency regulation implications
Subject to the general currency regulation legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.3.5.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.4.Becoming regulated as an Authorised Market Institution
2.4.1.Operating an Exchange
2.4.1.1.General description
Operating an Exchange is listed in section 1 of Schedule 4 of GEN.
It means operating a facility which functions regularly and brings together multiple third party buying and selling interests in Investments, in accordance with its non-discretionary rules, in a way that can result in a contract in respect of Investments admitted to trading or traded on the facility.
For more details see AIFC Authorised Market Institution Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article 5 of the Constitutional Statute on AIFC monetary obligations of trading members on the stock exchange are expressed and executed in currencies determined by the rules of the stock exchange.
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.4.1.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.4.2.Operating a Clearing House
2.4.2.1.General description
Operating a Clearing House is listed in section 2 of Schedule 4 of GEN. It means operating a facility where confirmation, clearance or settlement of transactions in Investments are carried out in accordance with the non-discretionary rules of the facility, under which the Person operating the facility:
- (a)either becomes a Central Counterparty (“CCP”); or
- (b)provides a book-entry Securities Settlement System (“SSS”), regardless of whether or not such a Person also operates a Central Securities Depository.
Acting as a Central Securities Depository means holding Investments in uncertificated (dematerialised) form to enable book entry transfer of such Investments for the purposes of clearing or settlement of transactions on its own facility and on any other similar facility.
For the meaning of “confirmation”, “clearance”, and settlement see GEN. For more details also see AIFC Authorised Market Institution Rules.
Currency regulation implications
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | Settlement depository services of the Astana International Exchange Central Securities Depository Limited in respect to all securities included in the official list of the Astana International Exchange Limited | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | 3.4.3. | |
Type of currency: | Any currency | |
Transaction implications | Via AIFC Banks: foreign currency Via second-tier banks: any currency | |
Currency reporting | Quarterly (no later than the 10th day of the month following the reporting month) reports on securities to the AFSA in accordance with Annex 3 to Schedule 5. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2. of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation applies. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.4.2.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.4.3.Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility
2.4.3.1.General description
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility is listed in paragraph 3 of Schedule 4 of GEN. It means operating a facility which functions regularly and brings together multiple parties
- (a)to buy, sell or exchange Digital Assets for a Fiat currency; or
- (b)to exchange one Digital Asset for another Digital Asset, in its Facility, in accordance with its non-discretionary rules.
Fiat currency means a currency which is issued by or on behalf of the government in its country (or countries) of issuance, and which is designated as legal tender in that or those countries through government decree, regulation or law.
Digital Asset has the same meaning as Private Electronic Currency or Private E-money and means a digital representation of value that:
- (1)can be digitally traded and functions as (a) a medium of exchange; or (b) a unit of account; or (c) a store of value;
- (2)can be exchanged back-and-forth for Fiat Currency, but is neither issued nor guaranteed by the government of any jurisdiction; and
- (3)fulfils the above functions only by agreement within the community of users of the Digital Asset; and, accordingly
- (4)is to be distinguished from Fiat Currency and E-money.
For more details see AIFC Authorised Market Institution Rules.
Currency regulation implications
To be completed
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.4.3.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.4.4.Operating a Loan Crowdfunding Platform
2.4.4.1.General description
Operating a Loan Crowdfunding Platform is listed in section 4 of Schedule 4 of GEN. It means:
(a)operating an electronic platform that facilitates the bringing together of potential lenders and Borrowers; and
(b)administering a loan agreement that results from operating the electronic platform.
For the meaning of “administering a loan agreement” and “electronic platform” see GEN. For more details see AIFC Authorised Market Institution Rules.
Currency regulation implications
To be completed
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.4.4.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.4.5.Operating an Investment Crowdfunding Platform
2.4.5.1.General description
Operating an Investment Crowdfunding Platform is listed in section 5 of Schedule 4 of GEN. It means:
- (a)operating an electronic platform that facilitates the bringing together of potential Investors and Issuers who wish to obtain funding for a business or project, resulting in an Investor obtaining an Investment from the Issuer seeking funding; and
- (b)administering an Investment that results from operating the electronic platform.
Operating an Investment Crowdfunding Platform also includes making arrangements for an Investor to sell its Investment.
For the meaning of “administering an Investment” and “electronic platform” see GEN.
It is also possible to operate several types of crowdfunding platforms. For this see guidance in section 5 of Schedule 4 of GEN.
For more details see AIFC Authorised Market Institution Rules.
Currency regulation implications
To be completed
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.4.5.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.4.6.Operating a Private Financing Platform
2.4.6.1.General description
Operating a Private Financing Platform is listed in section 6 of Schedule 4 to GEN. It means operating an electronic platform which brings together multiple third parties directly or indirectly buying an instrument acknowledging or creating indebtedness arising from the supply of goods or the delivery of services, and includes:
- (a)entering into an arrangement with a party for the purpose facilitating the activity above whether through an intermediary investment vehicle or otherwise;
- (b)facilitating an arrangement described in (a); or
- (c)holding or controlling Client Money or Arranging Custody in connection with an arrangement described above.
For more details see AIFC Authorised Market Institution Rules.
Currency regulation implications
To be completed
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.4.6.2.Exclusions
There are none.
2.5.Becoming regulated as a FinTech Lab participant
2.5.1.Activities performed in FinTech Lab
2.5.1.1.General description
Pursuant to GEN 1.4.1. the following activities can be performed in FinTech Lab:
- (a)the Regulated or Market Activities that are specified in Schedule 1 and 4 of GEN can be carried on by a Person subject to the terms and Licence issued under AIFC Financial Technology Rules.
- (b)a Person may apply to the AFSA for a Licence authorising a Centre Participant to carry on activities not specified in (a).
- (c)for the purposes of (b), the AFSA may grant a Licence for a Person to carry on activities as specified in the Licence.
FinTech means technology-enabled innovation in financial services that could result in new business models, applications, processes or products with an associated material effect on the provision of financial services.
The FinTech Lab is a regulatory environment within the AIFC that allows a Person to Test or Develop the FinTech Activities without being immediately subject to the full set of regulatory requirements under the FSFR and AIFC Financial Technology Rules.
For eligibility criteria for Testing and Developing the FinTech Activities, Licence requirements and possible waivers see AIFC Financial Technology Rules.
Currency regulation implications
If you plan to
Are you planning to offer your services to legal entities or natural persons – residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC Participants? | ||
Yes: | Your services will be subject to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | |
Name of allowed activity: | See sections 2.2 and 2.3. of PERG for a relevant Regulated or Market Activity. | |
Relevant reference to Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation: | Not applicable | |
Type of currency: | Not applicable | |
Transaction implications | Not applicable | |
Currency reporting | No specific reporting for a financial service. Transactional reporting may be applicable (see Chapter 4 of PERG for more details). | |
No: | Subrule 3.3.2. of AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation may apply. |
For more details see Chapter 4 of PERG.
2.5.1.2.Exclusions
There are none.
3. FINANCIAL PROMOTION AND COMMUNICATION
3.1.AFSA’s approach to financial promotion
Pursuant to section 27(1) of the FSFR a “Financial Promotion” is any communication (made via any medium including brochures, telephone calls and presentations) the purpose or effect of which is:
- (a)to promote or advertise (i) Investments or (ii) any Regulated Activity; or
- (b)to invite or induce any Person (i) to enter into an agreement with any Person in relation to Investments or (ii) to engage in any Regulated Activity.
A Centre Participant may not make a Financial Promotion except as provided by or under the FSFR and Rules relating to the circumstances in which a Centre Participant may make, or will be deemed to make, a Financial Promotion, and the form and content of such Financial Promotion.
3.1.1.Requirements for communications
Pursuant to section 3.2.1. of the COB an Authorised Firm must ensure that:
- (a)any communication with a Client in relation to a Financial Product or Financial Service; or
- (b)any Financial Promotion that it communicates or approves,
is fair, clear and not misleading.
A “communication” includes:
- (a)a Financial Promotion;
- (b)a client agreement;
- (c)terms of business;
- (d)Financial Product terms and conditions;
- (e)a mandate;
- (f)a power of attorney entered into for the purposes of a Financial Product or Financial Service; and
- (g)any other communication which relates in whole or in part to the provision of a Financial Product or Financial Service.
3.1.2. Financial Promotions
Pursuant to section 27 of the FSFR an unauthorised Person must not make a Financial Promotion in relation to a Regulated Activity or Market Activity.
There are three circumstances for making Financial Promotions pursuant to COB 3.3.1:
- (1)if they are made by Authorised Firms;
- (2)if their content was approved by an Authorised Firm; or
- (3)the communication is considered as Exempt Financial Promotion.
For the Purposes of COB 3.3.1. a person who makes Financial Promotion is called “Authorised Promoter”.
Any Authorised Firm must either have authorisation from the AFSA or fall within an exemption conferred by the AIFC Acts before it approves the content of a Financial Promotion.
Approval must be intended to allow unauthorised Firms to transmit Financial Promotions without breaching the restriction. Although the requirement is that approval relates to the content of communications, approval should relate specifically to that part of a communication which promotes an invitation or inducement as opposed to the whole communication.
Before Authorised Firms give their approval to unauthorised Firms, they need to make sure that promotions comply with the relevant conduct rules contained in COB (including the promotions to be fair, clear and not misleading).
Authorised Firms must not approve financial promotions if the promotions will be made in the course of a personal visit, telephone conversation or other interactive dialogue.
When an Authorised Firm approves a financial promotion, it must ensure that the promotion is fair, clear, and not misleading. If at a later stage they find out that promotions which they have approved no longer comply with the rules, they must withdraw their approval and notify anyone who is relying on it as soon as possible.
An Authorised Firm that communicates or approves a financial promotion must have put in place adequate systems and controls, or policies and procedures, to comply with COB.
In addition, a firm must ensure that information presented is accurate and always gives a fair and prominent indication of any relevant risks when referencing any potential benefits.
The following key elements must be considered to determine whether there is a Financial Promotion:
- (a)is there an invitation or inducement?
- (b)has it been communicated?
- (c)is it made during the course of business?
- (d)is the purpose or effect of the communication that a person will engage in investment activity or any Regulated Activity?
Under the Financial Promotion regime, promotions can be real time or non-real time, and real time promotions are subdivided to solicited or unsolicited promotions.
Real time promotion
Real-time promotions are promotions made in the course of a personal visit, telephone conversation or other interactive dialogue. Scope for interaction is essential if a Financial Promotion is to be a real-time communication. For example, a telephone call is not the same thing as a telephone conversation. A call can be made by an intelligent automated machine asking questions, however, this is not an interactive dialogue any more than a questionnaire or electronic decision tree. Broadly speaking, a real-time communication is one which enables interaction at the time it is made.
Non-real time promotion
Non-real-time promotions are promotions which are not real-time communications. They include dialogues which take place by letter, email or in a publication. In this context a “publication” includes newspapers, journals, magazines or other periodical publications, websites or similar systems for the electronic display of information, television or radio programmes and teletext services.
Meetings and presentations will be real-time communications, however slides, handouts and other visual aids made available during presentations and meetings will be non-real-time communications. Other communications which may exist in enduring form and which will be non-real-time communications include videos, audio cassettes, bulletin boards, websites and recorded telephone messages. Messages placed on internet chat-rooms will also be non-real-time communications.
Radio or television programmes or teletext services may contain communications that involve an interactive dialogue, for example, a communication made by the broadcaster and addressed to an interviewee studio guest, a member of the audience or a person who speaks to the broadcaster by telephone. However, these will always be non-real-time communications.
The Financial Promotion restriction is meant to catch the activities of people, rather than the media through which the activity in question is conducted, and is intended to be media-neutral. Internet publications are therefore treated in the same way as documents posted to specific recipients or published in newspapers as they are non-real time promotions.
Solicited real time promotion
A solicited real-time financial promotion is a communication made in the course of a personal visit, telephone conversation or other interactive dialogue which:
- (a)is initiated by the recipient, or
- (b)takes place in response to an express request from the recipient of the communication.
Real-time communications will only be solicited if it is clear from all the circumstances that they concern the kind of controlled activities or investments envisaged by the recipient at the time they initiate or request the communication. All the circumstances in which a call, visit or dialogue is requested or initiated need to be taken into account.
Unsolicited real time promotion
An unsolicited real-time promotion is the regulatory term for a cold call and it is defined as real-time communications which is not solicited.
More detailed definition, examples of and restrictions with regard to Unsolicited Real Time Financial Promotions are given in COB 3.4.
Promotion by crowdfunding platform
Pursuant to Rule 7.3.9 of the AIFC Authorised Market Institution Rules an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform must not advertise a specific lending or Investment proposal that is available on the Authorised Crowdfunding Platform. The Authorised Crowdfunding Platform must take reasonable steps to ensure that Borrowers or Issuers that use platform do not advertise the lending or Investment proposal, unless the advertisement is made on the platform and is accessible only to existing Clients who use the Authorised Crowdfunding Platform.
3.1.3. Exempt Financial Promotions
For the purposes of COB 3.3.1(c), a communication is an exempt Financial Promotion if it is:
- (a)directed at and capable of acceptance exclusively by a Person who is believed by the Person making the Financial Promotion, on reasonable grounds, to be a Professional Client or Market Counterparty;
- (b)made to a Person as a result of an unsolicited request by that Person to receive the Financial Promotion;
- (c)made or issued by or on behalf of a government or non-commercial government entity, (including a central bank);
- (d)made by a Person in the course of providing legal or accountancy services and may reasonably be regarded as incidental to and a necessary part of the provision of such services;
- (e)included in a Prospectus approved by the AFSA in accordance with MAR; or
- (f)included in any document required or permitted to be published under the Listing Rules.
A communication is exempt from the provisions related to Unsolicited Real Time Financial Promotions when it is an image advertising consisting of:
- (a)the name of the Authorised Promoter;
- (b)a logo or other image associated with the Authorised Promoter;
- (c)a contact point; and
- (d)a reference to the types of Financial Product or Financial Service provided by the Authorised Promoter, or to its fees.
3.1.4. Other exclusions from the Financial Promotions Prohibition
The requirements with regard to Financial Promotions do not apply to certain categories of Centre Participants:
- (a)a Representative Office;
- (b)a MTF Operator and an OTF Operator.
Provisions with regard to Unsolicited Real Time Financial Promotions do not apply to Market Counterparty Business.
4. CURRENCY REGULATION
4.1.Currency residency in the AIFC
AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation recognise the following persons as residents:
- (a)AIFC Participants;
- (b)individuals and legal entities, as well as branches (and representative offices) of foreign entities recognised as residents under the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Currency Regulation and Currency Control".
This chapter outlines the regulator’s approach to currency regulation in the AIFC of services provided by AIFC Participants, and transactions of AIFC banks.
4.2.Currency regulation for AIFC participants
4.2.1.Services of AIFC participants (except AIFC banks)
4.2.1.1. General description
AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation define conditions and procedure for provision of financial and related services, and provision of professional services.
Transactions related to these services can be performed via bank accounts of the AIFC participants opened in second-tier banks of Kazakhstan or AIFC Banks.
The list of financial and related services is given in Schedule 2 of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation.
The list of professional services is given in Schedule 3 of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation.
4.2.1.2. Types of services
Provision of financial and related services to other AIFC participants (residents) and non-residents
AIFC participants have the right to provide financial services to other AIFC participants and non-residents in accordance with their AFSA licence in national or foreign currency.
The requirements are listed in section 3.3.2. of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation and basically require:
- (i)using bank accounts in second-tier banks of Kazakhstan for financial services to be rendered both in national and foreign currency; and
- (ii)using bank accounts in AIFC banks for financial services to be rendered in foreign currency only.
Provision of professional services to other AIFC participants (residents) and non-residents
AIFC participants have the right to provide professional services to other AIFC participants and non-residents in accordance with the list approved by AFSA, in any currency.
The requirements are listed in section 3.4.1. of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation and follow the same approach:
- (i)using bank accounts in second-tier banks of Kazakhstan for professional services to be rendered both in national and foreign currency; and
- (ii)using bank accounts in AIFC banks for professional services to be rendered in foreign currency only.
Provision of financial and related services to residents that are not AIFC participants
AIFC participants provide financial and related services to residents that are not AIFC participants in accordance with the list of financial services and in the currency set out in Schedule 2 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation, subject to the Acting Law of the AIFC or legislation of Kazakhstan.
The requirements are listed in section 3.3.3. of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation and follow the same approach:
- (i)using bank accounts in second-tier banks of Kazakhstan for financial and related services to be rendered both in national and foreign currency; and
- (ii)(ii) using bank accounts in AIFC banks for financial and related services to be rendered in foreign currency only.
Provision of professional services to residents that are not AIFC participants
AIFC participants have the right to provide professional services in any currency to residents that are not AIFC participants in accordance with the list set out in Schedule 3 the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation.
The requirements are listed in section 3.4.1. of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation and follow the same approach:
- (i)using bank accounts in second-tier banks of Kazakhstan for financial and related services to be rendered both in national and foreign currency; and
- (ii)using bank accounts in AIFC banks for financial and related services to be rendered in foreign currency only.
1.2.1.3. Prohibitions
The following transactions can be carried out only via bank accounts of AIFC Participants opened in second-tier banks of Kazakhstan:
(i)related to export or import of goods, works, services;
(ii)exchange transactions using the national currency;
(iii)transactions subject to assignment of registration number in accordance with the currency legislation of Kazakhstan.
4.2.2.Transactions of AIFC banks
4.2.2.1. General description
AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation define conditions and procedures for the currency transactions provided by the following AIFC banks:
- (a)AIFC banks that are not Islamic Banks;
- (b)AIFC banks that are Islamic Banks.
4.2.2.2. Types of transactions
Performed by AIFC banks, including Islamic Banks
AIFC banks, including Islamic banks, have the right to:
- (a)open bank accounts in other banks, including foreign banks, and transfer own funds using such bank accounts in national or foreign currency (subject to the requirements in the acting AIFC Law and legislation of Kazakhstan);
- (b)open bank accounts for residents that are AIFC participants and non-residents (opening of savings (deposit) account for residents is prohibited to AIFC banks) and make payments or money transfers using such accounts (subject to the requirements set out in the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation);
- (c)open correspondent accounts in the second-tier banks of Kazakhstan in accordance with the procedure established by the legislation of Kazakhstan and carry out transactions using such correspondent accounts (subject to the requirements set out in the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation or the legislation of Kazakhstan);
- (d)open savings (deposit) accounts in foreign currency for non-residents, and AIFC participants the controlling shareholder of which is non-resident;
- (e)carry out transactions envisaged by Schedule 4 to AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation through their correspondent accounts in national currency in second-tier banks of Kazakhstan.
AIFC Islamic Banks have the right to:
- (a)open bank accounts in the national currency for residents, including AIFC participants and non-residents;
- (b)open savings (deposits) accounts for residents (including AIFC participants), subject to the provisions in subparagraph (d) of paragraph 3.1.3 of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation.
4.2.2.3. Prohibitions
AIFC banks that are not Islamic Banks
AIFC banks are prohibited to:
- (a)open bank accounts in the national currency for residents (including AIFC participants), and non-residents;
- (b)open savings (deposits) accounts for residents (including AIFC participants);
- (c)carry out transactions of residents related to export or import of goods, works, services, or transactions subject to assignment of registration number in accordance with the currency legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan;
- (d)carry out exchange transactions under instructions of clients using national currency, except for the cases of executing the instructions of clients as part of transactions set out in Schedule 4 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation;
- (e)make payments or money transfers with respect to the services which are, under the Acting Law of the AIFC or the legislation of RK, prohibited to be provided by AIFC participants to residents that are not AIFC participants;
- (f)provide services to residents that are not AIFC participants, the provision of which by AIFC banks is prohibited in accordance with the Acting Law of the AIFC or the legislation of RK; and
- (g)carry out transactions through correspondent accounts in the national currency in STBs of RK that are not in the list set out in Schedule 4 to these Rules.
AIFC banks that are Islamic Banks
Islamic banks of the AIFC are prohibited to:
- (a)carry out transactions of residents related to export or import of goods, works, services or transactions subject to assigning of registration number in accordance with the currency legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan;
- (b)carry out exchange transactions under instruction of clients using the national currency;
- (c)make payments or transfers of clients' money for the services not related to Islamic financing;
- (d)provide services to residents that are not AIFC participants, the provision of which by Islamic banks of the AIFC is prohibited in accordance with the Acting law of the AIFC or the legislation of RK.
4.2.3.Transactions of non-AIFC participants (except non-AIFC banks)
4.2.3.1. General description
Residents of Kazakhstan that are not AIFC participants are legal entities and individual residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
4.2.3.2. Prohibitions
Residents that are not AIFC participants, are prohibited to carry out the following transactions through the AIFC Banks:
- (a)related to export or import of goods, works, services;
- (b)exchange transactions using the national currency;
- (c)transactions subject to assignment of registration number in accordance with the currency legislation of Kazakhstan.
4.2.4. Transactions of non-AIFC banks
Transactions of non-AIFC banks are not regulated by the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation.
4.2.5. Payments or money transfers on transactions of residents and non-residents in the AIFC
Section 4 of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation contains provisions regulating payments or money transactions of residents and non-residents in the AIFC.
Such payments or money transfers on foreign exchange transactions are carried out through bank accounts in AIFC banks or the second-tier banks of Kazakhstan.
Bank transfers between the AIFC bank from the accounts of the AIFC participants to their accounts in a second-tier bank of Kazakhstan and vice-versa are made in foreign currency.
Section 4.3 of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation sets conditions for payments or money transfers for client transactions.
The list of identifying documents and information to be provided to the AIFC bank by the client includes the following documents and information:
- (a)currency contract (for transactions in the equivalent of over USD 10,000);
- (b)BIN;
- (c)if the client is a legal entity or an organisation that is not legal entity - documents defining the country of registration and the founders of the entity or organisation, if these documents have not been submitted or have been changed.
The AIFC bank must have sufficient identification information about the client to determine the client’s residency, link to the AIFC public register and, if applicable, client’s status as an AIFC participant as listed in section 4.3.(b) of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation.
The information considered as sufficient identification information about the client is listed in section 4.3.(c) of the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation.
Section 4.3. (d) sets the conditions when the AIFC bank must refuse to make a payment or to transfer money to the client.
4.2.6. Exchange transactions in the AIFC
A purchase or sale of foreign currency can be carried out only through AIFC banks or second-tier banks of Kazakhstan under the following requirements:
- (a)a request needs to indicate the purpose of the transaction;
- (b)when performed with non-cash foreign currency for the national currency it is carried out solely through second-tier banks of Kazakhstan;
- (c)when performed with non-cash foreign currency for other non-cash foreign currency it can be carried out through AIFC banks or second-tier banks of Kazakhstan;
- (d)when performed with foreign currency in cash it is carried out through second-tier banks of Kazakhstan or through legal entities authorised by the National Bank of Kazakhstan.
4.3.Currency reporting of AIFC participants
4.3.1.Reporting on services
Annex 3 to Schedule 5 to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation require AIFC participants providing depository and brokerage services in accordance with their AFSA Licence submitting quarterly (no later than the 10th day of the month following the reporting month) reports on securities to the AFSA.
The information is provided electronically through secure communication channels with confirmation by an electronic digital signature.
There is no other service specific reporting under the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation.
4.3.2.Reporting on transactions
AIFC Participants must provide information for the purposes of currency regulation with regard to the following:
- (a)information on payments and (or) money transfers on currency transactions carried out by AIFC banks, including on behalf of clients, as well as by a second-tier bank of Kazakhstan on behalf of AIFC participants;
- (b)information on resident clients' transactions and the status of their accounts provided by AIFC banks;
- (c)information on deals and transactions carried out by AIFC participants, including on behalf of clients, that affected the change in requirements for non-residents and obligations in front of them;
- (d)information on transactions with securities and derivatives carried out by AIFC participants with non-residents;
- (e)information on income accrued and received from foreign exchange transactions with financial instruments of AIFC participants.
The information is provided electronically through secure communication channels with confirmation by an electronic digital signature.
The AIFC participant provides the AFSA with information on the contract, on the basis of and pursuant to which capital movement transactions are carried out, for an amount equal to or exceeding the equivalent of USD 500,000, in accordance with Annex 4 to Schedule 5 to the AIFC Currency Rules. The information is provided before the expiration of 30 (thirty) calendar days from the date of commencement of payments under this contract.
5. UNREGULATED ACTIVITIES
5.1.AFSA’s approach to unregulated activities
5.1.1.AIFC Participants
While Persons applying to carry on Regulated Activities, Market Activities, Ancillary Services, and FinTech Lab Activities must be authorised, and must be registered/incorporated in the AIFC, not all companies registered/incorporated in the AIFC require an authorisation.
Those activities that are not listed as Regulated Activities, Market Activities, Ancillary Services and FinTech Lab Activities, could be registered/incorporated without authorisation.
5.1.2. Non-AIFC Participants
The Astana International Finance Centre is not the exclusive preserve of the AIFC Participants. Non-AIFC Participants established inside the territorial (geographical) boundary of the AIFC in the city of Astana can carry on trading, even in financial services, under the general law of the Republic of Kazakhstan and still remain unconnected to the AIFC. These others, in governing their affairs, remain subject to the Acting Law of Kazakhstan. Banks and other financial institutions can stay in the Centre without joining the Centre’s legal arrangements but complying with the general requirements in Kazakhstan concerning financial regulating in particular. Unless they register as the AIFC Participants, or make Financial Promotion the regulatory regime of the AFSA will not extend to them.
6. MISCELLANEOUS
Certain AIFC Participants who are not authorised or licensed by the AFSA will be subject to the AIFC Anti-Money Laundering, Counter-Terrorist Financing and Sanctions Rules if their activities constitute them being Designated Non-Financial Business and Profession (DNFBPs).
The following class of persons whose business or profession is carried on in or from the AIFC constitute DNFBPs:
- (a)A real estate developer or agency which carries out transactions with a customer involving the buying or selling of real property;
- (b)A dealer in precious metals or precious stones;
- (c)A dealer in any saleable item of a price equal to or greater than USD 15,000
- (d)A law firm, notary firm, or other independent legal business;
- (e)An accounting firm, audit firm, or insolvency firm; or
- (f)A Company service provider; or
- (g)A Single Family Office.
Be reminded that a person who is an Authorised Person or a Registered Auditor is not a DNFBP.
The AFSA may conduct reviews and inspections of DNFBPs to perform its AML and CFT responsibilities, including as part of its risk-based approach to supervision. In addition, DNFBPs must provide an annual AML return to the AFSA.
Consultation Paper on Proposed Amendments to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation and provision of information on currency transactions in the AIFC
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Introduction
Why are we issuing this Consultation Paper (CP)?
1.The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has issued this Consultation Paper to seek suggestions from the market on the proposed amendments to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC.
Who should read this CP?
2.The proposals in this paper will be of interest to current and potential AIFC participants, second-tier banks and other Persons who work within the AIFC or have currency transactions with AIFC participants or AIFC Bodies or/and organisations.
Terminology
3.Defined terms have the initial letter of the word capitalised, or of each word in a phrase. Definitions are set out in the Glossary Rules (GLO). Unless the context otherwise requires, where capitalisation of the initial letter is not used, the expression has its natural meaning.
What are the next steps?
4.We invite comments from interested stakeholders on the proposed framework. All commentsshould be in writing and sent to the addressor email specified below. If sending your comments by email, please use “Consultation Paper AFSA-G-CE-2023-0001” in the subject line. You may, if relevant, identify the organisation you represent when providing your comments. The AFSA reserves the right to publish, including on its website, any comments you provide, unless you expressly request otherwise. Comments supported by reasoning and evidence will be given more weight by the AFSA.
5.The deadline for providing comments on the proposed framework is 03 July 2023. Once we receive your comments, we shall consider if any refinements are required to this proposal.
6.AFSA prefers to receive comments by email at consultation@afsa.kz
Comments may also be posted to:
Governmental Relations Division
Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA)
55/17 Mangilik El, building C3.2, Kazakhstan
Structure of this CP
Part I – Background;
Part II – Proposals;
Part III – Questions in this consultation paper;
Annex 1 – Proposed amendments to the AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC.
Part I - Background
1.The Astana Financial Services Authority ("AFSA") intends to enhance the legislative framework of Astana International Financial Centre (“AIFC”) governing AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC (“the Rules”).
2.The proposed amendments in this consultation paper contain the following proposals from existing AIFC participants stemming from the practical application of the Rules and further enhancements developed internally within AFSA:
- A.Covering identified gaps;
- B.Extension of the list of financial services that AIFC participants may provide to residents;
- C.Extension of banking services and currency transactions;
- D.Provision of information on currency transactions within the AIFC;
- E.Editorial changes and clarifications.
Part II - Proposals
Gaps
Within one year of implementing the Rules, AFSA identified gaps that need to be addressed. For instance, one major concern arose regarding second-tier banks ("STBs"), as AIFC participants were unable to make payments to AFSA in foreign currency as stipulated in the AIFC Fees Rules. This issue stemmed from the absence of provisions covering AIFC Bodies as a subject of the Rules.
Another issue faced by AIFC participants was the difficulty in forming a company's share capital in foreign currency. The AIFC Companies Regulations do not impose any restrictions on forming the share capital in foreign currency. Additionally, Article 43(3)(a) of the AIFC Companies Regulations mandates that a Public Company must have an issued and allotted share capital (excluding treasury shares) of no less than USD 100,000 at any given time. However, STBs refused to allow AIFC participants to form the share capital in USD or any other foreign currency through their current banking accounts. This was due to the absence of explicit provisions in the Rules regarding such transactions. As a result, the STBs relied on the "On Currency Regulation and Currency Control" law, which prohibits such transactions between two residents.
Additionally, the Rules include a clause that allows AIFC banks to open correspondent accounts in STBs. However, the currency of these correspondent accounts is not specified, leading to uncertainty and the need for clarification.
In the current version of the Rules there is no clause that regulates currency transactions between AIFC bodies, AIFC participants and their employees. Article 5(1) of the Constitutional Statute permits AIFC Participants to denominate and fulfill their monetary obligations in the currencies agreed upon in their contracts. Furthermore, the AIFC Employment Regulations do not impose any restrictions on the currency in which wages should be paid within the AIFC. Therefore, it was proposed to make the specific amendment to the Rules.
The section regulating the provision of information on currency transactions lacked measures specifically tailored for AIFC participants, particularly concerning the absence or late submission of zero-value reports. To address this issue and ensure compliance, a proposal was made to introduce a clause granting AFSA the authority to impose enforcement measures.
Extension of financial services that AIFC participants may provide to residents that are not AIFC participants
Banking
In the current version of the Rules, it is unclear whether AIFC Islamic banks are permitted to offer deposits to residents who are not AIFC participants in any currency. This lack of clarity creates uncertainty for both customers and AIFC Islamic banks.
Also, to extent the powers of AIFC Islamic banks it was proposed to allow them to make payments and transfers of clients' money for the services that comply with principles of Islamic financing.
In the AIFC there are business models of banks that offer potential lending opportunities for the businesses in Kazakhstan. However, to extent loan possibilities it is necessary to enable lending against collateral provided by shareholders' funds deposited in savings accounts.
The Rules allow AIFC Islamic banks to offer Islamic banking and Islamic financing services. However, the current version of the document does not specifically mention Islamic financial organizations. To enhance Islamic financial services within the AIFC, AFSA has reached an agreement with the NBK to include this service in Schedule 2 of the Rules.
In Kazakhstan, there are programs aimed at developing the agricultural sector of the economy. However, AIFC participants who offer loans to the market have limitations on providing loans only in foreign currency. This poses an inconvenience for farms that primarily generate income in the national currency. As a solution, it has been proposed to include leasing services for legal entities in Kazakhstan, such as farms, individual entrepreneurs, and other business entities engaged in the agro-industrial complex in Schedule 2 of the Rules.
Digital assets
As per the Rules of the Pilot Project concerning the interaction between AIFC crypto exchanges and STBs, crypto exchanges are authorised to offer services to residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Currently, there are six crypto-exchanges and seven second-tier banks participating in the Pilot Project. Furthermore, to make digital services more comprehensive AFSA proposed to include dealer, broker, custody and investment management services with digital assets. Thus, it was proposed to include all these services to the Schedule 2 of the Rules.
Investment services
Currently, AIFC brokers do not have access to Kazakhstani securities unless they obtain a license from the ARDFM. To extend rights for AIFC participants, it has been proposed to introduce specific amendments that would grant AIFC brokers access to Kazakhstani securities without an ARDFM license.
Regarding depositary services in the Rules, there is a provision that restricts the holding of securities to those included in the official list of the AIX. However, some investors have expressed a desire to hold securities that are not listed on the AIX through a depositary governed by common law. The AIX CSD meets this requirement, enabling investors to expand their options. This development will enhance the functionality of AIX CSD.
Additionally, in order to increase the rights of fund managers of the AIFC, AFSA proposes to allow fund managers with AFSA license to provide managing investment services:
- in relation to securities of AIFC funds that are included in the list of AIX;
- access to retail investors, residents of the RK who are not AIFC participants.
Another AFSA initiative focuses on introduction of crowdfunding services to the Rules. On June 24, 2019, AFSA, with the support of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, developed the first-ever regulations on investment and loan crowdfunding in the region, giving impetus to the successful growth of crowdfunding activities at the AIFC. Currently, several crowdfunding platforms are registered at the AIFC. These amendments will expand the list of financial services and provide access for AIFC crowdfunding companies to operate in any currency in relation to residents of RK.
Trading platforms
Effective January 1, 2022, AFSA introduced regulations to govern the operations of Multilateral Trading Facilities (MTFs) and Organised Trading Facilities (OTFs) within the AIFC. These rules provide a comprehensive framework for overseeing the activities of MTFs and OTFs, aiming to enhance transparency and accountability in the financial markets operating within the AIFC. Thus, there is a need to add these services to the AIFC currency framework and expand the list of financial services that will be available to residents that are not AIFC participants.
Provision of information on currency transactions within the AIFC
The second part of the amendments related to the procedure on provision of information on currency transactions within the AIFC. According to paragraph 5 of article 5 of the Constitutional Statute - AIFC acts, that impose requirements on AIFC participants in relation to the provision of information about currency transactions as well as the procedure for the transfer of information between AIFC Bodies and the NBK shall be developed with the agreement of the NBK.
During the implementation, NBK and AFSA identified several issues concerning the procedure for providing information on currency transactions within the AIFC. To address these concerns, it has been proposed to make amendments to the Rules in order to rectify the existing issues and ensure a more streamlined process for reporting currency transactions.
For instance, AFSA decided to introduce for all types of reporting provided by the AIFC participants an obligation to submit zero values reports to the AFSA in the absence of transactions, the provision of information on which is provided for by these Rules, during the reporting period.
It has been proposed to include 4 amendments of a technical and clarifying nature in Annex 2, 4, 5 of the Rules. Additionally, to Annex 4 included a new section 3 regarding other transactions of capital movements. At the same time, it should be highlighted that most amendments have been developed to Annex 3. Major amendments to Annex 3 includes:
- -changing the reporting form (from 8 to 14 sections)
- -changing the terms of the reporting (quarterly from 10th to 15th following the reporting month)
- -adding dealer and custody services to the report
- -adding contact information of the reporter.
Part III – Questions in this consultation paper
Do you agree with the proposed amendments to AIFC Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC? If not, what are your concerns, and how should they be addressed?
Disclaimer:
The proposals incorporated into this Consultation paper have been developed by AFSA, taking into account the established practices of AFSA’s divisions and previous requests made by AIFC participants. It is important to note that according to paragraph 3 of article 5 of the Constitutional Statute "On the AIFC" dated December 7, 2015 (N438-V ZRK), proposed amendments to the Rules are subject to the approval of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Annex 1
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE AIFC RULES ON CURRENCY REGULATION
AND PROVISION OF INFORMATION ON CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS IN THE AIFC
In these amendments, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
- General Provisions
1.1. ….
1.2. ….
1.3. These Rules have been developed in furtherance of paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of Article 5 of the Constitutional Statute of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On the Astana International Financial Centre" dated December 7, 2015 No 438-V.
1.4. The provisions of these Rules apply to:
(a)the AIFC participants, AIFC Bodies and their organisations;
(b)the AIFC banks;
(c)residents and non-residents of RK carrying out the transactions with the AIFC participants, AIFC Bodies and their organisations or using bank accounts opened in the AIFC banks;
(d)STB of RK to the extent of transactions regulated by these Rules.
Transactions that are not regulated by these Rules are carried out by STB of RK in accordance with the legislation of RK and by the AIFC banks in accordance with the Acting Law of the AIFC.
1.5. ….
1.6. ….
2.Currency Residency in the AIFC
2.1 ….
3.Rights of the AIFC participants, the AIFC Bodies and their organisations. Transactions in the AIFC
3.1 Rights of the AIFC participants, the AIFC Bodies and their organisations
3.1.1 ….
3.1.2 ….
3.1.3 The AIFC banks, including Islamic banks of the AIFC, have the right to:
(а) ….
(b) ….
(с) open correspondent accounts in the STB of RK in the national and foreign currency in accordance with the procedure established by the legislation of RK and to carry out transactions using such correspondent accounts subject to the requirements set out in these Rules and (or) the legislation of RK;
(d) ….
(d-1) for Islamic banks of the AIFC to open savings (deposit) accounts that comply with the principles of Islamic financing in any currency for residents, including those who are the AIFC participants;
(e) ….
(f) open savings (deposit) accounts in foreign currency for residents to place funds on them as collateral for granted loans (within the permitted activities).
3.1.4 The AIFC banks (except for Islamic banks of the AIFC) are prohibited to:
…..
3.1.5 Islamic banks of the AIFC are prohibited to:
(a) ….
(b) ….
(c) make payments and (or) transfers of clients' money for the services not related to Islamic financing that do not comply with the principles of Islamic financing;
(d) ….
3.1.6 The AIFC participants that are investment funds or fund manager licensed by the AFSA within the regulated activities specified in section 3.5 of Schedule 2 of these Rules have right to carry out transactions with residents that are not AIFC participants in foreign currency:
a) for the acquisition and (or) sale of investment objects, within the framework of regulated activities;
b) to receive compensation for the value of lost investment objects of the fund, including compensation payments, insured events and fines in the framework of regulated activities.
3.2 Transactions of the AIFC Bodies, their organisations and the AIFC participants
3.2.1 Transactions between the AIFC participants, AIFC Bodies and their organisations are carried out in national or foreign currency, subject to the requirements stipulated by these Rules.
3.2.2 Transactions between the AIFC Bodies, their organisations or the AIFC participants (except for the AIFC banks) and non-residents are carried out in any currency at discretion of the parties in accordance with the requirements envisaged under the Acting Law of the AIFC and (or) the legislation of RK.
3.2.3 …
3.3 Provision of financial services by the AIFC participants
3.3.1 ….
3.3.2 The AIFC participants, except for the AIFC banks, have right to provide financial services to other AIFC participants, the AIFC Bodies, their organisations, and non-residents in accordance with the AFSA licence in national or foreign currency, subject to the following requirements:
- financial services to be rendered in the national currency are carried out using the bank accounts of the AIFC participants opened in STB of RK;
- financial services to be rendered in foreign currency are carried out using the bank accounts of the AIFC participants opened in the AIFC banks or STB of RK.
3.3.3 …..
3.4 Carrying out of transactions, related to provision of professional services by the AIFC participants
3.4.1 The AIFC participants provide professional services to other AIFC participants, the AIFC Bodies and their organisations and non-residents in accordance with the list approved by the AFSA, determined in the Schedule 2 of the AIFC General Rules, in any currency, subject to the following requirements:
- professional services to be rendered in the national currency are carried out using the bank accounts of the AIFC participants, the AIFC Bodies and their organisations opened in STB of RK;
- professional services to be rendered in foreign currency are carried out using the bank accounts of the AIFC participants, the AIFC Bodies and their organisations, opened in the AIFC banks or STB of RK.
3.5 ….
3.6 ….
3.7 ….
3.8 The AIFC participants, the AIFC Bodies and their organisations have the right to carry out operations for the formation of share capital through the STB of the RK in any currency and AIFC banks in foreign currency under the Acting Law of the AIFC.
3.9 Mandatory payments, fees, and fines to the AFSA, including for transactions related to registration, licensing and recognition in the AIFC, are made by natural and legal entities that are not the AIFC participants through the STB of RK in any currency, through AIFC banks in foreign currency.
3.10 Transactions for the transfer of wages to employees of the AIFC participants, AIFC Bodies and their organisations are made through the STB of the RK in any currency, through AIFC banks in foreign currency.
4. Payments and (or) money transfers on transactions of residents and non-residents in the AIFC
4.1 Payments and (or) money transfers on foreign exchange transactions of the AIFC participants (except for the AIFC banks) are carried out through bank accounts in the AIFC banks and (or) the STB of RK in compliance with the conditions envisaged under the Acting Law of the AIFC and the legislation of RK.
4.2 The AIFC bank transfers money of the AIFC participants from their accounts in the AIFC bank to their accounts in the STB of RK, as well as from their accounts in STB of RK to their accounts in AIFC bank in foreign currency.
4.3 Payments and (or) money transfers for client transactions are made in accordance with the following conditions:
(a) ….
(b) ….
(c) ….
(d) ….
(e) This paragraph does not apply to payments and money transfers made between non-residents not registered in RK and (or) not operating in the territory of RK.
4.4 ….
5 Exchange transactions in the AIFC
5. Purchase and (or) sale of foreign currency can be carried out only through the AIFC banks or STB of RK, subject to the following requirements:
(a) ….
(b) ….
(c) purchase or sale of non-cash foreign currency for other non-cash foreign currency is carried out through the AIFC banks or STB of RK, or foreign banks;
(d) …
(e) to ensure their own activities, the AIFC Bodies have the right to purchase non-cash foreign currency in the amount of not more than $300,000 in one bank in one business day, without limiting the time limit for the reverse exchange of foreign currency into national currency.
6. Provision of information on currency transactions in the AIFC for the purposes of currency regulation
6.1 The list and procedure for providing information on carried out transactions carried out on the territory of the AIFC and on transactions of the AIFC participants carried out outside the AIFC as well as financial requirements to non-residents and obligations to them is established in accordance with Schedule 5 to these Rules.
7.Exchange of information between the AIFC and NBRK bodies
….
8.Confidentiality
….
9.Responsibility for Rules violation
9.1 ….
9.2 In case of non-submission or late submission by the AIFC participants of the reporting provided by these Rules, the AFSA shall apply measures to them in accordance with the Acting Law of the AIFC.
Schedule 1
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
1)….
2)….
3)AIFC bank – the AIFC participant licensed by the AFSA to provide the following services, subject to the requirements established by these Rules:
a)accepting deposits, granting the loans, making payments providing money services, opening and maintaining bank accounts;
b)Islamic banking and Islamic financing (except for non-banking Islamic organisations);
4)….
5)….
6)….
7)….
8)….
9)….
10) ….
11) ….
12) ….
13) Credit provider – the AIFC participant, licensed by the AFSA to provide services for granting the loans, subject to the requirements established by these Rules;
14) AIFC Islamic bank is the AIFC participant that has a license from the AFSA to provide banking services, accept deposits and (or) open and maintain bank accounts in accordance with the principles of Islamic financing in the territory of the AIFC;
15) Islamic financial organisation is the AIFC participant, licensed by the AFSA to provide financial services that comply with the principles of Islamic financing.
Schedule 2
LIST OF FINANCIAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE AIFC PARTICIPANTS TO THE RESIDENTS THAT ARE NOT THE AIFC PARTICIPANTS
No. | Name of the service | Currency | |
1 | Banking, credit and payment services | ||
1.1 | Islamic banking | Any currency | |
1.2 | …. | … | |
1.3 | …. | … | |
1.4 | …. | … | |
1.5 | leasing services for legal entities of RK, including business entities (farms, individual entrepreneurs and other business entities engaged in the agro-industrial complex and road transport infrastructure) | Any currency | |
1.6 | opening and maintaining bank accounts (current, deposit) of clients for placing funds on them as collateral for loans granted (within the permitted activities) | Foreign currency | |
1.7 | exchange transactions using the national currency for the purpose of carrying out permitted activities | Foreign currency | |
2 | Insurance | ||
…. | …. | ||
3 | Investment services | ||
3.1 | Investment banking services | ||
3.1.1 | …. | …. | |
3.1.2 | …. | …. | |
3.2 | …. | ||
3.2.1 | …. | …. | |
3.3 | Brokerage services (conclusion of transactions in the interests of the client) | ||
3.3.1 | …. | ||
3.3.2 |
Brokerage services as related to Kazakhstani securities when concluding transactions by AIFC participants on stock exchanges operating in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan and (or) direct access to settlements in JSC "Central Securities Depository" and (or) direct access to settlements of the AIFC Central Securities Depository | …. | |
3.4 | Providing custody services (nominal holding, accounting and safeguarding of securities) | ||
3.4.1 | …. | …. | |
3.4.2 | …. | …. | |
3.4.3 | Settlement depository or custody services of the AIFC Central Securities Depository: - as related to Kazakhstani securities included in the official list of the AIFC Exchange; - as related to foreign securities and securities of the AIFC without restrictions | Any currency | |
3.5 | Managing Investment (including investment funds) | ||
3.5.1 | - in relation to clients (investors) - citizens and legal entities of the Republic of Kazakhstan investing in securities of the funds incorporated in the AIFC that are included in the official list of the AIFC Exchange and managed by management companies licensed by - in relation to clients (investors) - citizens and legal entities of the Republic of Kazakhstan investing in securities of the funds incorporated in the AIFC that are not included in the official list of the AIFC Exchange and managed by management companies licensed by ARDFM | Any currency | |
3.5.2 | …. | ….. | |
3.6 | Trust services | ||
3.6.1 | …. | ….. | |
3.7 | Crowdfunding | ||
3.7.1 | Operating a loan crowdfunding platform | Any currency | |
3.7.2 | Operating an investment crowdfunding platform | Any currency | |
4 | Digital assets* | ||
4.1 | Operating a digital assets platform (crypto exchange) | Any currency | |
4.2 | Dealer services with digital assets | Any currency | |
4.3 | Brokerage services with digital assets | Any currency | |
4.4 | Custody services with digital assets | Any currency | |
4.5 | Investment management of digital assets | Any currency | |
*Note: Residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan classified as retail clients under the AIFC acts are subject to a monthly fiat deposit limit equivalent to USD 1 000 (one thousand). This limit does not apply to residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan who were classified as professional clients under the AIFC acts. | |||
5 | Operating of trading, financing facilities and platforms | ||
5.1 | Operating a multilateral trading facility | Any currency | |
5.2 | Operating an organised trading facility | Any currency |
Schedule 4
LIST OF TRANSACTIONS THAT THE AIFC BANKS ARE ENTITLED TO CARRY OUT THROUGH THEIR CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS IN NATIONAL CURRENCY IN STB OF RK
No. | Type of transaction |
1 | …. |
2 | Execution of clients ' instructions on payment of taxes and obligatory payments to the budget, wages, lease of premises as well as execution by the AIFC bank of collection orders (tax authorities and bailiffs) brought forward to the client's current bank account |
3 | ….. |
4 | ….. |
5 | ….. |
6 | ….. |
Schedule 5
THE PROCEDURE FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION ON CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS IN THE AIFC
1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
1.1. ….
1.2. …..
1.3. …..
1.4. …..
1.5. ….
1.6. ….
1.7. ….
1.8 …..
1.9 For all types of reporting provided by the AIFC participants, including AIFC banks, and STBs of RK to the AFSA, in the absence of transactions, the provision of information on which is provided for by these Rules, during the reporting period, it is necessary to submit zero values reports to the AFSA. This paragraph does not apply to Annex 4 of Schedule 5 of these Rules.
2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
….
3. THE PROCEDURE FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION ON CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS BY THE AIFC BANKS AND STB OF RK
3.1. ….
3.2. ….
3.3. The AFSA, no later than the 18th (eighteenth) day of the month following the reporting month, provides information to the NBRK in the form of Annex 1 to this Schedule and no later than the 15th (fifteenth) day of the month following the reporting month, provides information to the NBRK in the form of Annex 2 to this Schedule electronically via secure communication channels with confirmation by electronic digital signature.
4. THE PROCEDURE FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION BY THE AIFC PARTICIPANTS PROVIDING DEPOSITORY AND BROKERAGE SERVICES
4.1. The AIFC participants providing dealer, depository, custodian and brokerage services in accordance with the AFSA's licence (hereinafter referred to as participants), quarterly no later than the 10th (tenth) 15 (fifteenth) day of the month following the reporting month, submit reports on securities to the AFSA in accordance with Annex 3 to this Schedule (in MS Excel format).
The AFSA submits the participants' reports to the NBRK no later than the 20th (twentieth) day of the month following the reporting quarter.
4.2. The report is submitted on the AIFC participants' own transactions and transactions of their clients. AIFC participants providing dealer and/or brokerage; custodial services in accordance with the Committee's license shall not provide data on transactions conducted on behalf of the following clients
- which are other participants of the AIFC;
- Joint Stock Company Development Bank of Kazakhstan;
- professional participants of the securities market of the Republic of Kazakhstan, having an appropriate license of the Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Regulation and Development of Financial Market.:
(a)with securities issued by residents and owned by a non-resident;(b)with securities issued by non-residents and owned by a resident;(c)with securities issued by residents abroad and owned by a resident.
4.3. The report reflects data on transactions carried out during the reporting period (on its own behalf and on behalf of clients) with all securities issued in the Republic of Kazakhstan and abroad.
- 1) with securities issued by residents in the Republic of Kazakhstan and owned by a non-resident client of an AIFC participant (transaction code - 1111);
- 2) with securities issued by non-residents and owned by an AIFC participant and a client-resident of an AIFC participant (transaction code - 2200);
- 3) with securities issued by residents abroad and belonging to the AIFC participant and client-resident of the AIFC participant (operation code 2120);
- 4) with securities issued by residents abroad and belonging to the client-nonresident of the AIFC participant (transaction code - 2121).
The report Data are also provided data on the number of securities, their value at the beginning and end of the reporting period, and, if available, investment income from the ownership of securities and service fees, including in the absence of transactions in the reporting period.
Transactions of securities repurchased (direct and reverse repurchase agreements) are not reflected in Annex 3 to this Schedule. Data at the beginning and end of the reporting period on the security involved in the repurchase agreements in repo transactions are reflected by the original owner of the security.
4.4. The data is presented separately for each type of security by customer/owner sectors final beneficiary:
A) country code - three-digit numerical code of account owner's country - beneficiary in accordance with national classifier of the Republic of Kazakhstan "Codes for representation of names of countries and their administrative-territorial subdivisions";
B) sector code of account owner-beneficiary:
«1» central government;
«2» regional and local governments;
«3» central (national) banks;
«4» other depositary organisations;
«5» other financial organisations;
«6» state non-financial organisations;
«7» non-state non-financial organisations;
«8» non-profit organisations serving households;
«9» households.
An AIFC participant providing custody services specifies the country and sector code for its AIFC depositary customer in an aggregated manner.
4.5. Positions on securities at the beginning of the reporting period are equal to their positions at the end of the previous period. The position on securities at the end of the reporting period is determined based on the market price announced on the organised securities market at the end of the reporting period. Financial transactions include transactions between a resident and a non-resident involving a change of economic ownership of securities and are recorded at the value specified in the transaction (if not, the price quoted in the market on the date of the agreement): purchase (sale) on the primary and secondary securities markets, crediting/writing of securities by mutual agreement; receipt (transfer) of securities as a gift, by inheritance.
4.6. In the case of securities for which transactions are concluded in an unorganised market, the following prices are applied in order of preference to assess the position on securities at the end of the reporting period:
(a) the last transaction price of the security;(b) the price of the security at the purchase price, excluding acquisition-related expenses (brokerage fees, banking services fees);(c) nominal value of the security.
Other transactions include:
1) Transactions between a resident and a non-resident which do not result in the transfer of ownership of securities (transfer of securities into nominal holding, transfer of clients from one nominee holder or registrar to another nominee holder or registrar);
2) Transactions between residents and non-residents with transfer of ownership, except those classified as financial transactions: alienation of securities by court decision;
3) Transactions between non-residents with transfer of ownership (purchase at the secondary market, sale at the secondary market);
4) Transactions between residents with transfer of ownership (purchase on the secondary market, sale on the secondary market).
4.7. Financial transactions include transactions between a resident and a non-resident involving a change in the economic ownership of securities, and are reflected at the value specified in the transaction (in case of absence - at the price quoted on the market on the date of the agreement): purchase (sale) on the primary and secondary securities markets, receipt (transfer) of securities as a gift, by inheritance. Value changes in column 20 include changes resulting from exchange rate fluctuations (exchange rate differences in the case of securities denominated in currencies other than United States dollars (hereinafter the "US dollars") as well as the market value of the security.
In order to correctly reflect changes in value, the statistical form must first be completed in the currency of denomination, and only then are flows and stocks translated at the appropriate exchange rates to the US dollar. After completing all columns other than value changes in the accounting currency, column 20 is determined by the residual method:
column 20 = column 22 - column 7 - column 9 + column 11 - column 13 + column 15 - column 17 + column 19 for each line.
4.8. Other transactions include:
1) transactions between a resident and a non-resident that do not result in the transfer of ownership of securities (transfer of securities to a nominal holding, transfer of clients from one nominal holder or registrar to another nominal holder or registrar);
2) transactions between a resident and a non-resident with the transfer of ownership rights, except for those related to financial transactions: alienation of securities by court decision;
3) transactions between non-residents with the transfer of ownership rights (purchase on secondary market, sale on secondary market);
4) transactions between residents with the transfer of ownership rights (purchase on secondary market, sale on secondary market).
Only data on debt securities are reflected in column 23:
1) accrual of announced fees for days of holding a security by the respondent or his/her client during the reporting period;
2) amortization of premium or discount for the days of holding a security by the respondent or his client during the reporting period.
4.9. Financial transactions and other indicators denominated in other foreign currencies are calculated in USD at the cross-rate determined as follows:
1) the cost at the beginning of the period is transferred at the cross-rate at the end of the previous period;
2) the cost at the end of the period - at the cross-rate at the end of the reporting period;
3) financial and other transactions, investment income and commissions – at the cross-rate at the date of the transaction or at the weighted average cross-rate for the reporting period.
Column 24 are reflected data on income received in the reporting period:
1) dividends received by the respondent or his/her client during the reporting period;
2) remuneration received by the respondent or his/her client during the reporting period upon repayment of accrued interest on debt securities by the issuer.
The income referred to in this paragraph are reflected in the amount including any fees or taxes withheld therefrom.
4.10. Column 25 are reflected the fee income for brokerage, advisory, information and other services paid by a non-resident client to the respondent.
For the Depositary of AIFC, it is allowed to show fees and commissions in aggregate for each non-resident client of the Depositary. In this case, the fee is recorded for the security (at the highest amount at the end of the period) owned by the non-resident customer.
4.11. Purchases and sales of securities on the secondary market are reflected in columns 13 and 15 at the current market value, or the value corresponding to the price indicated by the buyer or seller customer.
4.12. The securities positions at the beginning of the reporting period in columns 6 and 7 are reflected equal to their positions at the end of the previous period. The securities position at the end of the reporting period in column 22 are reflected determined on the basis of the market price announced on the organised securities market at the end of the reporting period.
4.13. In the case of securities for which transactions are executed on the unorganised market, the following prices shall be applied in order of preference to assess the position of securities at the end of the reporting period:
(a) the price of the security on the last transaction;
(b) price of the security at purchase value, excluding acquisition related costs (brokerage fees, bank fees);
(c) the nominal value of the security.
4.14. Financial transactions and other items denominated in other foreign currencies are translated into US dollars at cross rates determined as follows:
1) the value at the beginning of the period is translated at the cross rate at the end of the preceding period;
2) the value at the end of the period - at the cross rate at the end of the reporting period;
3) financial and other operations, investment income and commissions - at cross-exchange rate as of the date of operation or at the average weighted cross-exchange rate for the reporting period.
5. THE PROCEDURE FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION ON CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS OF CAPITAL MOVEMENTS BY THE AIFC PARTICIPANTS
5.1. …
5.2. …
5.3. …
Annex 1 to Schedule 5
Report on executed currency transactions
(structure of payment information in the bank's report)
Name of AIFC Bank/ STB of RK |
| |||
Address |
| |||
BIN |
| |||
Name of Implementing Officer of the AIFC Bank/ STB of RK |
| |||
Period | Number of month |
| Year |
|
Phone |
| |||
| ||||
Type of activity |
|
Name of AIFC Bank / STB of RK
(identification code) ___________________________
1. Details of the currency contract | 2. Sender of money under payment document | ||||||
1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 |
Number of currency contract | Date of currency contract | Account number of currency contract | Name or surname, first name, patronymic (if any) | BIN/ IIN | Country code | Residency indicator | Economic sector code |
… | |||||||
… | |||||||
.. |
3. Beneficiary of payment document | ||||
3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Name or surname, first name, patronymic (if any) | BIN/ IIN | Country code | Residency indicator | Economic sector code |
… | ||||
… | ||||
.. |
4. Information about currency transaction | ||||||||
4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.9 |
Date | Currency transaction reference | Currency transaction code | Payment purpose code (PPC) | Amount in thousands of currency units | Payment currency code | Payment indicator | Indicator of an intra-corporate money transfer | Indicator of transaction related to the withdrawal of money |
… | ||||||||
… | ||||||||
… |
5. Information about counterparty's organisation (bank) for a currency transaction | 6. Sender of money under a currency contract | ||||||
5.1 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.5 |
Identification code of the organisation (bank) (BIC) | Name | Country code | Name or surname, first name, patronymic (if any) | BIN/ IIN | Country code | Residency indicator | Economic sector code |
… | |||||||
… | |||||||
.. |
7. The recipient of money under currency contract | 8. Note | ||||
7.1 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
Name or surname, first name, patronymic (if any) | BIN/ IIN | Country code | Residency indicator | Economic sector code | |
… |
|
|
|
|
|
… |
|
|
|
|
|
… |
|
|
|
|
|
Annex 2 to Schedule 5
Report on the monetary movement on clients' bank accounts in foreign currency
as of__________
Name of AIFC Bank/ STB of RK |
| |||
Address |
| |||
BIN |
| |||
Name of Implementing Officer of the AIFC Bank/ STB of RK |
| |||
Period | Number of month |
| Year |
|
Phone |
| |||
| ||||
Type of activity |
|
Name of the AIFC Bank / STB of RK_____________
1.Aggregated information on the balance of funds on customers' bank accounts in foreign currency at the reporting date (in thousands of currency units).
Indicator name \ Bank account currency | Amount in USD in equivalent | Including by type of currency: | |||
USD | EUR | CNY | … | ||
Balance at the beginning of the period, total | |||||
including: | |||||
Residents - individuals | |||||
Non-residents - individuals | |||||
Residents - legal entities | |||||
Non-residents - legal entities | |||||
Receipt to clients' bank accounts in foreign currency, total | |||||
including from: | |||||
Residents - individuals | |||||
Non-residents - individuals | |||||
Residents - legal entities | |||||
including transactions: | |||||
Sale of goods and intangible assets | |||||
Provision of services | |||||
Receipt of the principal amount of debt and income on loans issued | |||||
Raising loan funds from resident banks | |||||
Transactions with securities, promissory notes and contributions ensuring participation in the capital | |||||
Other money transfers | |||||
Non-residents - legal entities | |||||
including transactions: | |||||
Sale of goods and intangible assets | |||||
Provision of services | |||||
Receipt of the principal amount of debt and income on loans issued | |||||
Raising loan funds | |||||
Transactions with securities, promissory notes and contributions ensuring participation in the capital | |||||
Other money transfers | |||||
Transfers of money from their bank accounts by residents – individuals. total | |||||
including opened in: | |||||
Resident banks | |||||
Non-resident banks | |||||
Transfers of money from non–resident individuals from their bank accounts, total | |||||
including opened in: | |||||
Resident banks | |||||
Non-resident banks | |||||
Transfers of money from their bank accounts by residents – legal entities, total | |||||
including opened in: | |||||
Resident banks | |||||
Non-resident banks | |||||
Transfers of money from non–resident legal entities from their bank accounts, total | |||||
including opened in: | |||||
Resident banks | |||||
Non-resident banks | |||||
Purchase of foreign currency, total | |||||
including: | |||||
Residents - individuals | |||||
Non-residents - individuals | |||||
Residents - legal entities | |||||
Non-residents - legal entities | |||||
Crediting foreign currency in cash to their bank accounts, total | |||||
including: | |||||
Residents - individuals | |||||
Non-residents - individuals | |||||
Residents - legal entities | |||||
Non-residents - legal entities | |||||
Withdrawal of money from clients' bank accounts in foreign currency, total | |||||
including in favor of: | |||||
Residents - individuals | |||||
Non-residents - individuals | |||||
Residents - legal entities | |||||
including transactions: | |||||
Purchase of goods and intangible assets | |||||
Receiving services | |||||
Grant of a loan | |||||
Fulfillment of obligations on loans attracted from resident banks | |||||
Transactions with securities, promissory notes and contributions ensuring participation in the capital | |||||
Other money transfers | |||||
Non-residents - legal entities | |||||
including transactions: | |||||
Purchase of goods and intangible assets | |||||
Receiving services | |||||
Grant of a loan | |||||
Fulfillment of obligations on loans attracted | |||||
Transactions with securities, promissory notes and contributions ensuring participation in the capital | |||||
Other money transfers | |||||
Transfers of money from residents - individuals to their bank accounts, total | |||||
of them opened in: | |||||
Resident banks | |||||
Non-resident banks | |||||
Transfers of money from non–resident individuals to their bank accounts, total | |||||
of them opened in: | |||||
Resident banks | |||||
Non-resident banks | |||||
Transfers of money from residents - legal entities to their bank accounts, total | |||||
of them opened in: | |||||
Resident banks | |||||
Non-resident banks | |||||
Transfers of money from non–resident legal entities to their bank accounts, total | |||||
of them opened in: | |||||
Resident banks | |||||
Non-resident banks | |||||
Sale of foreign currency, total | |||||
including: | |||||
Residents - individuals | |||||
Non-residents - individuals | |||||
Residents - legal entities | |||||
Non-residents - legal entities | |||||
Withdrawal of foreign currency cash from their bank accounts, total | |||||
including: | |||||
Residents - individuals | |||||
Non-residents - individuals | |||||
Residents - legal entities | |||||
Non-residents - legal entities | |||||
Balance at the end of the period, total | |||||
including: | |||||
Residents - individuals | |||||
Non-residents - individuals | |||||
Residents - legal entities | |||||
Non-residents - legal entities |
2.List of resident individuals and resident legal entities that opened bank accounts in foreign currency
Subparagraph No | IIN / BIN | Resident status in the AIFC | Account type | Account currency | Account opening date |
Annex 3 to Schedule 5
Report on transactions of resident clients with securities of foreign issuers, with securities issued by residents in accordance with the legislation of other states and on their territory, and on transactions of non-resident clients with securities issued by residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan
for ___ quarter of 20__
AIFC participant BIN/Name
Name of AIFC participant |
| |||
Address |
| |||
BIN |
| |||
Name of Implementing Officer of the AIFC particiopant |
| |||
Period | Number of month |
| Year |
|
Phone |
| |||
| ||||
Type of activity |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N | Operation Code | ISIN | Account holder type code | At the beginning of the reporting period | |||
Quantity, pcs | Securities value | ||||||
Country code | Economy sector code | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Financial operations | |||||||
primary market purchase | redemption/redemption by the issuer | secondary market purchase | secondary market sale | ||||
Quantity, pcs | Securities value | Quantity, pcs | Securities value | Quantity, pcs | Securities value | Quantity, pcs | Securities value |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
Other operations | Cost changes | At the end of the reporting period | |||||
on the crediting of securities | on writing off securities | Quantity, pcs | Securities value |
| |||
Quantity, pcs | Securities value | Quantity, pcs | Securities value |
| |||
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
|
Investment income | Commissions received | Name of asset/financial instrument | Name of issuer | Currency of issue | |
Accrued during the reporting period | Received during the reporting period | ||||
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
Transaction code - 1111. Securities issued by residents in the Republic of Kazakhstan and owned by a non-resident customer of an AIFC participant;
Transaction code - 2200. Securities issued by non-residents and owned by an AIFC participant and a client-resident of an AIFC participant;
Transaction code - 2120. Securities issued by residents abroad and owned by the AIFC participant and the client-resident of the AIFC participant;
Transaction code - 2121. Securities issued by residents abroad and held by a client which is a non-resident of an AIFC participant.
Annex 4 to Schedule 5
Information on contracts on the basis of and pursuant to which currency transactions of capital movements are carried out
The information is provided under currency contracts, on the basis of and pursuant to which currency transactions of capital movements are carried out, for an amount equal to or exceeding the equivalent of USD 500,000. The equivalent in USD is calculated at the market exchange rate (cross-rate) on the effective date of the contract.
The information is provided according to the following structure:
Name of the AIFC participant ________________________ BIN____________
Name of AIFC participant |
| |||
Address |
| |||
BIN |
| |||
Name of Implementing Officer of the AIFC particiopant |
| |||
Period | Number of month |
| Year |
|
Phone |
| |||
| ||||
Type of activity |
|
1. Information on financial loans attracted by AIFC participant from a non-resident (issued by AIFC participants to a non-resident)
Subparagraph No | Indicator name | Information about the financial loan 1 | Information about the financial loan 2 |
А | B | 1 | 2 |
1 | Contract identification data (name, number, date) | ||
2 | Aim and purpose of financing under the contract (if specified in the contract) | ||
3 | Effective date of the contract | ||
4 | Resident status under the contract (lender/borrower/agent) | ||
5 | Non-resident(s)-participant(s) of the contract (name) | ||
5.1 | Non-resident status under the contract (lender/borrower/agent) | ||
5.2 | Relation to the resident party to the contract (affiliation) | ||
5.3 |
Name/country code of the non-resident's registration country; | ||
6 | Currency of a contract | ||
7 | Contract amount (in thousands of units of the contract currency) | ||
8 |
Date of repayment of the loan under the contract. | ||
9 | The interest rate (in the case of a fixed interest rate, % per annum is indicated, in the case of a floating interest rate, the basis of its calculation and the margin size are indicated) | ||
10 | Debt repayment schedule (thousands of units of the contract currency) | ||
11 | Note |
2.Information about participation of a non-resident in the capital of AIFC participant (AIFC participant in the capital of a non-resident), as well as on transactions involving the acquisition from a non-resident (sale to a non-resident) by an AIFC participant of shares, participatory interests in the capital of a third party"
Subparagraph No | Indicator name | Information about capital participation 1 | Information about capital participation 2 |
А | B | 1 | 2 |
1 | Contract identification data (name, number, date) | ||
2 | Type of participation in the capital (acquisition of equity, units, shares, participatory inputs, etc.) | ||
3 | Share of participation based on the results of the transaction, as a percentage | ||
4 | Effective date of the contract | ||
5 | Resident status under the contract (investor/investment object/buyer/seller) | ||
6 | Investor (name or full name) | ||
6.1 | Residency indicator | ||
6.2 | BIN for residents | ||
6.3 | Country of legal registration for non-residents | ||
7 | Investment object (name) | ||
7.1 | Residency indicator | ||
7.2 | BIN for residents | ||
7.3 | Country of legal registration for non-residents | ||
8 | Seller (name or full name) | ||
8.1 | Residency indicator | ||
8.2 | BIN for residents | ||
8.3 | Country of legal registration for non-residents | ||
9 | Buyer (name or full name) | ||
9.1 | Residency indicator | ||
9.2 | BIN for residents | ||
9.3 | Country of legal registration for non-residents | ||
10 | Currency of a contract | ||
11 | Contract amount (in thousands of units of the contract currency) | ||
12 | Note |
3. Information on other capital transactions of an AIFC participant
N | Indicator name | Contract information 1 | Contract information 2 |
А | B | 1 | 2 |
1 | Type of transaction (ownership of real estate, exclusive right to intellectual property, joint venture, gratuitous transfer of money and other currency values) |
|
|
2 | Identification of the contract (name, number, date) |
|
|
3 | Non-resident(s)-contracting parties (name or surname) |
|
|
4 | Non-resident's country of registration (code) |
|
|
5 | Currency of the contract |
|
|
6 | Contract amount (in thousands of units of the contract currency) |
|
|
7 | Brief description of the operation |
|
|
8 | Note |
|
|
Explanation of completion:
1. non-resident to resident ratio is selected from the list:
1) _direct ownership by non-resident of 10 (ten) per cent or more of voting shares, votes of resident participants;
2) _indirect ownership by non-resident of 10 (ten) percent or more of voting shares, votes of resident participants;
3) _direct ownership by a resident of 10 (ten) per cent or more of voting shares, votes of non-resident participants;
4) _indirect ownership by a resident of 10 (ten) per cent or more of voting shares, votes of non-resident participants;
5) _ resident and non-resident do not have any control or influence over each other but are controlled or influenced by the same investor owning directly or indirectly at least 10 (ten) per cent of voting shares, votes of participants of a resident;
6) _cases not specified in subparagraphs 1), 2), 3), 4) and 5) of this paragraph.
1.Debt repayment schedule (in thousand units of the loan currency):
Quarter, year | Repayment of principal | Payment of remuneration |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Annex 5 to Schedule 5
List of AIFC participants which opened deposit accounts in STB
Name of STB of RK |
| |||
Address |
| |||
BIN |
| |||
Name of Implementing Officer of the STB of RK |
| |||
Period | Number of month |
| Year |
|
Phone |
| |||
| ||||
Type of activity |
|
№ | IIN/ BIN | Status of the AIFC participant | Account type | Currency of an account | Date of opening an account |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] For international organisations, specify "International Organisation"
[2] accrual of the declared remuneration for the days of ownership by the participant or his client of the security in the reporting period; depreciation of the premium or discount for the days of ownership by the participant or his client of the security in the reporting period
[3] dividends received by the respondent or his client in the reporting period; remuneration received by the respondent or his client in the reporting period when the issuer repays accrued interest on debt securities
[4] data on commission income for brokerage services, advisory, information, registration and other services paid by a non-resident client to a participant
Consultation Paper on Proposed Enhancing the Financial Services Tax Exemption Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
INTRODUCTION
Why are we issuing this Consultation Paper (CP)?
The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has released a Consultation Paper to gather input from the market regarding the proposed Guidance on the application of the Rules on substantial presence for AIFC participants seeking tax exemptions on corporate income tax and value-added tax (VAT) (Guidance on Substance Rules). The purpose of this consultation is to seek suggestions and feedback from stakeholders on the Guidance on the Substance Rules.
The Consultation Paper has been approved by the Legislative Committee of the Board of AFSA, indicating the official endorsement and authorization of the consultation process. The AFSA is seeking valuable insights and recommendations from the market to shape the final version of the Guidance.
By initiating this consultation, AFSA aims to ensure transparency, inclusiveness, and the participation of relevant stakeholders in the development of the Guidance. This collaborative approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of the market's perspectives and concerns, ultimately leading to the creation of a well-informed and effective set of rules.
Interested parties are encouraged to review the Consultation Paper and provide their suggestions and feedback based on their expertise and experience. This input will contribute to the refinement and enhancement of the proposed Guidance on the Substance Rules for AIFC participants.
Who should read this CP?
The proposals outlined in this paper will be of significant interest to various stakeholders, including international tax authorities or organizations, relevant government bodies, tax and law firms, and AIFC participants.
What are the next steps?
Interested stakeholders are encouraged to provide their comments on the proposed Guidance on the Substance Rules. It is preferable for comments to be submitted in writing and sent to the specified address or email. When submitting comments via email, please use the subject line "Consultation Paper AFSA-G-CE-2023-0002”to ensure proper identification. If applicable, stakeholders may also indicate the organization they represent when providing their comments.
Please note that unless expressly requested otherwise, the AFSA reserves the right to publish the comments received, including on its website. Stakeholders are encouraged to provide comments supported by reasoning and evidence, as such submissions will carry more weight in the assessment process conducted by the AFSA.
The deadline for providing comments on the proposed framework is 3 July 2023.
Once we receive your comments, we shall consider if any refinements are required to this proposal. Comments to be addressed by post:
Government Relations Division (Attention: M Ishaq Burney, MD and CLO)
Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA)
55/17 Mangilik El, building C3.2, Kazakhstan
or emailed to: consultation@afsa.kz
Tel: +7 7172 613741
Background
- I.The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) is a collaborative effort among more than 139 countries and jurisdictions. Its goal is to implement the BEPS Package, which consists of 15 Actions designed to address tax avoidance, enhance international tax rules, and promote transparency in taxation.
- II.Kazakhstan joined the Inclusive Framework on BEPS in January 2017, committing to comply with four minimum standards outlined in OECD Action 5 (Harmful tax practices), Action 6 (Treaty abuse), Action 13 (Transfer pricing documentation), and Action 14 (Dispute resolution).
- III.Action 5 specifically focuses on harmful tax practices and requires member countries to undergo peer reviews to identify features of preferential tax regimes that could facilitate base erosion and profit shifting, potentially undermining the tax base of other jurisdictions.
- IV.The AIFC tax regime underwent a review by the OECD's Forum on Harmful Tax Practices (FHTP) between 2018 and 2020. The FHTP Peer Review identified risks of tax base erosion and profit shifting associated with the AIFC and the Republic of Kazakhstan's tax regimes.
- V.As a result of such review, the FHTP Secretariat requested the implementation of "substantial presence" requirements by the AIFC to align with the standards set out in Action 5 of the BEPS initiative, which addresses harmful tax practices.
- VI.In November 2021, the Joint Order between the AFSA and the Ministry of Finance of Kazakhstan endorsed the Rules on the substantial presence of the AIFC participants applying tax exemptions for the payment of corporate income tax, and value-added tax (Substance Rules).
- VII.The Substance Rules establish the requirements for determining the substantial presence, but they do not provide detailed guidance on how to meet requirements. As a result, further clarification is needed in this regard the AFSA commenced the development of the Guidance on the Rules on the substantial presence of the AIFC participants applying tax exemptions for the payment of corporate income tax, value added tax (Guidance on the Substance Rules), aiming to establish a clear procedure for applying the Rules and provide comprehensive explanations to AIFC participants.
Proposal
The Substance Rules apply to the AIFC participants’ income derived from the tax exempt services.
If all the following conditions specified in paragraph 6 of the Substance Rules are met, the Participant may apply for exemptions from CIT and VAT:
- a.The Core Income Generating Activities (hereinafter, CIGA) of the AIFC Participant are provided on the territory of the AIFC and consist of the services established by paragraphs 3 and/or 4 of Article 6 of the Constitutional Statute of the Republic of Kazakhstan On the AIFC (Constitutional Law) and paragraph 5 of Chapter 3 of the List of Financial Services provided by participants of the AIFC (List of Financial Services).
- b.The amount of operating expenses incurred by the AIFC Participant must correspond to the adequate amount required for performing of the CIGA.
- c.The number of qualified full-time employees of the AIFC Participant must correspond to the adequate number required for delivery of the CIGA.
·CIGA
According to the Substance Rules, the Core Income Generating Activities (CIGA) that generate income and business value for AIFC Participants are specified in Article 6 of the and Chapter 3 of the List of Financial Services. It should be noted that the specific set of CIGA may vary for each AIFC Participant based on their license type, business model, and other conditions.
It is proposed to recognize a participant as conducting activities within the AIFC territory if two conditions met simultaneously: the substantial presence of Officers of the AIFC Participant within the AIFC’s premises performing official duties, and the substantial presence of the Board of Directors or the main executive body of the AIFC Participant within the AIFC when making major strategic and commercial decisions. Here:
− the term "substantial presence" refers to the physical presence of relevant persons within an office or premises on the AIFC territory, as defined by the terms and conditions of a labor or civil agreement and the boundaries of the AIFC set by the relevant decree.
− The definition of "Officers" includes Directors, Secretaries, Senior Managers, and in the case of liquidation or bankruptcy proceedings, may also include Interim and Bankruptcy Trustees, as well as the Liquidator of the company.
− Major strategic and commercial decisions encompass decisions made by the Board of Directors or the main executive body of the AIFC Participant that affect the conduct of CIGA, obligations and rights under licensed service agreements, and the fulfilment of agreements where the AIFC Participant acts as a contractor/subcontractor for licensed services. For AIFC Participants registered as a Recognized Company (branch) in the AIFC, major strategic and commercial decisions are limited to activities directly related to the branch's operations.
·Fulfillment of the condition on adequate operating expenses
It is proposed that operating expenses incurred by the AIFC Participant should be recorded in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and classified as operating expenses based on the accounting policy. For meeting requirements, the expenses should be directly connected to the CIGA performed by the AIFC Participant, generating income from the licensed services.
For verification of the adequacy of operating expenses it is proposed to formalize evidence of the following:
1. Execution of CIGA required to provide the licensed service during the relevant period.
2. Sources of operating expenses recorded in the accounting records, including salaries of employees involved in performing the necessary CIGA and expenses related to assets and liabilities used for carrying out the CIGA and providing the licensed services.
·Fulfillment of the condition on an adequate number of qualified employees
It is proposed to link the condition on the adequate number of qualified employees with the existing requirements set by the AFSA regarding the number of employees, their professional qualifications, work experience, certifications, and other criteria during the authorization procedure.
The proposed approach is the principles-based, aligning with the general legal framework of the AIFC. This makes it straightforward to adopt and implement.
QUESTIONS
The proposed questions for public consultation are as follows:
1. Does the Guidance on the Substance Rules provide you with a clear understanding of how to meet the substantial presence test? If not, please specify what aspects are unclear to you. What additions or amendments do you think should be made to the Guidance on the Substance Rules in order to be clearer?
3. Do you find the substance requirements burdensome? If yes, please explain in what ways and suggest how they could be eased.
4. Do you believe that your business will meet the substance requirements?
These questions aim to gather feedback and insights from the public regarding their understanding of the substantial presence test, suggestions for improving the clarity of the requirements, opinions on the burden of compliance, and the readiness of businesses to meet the substance requirements by the specified year.
Annex 1
Guidance for Applying the Rules on the Substantial Presence of the Astana International Financial Centre Participants Applying Tax Exemptions for the Payment of Corporate Income Tax, Value Added Tax
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. GENERAL PROVISIONS
3. CONDITIONS OF THE SUBSTANTIAL PRESENCE
4. PROCEDURE FOR APPLYING THE GUIDANCE
1. INTRODUCTION
1) This Guidance for Applying the Rules on the Substantial Presence of the Astana International Financial Centre Participants Applying Tax Exemptions for the Payment of Corporate Income Tax, Value Added Tax (hereinafter, the Guidance) is developed in accordance with Chapter 4 (Procedure for Applying the Rules) of the Rules on the Substantial Presence of the Astana International Financial Centre Participants Applying Tax Exemptions for the Payment of Corporate Income Tax, Value Added Tax, dated 17 October 2021 (hereinafter, the Rules).
2) The purpose of the Guidance is to provide a procedure for applying the Rules and to explain them to the Centre Participants. The provisions outlined in the Guidance must be followed by the Centre Participants in order to fulfil the conditions of substantial presence as defined by the Rules when carrying out activities on the territory of the Centre.
3) During tax audits, state revenue authorities may refer to the Guidance to determine whether the conditions of substantial presence outlined in the Rules have been met.
2. GENERAL PROVISIONS
1) Paragraph 6 of the Rules establishes the conditions that must be simultaneously fulfilled for a Centre Participant to be recognized as substantially present within the Centre's territory (referred to as "the Conditions").
If all the Conditions specified in paragraph 6 are met, the Participant may apply for exemptions from Corporate Income Tax (CIT) and Value Added Tax (VAT) when providing specified financial services, as outlined in paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Constitutional Statute of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On the Astana International Financial Centre" (referred to as “ the Constitutional Law”) and paragraph 5 of Chapter 3 of the List of Financial Services provided by participants of the Astana International Financial Centre[1] (referred to as "the List of Financial Services").
2) The time period for a Centre Participant to be recognized as substantially present is a calendar year. The Participant will be considered substantially present only within the tax period in which they fulfill the conditions.
3) Centre Participants are required to follow the Guidance to independently determine whether the conditions stipulated by the Rules have been met when conducting activities within the Centre's territory.
4) Tax audits by state revenue authorities is conducted in accordance with the tax legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
5) An economic study of the project, including expense justifications and employee numbers, must be submitted to the state revenue authority at the place of registration by March 31 of the year following the reporting period. This submission should follow the provided form in Annex 1 and consider the deadlines for extending tax return submissions.
6) Centre Participants should make their best efforts to submit the economic study according to the procedure and deadlines outlined in paragraph 5.
7) Failure to submit the economic study as per the procedure and deadlines mentioned in paragraph 5 may result in administrative liability in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
8) Outsourcing or subcontracting services and works directly related to the Core Income Generating Activities (CIGA) is not allowed outside of the RoK.
3. CONDITIONS OF THE SUBSTANTIAL PRESENCE
1) CIGA
Regarding sub-paragraph 1 of paragraph 6 of the Rules, the CIGA consist of services and inherent activities outlined in paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Constitutional Statute and/or paragraph 5 of Chapter 3 of the List of Financial Services.
CIGA are essential and valuable activities that generate income and business value for Centre Participants, as explained in paragraph 10 of the Rules. Depending on the license type, business model, and other conditions, each Centre Participant may engage in a unique set of CIGA. The Participant may perform the full list of CIGA specified in their license.
A Centre Participant will be recognized as conducting activities within the Centre's territory if the following two conditions are met simultaneously:
- a. Employees of the Centre Participant are physically present within the Centre and perform their official duties on its premises.
- b. The Board of Directors or the main executive body of the Centre Participant is physically present within the Centre when making major strategic and commercial decisions.
"Substantial presence" refers to the physical presence of the relevant person for a specific period of time as defined by the terms and conditions of a labour agreement or a civil agreement, within an office or premises located on the territory of the Centre that the person has a right to use through ownership, lease, or other legal basis. The boundaries of the Centre’s territory as defined by the relevant decree.
Major strategic and commercial decisions include any decisions made by the Board of Directors or the main executive body of the Centre Participant that impact:
- a. Conducting CIGA/providing licensed services;
- b. Obligations and rights under licensed service agreements;
- c. Fulfillment of agreements where the Centre Participant acts as a contractor/subcontractor for licensed services.
For Centre Participants registered as a Recognized Company (branch) in the Centre, major strategic and commercial decisions only pertain to activities directly related to the branch's operations.
2) Fulfillment of the condition on adequate operating expenses
Regarding sub-paragraph 2 of paragraph 6 of the Rules, the amount of operating expenses incurred refers to expenses recorded in the Centre Participant's accounting records in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. These expenses should be classified as operating expenses according to the accounting policy for the profit and loss statement.
The adequacy of operating expenses means that there is a direct connection between the expenses incurred and the CIGA performed by the Centre Participant to generate income from the services or work provided as specified in paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Constitutional Statute and/or paragraph 5 of Chapter 3 of the List of Financial Services.
Therefore, the link between operating expenses and CIGA indicates that these expenses were incurred to carry out the CIGA and ultimately generate income from the licensed activities.
To independently verify the fulfillment of the condition of adequate operating expenses, the Centre Participant should have documented evidence of the following:
I. The execution of CIGA required to provide the licensed service during the period.
II. The sources of operating expenses recognized in the accounting records, including but not limited to:
a. Salaries of employees and individuals directly involved in performing the CIGA necessary for providing the licensed services.
b. Expenses related to assets and liabilities of the Centre Participant directly used to carry out the CIGA and necessary for the provision of the licensed services.
3) Fulfillment of the condition on an adequate number of qualified employees
Regarding sub-paragraph 3 of paragraph 6 of the Rules, it implies that the Astana Financial Services Authority's (referred to as “the AFSA”) requirements regarding the number of employees, their professional qualifications, work experience, certifications, and other criteria established during the authorization procedure and license acquisition must be met during the period.
4. PROCEDURE FOR APPLYING THE GUIDANCE
For matters not addressed in the Guidance, the Centre Bodies, in accordance with the Constitutional Law, have the authority to:
1) Amend and supplement the Guidance in consultation with the state authority responsible for tax collection and other mandatory payments to the budget, as long as it is not contradictory to the Constitutional Statute cons.
2) Provide explanations and comments on the application of the Guidance within their jurisdiction.
Annex 1
to the Guidance for Applying the Rules on the Substantial Presence
of Participants of the Astana International Financial Centre Applying
Tax Exemptions for the Payment of Corporate Income Tax, Value Added Tax
Form of economic study of the project,
justification of expenses and number of employees
Section А. General information about the taxpayer
1. BIN: ___________________
2. Tax period for which the Form is submitted: _____
3. Name of the taxpayer: __________________________________
4. Name of the licence issued by the Astana Financial Services Authority:
_________________________________________________________________
5. Licence number, date of issue: ______________________________________
6. Types of core income generating activities (according to paragraph 5 of Chapter 3 of the List of Financial Services)
Section В. Information about income
Income | Total income (excluding VAT, in KZT) |
Income from licensed activities on the territory of the Centre | |
Other income | |
TOTAL |
|
Section С. Information about expenses
Description of expenses | Total income (excluding VAT, in KZT) |
Total amount of operating expenses | |
including: - expenses associated with the maintenance and upkeep of the office on the territory of the Centre, in which workplaces are located | |
- expenses for qualified personnel (payroll, taxes) | |
- depreciation charges calculated on assets used for the CIGA; | |
- other expenses for goods, works, services used when carrying out the CIGA | |
Other expenses | |
TOTAL |
Section D. Information about qualified personnel
Expenses for employees | Headcount | Total expenses, in KZT |
Payroll and tax expenses for qualified employees | ||
Payroll and tax expenses for other employees | ||
TOTAL |
Head of "_ (insert name of the legal entity_")
Full name
SealSubmission date: ___________________
[1] Joint Order of the AIFC, the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Approval of the List of Financial Services Income from which is Exempt from the Payment of Corporate Income Tax and Value Added Tax, provided by Participants of the Astana International Financial Centre".
Consultation Paper on Proposed Amendments to the AIFC Financial Services Framework Regulations
Introduction
Why are we issuing this Consultation Paper (CP)?
1. The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has issued this Consultation Paper to seek suggestions from the market on the proposed amendments to the AIFC Financial Services Framework Regulations.
Who should read this CP?
2. The proposals in this paper will be of interest to current and potential AIFC Participants dealing with digital assets as well as the market and other stakeholders.
Terminology
3. Defined terms have the initial letter of the word capitalised, or of each word in a phrase. Definitions are set out in the Glossary Rules (GLO). Unless the context otherwise requires, where capitalisation of the initial letter is not used, the expression has its natural meaning.
What are the next steps?
4. We invite comments from interested stakeholders on the proposed amendments. All commentsshould be in writing and sent to the email specified below. If sending your comments by email, please use “Consultation Paper AFSA-L-CE-2023-0003” in the subject line. You may, if relevant, identify the organisation you represent when providing your comments. The AFSA reserves the right to publish, including on its website, any comments you provide, unless you expressly request otherwise. Comments supported by reasoning and evidence will be given more weight by the AFSA.
5. The deadline for providing comments on the proposed framework is 2 July 2023. Once we receive your comments, we shall consider if any refinements are required to this proposal.
6. AFSA prefers to receive comments by email at consultation@afsa.kz or posted to:
Policy and Strategy Division
Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA)
55/17 Mangilik El, building C3.2, Astana, Kazakhstan
Structure of this CP
Part I – Background;
Part II – Issues;
Part III – Best Practice;
Part IV – Proposals;
Part V – Public Consultation Questions;
Part VI – Outcomes.
Annex 1 - Draft amendments to the AIFC Financial Services Framework Regulations;
Annex 2 – Consequential amendments to AIFC rules.
Background
In accordance with the Constitutional Statute of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On the Astana International Financial Centre” (the “Constitutional Statute”), the Astana Financial Services Authority (the “AFSA”) is a legal entity responsible for the regulation of financial services and related activities in the Astana International Financial Centre (the “AIFC”). Pursuant to sub-paragraph 5) of paragraph 3 of Article 12 of the Constitutional Statute, the AFSA also conducts consumer protection, exercises control and supervision over the activities of AIFC Participants and takes appropriate measures in relation to them.
The AIFC Financial Services Framework Regulations provide that in performing its functions and exercising its powers, the AFSA may pursue the following objective: preventing, detecting and restraining actions that may cause damage to the reputation of the AIFC or to the financial activities carried out in the AIFC by taking appropriate measures, including by imposing sanctions.
ASP regime
The AFSA, as a supervisory authority, is responsible for the regulation of Financial Services and Ancillary Services in the AIFC.
Ancillary Services in the AIFC include providing:
1.Legal Services;
2.Audit Services;
3.Accountancy Services;
4.Consulting Services;
5.Credit Rating Services.
A law firm, accounting firm, audit firm, insolvency firm, and company service provider are also considered as Designated Non-Financial Business and Profession (“DNFBP”) in the AIFC.
The AFSA may only grant a Licence permitting a Centre Participant to carry on one or more Ancillary Services if it is satisfied that the Centre Participant is fit and proper. AFSA prescribed by Rules the requirements for the grant of such Licence and the circumstances in which the AFSA may withdraw such a Licence.
In relation to Legal Services Providers, AIFC Legal Services Regulations were adopted in 2022, which provided a statutory ground to establish the AIFC Legal Services Board (“LSB”) as a designated body within the AIFC for registration and regulation of legal advisers. The LSB determines standards of legal services, qualification requirements, code of ethics and some other measures to foster the development of the AIFC legal services market. Amendments were introduced to the AIFC General Rules, AIFC Conduct of Business Rules and the AIFC Glossary on a statutory requirement for registration of at least 1 legal adviser for Legal Services Providers to be eligible to receive and maintain a Licence from the AFSA to Providing Legal Services in the AIFC.
As to the Audit Services providers, AFSA adopted AIFC Auditor Rules with purpose to provide a single reference point for all persons who are permitted by the AFSA and the Registrar of Companies to carry out audit services in the AIFC and to ensure that auditors, and audit services undertaken in the AIFC comply with international best practice in the field of regulation of audit and the provision of audit services.
However, the AIFC legal system does not contain any special provisions for supervisory powers of the AFSA in relation to Ancillary Service Providers (“ASP”). The existing powers of the AFSA do not fully comply with effective Regulator principles due to the current absence of the regulatory framework for the supervision of ASPs. The lack of the regulator’s supervisory powers creates risks and may have a negative impact on the customers.
As of 18 May 2023, 120 ASPs have been licensed to provide legal, consulting, accountancy, audit activities, credit rating services; none of these are deemed to be of systemic importance.
Issues
The FSFR have been drafted based on various sources including similar framework legislation in the United Kingdom, Dubai International Financial Centre (the “DIFC”), Abu Dhabi Global Market, Qatar Financial Centre (the “QFC”), Guernsey, and Australia. The DIFC Regulatory Law was served as the primary legislative model for decision-making procedures. However, the DIFC has the Regulatory Policy and Process Sourcebook (the “RPP”) which specifies that decisions made by the DFSA fall into three categories:
- (a) decisions which are subject to the procedures in Schedule 3 of the Regulatory Law (“Schedule 3 Decisions” is similar to Schedule 1 of the FSFR), e.g., a decision to withdraw the Licence of an Authorised Person;
- (b) decisions which are subject to a bespoke process instead of the procedures in Schedule 3, e.g., the rejection of a new Controller of an Authorised Firm; and
- (c) routine operational decisions, e.g., a DFSA decision to start an investigation against a Person. These decisions are not subject to the procedures in Schedule 3 and are not referable to the Financial Markets Tribunal but may be reviewed by way of judicial review in the DIFC Court.
Section 10 (1) of the FSFR provides that ‘[w]here a provision in these Regulations or Rules made thereunder requires the AFSA to make a decision, the AFSA will follow the decision making procedures set out in Schedule 1’. Since there is no document in the AIFC similar to the DIFC Regulatory Policy and Process Sourcebook, there are some uncertainties in which cases the AFSA should follow procedures specified in Schedule 1.
ASP regime
The absence of the supervisory powers of the AFSA in relation to ASPs has been highlighted in recent assessments conducted of the AIFC jurisdiction.
During the self-assessment against the International Organization of Securities Commissions (“IOSCO”) principles for August 2020 – March 2021, it was identified that out of 37 principles, ASP is covered in five principles from 19 to 23. AFSA is fully compliant with principles 19, 20, 21 and 23.
Principle 22 was marked as not compliant with following deficiencies and proposed solutions. It was noted that AIFC legal framework does not contain provisions that allow AFSA to an adequate level of oversight (ongoing supervision, inspections, enforcement) in relation to ASPs.
The leading financial centres in the Asian region (e.g., Dubai International Financial Centre (“DIFC”), Abu-Dhabi Global Market (“ADGM”), Qatar Financial Centre (“QFC”). Hong-Kong) have implemented supervisory framework for ASPs or DNFBPs.
The AIFC in its further development stage needs to have a supervisory framework to maintain the competitive advantages that its regulatory system offers to investors in or from the region.
Best Practice
The AFSA reviewed financial services frameworks of peer jurisdictions (e.g., the DIFC Regulatory Law and QFC Financial Services Regulations) and made a comparison of their regimes with the one in the AIFC.
In relation to the decision-making procedures, there were several options which we considered:
1) to explicitly specify in Section 10 of the FSFR decisions which should not be subject to Schedule 1 (e.g., the AFSA’s decision to exercise the power to require the production of a report); or
2) to categorise all decisions that the AFSA may make and specify which of them are subject to Schedule 1; or
3) to insert additional subsections to certain sections of the FSFR that will clarify that these sections are subject to Schedule 1.
Having considered all three options, we concluded that options 1 and 2 have some flaws. For example, there is a risk that we may not capture all existing decisions. In addition, since the AFSA has been constantly working on the development and enhancement of the AIFC’s legal and regulatory framework, some new provisions may be developed which will give the AFSA power to make decisions in new cases. This approach may require the AFSA to constantly amend and update Section 10 of the FSFR.
Therefore, the drafters suggest following Option 3 and inserting new subsections that would explicitly state that the AFSA should follow Schedule 1 when makes decisions under these sections (e.g., suspending a Licence of an Authorised Person). In this regard, the drafters made a table of cases (sections) where the AFSA may exercise its powers and indicated sections where the AFSA’s decisions should be subject to Schedule 1. Such approach seems to give more comfort both to the regulator and regulated entities.
ASP regime
The AFSA conducted a thorough analysis of the ASP frameworks of peer jurisdictions (DIFC, ADGM, QFC and Hong-Kong), and used as best example jurisdictions to identify the requisites for the ASP framework. The analysis is briefly summarised below.
DIFC
The legislative framework in the DIFC is based on Law No 5 of 2021 Concerning the DIFC and DIFC Regulatory Law 2004.
Since 2006, the DFSA supervision of an ASP had been primarily focused on its compliance with AML rules. This supervisory approach was reflected in the contents of the ASP Module, the bulk of which was made up of AML rules which largely duplicated those in the AML module.
ASP regime was reviewed in 2012, and relevant amendments to the DIFC Regulatory Law 2004 followed. ASPs were brought into the DNFBP regime and consequently the ASP regime was repealed, with existing ASPs being re-classified as DNFBPs. The purpose was to avoid having a twin track regime depending on whether a person provides services to an Authorised Person.
At that time, DNFBP definition included law firms, notary firms, or other independent legal businesses; accounting, audit or insolvency firms; company service providers among others.
In 2013, following a strategic review by the DIFC Authority (DIFCA), the responsibility for AML/CTF supervision of DNFBPs was transferred to the DFSA by DIFCA. This was on the basis that the DFSA was to be the single authority responsible for AML/CTF supervision in the DIFC for Financial Institutions and DNFBPs. As the single authority responsible for AML/CTF supervision of these entities, the DFSA consolidated its AML rules into one module.
In 2018, DFSA introduced changes to the DNFBP regime so that DNFBPs ceased to be able to conduct any activities in or from the DIFC unless they were registered by the DFSA as a DNFBP.
Currently, DNFBP means:
(1) The following class of Persons whose business or profession is carried on in or from the DIFC:
- (a)a real estate developer or agency which carries out transactions with a customer involving the buying or selling of real property;
- (b)a dealer in precious metals or precious stones;
- (c)a dealer in any saleable item of a price equal to or greater than $15,000;
- (d)a law firm, notary firm, or other independent legal business;
- (e)an accounting firm, audit firm or insolvency firm;
- (f)a company service provider; or
- (g)a Single Family Office.
(2) A Person who is an Authorised Person or an Auditor is not a DNFBP.
The Regulatory Law gives the DFSA a power to supervise DNFBPs’ compliance with relevant AML laws in the State. The Regulatory Law requires a DNFBP to be registered by the DFSA to conduct its activities in the DIFC. The Regulatory Law also gives the DFSA several other important powers in relation to DNFBPs, including powers of enforcement. This includes a power to obtain information and to conduct investigations into possible breaches of the Regulatory Law. The DFSA may impose fines for breaches of the Regulatory Law or the Rules. It may also suspend or withdraw the registration of a DNFBP in various circumstances.
To register as a DNFBP, an applicant needs to satisfy the DFSA that:
(a)it is fit and proper to perform AML functions;
(b)it has adequate resources and systems and controls, including policies and procedures, to comply with the applicable AML requirements under the Federal AML Legislation, the Regulatory Law and the AML Module; and
(c)it satisfies any other requirements prescribed by the DFSA.
The DFSA emphasises that the registration process for DNFBPs would be different to that for Authorised Firms and focus on the issue of the integrity and suitability of the applicant to control a DNFBP, rather than on qualifications and experience. The registration process must include, reviewing the fitness and propriety of relevant persons, and ascertaining the identity of the ultimate beneficial owners.
From the supervision standpoint, DNFBPs are obliged to notify the DFSA promptly of any change in name, legal status, address, MLRO, or beneficial owners; and submit an Annual Information Return.
ADGM
The Registration Authority (“RA”) is responsible for the regulation of all ADGM licensed persons (Controlled Activities) as well as Registered Auditors, Registered Audit Principals and insolvency practitioners in accordance with ADGM’s commercial legislation.
In the ADGM ASPs are regulated by the Commercial Licensing Regulations 2022, Commercial Licensing Regulations (Controlled Activities) Rules 2022, Financial Services and Markets Regulations 2015 and Anti-Money Laundering and Sanctions Rules and Guidance (AML).
Controlled activities include [Commercial Licensing Regulations (Controlled Activities) Rules 2022]:
1. financial services;
2. legal services;
3. accountancy services;
4. audit services;
5. insolvency practitioner services;
6. company services;
7. other economic activities.
For legal services, accountancy services, insolvency practitioners services, healthcare, providing company services it is mandatory to be licensed or authorised by an approved legal regulatory body to carry on activities of the kind which the applicant intends to carry on in the ADGM.
DNFBP [Anti-Money Laundering and Sanctions Rules and Guidance (AML)]:
- (a) a real estate agency, which carries out transactions with other persons that involve the acquiring or disposing of Real Property;
- (b) a dealer in precious metals or precious stones;
- (c) a dealer in any saleable item of a price equal to or greater than USD15,000;
- (d) an accounting firm, audit firm, insolvency firm or taxation consulting firm;
- (e) a law firm, notary firm or other independent legal business; or
- (f) a company service provider that carries out any of the following services to a customer:
- (i) acting as a formation agent of a Legal Person;
- (ii) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a director or secretary of a company, a partner of a partnership or a similar position in relation to other Legal Persons or any other legal arrangement;
- (iii) providing a registered office, business address or accommodation, correspondence or administrative address for a Legal Person or any other legal arrangement;
- (iv) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a trustee of an express trust or performing the equivalent function for another form of legal arrangement; or
- (v) acting as (or arranging for another Person to act as) a nominee shareholder for another person.
For legal services, accountancy services, insolvency practitioners’ services, healthcare, providing company services it is mandatory to be licensed or authorised by an approved legal regulatory body to carry on activities of the kind which the applicant intends to carry on in the ADGM.
Pursuant to Article 11(6) of Abu Dhabi Law No. 4 of 2013, the RA, in addition to registering and licensing legal entities, is the commercial regulator of the ADGM, responsible for monitoring and, where necessary, enforcing compliance with ADGM’s commercial legislation.
The scope of the RA’s monitoring and enforcement function is broad as the RA is responsible for monitoring all ADGM licensed persons (financial, non-financial and retail businesses), auditors and insolvency practitioners, concerning a range of different commercial regulatory regimes, as applicable. The RA is also responsible for administering and monitoring the UAE’s economic substance requirements in respect of ADGM licensed persons.
In turn, the Financial Services and Markets Regulations (“FSMR”) establish the legislative and regulatory framework for financial services in ADGM. FSMR gives the Regulator a power to supervise DNFBPs’ compliance with relevant Anti-Money Laundering laws in the State. FSMR also gives the Regulator a number of other powers in relation to DNFBPs, including powers of enforcement. This includes a power to obtain information and to conduct investigations into possible breaches of the FSMR. The Regulator may also impose fines for breaches of FSMR or the Rules. It may also suspend or withdraw the registration of a DNFBP in various circumstances.
Under an agreement with the FSRA, the RA is also responsible for monitoring compliance with anti-money laundering requirements by ADGM licensed DNFBPs.
For note:
An accounting firm, audit firm, insolvency firm or taxation consulting firm; a law firm, notary firm or other independent legal business; and a company service provider are among others treated as NFDBPs.
QFC
The QFC Law provides that no activities may be conducted in or from the QFC unless they fall within the general categories of Permitted Activities.
The Permitted Activities are divided in two types: Regulated Activities and non-Regulated Activities, as determined by QFC Law No. 7 of Year 2005. Not Regulated Activities include, among others, the business of providing professional services including audit, accounting, tax, consulting and legal services and the business of provision, formation, operation and administration of companies.
The QFC Authority Rules among other things deal with the licensing of firms to conduct non-Regulated activities and contain rules relating to the conduct of business, licensed firm assets and compliance and enforcement. The QFC Authority currently licenses firms to provide non-Regulated services in or from the QFC.
When licensing applicants for non-Regulated Activities, a list of the professional bodies to which the Applicant is associated and/or regulated by is considered. Conduct of Business, Compliance and Enforcement procedures are determined by QFC Authority Rules and administered by the QFC Authority.
It is worth to mention, that in 2017 Legal Services Code, applied to all Legal Services Firms and all QFC Lawyers, and QFC Professional Accountants’ Code, applied to all Accountancy Firms and QFC Accountants, were adopted by the QFC Authority as parts of the QFC Authority Rules.
Hong Kong
Legal Services
The legal profession in Hong Kong is self-regulated by the Bar Association and the Law Society. The Bar Association is a professional organisation of barristers in Hong Kong. It is governed by an executive committee known as the Bar Council. The Law Society is a professional association for solicitors (including trainee solicitors and foreign lawyers). It is mandatory for barristers and solicitors to be members of the Bar Association and Law Society respectively.
The Barristers Disciplinary Tribunal is an independent body, and it deals with cases referred by the Bar Council where a barrister acts in breach of the Bar Code. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal is an independent body, and it deals with disciplinary cases brought by the Law Society against solicitors, registered foreign lawyers, trainee solicitors or an employee of a solicitor or a registered foreign lawyer in Hong Kong for alleged professional misconduct.
The provisions under the Drug Trafficking (Recovery of Proceeds) Ordinance/Organised and Serious Crimes Ordinance/ United Nations (Anti-Terrorism Measures) Ordinance in respect of, among other things, dealing with criminal proceeds, funding terrorist activities and suspicious transaction reporting, apply to every person in Hong Kong including the legal profession.
In addition, the Law Society has issued Practice Direction P "Guidelines on Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing". Any law firm or solicitor who fails to follow the mandatory elements of Practice Direction P can be subject to disciplinary proceedings. The mandatory requirements include rules on client identification and verification, client due diligence, record keeping and staff training. Since 1 March 2018, the customer due diligence and record-keeping requirements of the AMLO apply to legal professionals. The AMLO enables the Law Society, as the sole authority for enforcing AMLO requirements for legal professionals, to have the discretion to promulgate guidelines and determine the content of Practice Direction P. Practice Direction P has been revised with effect from 1 September 2018 in light of the amendments to the AMLO.
Audit services
The Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“HKICPA”) as the professional body for certified public accountants in Hong Kong sets the standards for auditing and assurance and regulates the profession. HKICPA develops and issues Hong Kong Standards on Auditing (“HKSA”), which are converged with the Clarified International Standards on Auditing that are to be applied in audits of financial statements. All companies registered in Hong Kong are required to have their financial statements audited, and audits of financial statements have to be carried out in accordance with HKSA.
To be eligible to conduct an audit in Hong Kong, the auditor must be:
1.A member of the HKICPA;
2.Registered with the HKICPA;
3.Authorized by the HKICPA to conduct the evaluation process.
The roles and responsibilities of auditors vary depending on the type of audit being conducted. However, all auditors must:
1.Conduct the process following HKICPA standards;
2.Cooperate with the company during the audit process;
3.Report any irregularities or non-compliance to the HKICPA.
Accountancy services
The accountancy profession in Hong Kong is self-regulated under the Professional Accountants Ordinance (“PA Ordinance”) by the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (HKICPA).
Under the PA Ordinance, professional accountants in Hong Kong are designated as Certified Public Accountants (“CPA”) and Certified Public Accountants Practicing (CPA (Practicing)) for auditors. These designations are conferred by HKICPA. Membership and a practicing certificate issued by HKICPA is mandatory for auditors. The PA Ordinance also establishes the functions of the HKICPA, including maintaining a registry of all professional accountants and firms, regulating the practice of accountancy professionals by establishing quality assurance reviews and an investigation and discipline systems for members and member firms, setting ethical requirements for members, setting auditing and accounting standards to be applied in Hong Kong, and setting initial professional development and continuing professional development (“CPD”) requirements.
To qualify to become a professional accountant with the HKICPA, individuals have to complete the Qualification Program (“QP”) offered by HKICPA, which is made up of four technical modules that include technical workshops, a final examination of professional competence, and completing supervised practical experience. To qualify for the QP, a Bachelor’s degree in accounting from any Hong Kong tertiary institution, or an overseas degree, or other academic qualification accepted by HKICPA is required. Individuals who wish to practice as auditors are required to satisfy up to four-years of full-time approved work experience, pass relevant Practicing Certificate examinations in auditing, local law and taxation (if not qualified through the QP), and complete relevant CPD. Annual CPD is mandatory for all CPA’s.
Under the Professional Accountants Ordinance, the HKICPA is responsible for setting ethical requirements for professional accountants in Hong Kong.
Credit Rating services
The Securities and Futures Commission ("SFC”) is an independent statutory body which licences Type 10 regulated activity – providing credit rating services. The SFC will be guided by the Code of Conduct for Persons Providing Credit Rating Services (“CRA Code”) in considering whether a licensed or registered person satisfies the requirement that it/he is fit and proper to be or to remain licensed or registered. The CRA Code is based on the revised Code of Conduct Fundamentals for Credit Rating Agencies issued by the International Organization of Securities Commissions in May 2008 (“IOSCO Code”).
Only a staff member, who prepares credit ratings for a Credit Rating Agency (“CRA”), is required to be licensed. Marketing or business development activities are unlikely to be regarded as “providing credit rating services”.
In general, a CRA should not carry on any business which can reasonably be considered to have the potential to give rise to any conflict of interest in relation to its business of providing credit rating services. If the CRA intends to provide Ancillary Services, it should ensure its compliance with paragraph 30 of the CRA Code. In any event, a CRA is not allowed to provide the consultancy or advisory services to a rated entity, or its related party, regarding the corporate or legal structure, assets, liabilities or activities of that rated entity or related party.
Apart from being an analyst involved in the rating process of a CRA, experience acquired by an individual in relation to credit risk management of financial institutions, financial analysis, credit analysis or bank’s internal counterparty risk assessment would also be considered as relevant to “providing credit rating services”.
Proposals
The analysis suggests that the AIFC may enhance its framework by:
1) Clarifying in which cases Schedule 1 (Decision-making procedures) of the FSFR apply;
2) Adding new provisions that will fill some current gaps;
3) Extending the AFSA”s powers in certain aspects; and
4) Making the relevant editorial changes.
It is expected that the clarification of whether Schedule 1 of the FSFR applies will provide greater certainty to the users of the FSFR. As noted above, in comparison with the DIFC, there is currently no analogue of the RPP in the AIFC. The RPP aims to provide an understanding of how the DFSA functions and operates and what is expected from the regulated community.
Another benefit of specifying cases in which Schedule 1 to the FSFR applies is related to the development of the new legal frameworks. This implies that there could be more instances where the AFSA would need to make a decision. As not all of these decisions should be subject to the decision-making procedures, new subsections that indicate the application of Schedule 1 would provide a better understanding to the readers.
In addition, it is suggested to extend the AFSA’s powers in relation to:
-making an order, issuing a direction or prohibition, or imposing a requirement in relation to any Person (not only in relation to Authorised Persons);
-the appointment or removal of an Auditor in relation to an Authorised Person;
-Ancillary Service Providers (from the supervisory powers’ perspective since they are also licensed and should be supervised appropriately).
Other proposed amendments relate to making a Money Laundering Reporting Officer an Approved Individual (it is currently a Designated Individual) and some other editorial changes for consistency throughout the Act.
Besides, for the sake of consistency with other AIFC acts (e.g., Section 5(2) of the AIFC Companies Regulations) and making it clearer to a reader section 6 of the FSFR was amended to clarify that the expression “in the AIFC” should be read as if it includes the expression “from the AIFC”. A such, any reference in the FSFR or any other rules under the AIFC financial services legal framework now should be read as “in or from the AIFC”. This addition brings more clarity since the AIFC legal framework does allow the AIFC Participants to, for example, market or provide financial services to their clients and users who are based outside the territory of the AIFC.
ASP regime
As the analysis showed, in the jurisdictions where a financial regulator regulates ASPs, the financial regulatory law’s scope covers ASPs. In those jurisdictions, where authorities other than a financial regulator do regulate ASPs/DNFBPs, separate ASP framework is adopted.
Since the AFSA is a single regulator for Financial Services and Ancillary Services in the AIFC, it is proposed to expand the FSFR.
To enhance the AIFC ASP framework in accordance with the recommendations in the self-assessment against IOSCO principles, the AFSA proposes to adopt a number of amendments, mainly to the AIFC Financial Services Framework Regulations ("FSFR") and, additionally, to the AIFC General Rules and AIFC Conduct of Business Rules to extend supervisory powers of AFSA to ASPs.
The draft rules and amendments to the FSFR are similar to the DIFC legal framework for ASP regulation, namely some provisions of the DIFC Regulatory Law 2004 related to the DNFBPs. From the analysis of the provisions existing in the DIFC it is concluded that they correspond to the requirements of the recommendations in the IOSCO self-assessment report. The DIFC legal framework has also been chosen due to the similarity of their legal framework with existing legal framework in the AIFC.
(1) AIFC FSFR
The suggested amendments include specification of the AFSAs’ supervisory powers to act as a supervisory authority and apply supervisory powers and tools over ASPs:
- (a) clarification on withdrawal of ASP Licence application by an applicant;
- (b) clarification on the AFSA powers to grant or reject ASP Licence application;
- (c) extension of the AFSA supervisory powers (Part 8: Supervision) in relation to ASPs:
- power to gather information;
- power to require a production of report;
- power to restrict, withdraw or suspend a Licence;
- power to impose a prohibition and requirement;
- power to obtain information and documents for investigation;
- (d) clarifications on obligations of ASPs:
- obligation of disclosure to AFSA;
- obligation to comply with an order or requirement of the AFSA;
- obligation of an ASP to provide an annual activity report;
- obligation not to engage in conduct that is intended to obstruct the AFSA;
- (e) clarification on no liability for provision of information or documents to the AFSA;
- (f) editorial amendments.
(2) Amendments to the AIFC Rules
In addition, certain amendments are proposed to the AIFC General Rules and AIFC Conduct of Business Rules related to the licensing of Legal Services Providers.
AIFC General Rules
It is proposed to add new subrule “Effective supervision” in relation to the ASPs. In assessing whether an applicant is capable of being effectively supervised by the AFSA for the purposes of section 41(1) of the Framework Regulations, the AFSA will consider the nature, including the complexity, of the Ancillary Services that the applicant will carry on; and the way in which the applicant's business is organised; and (if the applicant is a member of a Group) whether membership of the Group is likely to prevent the AFSA’s effective supervision of the applicant; and whether the applicant is subject to consolidated supervision.
It is suggested to extend conflict of interest and record keeping obligation to the ASPs. It is also proposed to extend “Guidance: Exercise of supervisory powers by the AFSA”, “core information”, “regulatory impact”, “fraud and errors”, “winding up, bankruptcy and insolvency”, “accuracy of information”, “correction of inaccurate information” subrules to the ASPs
It is suggested to make amendments to AIFC General Rules on replacing a statutory requirement in registration of at least 1 legal adviser for Legal Services Providers to be eligible to receive and maintain a Licence from the AFSA to Provide Legal Services in the AIFC with all legal advisers employed by Legal Services Providers starting from 1 January 2024.
This proposal is based on practices of regulation of legal profession in common law countries, including Hong Kong. It aims to further enhance standards of ethics and conduct on ASPs providing Legal Services in the AIFC. Legal Consultants employed by ASPs in the AIFC will continue to be regulated by the AIFC Legal Services Board.
Other Ancillary Services were considered whether any special rules are needed to be adopted. Considering practice of the DIFC, ADGM, and the QFC, any special rules related to Accountancy, Consulting, and Credit Rating Services are not proposed at this stage of the AIFC development.
AIFC Conduct of Business Rules
It is proposed to supplement Part 13 “Ancillary Service Providers” with 2 more principles of conduct for ASPs:
1.“Conflicts of Interest” to ensure that conflicts of interest between itself and its Clients, between its Employees and Clients and between one Client and another are identified and then prevented or managed, or disclosed, in such a way that the interests of a Client are not adversely affected; and
2.“Complaints” to ensure that Complaints made against it by Clients are handled fairly, consistently and promptly.
AFSA Glossary
Editorial amendments – replacing “Constitutional Law” term with “Constitutional Statute” term and replacing the word 'shall' with the word 'must'.
AIFC Fees Rules
Editorial amendments – dealing with typo, replacing words “modify”, “modification” with words “vary”, “variation”.
For the sake of consistency, it is also proposed that to use the same drafting style when some expressions are used. For example, the AFSA “makes a decision”, “issues, varies or withdraws a Licence”, “withdraws an Approved Individual status”, “gives a direction”, “revokes a direction”, “withdraws a condition or restriction”, etc. In this regard, it is suggested to replace the word used in the expression “revoke a Licence” (used only once in section 41 of the FSFR) with the word “withdraw”.
Such approach is consistent with the drafting styles used in peer jurisdictions. For example, there are 4 instances in the DIFC Regulatory Law where the word “revoke’ was used (in relation to a direction, requirement and recognition). There are only 1 instance in the QFC’s Financial Services Regulations where the word “revoke” was used (in relation to a written notice).
The word “withdrawal” is used (both in case of the applicant and regulator) in the QFC and DIFC in the context of the Licence (Authorisation).
The approach used in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 follows the same approach as the word “revoke/revocation” is used in relation to requirements, recognition, directions, authorisation orders” but not in relation to licences/authorisations. The word “withdrawal” is used in section 33 in terms of the authorisation (licence).
Public consultation questions
In the course of public consultation, existing and potential market participants will be invited to comment on the following questions:
1. Do you agree with our proposal to clearly state where Schedule 1 of the FSFR applies? If not, why not?
2. Do you agree with the introduction of new sections?
3. Do you agree with our proposals in relation to Ancillary Service Providers? If not, why, and what alternative(s) would you suggest?
4. Do you consider that the FSFR should include provisions providing for passporting of licensees from other jurisdictions or whether such matters should be dealt with by way of class orders/waivers and operational arrangements of the AFSA?
Outcomes
As a result of the proposed amendments, the AFSA will fill certain gaps and clarify powers to give certainty to AIFC Participants. Additionally, the proposed amendments will bring in line the FSFR with its counterparts in other peer jurisdictions.
ASP regime
From the ASP regime’s perspective, the AFSA will address the shortcomings identified in the preliminary review of its legal regime and as noted in recent assessment exercises. It is expected that the ASPs regulatory framework clarifications will make the AIFC jurisdiction more aligned with the applicable international standards of, in the first instance, Ancillary Services, including DNFBPs.
Enhancement of the ASPs regulatory framework will also help the AIFC to continue positioning itself as a financial centre compliant with the highest international standards, bringing more economic activity to the centre and reaffirming its existing commitments to those international standards.
Annex 1
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE AIFC FINANCIAL SERVICES FRAMEWORK REGULATIONS
In these Regulations, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
CONTENTS
40. Application for a Licensce to carry on Ancillary Services
(…)
PART 8: SUPERVISION OF AUTHORISED PERSONS
(…)
CHAPTER 2 – Obligations of Authorised Persons and Ancillary Service Providers
(…)
3. Application
(1) These Regulations apply in the AIFC.
(2) Where the AFSA makes an order, issues a direction or prohibition, or imposes any requirement in relation to a Person pursuant to a provision of these Regulations or Rules or legislation administered by the AFSA, such Person must, unless he has a reasonable excuse, comply with such order, direction, prohibition or requirement.
6. Meaning of “in the AIFC”
(1) A Person will be deemed to be carrying on activities in the AIFC for the purposes of these Regulations if:
(a) that Person is a Centre Participant and the day-to-day management of those activities (even if those activities are undertaken in whole or in part from outside the AIFC) is the responsibility of the Centre Participant in its capacity as such; or
(b) that Person’s head office is outside the AIFC but the activity is carried on from a branch maintained by it in the AIFC; or
(c) the activities are conducted in circumstances that are deemed to amount to activities carried on in the AIFC under Rules made by the AFSA.
(2) The AFSA may issue Rules and guidance as to the circumstances in which activities capable of having an effect in the AIFC are or are not to be regarded as conducted in the AIFC.
(3) The expression “in the AIFC” means “in or from the AIFC”. Any reference to the expression “in the AIFC” in these Regulations and rules made thereunder means the expression “in or from the AIFC”.
7. Main functions, powers and objectives of the AFSA
(…)
(3) In performing its functions and exercising its powers, the AFSA will pursue the following objectives (“the Regulatory Objectives”):
(a)the regulation, control and supervision of financial activities in the AIFC by Centre Participants with a view to the maintenance of the safety and soundness of the financial system within the AIFC;
(b)ensuring that financial markets in the AIFC are fair, efficient, transparent and orderly;
(c)creating fair, transparent and non-discriminatory conditions for Centre Participants;
(d)fostering and maintaining confidence in the AIFC’s financial system and regulatory regime;
(e)fostering and maintaining the financial stability of the AIFC’s financial services industry and capital markets, including the reduction of systemic risks;
(f)preventing, detecting and restraining actions, including the Financial Crime, that may cause damage to the reputation of the AIFC or to the financial activities carried out in the AIFC by taking appropriate measures, including by imposing sanctions;
(g)protecting interests of investors and users of financial services;
(h)implementing in the AIFC a regulatory regime that complies with international standards in the sphere of regulation of financial services;
(i)fostering the development of financial technologies in the AIFC; and
(j)pursuing such other objectives as may be specified by AIFC’s Regulations from time to time.
(4) The AFSA may prepare and make available forms for any purpose under these Regulations or Rules made hereunder and may give instructions for their completion.
7A. Principles of good regulation
In performing its functions and exercising its powers under the Acting Law of the AIFC and these Regulations, the AFSA must have regard to:
(a) the need to use its resources in the most economic and efficient way;
(b) the desirability of facilitating innovation and fostering the international competitiveness of the AIFC;
(с) the desirability of fostering competition between those who are subject to regulation by the AFSA;
(d) the principle that the AFSA should exercise its powers and functions in a fair and transparent manner;
(е) the need to comply with such generally accepted principles of good governance as it is reasonable to regard as applicable to it;
(f) the need to balance the burdens and restrictions on firms with the benefit of regulation; and
(g) the need to act in accordance with all laws and Regulations to which it is subject.
(…)
8A. Power of the AFSA to give Guidance
(1)The AFSA may, on the application of Person(s) or on its own initiative, give Guidance consisting of such information and advice as it considers appropriate:
(a)with respect to the operation of specified parts of these Regulations, any Regulations and any Rules which the AFSA administers;
(b)with respect to any matter relating to functions of the AFSA;
(c)for the purpose of meeting the Regulatory Objectives; and
(d)with respect to any matters about which it appears to the AFSA to be desirable to give the relevant information or advice.
(2)Guidance issued by the AFSA may be given to Persons generally, to a class of Authorised Persons or Ancillary Service Providers, or to any Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider or other Person individually.
(3)Unless otherwise indicated by the AFSA, Guidance issued by the AFSA is indicative of the view of the AFSA at the time and in the circumstances in which it was given and is non-binding.
(4)Unless the AFSA is satisfied that it is inappropriate or unnecessary to do so, it must publish Guidance in a way the AFSA considers appropriate for bringing Guidance to the attention of:
(a)Persons(s) likely to be affected by it; and
(b)others who may be likely to become subject to similar guidance.
9. AFSA power to modify, waive or grant relief
(…)
(2) The AFSA must not givemake a direction under (1)(a) unless it is satisfied that:
(…)
(2-1) The AFSA mustshall make public by way of guidance the criteria applicable to the making ofgiving directions under (1)(b) after the date of publication of the guidance.
(…)
11. Appeals against decisions of the AFSA, and the AFSA's statutory immunity
(…)
(4) Neither the AFSA nor any Person who is, or is acting as, a director, officer or member of staff of the AFSA mustshall be held liable for anything done or omitted to be done in the performance or purported performance of its functions, or in the exercise or purported exercise of its powers, under these Regulations or any other AIFC Regulations or Rules, unless the act or omission is shown to have been done in bad faith.
20. Definition of Controlled Function
(…)
(2) Controlled Functions prescribed under section 20(1) may include the functions of senior officers or Eemployees with material responsibility for both or either:
(…)
35. Grant or rejection of application
(…)
(3) Where the AFSA rejects an application for Aauthorisation or variation or withdrawal of an Aauthorisation, the AFSA will inform the applicant in writing of such refusal and, where requested by the applicant, the reasons for such refusal, and of the applicant’s right to appeal that decision to the AIFC Court.
(4) If the applicant requests the AFSA to provide the reasons for refusal, the time for instituting an appeal stops and resumes after the AFSA provides the reasons for refusal.
38. Grant or rejection of application
(…)
(3) Where the AFSA rejects an application under section 36, the AFSA will inform the applicant in writing of such refusal and, where requested by the applicant, the reasons for such refusal, and of the applicant’s right to appeal that decision to the AIFC Court.
(3A) If the applicant requests the AFSA to provide the reasons for refusal, the time for instituting an appeal stops and resumes after the AFSA provides the reasons for refusal.
39. Exemption for Authorised Market Institutions
(…)
(3) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility is exempt from the General Prohibition in respect of any Regulated Activity: [intentionally omitted]
(a) which is carried on as a part of the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility's business as a Digital Asset trading facility; or [intentionally omitted]
(b) which is carried on for the purposes of, or in connection with, the provision by the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility of services designed to facilitate the provision of clearing services by another Person. [intentionally omitted]
CHAPTER 3 – Licensing of Ancillary Service Providers
40. Application for a Licensce to carry on Ancillary Services
(1) A Person may apply to the AFSA for a License permitting a Centre Participant to carry on one or more Ancillary Services.
(2) An Ancillary Service Provider may apply to the AFSA to extend, vary, or withdraw its Licence to carry on Ancillary Services. The applicant for a Licence or its variation or withdrawal may withdraw its application by giving the AFSA notice at any time before the AFSA issues, varies or withdraws the Licence or rejects the application.
(…)
40A. Grant or rejection of application
(1) The AFSA may:
(a) grant an application under section 40, either without conditions, restrictions or requirements or with such conditions, restrictions or requirements as it considers appropriate; or
(b) reject the application.
(2) Where the AFSA grants an application under section 40, the AFSA will notify the applicant of:
(a) such decision;
(b) the date on which the Licence will be deemed to take effect;
(c) the Ancillary Service or Ancillary Services that the applicant is authorised to carry on; and
(d) any conditions and restrictions applicable to the Licence.
(3) Where the AFSA rejects an application under section 36, the AFSA will inform the applicant in writing of such refusal and, where requested by the applicant, the reasons for such refusal, and of the applicant’s right to appeal that decision to the AIFC Court.
(4) If the applicant requests the AFSA to provide the reasons for refusal, the time for instituting an appeal stops and resumes after the AFSA provides the reasons for refusal.
(5) The AFSA may vary the terms of a Licence granted by it under this section, either on the application of the Ancillary Service Provider or upon its own initiative.
41. Criteria for the grant of a Licence to carry on Ancillary Services
(1) The AFSA may only grant a Licence permitting a Centre Participant to carry on one or more Ancillary Services if it is satisfied that the Centre Participant is fit and proper.
(2) The AFSA may prescribe by Rules:
(a) the Centre Participants or class of Centre Participants who may be permitted to carry on Ancillary Services;
(b) the requirements for the grant of such a Licence; and
(c) the circumstances in which the AFSA may withdrawrevoke such a Licence.
44. Grant or rejection of application
(…)
(3) Where the AFSA rejects an application for approval or variation of an approval under section 42, the AFSA will inform the Authorised Person in writing of such refusal and, where requested by the Authorised Person, the reasons for such refusal, and of the Authorised Person’s right to appeal that decision to the AIFC Court.
(4) If the Authorised Person requests the AFSA to provide the reasons for refusal, the time for instituting an appeal stops and resumes after the AFSA provides the reasons for refusal.
45. Residency requirement for AuthorisedApproved Individual
The AFSA may require where it considers appropriate in particular circumstances an Authorised Person to ensure that a particular Controlled Function is carried on by an Authorised Approved Individual who is resident in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
45A. Suspending or withdrawing Approved Individual status
(1) If the AFSA reasonably concludes that:
(a) an Approved Individual is in breach of, or has been in breach of, an obligation that applies as a result of such individual’s Approved Individual status; or
(b) an individual is no longer fit and proper to perform a role in respect of which he is an Approved Individual;
it may either restrict the individual from carrying on a Controlled Function or suspend or withdraw the Approved Individual status from such individual.
(2) The AFSA may withdraw the Approved Individual status of an individual if:
(a) the individual becomes bankrupt;
(b) the individual is convicted of a serious criminal offence;
(c) the individual becomes incapable (through mental or physical incapacity) of managing his affairs;
(d) the individual or the relevant Authorised Person requests the AFSA to withdraw the relevant status; or
(e) the Licence of the relevant Authorised Person is withdrawn.
(3) Where the AFSA:
(a) is conducting an investigation under section 114; and
(b) in the course of such investigation believes on reasonable grounds that an individual has engaged in serious misconduct that may form grounds for the withdrawal of the individual’s Approved Individual status;
it may suspend the Approved Individual status of such individual for the duration of the investigation or related proceedings insofar as such investigation or proceedings relate to the individual.
(4) An individual commits a contravention if the individual carries on a Controlled Function:
(a) in breach of a provision in these Regulations or any Rules or legislation administered by the AFSA that applies to that individual;
(b) contrary to a restriction imposed under subsection (1); or
(c) where his Approved Individual status has been suspended or withdrawn under subsections (1), (2) or (3).
(5) The AFSA may vary or withdraw a restriction or suspension imposed under this section where it is reasonable to do so.
(6) the AFSA may act under subsection (5) on its own initiative or at the request of the relevant individual or Authorised Person.
(7) The decision-making procedures in Schedule 1 apply to a decision made by the AFSA under this section.
49. Rules governing cControllers
The AFSA may make Rules in connection with the change of control of Authorised Persons incorporated in the AIFC, including Rules as to:
(a) when a Person becomes or ceases to be a Controller of an Authorised Person;
(b) when the acquisition or increase in the level of control of an Authorised Person requires either the prior approval of, or notification to, the AFSA;
(c) when the AFSA is likely object to an existing Controller;
(d) the procedures relating to the approval, notification and objections referred to in section 49(b) and 49(c); and
(e) any other matter necessary or incidental to give effect to the provisions governing cControllers.
50. Powers of the AFSA in respect of Controllers
(1) Without limiting the generality of the AFSA powers, the AFSA may:
(a) approve or object to a Person becoming a Controller of an Authorised Person incorporated in the AIFC;
(b) approve or object to an increase in the level of control of an existing cController of an Authorised Person incorporated in the AIFC;
(c) object to an existing cController of an Authorised Person incorporated in the AIFC where it has reasonable grounds to believe that such a Person is no longer an acceptable cController; and
(d) approve a Person as a Controller or approve an increase of control by an existing Controller subject to such conditions as it considers appropriate.
(…)
57. AFSA power to impose requirements on an Authorised Market Institution
Without limiting the powers available to the AFSA under Part 8 (Supervision of Authorised Persons), the AFSA may direct an Authorised Market Institution to do or not do specified things that the AFSA considers are necessary or desirable or to ensure the integrity of the AIFC financial markets, including but not limited to directions:
(a) requiring compliance with any duty, requirement, prohibition, obligation or responsibility applicable to an Authorised Market Institution; or
(b) requiring an Authorised Market Institution to act in a specified manner in relation to a transaction conducted on or through the facilities operated by an Authorised Market Institution, or in relation to a specified class of transactions; or
(c) requiring an Authorised Market Institution to act in a specified manner or to exercise its powers under any rules that the Authorised Market Institution has made.; or
(d) excluding the application of any requirements for engaging in the activity of Operating a Digital Asset Business imposed by the Rules; or [intentionally omitted]
(e) imposing on an Authorised Person engaged in the activity of Operating a Digital Asset Business any additional requirements that the AFSA considers appropriate.[intentionally omitted]
68. Suspending and delisting Securities or Units in a Listed Fund from an Official List
(…)
(3) The AFSA may revokewithdraw a direction givenmade under section 68(2) at any time.
(…)
71. AFSA power to authorise omission of information
The AFSA may authorise the omission from the Prospectus, or constituent parts thereof, of certain information to be included therein, where it considers that any of the following conditions is met:
(a) disclosure of such information would be contrary to the public interest;
(b) disclosure of such information would be seriously detrimental to the Issuer or to the guarantor, if any, provided that the omission of such information would not be likely to mislead the public with regard to facts and circumstances essential for an informed assessment of the Issuer or guarantor, if any, and of the rights attached to the Ssecurities to which the prospectus relates;
(c) such information is of minor importance in relation to admission to trading on an Authorised Investment Exchange and would not influence the assessment of the financial position and prospects of the Issuer or guarantor, if any.
77. Defence of reasonable reliance on information given by another Person
(1) A Person does not commit a contravention of section 75(1) if the Person proves that he placed reasonable reliance on information given to him by:
(a) if the Person is not a natural person, someone other than a member of the Ggoverning Bbody, or Eemployee or agentrepresentative of the Person; or
(b) if the Person is a natural person, someone other than an Eemployee or agentrepresentative of the natural person.
(2) For the purposes of this Part, a Person is not the agentrepresentative of a Person merely because he performs a particular professional or advisory function for the Person.
78. Statements about future matters
(1) A Person is taken to make a misleading or deceptive statement about a future matter whether by himself or through his agent, if he, at the time of making the statement or causing the statement to be made, did not have reasonable grounds for making the statement or causing the statement to be made.
(…)
84. Financial reports
The AFSA may prescribe by Rules:
(a) financial reports to be filed by a Reporting Entity; and
(b) audit requirements to be observed by a Reporting Entity.
CHAPTER 8 – Prevention of Market Abuse
86. Market Abuse
A Person must not:
(…)
(d) effect, or participate in effecting, transactions or orders to trade (otherwise than for legitimate reasons in conformity with accepted market practice on the relevant market) which:
(i) give, or are likely to give a false or misleading impression as to the supply of, or demand for, or as to the price or value of, one or more Investments; or
(ii) secure the price of one or more Investments at an abnormal or artificial level; or
(…)
CHAPTER 10 – Recognition
89. Recognition of Non-AIFC Market Institutions
(…)
(3) The AFSA may make an order referred to in subsection (1) if, having regard to the law and practice of the country or territory in which the applicant's head office is situated and to the rules and practice of the applicant, it appears to the AFSA that the following requirements are met:
(a) investors are afforded protection equivalent to that which they would be afforded if the body concerned were required to comply with the relevant requirements for the licensing of an Authorised Market Institution in 0Chapter 2 of Part 3;
(…)
91. Recognised Non-AIFC Member
(…)
(3) The AFSA may make an order referred to in subsection (1) if, the applicant satisfies the AFSA that the following requirements are met:
(a) the applicant is licensed or otherwise authorised to trade on or use the facilities of an exchange or clearing house in a jurisdiction acceptable to the AFSA;
(b) the applicant is regulated in respect of trading in such jurisdiction by a regulator to a standard satisfactory to the AFSA;
(c) the law and practice under which the applicant is licensed or otherwise authorised is broadly equivalent to the AFSA’s regulatory regime as it applies to a Member;
(d) when using the facilities of an Authorised Investment Exchange, or Authorised Clearing House, MTF Operator, OTF Operator, or Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator the applicant does not exceed the scope of the activities it is authorised to carry on by those responsible for the supervision of the applicant in the country or territory in which the applicant’s head office is situated;
(e) the applicant has agreed to cooperate with the AFSA and subject itself to such parts of the legal and regulatory framework administered by the AFSA as the AFSA may require.
(…)
94. Power to givemake directions in respect of Collective Investment Schemes
(…)
PART 8: SUPERVISION OF AUTHORISED PERSONS
CHAPTER 1 – Supervisory powers of the AFSA
95. Exercise of supervisory powers by the AFSA
(…)
(3) Where the AIFC has exercised one or more of the powers set out in this Chapter it may, where it considers it necessary or desirable to do so in accordance with its Regulatory Objectives:
(a) withdraw a prohibition, restriction, or requirement, or decision to exercise any of its supervisory powers; or
(b) substitute or vary an existing prohibition, restriction, or requirement, or decision to exercise any of its supervisory powers.
(…)
96. Power to gather information
(1) The AFSA may, by notice in writing, require an Authorised Person, Ancillary Service Provider, Approved Individual, Designated Individual or any other Director, Employee or representative agent of an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider to:
(…)
(2) The AFSA may require an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider to allow the AFSA to enter its premises during normal business hours or at any other time as may be agreed for the purpose of inspecting and copying information or documents stored in any form on such premises, as it considers necessary or desirable to meet the Regulatory Objectives of the AFSA.
97. Power to require a production of a report
(1) The AFSA may, by notice in writing, require an Authorised Person, or Ancillary Service Provider to provide the AFSA with a report on any matter as the AFSA considers necessary or desirable to meet the objectives of the AFSA.
(2) The Person appointed to make a report required by section 97(1) must be a Person nominated or approved by the AFSA.
(3) Where a requirement has been made of an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider under this section, the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must take all reasonable steps to ensure that:
(a) any Person who is providing or has provided services to the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must provide all such assistance as the appointed Person may reasonably require; and
(b) the appointed Person co-operates with the AFSA.
(4) The obligation in section 97(1) is enforceable on application by the AFSA to the AIFC Court.
(5) The costs of providing a report under section 97(1) will be borne by the Authorised Person,or Ancillary Service Provider to whom a notice has been given under section 97(1).
(…)
98. Power to restrict, withdraw or suspend a Licence
(1) The AFSA may:
(a) impose or vary such conditions, restrictions and requirements on a Licence as the AFSA considers appropriate; or
(b) withdraw an Authorised Person’s Licence or vary its Licence to remove one or more Regulated Activities or Market Activities; or
(ba) withdraw an Ancillary Service Provider’s Licence or vary its Licence to remove one or more Ancillary Services; or
(c) suspend an Authorised Person’s Licence in relation to one or more Regulated Activities or Market Activities.; or
(ca) suspend an Ancillary Service Provider’s Licence in relation to one or more Ancillary Services.
(2) The decision-making procedures in Schedule 1 apply to a decision made by the AFSA under this section.
99. Power to impose a prohibition
(1) The AFSA may prohibit an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider from:
(a) entering into certain specified transactions or types of transactions; or
(b) soliciting business from certain specified Persons or types of Persons; or
(c) carrying on business in a specified manner or other than in a specified manner; or
(d) using a particular name or description in respect of the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider; or
(e) dealing with any relevant property in a specified manner or other than in a specified manner; or
(f) assisting, counselling or procuring another Person to deal with any relevant property in a specified manner or other than in a specified manner.
(2) The decision-making procedures in Schedule 1 apply to a decision made by the AFSA under this section.
99A. Power to issue directions for prudential purposes and capital requirements
(1)For prudential purposes and capital requirements, the AFSA may direct that an Authorised Person or Authorised Persons within a specified class (including but not limited to):
(a)comply with any specified additional capital or liquidity requirements;
(b)apply a specific provisioning policy or treatment of specified assets;
(c)comply with specified limits on material risk exposures;
(d)comply with specified limits on exposures to related parties;
(e)meet additional or more frequent reporting requirements; or
(f)take such other action as is specified in the direction.
(2)The AFSA may direct an Affiliate of an Authorised Person to take specified steps or not to carry out specified activities if the AFSA:
(a)is the consolidated supervisor of the Group to which the Authorised Person belongs; and
(b)is satisfied that the direction is necessary or desirable for the purposes of the effective prudential supervision of the Group on a consolidated basis.
(3)A direction to an Affiliate under subsection (2) may include a requirement that the Affiliate:
(a)limit any activities it undertakes or may undertake (including closing any office which is outside the jurisdiction in which it has its principal place of business and head office) if the activities are reasonably likely to expose the Authorised Person or its Group to excessive risks or risks that are not properly managed; or
(b)take such other measures as are necessary to remove any impediments to effective supervision of the Group on a consolidated basis, including a direction to take steps to restructure the Group.
(4)Nothing in this section limits the scope or application of any other power that the AFSA may have in these Regulations, any Rules or Regulations or legislation administered by it.
(5)A direction issued under this section comes into force on the date specified in it and remains in force, subject to subsection (7), until it is revoked or varied in writing by the AFSA pursuant to subsection (6).
(6)The AFSA may withdraw or vary any direction given pursuant to this section.
(7)A direction issued to Authorised Persons within a specified class under subsection (1), including any variation made to such a direction according to subsection (6), may not remain in force for a period longer than 12 months from the date specified in the initial direction issued according to subsection (1).
(8)The decision-making procedures in Schedule 1 apply to a decision made by the AFSA under this decision.
100. Power to impose a requirement
(1) The AFSA may require an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider to:
(a) take or refrain from taking such action as the AFSA considers appropriate;
(b) carry on business in, and only in, a specified manner;
(c) deal with any relevant property in a specified manner;
(d) deal with any relevant property such that:
(i) the property remains of a value and in a condition that appears to the AFSA to be desirable with a view to ensuring that the Person will be able to meet its liabilities in relation to the business which constitutes a Regulated Activity for which it holds a Licence or Ancillary Service; and
(ii) the Person is able at any time to transfer or dispose or otherwise deal with the property when instructed to do so by the AFSA.
(…)
(3) The decision-making procedures in Schedule 1 apply to a decision made by the AFSA under this section.
CHAPTER 2 – Obligations of Authorised Persons and Ancillary Service Providers
102. Obligation of disclosure to the AFSA
(1) Subject to (2), an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must disclose to the AFSA anything which reasonably tends to show:
(a) a breach, or likely breach of a provision of legislation administered by the AFSA; or
(b) a failure, or likely failure, to comply with any obligation to which a Person is subject under such legislation; or
(c) any other matter as the AFSA may prescribe in Rules;
which may be attributable to the conduct of the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider or theirits Directors, officers, Employees or representativesagents.
(…)
(3) An Authorised Person or an Ancillary Services Provider must establish and implement appropriate systems and internal procedures to enable its compliance with section 102(1).
(4) Any provision in an agreement between an Authorised Person, Ancillary Service Provider and a dDirector, officer, eEmployee, representativeagent or auditor thereof is void in so far as it purports to hinder compliance with an obligation under section 102(1).
(5) No Person may be subjected to detriment or loss or damage merely by reason of undertaking any act to cause or assist an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider to comply with an obligation under section 102(1).
(…)
103. Obligation to comply with an order or requirement of the AFSA
Where the AFSA makes an order, issues a direction or prohibition, or makes any requirement in relation to an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider pursuant to a provision of this Law these Regulations or Rules or legislation administered by the AFSA, such Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must, unless he has a reasonable excuse, comply with such order, direction, prohibition or requirement.
104. Provision of information to the AFSA
(1) An Authorised Person and Ancillary Service Provider must not:
(…)
(2) An Ancillary Service Provider must provide to the AFSA an activity report using the appropriate form specified by the AFSA on an annual basis.
105. Obstruction of the AFSA
An Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must not engage in conduct that is intended to obstruct the AFSA in the exercise of any powers under this Part or Part 9 (Enforcement), including without limitation the:
(…)
106. No liability for provision of information or documents to the AFSA
An Authorised Person, an Ancillary Service Provider, an Approved Individual, a Designated Individual or any other Employee or Director of an Authorised Person or an Ancillary Service Provider is neither liable to a proceeding, nor subject to a liability, nor in breach of any duty, merely by reason of:
(…)
107. Self-incrimination
(…)
pursuant to any requirement under either this Part 8 (Supervision of Authorised Persons) or 09 (Enforcement) on the grounds that any such information or document or answer, as the case may be:
(…)
109. Requirement to appoint an Auditor
(1) An Authorised Person must appoint an Auditor.
(2) The AFSA may direct, or the AIFC Court on an application made by the AFSA may order, an Authorised Person to:
(a) appoint an Auditor, where an Auditor has not been appointed by the Authorised Person; or
(b) remove an Auditor and appoint a new Auditor, where in the opinion of the AFSA or the AIFC Court (as the case may be) the Auditor appointed by the Authorised Person is not suitable to provide Audit Services to the Authorised Person.
(3) The decision-making procedures in Schedule 1 apply to a decision made by the AFSA under this section.
111. Relevant Transfer
The AFSA may provide by Rules that the transfer of the business of carrying on specified Regulated Activities by an Authorised Firm (a “Relevant Transfer”) either:
(a) may only be made by an order of the AIFC Court under section 1130; or
(b) may be made by such an order if the transferor elects.
113. Powers of the Court in relation to a transfer scheme
(1) The AIFC Court may make an order under this section sanctioning a Relevant Transfer if:
(a) any directions madegiven by the ASFA pursuant to section 112(2) have been complied with;
(…)
116. Powers to Obtain Information and Documents for Investigation
(1) Where the AFSA considers that a Person is or may be able to give information or produce a document which is or may be relevant to an investigation, it may:
(a) enter the business premises of such Person during normal business hours for the purpose of inspecting and copying information or documents stored in any form on such premises;
(b) require such Person, by written notice, to
(i) give, or procure the giving of, specified information in such form as it may reasonably require; or
(ii) produce, or procure the production of, specified documents; or
(iii) to attend before an officer, or Eemployee or agent of the AFSA at a specified time and place to answer questions in private (compulsory interview); or
(iv) give it any assistance in relation to the investigation which the Person is able to give.
(…)
(5) The AFSA may exercise its powers under section 116(1) in respect of any Person within, or outside of, the AIFC provided that, if the Person is outside the AIFC and is not an Authorised Person, Ancillary Service Provider or Approved Individual, the AFSA will either:
(…)
118. Sanctions for contraventions
(1) If the AFSA considers that a Person has committed a Contravention, it may:
(a) fine the Person such amount as it considers appropriate in respect of the contravention; and/or
(b) censure the Person in respect of the contravention; and/or
(c) makegive a direction requiring the Person to effect restitution or compensate any other Person in respect of the contravention within such period and on such terms as the AFSA may direct; and/or
(d) makegive a direction requiring the Person to account for, in such form and on such terms as the AFSA may direct, such amounts as the AFSA determines to be profits or unjust enrichment arising from the contravention; and/or
(e) makegive a direction requiring the Person to cease and desist from such activity constituting or connected to the contravention as the AFSA may stipulate; and/or
(f) makegive a direction requiring the Person to do an act or thing to remedy the contravention or matters arising from the contravention; and/or
(g) makegive a direction restricting or prohibiting the Person from holding office in or being an Director or Eemployee of any Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider.
(2) Nothing in this section prevents the AFSA from exercising any other power that it may exercise under any legislation administered by it.
(3) The decision-making procedures in Schedule 1 apply to a decision made by the AFSA under this section.
123. Compulsory Winding up
(1) The AFSA may present a petition to the AIFC Court for the winding up of an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider.
(2) On such a petition, the AIFC Court may wind up the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider if it is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that it should be wound up.
125. Injunction – investigations and proceedings
(…)
(g) in the event that the relevant Person is a natural pPerson
(…)
130A. Procedural irregularities
(1) A procedure under these Regulations or any other Rules or Regulations is not invalidated because of any procedural irregularity unless the AIFC Court declares the procedure to be invalid.
(2) For the purposes of this Section:
(a) procedure includes the making of a decision, the conduct of a hearing, the giving of the relevant notice, and any proceedings (legal or otherwise); and
(b) procedural irregularity includes a reference to a defect, irregularity or deficiency of notice or time.
PART 10: CONFIDENTIALITY
131. Confidential information
(1) For the purposes of these Regulations, information is confidential if it is received by the AFSA or an officer, Eemployee,or delegate or agent of the AFSA in the exercise of a function under these Regulations or any other AIFC Regulations or Rules.
(…)
132. General prohibition on disclosure
(1) Subject to subsection (2), confidential information must not be disclosed to a third party by the AFSA or by an officer, Eemployee, or delegate or agent of the AFSA, or by any Person coming into possession of the information, without the consent of the Person to whom the duty of confidentiality is owed.
(2) The AFSA may disclose confidential information where such disclosure:
(a) is permitted or required under these Regulations or under any other AIFC Regulations or Rules;
(b) is made to any of the authorities listed in CO-OP for the purpose of assisting the exercise by any such authority of its regulatory functions; or
(c) is made in good faith for the purposes of the exercise of the functions and powers of the AFSA.
(3) A Contravention in bad faith of subsection (1) by an officer, Eemployee, delegate or agent of the AFSA, or by any other Person coming into possession of the information shall be punishable by a fine of such amount as it considers appropriate in respect of the Contravention up to a maximum fine of $10,000 and/or disciplinary proceedings. The AFSA may seek injunctive relief where appropriate.
(4) The AFSA may make Rules for the purpose of ensuring the confidentiality of information received in the exercise of a regulatory function.
132A. Prohibition on disclosure for Person
A Person who received from the AFSA any notice, decision, direction, order, request or warning, which is marked as confidential, must not disclose the existence and content of such notice, decision, direction, order, request or warning to any third party except for obtaining any necessary professional advice in relation to his rights and obligations.
PART 11:CO-OPERATION AND EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION
133. Regulatory co-operation
(…)
(2) The AFSA mustshall implement policies and procedures to ensure that it:
(…)
PART 12: Miscellaneous
134. Public Registers
(1) The AFSA must publish and maintain a register of current and past grants, withdrawals and suspensions of Licences of all Authorised Persons and Ancillary Service Providers, statuses of Recognised Non-AIFC Market Institutions, Recognised Non-AIFC Members, Foreign Fund Managers, Approved Individuals, and Principal Representatives in such manner as it believes appropriate.
(2) The AFSA may publish and maintain registers of:
(a) all Persons in relation to whom action has been taken under section 45A(1); and
(b) all Persons who have been prohibited under section 118(1)(g) from holding office or being a Director or Employee of any Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider,
indicating whether any such action is of past effect or current, in such manner as the AFSA believes appropriate.
(3) The AFSA may decide not to publish information about a suspension imposed under section 45A(3).
(4) The AFSA must make a reasonably current version of each register kept under subsections (1) to (3) freely available for viewing by the public during the normal business hours of the AFSA.
135. Extended jurisdiction
(1) Any power which the AFSA may exercise in relation to an Authorised Person, Ancillary Service Provider, Approved Individual, Designated Individual or any Director, officer, Employee or representative of an Authorised Person, Ancillary Service Provider, Registered Auditor under these Regulations or any other Rules or other legislation administered by the AFSA may, subject to subsections (2) and (3), continue to be exercised after the date on which:
(a) the Licence of such Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider; or
(b) the Approved Individual or Designated Individual status of such individual;
is withdrawn by the AFSA under these Regulations or any other Rules or other legislation administered by the AFSA.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (3), the AFSA may only exercise a power under subsection (1) in relation to a Person within three years after the day on which the AFSA became aware of the act or omission that gave rise to the right to exercise the power in respect of that Person.
(3) If proceedings with respect to the act or omission are commenced by the AFSA within the period referred to in subsection (2), then the provisions of subsection (1) must remain in force until such time as the proceedings and any review or appeal relating to the proceedings are completed.
(4) For the purposes of this section, the AFSA is aware of an act or omission if it has information from which the act or omission can reasonably be inferred.
(5) The decision-making procedures in Schedule 1 apply to a decision made by the AFSA under this section.
136. Publication by the AFSA
The AFSA may publish in such form and manner as it regards appropriate information and statements relating to decisions of the AFSA and the AIFC Court, sanctions, and any other matters which the AFSA considers relevant to the conduct of affairs in the AIFC.
SCHEDULE 1: Decision-making procedures of the AFSA
(…)
2. Application of Schedule
This Schedule applies to the AFSA where a provision in these Regulations or Rules made
3. Decisions to which procedures do not apply
(1) The procedures in this Schedule (other than sub-paragraph (2) of this paragraph) do not apply to a decision by the AFSA:
(a) to revokewithdraw a direction,or withdraw a requirement, restriction or prohibition; or
(b) to withdraw a condition or restriction imposed in relation to a Licence, registration, authorisation or approval; or
(c) in relation to a Person, if the Person has requested, or consented in writing to, the making of the decision.; or
(d) to givemake, revoke and/or vary a direction under section section 9.
4. Opportunity to make representations before a decision
(1) If the AFSA proposes to make a decision to which this Schedule applies, it must first give the Rrelevant Person:
(a) a written notice (a “Preliminary Notice”) containing the information in sub-paragraph (2); and
(b) an opportunity to make representations to the AFSA in Pperson orand in writing concerning the decision the AFSA proposes to take.
(…)
6. Opportunity to make representations after a decision
(1) If this paragraph applies under paragraph 4(7), the AFSA must:
(a) provide the Relevant Person with an opportunity to make representations to the AFSA in Pperson orand in writing within a period of 14 days, or such further period as may be agreed, from the date on which the Decision Notice is given to the Person under paragraph 5; and
(…)
7. Third party rights
(1) If any of the reasons contained in a Decision Notice relate to a matter which:
(a) identifies a Person (a “Third Party”) other than the Person to whom the Decision Notice is given; and
(b) in the opinion of the AFSA, is prejudicial to the Third Party,
The AFSA must give a notice or a copy of the Decision Notice, or extracts of its relevant parts, to the Third Party.
(2) The notice copied to the Third Party must specify a reasonable period within which he may make representations to the AFSA.
(3) A copy of the notice is not required to be given to a Third Party if the AFSA considers it impractical to do so.
(4) The Third Party may refer to the AIFC Court:
(a) the decision in question or any aspect of the decision, so far as it related to him; or
(b) any opinion expressed by the AFSA in relation to him.
(5) The copy of the Decision Notice must advise the Third Party’s right to make a reference to the AIFC Court.
(6) If the Third Party does refer the matter to the AIFC Court, the Third Party may apply to the AIFC Court to stay the action specified in the Decision Notice.
(7) The Third Party must be given a copy of any discontinuance applicable to the proceedings to which the Decision Notice related.
SCHEDULE 2: Appeal to the AIFC Court
1. Time frame for instituting an appeal
(1) An appeal under section 11 may be instituted:
(a) within a period of 28 days immediately following the date of the decision, including the Decision Notice, given to the Personissued by the AFSA, and
(b) by serving a Claim Form on the AFSA, in accordance with the service provisions of the AIFC Court Rules, stating the grounds and material facts on which the appellant relies.
(2) An appeal does not operate as a stay of the decision being appealed.
(…)
Annex 2
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE AIFC GENERAL RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
Guidance: Purpose of this rulebook
…
• GEN 5 contains the key System and Controls requirements that apply to all Authorised Persons and Ancillary Services Providers.
• GEN 6 complements Part 8 of the Framework Regulations (Supervision of Authorised Persons). The chapter begins with guidance setting out a non-exhaustive list of the circumstances in which the AFSA is likely to exercise the supervisory powers granted to it by sections 96 to 101 of the Framework Regulations. GEN 6.1 adds details to section 97 of the Framework Regulations which gives the AFSA the power to require an Authorised Person to provide it with a report on a specified matter. GEN 6.2 identifies a large number of instances in which an Authorised Person is obliged to make a notification to the AFSA. Finally GEN 6.3 contains requirements relating to accounting and auditors, including requirements to prepare financial reports, keep accounting records, make certain notifications to the AFSA and cooperate with an auditor.
…
1.3.2. Form and content of application for a Licence
A Person may apply to the AFSA for a Licence authorising a Centre Participant to carry on one or more Ancillary Services in the AIFC by:
(a) completing the form prescribed in Schedule 3 and filing the form with the AFSA accompanied by such documents as are specified in the form;
(b) providing such further information as the AFSA may require; and
(c) paying the fee prescribed in the Fees Rules to the AFSA.
1.3.3-1 Effective supervision
In assessing whether an applicant is capable of being effectively supervised by the AFSA for the purposes of section 41(1) of the Framework Regulations, the AFSA will consider:
(a) the nature, including the complexity, of the Ancillary Services that the applicant will carry on; and
(b) the way in which the applicant's business is organised; and
(c) (if the applicant is a member of a Group) whether membership of the Group is likely to prevent the AFSA’s effective supervision of the applicant; and
(d) whether the applicant is subject to consolidated supervision.
2. CONTROLLED AND DESIGNATED FUNCTIONS
2.1. Mandatory appointments
2.1.1. Appointments to be filled by Approved Individuals
(1) Subject to (2) an Authorised Person must make the following appointments and ensure that they are held by one or more Approved Individuals at all times:
(a) Senior Executive Officer;
(b) Finance Officer; and
(c) Compliance Officer.; and
(d) Money Laundering Reporting Officer.
(2) For an Authorised Person Operating a Representative Office the mandatory appointments in (1) may be carried on by its Principal Representative.
2.2.5-1. Money Laundering Reporting Officer
The Money Laundering Reporting Officer function must be carried out by an individual who is a Director, Partner or Senior Manager of an Authorised Person and who has responsibility for the implementation of an Authorised Person's anti‐money laundering policies, procedures, systems and controls and day to day oversight of its compliance with the Rules in AML and any relevant anti‐money laundering Rules.
2.3.4. Money Laundering Reporting Officer
The Money Laundering Reporting Officer function must be carried out by an individual who is a Director, Partner or Senior Manager of an Authorised Person and who has responsibility for the implementation of an Authorised Person's anti‐money laundering policies, procedures, systems and controls and day to day oversight of its compliance with the Rules in AML and any relevant anti‐money laundering Rules. [intentionally omitted]
5.6 Conflicts of interest
5.6.1. Identification of conflicts of interest
An Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must take all reasonable steps to identify conflicts of interest that may arise between:
(a)the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider, (including its managers and Employees,) and the Clientsof the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider, or any Persondirectly or indirectly linked to the Authorised Persons or Ancillary Service Providersthem by control; or
(b)one Client of the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider and another Client,
in the course of the Authorised Person carrying on any Regulated Activity or Market Activity or Ancillary Service Provider carrying on Ancillary Services.
5.6.2. Factors relevant to the existence of a conflict of interest in the provision of a service
For the purposes of identifying the types of conflict of interest that arise, or may arise, in the course of providing a service and whose existence may entail a material risk of damage to the interests of a Client, an Authorised Person or an Ancillary Service Provider must take into account, as a minimum, whether the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider or a Persondirectly or indirectly linked by controlto the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider:
(a)is likely to make a financial gain, or avoid a financialloss, at the expense of the Client;or
(b)has an interestin the outcome of a service providedto the Client or of a transaction carried outon behalf of the Client,which is distinctfrom the Client'sinterest in that outcome; or
(c)has a financial or other incentive to favour the interest of another Client or group of Clients over the interests of the Client;or
(d)carries on the same businessas the Client; or
(e)receives or will receive from a Personother than the Client an inducement in relation to a service provided to the Client, in the form of monies, goods or services, other than the standard commission or fee for that service.
5.6.3. Management of conflicts of interest
If arrangements made by an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider to manage conflicts of interest are not sufficient to ensure, with reasonable confidence, that risks of damage to the interests of a Client will be prevented, the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must clearly disclose the general nature and sources of conflicts of interest to the Clientbefore undertaking businessfor the Client.
…
5.9. Recordkeeping
5.9.1. Record keeping obligation
An Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must make and retain recordsof matters and dealings, including Accounting Records and corporate governance practices which are the subjectof requirements and standards under the Framework Regulations and Rules.
5.9.2. Retrieval of records
An Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must ensure that records stored pursuant to GEN 5.9.1 are capable of reproduction on paper withina reasonable periodnot exceeding five Business Days.
6. SUPERVISION
…
Guidance: Exercise of supervisory powers by the AFSA
The AFSA is likely to exercise the supervisory powers in sections 96 to 101 of the Framework Regulations in the following circumstances:
(a)an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider is failing, or is likely to fail, to satisfy the criteria referred to in sections 34 or 37 or 41 of the Framework Regulations as appropriate (Criteria for the grant of a Licence); or
(b)an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider has failed, during a period of at least 12 months, to carry on a Regulated Activity or Market Activity or Ancillary Service for which it has a Licence;or
(c)it is desirable to take such steps to exercise such power in order to protect the interests of Clientsor customers of an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider or the financial system; or
(d)an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider is in breach of, or has been, in breach of one or more conditions, restrictions or requirements applicable to its Licence; or
(e)an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider is (or has been) otherwise in breach of the AIFC Constitutional Law Statute, the Framework Regulations or any Rulesor other relevantlegislation; or
(f)an Authorised Person is in breachof a requirement under section48 of the Framework Regulations (Requirement for AFSA approvalto change in control); or
(g)a request has been received from aFinancial Services Regulator; or
(h)there is a reasonable likelihood that an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider will contravene a requirement of any Regulations or Rules; or
(i)an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider has contravened a relevant requirement and there is a reasonable likelihood that the contravention will continue or be repeated; or
(j)there is loss, risk of loss, or other adverse effect on an Authorised Person’s or Ancillary Service Provider’s Clients; or
(k)an investigation is being carried out in relation to an act or omission by an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider that constitutes or may constitute a Contravention of any applicable Regulation or Rule; or
(l)an enforcement action has commenced againstan Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider for a Contravention of any applicable Regulation or Rule; or
(m)civil proceedings have commenced against an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider; or
(n)an Authorised Person, or Ancillary Service Provider, or any of Its Employeesmay be or has been engaged in Market Abuse; or
(o)an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider is subjectto a merger; or
(p)a meeting has been called to consider a resolution for an Authorised Person’s or Ancillary Service Provider’s winding‐up; or
(q)an application has been made for the commencement of any insolvency proceedings or the appointment of any receiver,administrator or provisional liquidator under the law of any country,territory or jurisdiction outside the AIFC for an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider; or
(r)there is a notification to dissolve an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider or strike it from the register maintained by the Registrarof Companies, or a comparable register in another jurisdiction; or
(s)there is information to suggest that an Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider is involved in Financial Crime; or
(t)the AFSA considers that the exerciseof the power is necessaryor desirable to ensure Clients, Authorised Persons, Ancillary Service Providers or the financial system, are not adversely affected.
6.2 Obligation of disclosure to the AFSA
6.2.1. Core information
An Authorised Personor Ancillary Service Provider must provide the AFSA with reasonable advance notice of a changein:
(a)the Authorised Person’s or Ancillary Service Provider’s name; or
(b)any business or tradingname under which the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider carries on a Regulated Activity, MarketActivity or Ancillary Service; or
(c)the address of the Authorised Person’sor Ancillary Service Provider’s principal place of business in the AIFC; or
(d)in the case of a Branch,its registered office or head officeaddress; or
(e)its legal structure; or
(f)an Approved Individual’s name or any material mattersrelating to his fitness and propriety.
…
6.2.3. Regulatory impact
An Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must advisethe AFSA immediately if it becomesaware, or has reasonable grounds to believe, that any of the following matters may have occurred or may be about to occur:
(a)the Authorised Person’s or Ancillary Service Provider’s failure to satisfy the fit and proper requirements; or
(b)any matter which could have a significant adverse effect on the Authorised Person’s or Ancillary Service Provider’s reputation; or
(c)any matter in relation to the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider which could result in serious adverse financialconsequences to the financial system or to other Authorised Persons or Ancillary Service Providers; or
(d)a significant breach of a Rule by the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provideror any of its Employees; or
(e)a breach by the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider or any of Its Employees of any requirement imposed by any applicable law bythe Authorised Personor Ancillary Service Provider orany of its Employees; or
(f)any proposed restructuring, merger, acquisition, reorganisation or business expansion which could have a significant impact on the Authorised Person’s or Ancillary Service Provider's risk profileor resources; or
(g)any significant failure in the Authorised Person’s or Ancillary Service Provider’s systems or controls,including a failurereported to by the Authorised Person’s or Ancillary Service Provider's Auditor; or
(h)any action that would result in a materialchange in the capital adequacy or solvency of the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider; or
(i)non-compliance with Rules due to an emergency outsidethe Authorised Person’sor Ancillary Service Provider’s controland the steps beingtaken by the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider.
…
6.2.6. Fraud and errors
An Authorised Personor Ancillary Service Provider must notify the AFSA immediately if one of the followingevents arises inrelation to its activities:
(a)it becomes aware that an Employee may have committeda fraud against one of its or another Person’s Clients; or
(b)a fraud has been committed againstit; or
(c)it has reasonto believe that a Personis acting with intent to commit a serious fraud against it; or
(d)it identifies significant irregularities in its accounting or other records,whether or not there is evidence of fraud; or
(e)it suspects that one of its Employees who is connected with the Authorised Person’s Regulated Activities or MarketActivities or Ancillary Service Provider’s Ancillary Services may be guilty of serious misconduct.
…
6.2.9. Winding up, bankruptcy and insolvency
An Authorised Personor Ancillary Service Provider must notify the AFSA immediately on:
(a)the calling of a meetingto consider a resolution for winding up the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider; or
(b)an application to dissolvethe Authorised Personor Ancillary Service Provider orto strike it from the register maintained by the AIFC Registrar of Companies, or a comparable register in anotherjurisdiction; or
(c)the presentation of a petitionfor the windingup of the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider; or
(d)the making of, or any proposals for the making of, a composition or arrangement with creditors of the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider; or
(e)the application of any Person against the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider for the commencement of any insolvency proceedings, appointment of any receiver, administrator or provisional liquidator under the law ofany country.
…
6.2.11. Accuracy of information
An Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must take reasonable steps to ensure that all information that it provides to the AFSA in accordance with any applicable legislation is:
(a)factually accurate or, in the case of estimates and judgements, fairlyand properly based; and
(b)complete, in that it should include anything of which the AFSA would reasonably expect to be notified.
6.2.12. Correction of inaccurate information
An Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider must notify the AFSA immediately if it becomes aware, or has information that reasonably suggests, that it:
(a)the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider has or may have provided the AFSA with information which was or may have been false, misleading, incomplete or inaccurate; or
(b)the information provided by the Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider has or may have changed in a material particular.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE AIFC CONDUCT OF BUSINESS RULES 2017
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
Guidance: Purpose of this rulebook
The purpose of this rulebook,“COB”, is to ensure that financial servicesfirms operating in the AIFC meet the standards of conduct expected of such firms, particularly with regard to the treatment of their clients, but also in their dealings with counterparties and other market participants. COB also includes rules to ensure that the behaviour of firms operating in the AIFC contributes to fostering and maintaining the integrity of financialmarkets in the AIFC. COB also includes certain requirements applicable to Ancillary Services Providers.
(…)
13. ANCILLARY SERVICEPROVIDERS
(…)
13.2. Principles for Ancillary Service Providers
(…)
13.2.9. Principle 9 ‐ Conflicts of interest
An Ancillary Service Provider must take all reasonable steps to ensure that conflicts of interest between itself and its Clients, between its Employees and Clients and between one Client and another are identified and then prevented or managed, or disclosed, in such a way that the interests of a Client are not adversely affected.
13.2.10. Principle 10 – Complaints
An Ancillary Service Provider must take all reasonable steps to ensure that Complaints made against it by Clients are handled fairly, consistently and promptly.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE AFSA GLOSSARY
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
AIFC Court | The court specified under Article 13 of the Constitutional |
Centre Bodies | The bodies identified in Article 9 of the Constitutional |
Centre Participant | As defined in Article 1(5) of the Constitutional |
Client Assets | Client Money and Client Investment |
Financial Crime | Any kind of conduct relating to money or to financial services or markets that would amount to criminal conduct under Kazakh law (whether or not such conduct takes place in the Republic of Kazakhstan), including any offence involving: (a) fraud or dishonesty; or (b) misconduct in, or misuse of information relating to, a financial market; or (c) handling the proceeds of crime; or (d) the financing of terrorism (e) money laundering. |
Guidance | (a) guidance adopted under, or contained in, any AIFC Act; or (b) a code of practice, standard, policy statement or anything else adopted as guidance under any AIFC Act. |
Offer | (1) In relation to Securities, an Offer of Securities. (2) In relation to Units, an Offer of Units (and “Offered” and “Offering” and similar terms have corresponding meanings |
Regulation | A regulation enacted under Article 4(3) of the Constitutional |
Rule | A rule made by the AFSA under Article 4(3) of the Constitutional |
Security | 1. A Security is: (a) a Share; (b) a Debenture; (c) a Warrant; (d) a Certificate; or (e) a Structured Product. 2. For the purposes of article 6 of the Constitutional |
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE AIFC FEES RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
1.2.3. Application fees payable to the AFSA in respect of Ancillary Services
An applicant seeking to carry on one or more Ancillary Services or an Authorised FirmAncillary Service Provider applying to modifyvary or withdraw a Licence to carry on Ancillary Services, must pay to the AFSA:
(a) the application fees specified in Schedule 3; and
(b) any supplementary fee required by the AFSA in accordance with FEES 6.
SCHEDULE 3: APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA FOR ANCILLARY SERVICES
…
1.2 Fees for variationmodification or withdrawal of a Licence
Application to varymodify or withdraw a Licence
Fee (USD)*
VariationModification of an Ancillary Service Provider's Licence
The application fee under table 1.1 of Schedule 3 of FEES for an additional type of Ancillary Service currently being sought. This applies only to a variationmodification (change) of the scope of Licence where new Ancillary Services sought to be included.
Withdrawal of an Ancillary Service Provider’s Licence
At present, the AFSA does not intend to charge an application fee for these activities. Any such application fee shall be determined by the AFSA at a later date.
* Application fee for variationmodification of a Licence prescribed herein is applied from 1 May 2022. Before 1 May 2022, this fee is not applied.
Applications to varymodify or withdraw
An Ancillary Service Provider applying to the AFSA to change the scope of its Licence, to have a condition or restriction varied or withdrawn, or to have its Licence withdrawn must pay the prescribed fee set out in the table at 1.2 above
Consultation Paper on Proposed AIFC Digital Assets Trading Facility Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Introduction
Why are we issuing this Consultation Paper (CP)?
1.The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has issued this Consultation Paper to seek suggestions from the market on the amendments to the AIFC Rules and regulations to enhance the AIFC Digital Asset Trading Facility Framework.
Who should read this CP?
2.The proposals in this paper will be of interest to current and potential AIFC participants dealing with digital assets as well as the market and other stakeholders.
Terminology
3.Defined terms have the initial letter of the word capitalised, or of each word in a phrase. Definitions are set out in the Glossary Rules (GLO). Unless the context otherwise requires, where capitalisation of the initial letter is not used, the expression has its natural meaning.
What are the next steps?
4.We invite comments from interested stakeholders on the proposed framework. All commentsshould be in writing and sent to the addressor email specified below. If sending your comments by email, please use “Consultation Paper AFSA-L-CE-2023-0001” in the subject line. You may, if relevant, identify the organisation you represent when providing your comments. The AFSA reserves the right to publish, including on its website, any comments you provide, unless you expressly request otherwise. Comments supported by reasoning and evidence will be given more weight by the AFSA.
5.The deadline for providing comments on the proposed framework is 2 July 2023. Once we receive your comments, we shall consider if any refinements are required to this proposal.
6.AFSA prefers to receive comments by email at consultation@afsa.kz or posted to:
Policy and Strategy Division
Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA)
55/17 Mangilik El, building C3.2, Astana, Kazakhstan
Structure of this CP
Part I – Background;
Part II – Issues;
Part III – Best Practice;
Part IV – Proposals;
Part V – Public Consultation Questions;
Part VI – Outcomes.
Annex 1 - Draft AIFC Rules on Digital Asset Activities (Digital Asset Trading Facility framework);
Annex 2 – Consequential amendments to AIFC Regulations and Rules.
Background
1.Regulatory authorities globally are examining the issues surrounding trading of digital assets. The International Organization of Securities Commissions’ (“IOSCO”) in its March 2022 Decentralized Finance Report have raised concerns about key risks including market integrity, illicit activity and operational and technological risks. There are also other issues such as safekeeping and segregation of client assets, liquidity (or insolvency) risk, lack of disclosure and skills (experience, culture) on market surveillance function, risk of improper investor assessment, business continuity risk (prudential risk), pre- and post-trade processes, risk of arbitrage and inefficient price formation which regulators seek to address. The AFSA also examined its legal and regulatory framework based on risks and issues that were raised by jurisdictions around the world.
Based on our analysis, it is believed that the below factors require further enhancements of the framework:
- i.Market specifics and consequential risks; and
- ii.Concerns of the current Digital Asset Trading Facility (“DATF”) framework structure.
2.Following the review of the AIFC DATF framework, AFSA issued a Consultation Paper on “Enhancements to Digital Asset Trading Facility framework” on 27 January 2023 to address the existing risks in the digital asset industry and consider options for restructuring the DATF framework.
3.Feedback received during the public consultation as well as initial examination of the DATF framework by AFSA were used to prepare this Consultation Paper on “Amendments to the AIFC Digital Asset Trading Facility framework”.
Issues
In light of the recent developments and reported failures of some cryptoexchanges, the AFSA considers taking measures in order to pursue its regulatory objectives. The absence of a clear legal and regulatory framework for digital assets may lead to a lack of investors’ confidence in those digital assets, which could significantly hinder the development of a market and could lead to missed opportunities in terms of innovative digital services or new funding sources for AIFC companies.
Regulatory authorities globally are examining the issues surrounding trading of digital assets. International Organization of Securities Commissions’ (“IOSCO”) in its March 2022 Decentralized Finance Report have raised concerns about key risks including market integrity, illicit activity and operational and technological risks. There are also other issues such as safekeeping and segregation of client assets, liquidity (or insolvency) risk, lack of disclosure and skills (experience, culture) on market surveillance function, risk of improper investor assessment, business continuity risk (prudential risk), pre- and post-trade processes, risk of arbitrage and inefficient price formation which regulators seek to address. The AFSA also examined its legal and regulatory framework based on risks and issues that were raised by jurisdictions around the world.
Based on our analysis, it is believed that the below factors require further enhancements of the framework:
(1)Market specifics and consequential risks; and
(2)Concerns of the current DATF framework structure.
Market specifics and consequential risks
There is a number of market factors that influence the level of risks originating from DATFs:
·Market capitalisation hit 2.6 trln. USD (2021) with subsequent fall to one third of value (to approximately one 1 trln. USD);
·A large number of Retail Investors (e.g., 6.2% of British citizens own cryptoassets);
·Increasing level of adoption of cryptocurrencies by traditional finance intermediaries. Many online retailers and some brick-and-mortar stores accept payment in crypto through payment service gateways and providers.
·Collapse of Luna and Terra (USD pegged algorithmic stablecoin) in Q2 2022 and FTX in Q4, demonstrating the high volatility of the asset class.
The above factors demonstrate the risks for consumer protection and financial stability from illicit activities, cyber threats and market abuse. These risks are only partially addressed by the existing mitigants or lack the appropriate and adequate measures, including
(1)money laundering and terrorist financing risks;
(2)risk of operational failure and cyber risk;
(3)conflict of interest risk;
(4)market abuse risk (market manipulation, misleading or other fraudulent and deceptive conduct);
(5)insufficient information available to the investors on trading rules;
(6)lack of information describing all relevant types of Digital Assets;
(7)insufficient knowledge by DATFs;
(8)counterparty risk and settlement finality risk;
(9)problems within DATF framework, i.e., inefficient structure of the framework, inefficient provisions, deficiencies revealed as a result of day-to-day supervision processes;
(10)structural issues with the DATF framework.
Concerns of current DATF framework’s structure
The ongoing supervision of cryptoexchanges revealed contradictions, inefficient provisions, and uncertain definitions within the regime. The AIFC DATF regime does not address all required risks that would be caused if/when FinTech Lab cryptoexchanges start operating under full authorisation regime. Another deficiency of the framework is its form, where DATF related rules are spread across various AIFC rules. This is known to be inconvenient to technology driven cryptoexchanges that do not have a regulatory compliance skillset and culture and prefer to have all requirements in one place.
Best Practice
The AIFC’s legal framework was assessed against the issues and risks specified in the IOSCO’s Final Report “Issues, Risks and Regulatory Considerations Relating to Crypto-Asset Trading Platforms”. Guidance of other global standard setting bodies (e.g., the FATF and Financial Stability Board) has also been taken into account, and relevant suggestions / recommendations have been developed based on such guidance and best international practice. The Policy Paper mainly focuses on the analysis of regimes in such financial centres and jurisdictions as the Abu-Dhabi Global Market (“ADGM”), Dubai International Financial Centre (“DIFC”), and Bahrain that have comprehensive cryptoexchange regulatory frameworks. In addition, in some instances, references to best practices of other jurisdictions (Malaysia, the European Union, United States, and Japan) have been given.
Primarily, the legal framework of the ADGM is selected as a primary benchmark due to various common features such as:
(1)Similar status of international financial centre with risk-based regulation;
(2)Regulatory framework is generally based on the UK financial legal framework, principles and rules;
(3)Comprehensive regulatory framework for DATFs embracing many aspects of their activities (e.g., authorisation, fitness and propriety, conduct of business, anti-money laundering, prudential requirements and guidance);
(4)Previously AIFC followed the ADGM approach for DATF and DA regulations;
(5)Relatively mature DATFs regulatory framework that was implemented in 2018 and was subject to revisions;
(6)Relatively developed cryptomarket (multiple DATFs have been licenced by the ADGM’s Financial Services Regulatory Authority);
The other two benchmark jurisdictions are the DIFC and Bahrain. The DIFC introduced its Investment Token framework recently in October 2022 and its Crypto Token Framework in November 2022. The Bahraini framework has also the common financial center feature and is based on the UK financial legal framework. Bahrain adopted its DASPs and DA regulatory framework in 2019. Bahrain established a standalone crypto framework that is comprehensive, convenient in terms of navigation, has some commonalities with ADGM, but at the same time provides for many specific and tailored measures that address the risks of the DASP-related activities.
Unlike AIFC, where DATF is treated as an Authorised Market Institution, cryptoexchanges provide services under the Multilateral Trading Facility regime in the ADGM.
Proposals
1. Risk mitigation measures
1.1. Governance
Digital Asset Service Providers should have internal controls in place with a view to establish risk management across its operations, departments, branches, and subsidiaries, both domestically and where relevant abroad. Those internal controls should include appropriate governance arrangements to establish clear responsibilities for the management of risks. These arrangements are scalable depending on the nature and size of the business, but for a cryptoexchange or large broker should include a board of directors, board committees and an executive team with a Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Technology Officer, and external/internal independent audit function. Some of these requirements are already set by the AIFC General Rules.
1.2.Risk of illicit activity
Following the analysis of AIFC AML regime, it was concluded that it has to be strengthened by a Travel Rule requirement, Guidance on AML aspects of DATF operations (e.g., setting criteria for Digital Assets admission to trading) and imposing bans on privacy tokens (fully anonymous digital assets).
The rule, formally known as FATF Recommendation #16, requires DASPs to obtain, hold, and submit required originator and beneficiary information associated with Digital Asset transfers in order to identify and report suspicious transactions, take freezing actions, and prohibit transactions with designated persons and entities. Besides, AFSA proposed its approach to the transactions of DASPs with unhosted wallets and sunrise issue that follows FATF recommendations.
Finally, AFSA set a requirement on conducting due diligence by VASPs of its counterparties as per FATF recommendation #13.
1.3. Operational resilience and cyber security
Overall, the regulatory measures under the AIFC Rules are aimed at ensuring basic standards for technology governance to prevent operational disruptions and cyber threats within cryptoexchanges (systems and controls, outsourcing requirements, requirements for testing etc.). However, given the high cyber risks in the cryptosphere, the regulatory protections have some deficiencies. Therefore, the following measures are suggested:
(1) impose mandatory independent third-party audit of technology governance and IT systems of all DASPs; set a criteria for the independent third-party auditors and define scope of the audit;
(2) requirement to make a mandatory appointment of Chief Information Technology Officer;
(3) regulate the types of wallet solutions (hot vs cold wallet) for Digital Asset custody through a guidance; the Paper suggests setting expectations under the Guidance for storage of DAs in cold wallet or using other alternative solutions that ensure high standards of security and resilience.
(4) extend the COB Chapter 4 on Client agreement and Key Information on DATF regime;
(5) impose additional obligations for providing DA custody services (e.g., informing client on confirmation of successful transfer of DA, on final fees and charges, set out in Client agreement the legal grounds for cryptoexchange to stop and restrict client access to its services).
1.4. Safekeeping and segregation of client assets
There is a high risk of co-mingling of cryptoexchanges’ DAs with those of their clients and there are concerns with proper record-keeping procedures in cryptoexchanges. Measures proposed below will enhance segregation, reconciliation and accurate accounting requirements:
(1) application of COB 8 Client investment rules on DATF (proposal considered when a problem of treatment of cryptoexchanges as Regulated or Market activity is analyzed below);
(2) substitute the term “Digital Asset Depository” with the term “Providing (Digital Asset) Custody” services; and
(3) daily reconciliation of Digital Asset balances requirements.
1.5. Conflict of interests
Existing cryptoexchanges’ business models that combine custody, market making, settling and clearing services are highly exposed to conflicts of interest risk. The current regulatory measures against this risk are not efficient since conflict of interests rules under COB are not applicable to DATF activity. Hence, this Paper proposes to extend existing conflicts of interests Rules under COB on DATF.
Additionally, AFSA suggests to allow proprietary trading for DATF on its own platform. Proprietary trading by cryptoexchanges is a prevailing practice in many markets abroad, used for creating liquidity on its own platform. Given that the AIFC cryptoexchange market is at the early stage of development, this approach may have positive effects such as decreased price volatility and attraction of investors. Furthermore, to avoid the comingling of the traditional finance activities with activities of DASPs, AFSA proposes a prohibition for traditional services Operating an Exchange to admit and trade Digital Assets.
1.6. Market Abuse
Trading on cryptoexchanges globally has attracted various market abuse practices, whereas the measures are generic and lack the clarity on applicability of the separate and comprehensive rules against market abuse on DATF and Digital Assets. Thus, the applicability of Market Abuse provisions under AIFC Market Rules to DATF and Digital Assets is clearly defined. Additional mitigants concern imposing requirement on DATF to monitor its own forums to avoid market manipulation.
1.7. Disclosures to investors
The process of admission to trading would require the DATF to prepare a report on Digital Asset in the form of a white paper but additionally with non-technical details for AFSA’s approval.
In regard to the lack of specific rules on disclosures of data on specific features of Digital Assets (e.g., hacking vulnerabilities, traceability of Digital Assets), that is mitigated by imposing a requirement on DASPs to disclose a Key Features Document (KFD or “Digital Asset Prospectus”) prior to providing services to clients. KFD may provide data on key issuers, design team of the Digital Assets, underlying technology, valuation of the Digital Assets, volatility, fraud, hacking risks, and other relevant topics.
1.8.Pre- and post-trade processes
In addition to the existing requirements on cryptoexchanges to disclose trade data prior to and after the trades, it is proposed that DATFs have to disclose additional pre-trade data, in the form of volume of bid and offer, and the depth of trading interest shown at the prices and volumes advertised to participants.
Further, the proposed amendments is also aimed at providing an exemption from pre-trade transparency for participants that intend to enter into large trades (e.g., large orders of institutional investors that do not wish such orders to be displayed) that will benefit the certain large players.
1.9. Retail Clients protections
Retail clients have a direct access to the DATF platform. Therefore, direct investing in digital assets that are risky and volatile, exposes the retail consumers to the high risks and losses. Existing measures to protect Retail clients under AIFC DATF framework will be complemented by:
·retaining investment limits to digital assets on retail clients – residents of Kazakhstan, whereas no investment limits will be applicable on non-residents of Kazakhstan. However, non-residents of Kazakhstan will be subject to appropriateness assessment by the DATF Operator prior to allowing access to trading.
·Prohibition to use the Digital Asset Derivative products, unless Retail Clients residents of Kazakhstan successfully pass appropriateness assessment by the DATF Operator.
2. Further enhancement of the existing DATF framework
During our analysis, several policy matters were identified that are suggested to be changed.
2.1.Regulated vs Market activity
The fundamental aspect of the regulatory regime is treatment of the cryptoexchange either as a market or regulated activity. Currently, cryptoexchanges are considered an Authorised Market Institution, however direct access of investors to a cryptoexchange without traditional brokers weakens its market infrastructure features. The business practices of cryptoexchanges require them to combine additional custody and proprietary trading services (meaning direct interaction with clients), therefore, it is concluded that qualifying the cryptoexchange as a regulated firm is more appropriate.
2.2. Net asset test
It is proposed to allow investors to provide evidence of owning Digital Assets as part of their net assets for the professional investor eligibility test. Specifically, it is proposed to recognise Approved Digital Assets in the net asset test with 70% haircut for unbacked Digital Assets (e.g., Bitcoin) or without a haircut for regulated fiat stablecoins (e.g., USD Coin or Tether).
2.3.“Green list”
The existing DATF regulatory regime requires the approval of Digital Assets for trading on cryptoexchange by the AFSA. To increase efficiency in the course of assessment, the Paper proposes a criteria-based process that leads to the inclusion of Digital Asset on a “green list”. These criteria may include maturity / market capitalisation, security, traceability of the Digital Asset, support of Digital Assets by other cryptoexchnages, security and usability of distributed ledger technology, innovation / efficiency, and practical application/functionality. AFSA may publish the so-called green list of the Approved Digital Assets on its website, and regularly review it.
This Paper proposes to impose a requirement on DATFs to notify the AFSA 10 days before admission of a Digital Asset to trading and confirm that it has available tools to trace the specific Digital Asset transaction on its underlying blockchain. In addition, the Paper proposes to impose a requirement on DATFs to notify the AFSA if DATFs become aware of significant developments that may result in the Digital Asset no longer qualifying as an Approved Digital Asset (e.g., cyber risks, or privacy features making the Digital Asset transaction non-traceable or fully-anonymous).
2.4. Considering DATF framework restructuring
One of the deficiencies of the existing framework is its form, where DATF related rules are spread across various AIFC Rules. This is known to be inconvenient to technology driven cryptoexchanges that do not have a high-level regulatory compliance skillset and culture and prefer to have all requirements in one place.
Therefore, analysis suggested three options for the restructuring of the existing DAFT Framework:
Option 1 – Keeping the existing framework form; or
Option 2 – Developing a standalone DATF framework; or
Option 3 – Treatment of cryptoexchanges as an MTF.
As a result of review of the options, it is proposed to select the most user-friendly and comprehensive approach - option 2, where a single Rulebook brings together all provisions from other rulebooks with necessary adjustments for Digital Asset and DATF activity.
Public consultation questions
In the course of public consultation, existing and potential market participants will be invited to comment on the following questions:
(1)AFSA invites comments on the draft Rules on Digital Asset Activities and consequential amendments set out in the paper.
(2)Are there any new provisions or amendments that are not clear? What are they and what is your interpretation of them? How would you recommend addressing the lack of clarity?
(3)How much time will your business need to make itself compliant with the proposed amendments?
(4)AFSA invites comments on the proposed DATF rulebook restructuring.
(5)What is your view on the proposed capital requirements?
(6)Do you agree with our proposal to insert provisions in the Rules which will outline requirements in relation to the composition, structure, duties, and powers as well as skills, experience and qualifications of the members of the Board of Directors? Do you think there is a need to add provisions which will specify the minimum number of independent directors? If so, how many independent directors you think will be the optimal number?
(7)What do you think about the proposed requirements in relation to the IT systems and technology governance?
(8)What is your view on the approval process of the Digital Assets to trading? Do you agree that DATF Operators should analyse and decide themselves whether to admit Digital Assets to trading?
(9)Do you agree with the proposed restrictions and prohibitions?
(10)Do you agree with our proposal to specify in the Rules the residency requirement (i.e. to be residents in the Republic of Kazakhstan) for certain Approved Individuals?
Outcomes
It is expected that the implementation of the Amendments to the AIFC Digital Asset Trading Facility framework by the AFSA will help:
1) address and mitigate risks originating from cryptoexchanges’ operations and cryptoasset industry in general;
2) address contradictions, inefficient requirements, unclear provisions of the existing framework;
3) create favorable regime for cryptoexchange business in the AIFC, encouraging innovation in digital assets and contributing to the development of crypto-asset ecosystem in Kazakhstan.
This will collectively help to create a clear, convenient, efficient, detailed and balanced AIFC DATF framework with high standards for consumer protection, without hindering development of cryptoexchanges.
Annex 1
1.GENERAL
1.1.Application of these Rules
These Rules, which may be cited as the AIFC Rules on Digital Asset Activities (“DAA”), apply to a Person carrying on, in or from the AIFC, the following Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets:
(a)Dealing in Investments as Principal;
(b)Dealing in Investments as Agent;
(c)Managing Investments;
(d)Managing a Collective Investment Scheme;
(e)Providing Custody;
(f)Arranging Custody;
(g)Advising on Investments;
(h)Arranging Deals in Investments;
(i)Providing Money Services; and
(j)Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility.
Guidance:
The following activities do not constitute Operating a Digital Asset Business:
(a) trading of Digital Assets for the Person’s own investment purposes; or
(b) any other activity or arrangement that is deemed by the AFSA to not constitute Operating a Digital Asset business, where necessary and appropriate in order for the AFSA to pursue its objectives.
2.RULES APPLICABLE TO DIGITAL ASSET TRADING FACILITY OPERATORS
This Chapter 2 applies to all Digital Asset Trading Facility Operators.
Guidance
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator is an Authorised Firm to which the following provisions of the Constitutional Statute, GEN, COB, AML, MAR are applicable either directly or in respect of its officers and Employees who are Approved Individuals or Designated Individuals:
Article 4-1 of the Constitutional Statute;
AML (in whole);
Chapter 2 (Client classification) of the COB;
Chapter 3 (Communications with Clients and Financial Promotions) of the COB;
Chapter 4 (Key information and client agreement) of the COB;
Chapter 7 (Conflicts of interest) of the COB;
Chapter 8 (Client Assets) of the COB;
Chapter 9 (Reporting to Clients) of the COB;
Chapter 15 (Complaints handling and dispute resolution) of the COB;
Chapter 5 (Market Abuse) of the MAR;
Chapter 2 (Controlled and Designated Functions) of the GEN;
Chapter 3 (Control of Authorised Persons) of the GEN;
Chapter 4 (Core Principles) of the GEN;
Chapter 5 (Systems and Controls) of the GEN;
Chapter 6 (Supervision) of the GEN; and
Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC.
2.1.Authorisation
(1) A Person wishing to carry on the Regulated Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility must be an Authorised Firm licensed by the AFSA.
(2) A Person wishing to carry on the Regulated Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility must submit to the AFSA relevant policies and controls.
2.2.Requirements for Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator authorisation
The AFSA may not grant authorisation or variation to operate a Digital Asset Trading Facility unless the applicant satisfies all of the following requirements:
(1)general authorisation requirements applicable to the applicant under the Framework Regulations and other applicable rules, and
(2)the applicant must ensure that it maintains at all times capital resources in the amount specified in Table 1 by reference to the activity that the Authorised Firm is licensed to conduct or, if it is authorised to conduct more than one such activity, the amount that is the higher or highest of the relevant amounts in Table 1.
Table 1
Regulated Activity | Capital requirement (USD) |
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility | 200,000 or amount equal to 12 months’ operational expenses (the amount that is the higher or highest) |
Providing Custody (in relation to Digital Assets) | 250,000 |
2.3.Governance
2.3.1. Mandatory appointments
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must make the following appointments and ensure they are held by the relevant Approved or Designated Individuals at all times:
(1)the Senior Executive Officer;
(2)Finance Officer;
(3)Compliance Officer;
(4)Risk Manager; and
(5)Money Laundering Reporting Officer.
In addition, a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must appoint a Chief Information Technology Officer, who is an individual responsible for its ongoing information technology (“IT”) operations, maintenance and security oversight to ensure that the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s IT systems are reliable and adequately protected from external attack or incident.
2.3.2. Board of Directors of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must have an effective Board of Directors which is collectively accountable for ensuring that the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s business is managed prudently and soundly.
(2) The AFSA may issue guidance on the requirements relating to Board composition, structure, duties and powers as well as skills, experience and qualifications of Directors, and other relevant requirements.
(3) The Board must ensure that there is a clear division between its responsibility for setting the strategic aims and undertaking the oversight of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator and the senior management’s responsibility for managing the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s business in accordance with the strategic aims and risk parameters set by the Board.
(4) The Board and its committees must have an appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence, and knowledge of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s business, and adequate resources, including access to expertise as required and timely and comprehensive information relating to the affairs of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator.
(5) The Board must ensure that the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator has an adequate, effective, well-defined and well-integrated risk management, internal control and compliance framework.
(6) The Board must ensure that the rights of shareholders are properly safeguarded through appropriate measures that enable the shareholders to exercise their rights effectively, promote effective dialogue with shareholders and other key stakeholders as appropriate, and prevent any abuse or oppression of minority shareholders.
(7) The Board must ensure that the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s financial and other reports present an accurate, balanced and understandable assessment of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s financial position and prospects by ensuring that there are effective internal risk control and reporting requirements.
(8) A Director of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must act:
(a)on a fully informed basis;
(b) in good faith;
(c) honestly;
(d) with due skill, care and diligence; and
(e) in the best interests of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator and its shareholders and Clients.
2.4.Technology resources
2.4.1. Sufficient resources
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must have sufficient technology resources to continually operate, maintain, and supervise its facility.
2.4.2. Confidentiality
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must take reasonable steps to ensure that its information, records and data are secure, and the confidentiality is maintained.
2.4.3. Cyber-security
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must take reasonable steps to ensure that its IT systems are reliable and adequately protected from external attack or incident.
2.4.4. Cyber-security policy
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must implement a written cyber-security policy setting forth its policies and procedures for the protection of its electronic systems and Members and counterparty data stored on those systems, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s Governing Body at least on an annual basis.
(2) The cyber-security policy must, as a minimum, address the following areas:
(a) information security;
(b) data governance and classification;
(c) access controls;
(d) business continuity and disaster recovery planning and resources;
(e) capacity and performance planning;
(f) systems operations and availability concerns;
(g) systems and network security;
(h) systems and application development and quality assurance;
(i) physical security and environmental controls;
(j) customer data privacy;
(k) vendor and third-party service provider management; and
(l) incident response.
(3) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must inform the AFSA immediately if it becomes aware, or has reasonable grounds to believe, that a significant breach by any Person of its cyber-security policy may have occurred or may be about to occur.
2.4.5. On-going monitoring
For the purposes of meeting the requirement in DAA 2.4.1, a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must have adequate procedures and arrangements for the evaluation, selection and on-going maintenance and monitoring of IT systems. Such procedures and arrangements must, at a minimum, provide for:
(a) incident and problem management and system change;
(b) testing IT systems before live operations in accordance with the requirements in DAA 2.4.6. and 2.4.7;
(c) real time monitoring and reporting on system performance, availability and integrity; and
(d) adequate measures to ensure:
(i) the IT systems are resilient and not prone to failure;
(ii) business continuity in the event that an IT system fails;
(iii) protection of the IT systems from damage, tampering, misuse or unauthorised access; and
(iv)the integrity of data forming part of, or being processed through, IT systems.
2.4.6. Testing of technology systems
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must, before commencing live operation of its IT systems or any updates thereto, use development and testing methodologies in line with internationally accepted testing standards in order to test the viability and effectiveness of such systems. For this purpose, the testing must be adequate for the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator to obtain reasonable assurance that, among other things the systems:
(a)enable it to comply with all the applicable requirements on an on-going basis;
(b)can continue to operate effectively in stressed market conditions;
(c)have sufficient electronic capacity to accommodate reasonably foreseeable volumes of messaging and orders;
(d) are adequately scalable in emergency conditions that might threaten the orderly and proper operations of its facility; and
(e)embed any risk management controls, such as generating automatic error reports, work as intended.
2.4.7. Testing relating to Members’ technology systems
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must implement standardised conformance testing procedures. A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must ensure that the systems which its Members are using to access facilities operated by it have a minimum level of functionality that is compatible with its IT systems and will not pose any threat to fair and orderly conduct of its facility.
(2) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must also require its Members, before commencing live operation of any electronic trading system, user interface or a trading algorithm, including any updates to such arrangements, to use adequate development and testing methodologies to test the viability and effectiveness of their systems, to include system resilience and security.
(3) For the purposes of (2), a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must require its Members:
(a) to adopt trading algorithm tests, including tests in a simulation environment which are commensurate with the risks that such a strategy may pose to itself and to the fair and orderly functioning of the facility operated by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator; and
(b)not to deploy trading algorithms in a live environment except in a controlled and cautious manner.
(4) The requirements in (1)-(3) do not apply to the Member of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator if the Member is a Body Corporate or an individual (natural person) that carries on the activity solely as principal.
2.4.8. Regular review of systems and controls
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must undertake annual review and updates of its IT systems and controls as appropriate to the nature, scale and complexity of its operations, the diversity of its operations, the volume and size of transactions, and the level of risk inherent with its business
(2)For the purposes of (1), a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must adopt well defined and clearly documented development and testing methodologies which are in line with internationally accepted testing standards.
2.4.9. Mandatory third-party audit of technology governance and IT systems
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator is required to undergo a qualified independent third-party technology governance and IT audit to conduct vulnerability assessments and penetration testing at least on an annual basis.
(2) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must provide the results of technology governance and IT assessments and tests to the AFSA upon its request.
(3) The AFSA may publish a list of requirements that should be met by qualified auditors who conduct independent third-party technology governance and IT audit.
Guidance:
Credentials which indicate a qualified independent third-party auditor is suitable to conduct audit of technology governance and IT systems may include:
(1) designation as a Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA) or Certified Information Security Manager (CISM) by the Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA); or
(2) designation as a Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) by the International Information System Security Certification Consortium (ISC); or
(3) accreditation by a recognised and reputable body to certify compliance with relevant ISO/IEC 27000 series standards; or
(4) accreditation by the relevant body to certify compliance with the Kazakhstani standards in the area of information (cyber) security.
2.4.10. Systems and controls
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must ensure that it has appropriate systems and controls to address the risks to their business. Such systems and controls should be developed considering such factors as the nature, scale and complexity of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s business, the diversity of its operations, the volume and size of transactions, and the level of risk inherent with its business.
(2) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must, as a minimum, have in place systems and controls with respect to the procedures describing the creation, management and control of Digital wallets and private keys.
(3) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must have adequate systems and controls to enable it to calculate and monitor its capital resources and its compliance with the requirements in DAA 2.2.(2). The systems and controls must be in writing and must be appropriate for the nature, scale and complexity of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s business and its risk profile.
2.4.11. Technology governance
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must, as a minimum, have in place systems and controls with respect to the following:
(a) Procedures describing the creation, management and controls of Digital Asset wallets, including:
(i) wallet setup/configuration/deployment/deletion/backup and recovery;
(ii) wallet access management;
(iii) wallet user management;
(iv) wallet rules and limit determination, review and update; and
(v) wallet audit and oversight.
(b) Procedures describing the creation, management and controls of private and public keys, including, as applicable:
(i) private key generation;
(ii) private key exchange;
(iii) private key storage;
(iv) private key backup;
(v) private key destruction;
(vi) private key access management;
(vii) public key sharing; and
(viii) public key re-use.
(c) Systems and controls to mitigate the risk of misuse of Digital Assets, setting out how
(i) the origin of Digital Assets is determined, in case of an incoming transaction; and
(ii) the destination of Digital Assets is determined, in case of an outgoing transaction.
(d) A security plan describing the security arrangements relating to:
(i) the privacy of sensitive data;
(ii) networks and systems;
(iii) cloud based services;
(iv) physical facilities; and
(v) documents, and document storage.
(e) A risk management plan containing a detailed analysis of likely risks with both high and low impact, as well as mitigation strategies. The risk management plan must cover, but is not limited to:
(i) operational risks;
(ii) technology risks, including ‘hacking’ related risks;
(iii) market risk for each Digital Asset admitted to trading; and
(iv) risk of Financial Crime.
2.5.Requirements applicable to a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator
2.5.1. Business Rules, Membership Rules and Admission to Trading Rules
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must prepare Business Rules, Admission to Trading Rules, and Membership Rules (the “DATF Operator’s Rules”).
2.5.2.Content of Business Rules
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s Business Rules must:
(a) be based on objective criteria;
(b) be non-discriminatory;
(c) be clear and fair;
(d) set out the Members’ and other participants’ obligations:
(i) arising from the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s constitution and other administrative arrangements;
(ii) when undertaking transactions on its facility; and
(iii) relating to professional standards that must be imposed on staff and agents of the Members and other participants when undertaking transactions on its facility;
(e) be made publicly available free of charge;
(f) contain provisions for the resolution of Members’ and other participants’ disputes and an appeal process from the decisions of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator, whether by an internal but independent body or otherwise; and
(g) contain disciplinary procedures, including any sanctions that may be imposed by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator against its Members and other participants.
2.5.3.Monitoring and enforcing compliance with Business Rules
The Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must have effective arrangements for monitoring and enforcing compliance with its Business Rules including procedures for:
(a) prompt investigation of complaints made to the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator about the conduct of Persons in the course of using the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility; and
(b) where appropriate, disciplinary action resulting in financial and other types of penalties.
2.5.4.Financial penalties
Where arrangements made pursuant to DAA 2.5.3. include provision for requiring the payment of financial penalties, they must include arrangements for ensuring that any amount so paid is applied only in one or more of the following ways:
(a) towards meeting expenses incurred by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator in the course of the investigation of the breach or course of conduct in respect of which the penalty is paid, or in the course of any appeal against the decision of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator in relation to that breach or course of conduct; or
(b) for the benefit of users of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator's facility.
2.5.5.Appeals
Arrangements made pursuant to DAA 2.5.3. must include provision for fair, independent and impartial resolution of appeals against decisions of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator.
2.5.6.Membership Rules
The Membership Rules of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must specify the obligations imposed on users or Members of its facility arising from:
(a) the constitution and administration of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator;
(b) where appropriate rules relating to transactions on its trading venues;
(c) admission criteria for Members;
(d) where appropriate rules and procedures for clearing and settlement of transactions; and
(e) where appropriate rules and procedures for the prevention of Market Abuse, money laundering and Financial Crime.
2.5.7.Admission to Trading Rules
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must make clear and transparent rules concerning the admission of Digital Assets to trading on its facility.
(2) The Admission to Trading Rules of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must ensure that:
(a) Digital Assets admitted to trading on a facility of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator are capable of being traded in a fair, orderly and efficient manner; and
(b) Digital Assets admitted to trading on a facility of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator are freely negotiable.
2.5.8. Consultation
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must seek prior approval of any of the DATF Operator’s Rules and of amendments to any of its Rules by:
(a) making such Rules available to public for consultation for no less than 30 days; and
(b) obtaining approval of the AFSA.
(2) For these purposes, a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must publish a consultation paper setting out:
(a) the text of both the proposed amendment and the current version of the rules that are to be amended;
(b) the reasons for proposing the amendment; and
(c) a reasonable consultation period, which must not be less than thirty calendar days after the date of publication, within which Members and other stakeholders may provide comments.
The Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must lodge with the AFSA the consultation paper no later than the time when it is released for public comment.
(3) The AFSA may, if it considers on reasonable grounds that it is appropriate to do so, require the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator to extend its proposed period of public consultation specified in the consultation paper.
(4) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must:
(a) facilitate, as appropriate, informal discussions on the proposed amendment with Members and other stakeholders including any appropriate representative bodies of such Persons;
(b) consider the impact the proposed amendment has on the interests of its Members and other stakeholders; and
(c) have proper regard to any public comments received.
(5) Following public consultation, a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must publish the final version of any of the DATF Operator’s Rules and consider whether it would be appropriate to discuss the comments received and any amendments made before publication.
(6) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must have procedures in place to ensure that the relevant of its Rules are monitored and enforced.
2.5.9. Waiver of consultation requirement
The AFSA may dispense with the requirement in DAA 2.5.2(2)(a) in cases of emergency, force majeure, typographical errors, minor administrative matters, or to comply with applicable laws. A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must have procedures for notifying users of these amendments for which the ASFA has dispensed with public consultation.
2.5.10. Review of Rules
In determining whether a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s procedures for consulting Members and other users of its facilities are appropriate, the AFSA may have regard to:
(a) the range of Persons to be consulted by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator under those procedures; and
(b) the extent to which the procedures include:
(i) informal discussions at an early stage with users of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility or appropriate representative bodies;
(ii) publication to users of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility of a formal consultation paper which includes clearly expressed reasons for the proposed changes and an appropriately detailed assessment of the likely costs and benefits;
(iii) adequate time for users of its facility to respond to the consultation paper and for the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator to take their responses properly into account;
(iv) adequate arrangements for making responses to consultation available for inspection by users of its facility, unless the respondent requests otherwise; and
(v) adequate arrangements for ensuring that the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator has proper regard to the representations received.
2.6.Membership
2.6.1. Persons eligible for Membership
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator may only admit as a Member a Person who satisfies admission criteria set out in its Membership Rules and which is:
(a) an Authorised Firm whose Licence permits it to carry on the Regulated Activities of Dealing in Investments as Principal and Dealing in Investments as Agent;
(b) a Recognised Non-AIFC Member; or
(c) a Body Corporate or an individual (natural person) which carries on the activity solely as principal.
2.6.2. Admission criteria
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must ensure that access to its facility is subject to criteria designed to protect the orderly functioning of the market and the interests of investors.
(2) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator may only give access to or admit to membership a Person who:
(a) is fit and proper and of good repute;
(b) if applicable, has a sufficient level of ability, competence and experience, including appropriate standards of conduct for its staff; and
(c) if applicable, has adequate organisational arrangements, including financial and technological resources.
(3) In assessing whether access to a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility is subject to criteria designed to protect the orderly functioning of the market or of those facilities and the interests of investors, the AFSA may have regard to whether:
(a) the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator limits access as a Member to such Persons:
(i) over whom it can with reasonable certainty enforce its rules contractually;
(ii) who have sufficient technical competence to use its facilities; and
(iii) if appropriate, who have adequate financial resources in relation to their exposure to the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator;
(b) indirect access to the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility is subject to suitable criteria, remains the responsibility of a Member of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator and is subject to the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s rules; and
(c) the Operator’s rules:
(i) set out the design and operation of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s relevant systems;
(ii) set out the risk for Members and other users when accessing and using the Operator’s facilities;
(iii) contain provisions for the resolution of Members’ and other users’ disputes and an appeal process for the decisions of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator;
(iv) contain disciplinary proceedings, including any sanctions that may be imposed by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator against its Members and other users; and
(v) set out other matters necessary for the proper functioning of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator and the facilities operated by it.
2.6.3. Lists of users or Members
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must make arrangements to provide the AFSA quarterly with a list of users or Members of its facility.
2.6.4. Undertaking to comply with AFSA rules
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator may not admit a Recognised Non-AIFC Member as a Member unless it:
(a) agrees in writing to submit unconditionally to the jurisdiction of the AFSA in relation to any matters which arise out of or which relate to its use of the facility of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator;
(b) agrees in writing to submit unconditionally to the jurisdiction of the AIFC Court in relation to any disputes, or other proceedings in the AIFC, which arise out of or relate to its use of the facility of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator;
(c) agrees in writing to subject itself to the Acting Law of the AIFC in relation to its use of the facility of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator; and
(d) where the Recognised Non-AIFC Member is incorporated outside the Republic of Kazakhstan, appoints and maintains at all times, an agent for service of process in the AIFC.
2.7.Direct Electronic Access
2.7.1.Direct Electronic Access to the facility
For the purposes of these Rules, Direct Electronic Access means any arrangement, such as the use of the Member's trading code, through which a Member or the Clients of that Member are able to transmit electronically orders relating to Digital Assets directly to the facility provided by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator and includes arrangements which involve the use by a Person of the infrastructure of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or the Member or Client or any connecting system provided by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Member or Client, to transmit the orders and arrangements where such an infrastructure is not used by a Person.
Guidance:
A Person who is permitted to have Direct Electronic Access to a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator's facility through a Member is not, by virtue of such permission, a Member of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator.
2.7.2.Permitting Members that are Body Corporates to provide Direct Electronic Access to clients
(1) This rule applies if a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator proposes to permit a Member that is a Body Corporate to provide its clients Direct Electronic Access to the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility.
(2) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator may permit a Member to provide its clients Direct Electronic Access to the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility only if:
(a) the clients meet the suitability criteria established by the Member in order to meet the requirements in DAA 2.7.3;
(b) the Member retains responsibility for the orders and trades executed by its clients who are using Direct Electronic Access; and
(c) the Member has adequate mechanisms to prevent its clients placing or executing orders using Direct Electronic Access in a manner that would result in the Member exceeding its position or margin limits.
2.7.3. Criteria, standards and arrangements for providing Direct Electronic Access to clients of Members that are Body Corporates
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator which permits its Members to provide its clients Direct Electronic Access to the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility under DAA 2.7.2. must:
(a) set appropriate standards regarding risk controls and thresholds on trading through Direct Electronic Access;
(b) be able to identify orders and trades made through Direct Electronic Access; and
(c) if necessary, be able to stop orders or trades made by a client using Direct Electronic Access provided by the Member without affecting the other orders or trades made or executed by that Member.
(2) A client who is permitted to have Direct Electronic Access to a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility through a Member is not, by virtue of such permission, a Member of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator. However, such client is subject to the jurisdiction of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator.
(3) In determining whether a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator has adequate arrangements to permit Direct Electronic Access to its facility and to prevent and resolve problems likely to arise from the use of electronic systems to provide indirect access to its facility to Persons other than the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s Members, the AFSA may have regard to:
(a) the rules and guidance governing Members’ procedures, controls and security arrangements for inputting instructions into the system;
(b) the rules and guidance governing the facilities that Members provide to its clients to input instructions into the system and the restrictions placed on the use of those systems;
(c) the rules and practices to detect, identify, and halt or remove instructions breaching any relevant restrictions;
(d) the quality and completeness of the audit trail of a transaction processed through an electronic connection system; and
(e) procedures to determine whether to suspend trading by those systems or access to them by or through individual Members.
2.7.4. Criteria, standards and arrangements for giving Direct Electronic Access to Members who are individuals (natural persons)
(1) This rule applies if a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator proposes to give to a Member who is an individual (natural person) Direct Electronic Access to the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility.
(2) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must ensure that:
(a) its rules clearly set out:
(i) the duties owed by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator to its Members with Direct Electronic Access, and how the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator is held accountable for any failure to fulfil those duties; and
(ii) the duties owed by the Members with Direct Electronic Access to the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator and how such Members are held accountable for any failure to fulfil those duties;
(b) appropriate investor redress mechanisms are available, in accordance with COB Chapter 15, and disclosed to Members permitted to trade Digital Assets on its facility; and
(c) its facility contains a prominent disclosure of the risks associated with trading and clearing Digital Assets.
(3) Without limiting the generality of the systems and controls obligations of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must have adequate systems and controls to address market integrity, AML and CTF, and investor protection risks in giving Direct Electronic Access to a Member, to trade on its facility, including procedures to:
(a) ensure that appropriate customer due diligence sufficient to address AML and CTF risks has been conducted on each Member, before permitting the Member to trade on its facility and periodically on an ongoing basis after the establishment of relations with a Member;
(b) detect and address market manipulation and abuse; and
(c) ensure that there is adequate disclosure relating to the Digital Assets that are traded on the facility.
(4) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must have adequate controls and procedures to ensure that trading Digital Assets by Members with Direct Electronic Access does not pose any risks to the orderly and efficient functioning of the facility’s trading system, including controls and procedures to:
(a) mitigate counterparty risks that may arise from defaults by such Members through adequate collateral management measures, such as margin requirements, based on the settlement cycle adopted by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator;
(b) identify and distinguish orders that are placed by such Members, and, if necessary, enable the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator to stop orders of, or trading by, such Members;
(c) prevent such Members from allowing access to other Persons to trade on the trading facility; and
(d) ensure that such Members fully comply with the rules of the facility and promptly address any gaps and deficiencies that are identified.
(5) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must have adequate resources and systems to carry out frontline monitoring of the trading activities of Members with Direct Electronic Access.
2.8.Admission of Digital Assets to trading
2.8.1. Application for admission of Digital Assets to Trading
(1) Applications for the admission of a Digital Asset to trading can be made to a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator by:
(a) the issuer of the Digital Asset; or
(b) a third party on behalf of and with the consent of the issuer of the Digital Asset; or
(c) a Member of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator.
(2) A Digital Asset can also be admitted to trading on the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s own initiative.
(3) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must, before admitting any Digital Asset to trading:
(a) be satisfied that the applicable requirements, including those in its Admission to Trading Rules, have been or will be fully complied with in respect of such Digital Asset; and
(b) obtain approval of the AFSA in respect of such Digital Asset.
(4) For the purposes of (1), a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must notify an applicant in writing of its decision in relation to the application for admission of the Digital Asset to trading. In the case that such decision is to reject the application, the written notice should indicate (i) whether the application has been considered by the AFSA, and if so, (ii) the AFSA’s determination in respect thereof.
(5) For the purposes of 3(b), an application to the AFSA by a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must include:
(a) a copy of the admission application; and
(b) any other information requested by the AFSA.
(6) In assessing an application, the AFSA may:
(a) require the applicant to provide additional information reasonably required for the AFSA to be able to decide the application;
(b) require the applicant to provide information on how the applicant intends to ensure compliance with any criterion;
(c) require the applicant to verify information it provides to the AFSA in any way that the AFSA specifies;
(d) make any enquiries which it may consider appropriate; and
(e) take into account any information which it considers to be relevant in making a suitability assessment.
2.8.2. Admission criteria
(1) For the purposes of 2.8.2(3)(b), a Digital Asset can be admitted to trading on the Operator’s facility if the AFSA is satisfied that:
(a) having considered the matters in (2), the Digital Asset is suitable for use in the AIFC;
(b) is not prohibited for use in the AIFC; and
(c) for a Fiat or Commodity stablecoin, all of the requirements in (4) are met in respect of that Fiat or Commodity stablecoin (and conditions (a) and (b) above are met).
(2) The matters referred to in (1)(a), which the AFSA considers, are:
(a) the regulatory status of the relevant Digital Asset in other jurisdictions, including whether it has been assessed or approved for use in another jurisdiction;
(b) whether there is adequate transparency relating to the Digital Asset and underlying blockchain, including sufficient detail about its purpose, protocols, consensus mechanism, governance arrangements, founders, key persons, miners and significant holders;
(c) the size (the market capitalisation), liquidity and volatility of the market for the Digital Asset globally;
(d) whether there is a total limit (cap) for the issuance of Digital Asset; the controls/processes to manage volatility of a particular Digital Asset (tokenomics);
(e) the adequacy and suitability of the technology used in connection with the Digital Asset; and
(f) whether risks associated with the Digital Asset are adequately mitigated, including risks relating to governance, legal and regulatory issues, cybersecurity, money laundering, Market Abuse and other
Financial Crime;
(g) whether a Digital Asset is traceable;
(h) whether there are any issues relatingto the security and/or usability of a DLT used for the purposes of a Digital Asset; and
(i) whether a DLT and smart contract (if any) have stress tested or subject to independent audit.
(3) In assessing the matters in (2), the AFSA may consider the cumulative effect of factors which, if taken individually, may be regarded as insufficient to give reasonable cause to doubt that the criteria in (1)(a) is satisfied.
(4) In the case of a Fiat stablecoin or Commodity stablecoin, the additional criteria referred to in (1)(c) are that:
(a) information is published at least once in a quarter on the value and composition of the reserves backing the Fiat stablecoin or Commodity stablecoin;
(b) the published information referred to in (4)(a) is verified by a suitably qualified third-party professional who is independent of the issuer of the Digital Asset and any persons responsible for the Digital Asset;
(c) the published information referred to in (4)(a) demonstrates that the reserves:
(i) at least equal in value to the notional value of outstanding Digital Assets in circulation (that value being calculated by multiplying the number of Digital Assets in circulation by the purported pegged Fiat Currency value);
(ii) include not more than 10% in high quality liquid assets other than cash;
(iii) are denominated in the reference currency; and
(iv) are held in segregated accounts with properly regulated banks or custodians in jurisdictions with regulation that is equivalent to the AFSA’s regime and AML regulation that is equivalent to the
standards set out in the FATF Recommendations;
(d) the Digital Asset is able to maintain a stable price relative to the Fiat Currency it references; and
(e) a Person is clearly responsible and liable to investors for the Digital Asset.
2.8.3. Decision-making procedures for the AFSA in relation to applications for approval of the admission of Digital Assets to trading
(1) Where a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator applies for approval of the admission of a Digital Asset to trading, the AFSA may:
(a) approve the application;
(b) reject the application; or
(c) approve the application subject to conditions or restrictions.
(2) The AFSA may exercise its powers under (1)(b) where the AFSA reasonably considers that:
(a) granting the Digital Assets admission to trading of Digital Assets would be detrimental to the interests of Persons dealing in the relevant Digital Assets using the facilities of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or otherwise; or
(b) any requirements imposed by the AFSA or in the Admission to Trading Rules of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator as are applicable have not been or will not be complied with; or
(c) the issuer of the Digital Assets has failed or will fail to comply with any obligations applying to it including those relating to having its Digital Assets admitted to trading or traded in another jurisdiction.
(3) Where the AFSA rejects an application for approval of admission of a Digital Asset to trading pursuant to (2), such Digital Assets must not be admitted by a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator to its facility.
(4) Where the AFSA approves an application for approval of admission of a Digital Asset to trading subject to conditions or restrictions, the A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator is responsible for implanting such conditions and restrictions in admitting the Digital Asset to trading, and such conditions or restrictions may not be varied or removed without the approval of the AFSA.
2.8.4. Withdrawal of a Digital Asset from the List of Digital Assets admitted to trading
The AFSA may withdraw a Digital Asset from the List of Digital Assets admitted to trading if it is no longer satisfied of the matters specified in DAA 2.8.2. in respect of the Digital Asset.
2.8.5. Events or developments affecting the Digital Asset
(1) If a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator becomes aware of any significant event or development that reasonably suggests that the Digital Asset no longer meets the criteria in DAA 2.8.2 for it to be admitted to trading, it must immediately notify the AFSA of such event or development.
(2) A notification under (1) is not required if the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator reasonably believes that the information is already generally available to the public.
(3) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must ensure that, where it seeks to offer services in relation to the Digital Asset associated with the new version of the underlying protocol (“hard fork”), this new Digital Asset meets the requirements for an Approved Digital Asset and that it obtains approval of the AFSA in respect of such Digital Asset.
2.8.6. List of Digital Assets admitted to trading
(1) The AFSA may publish on its website a List of Digital Assets admitted and approved by the AFSA to trading which can be traded on the trading facility of any Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator without obtaining the AFSA’s approval.
(2) Where a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator decides to admit a Digital Asset under (1) to trading, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator is required to notify the AFSA 10 days prior to the date of the admission of the Digital Asset to trading.
(3) Where a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator admits a Digital Asset to trading under (1), it is still required to publish a key features document under DAA 2.8.8.
2.8.7. Digital Asset white paper
(1) A Person seeking admission of a Digital Asset to trading a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility must prepare, submit to the AFSA and publish on its website the Digital Asset white paper.
(2) A Digital Asset white paper must contain:
(a) information about:
(i) the offeror or the Person seeking admission to trading; or
(ii) the issuer, if different from the offeror or Person seeking admission to trading; or
(iii) the Member of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility seeking admission to trading; or
(iv) the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator when it is seeking admission on its own initiative;
(b) information about the admission to trading on a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility;
(c) information on the rights and obligations attached to a Digital Asset;
(d) information on the underlying technology, including details of the technology that is used to issue, store or transfer the Digital Asset;
(e) information on the valuation of a Digital Asset;
(f) information on how ownership of the Digital Asset is established, certified, or otherwise evidenced;
(g) risks related to fraud, hacking, and Financial Crime;
(h) risks related to the volatility and unpredictability of price of the Digital Asset relative to Fiat Currency, which may result in significant losses over a short period of time;
(i) any other information relevant to the relevant Digital Asset that may assist the Client to understand the product and technology better and to make an informed decision; and
(j) any other information that the AFSA may request to add.
(3) All information referred to DAA 2.7.3. (2) must be clear, fair, and not misleading. The Digital Asset white paper should not contain materials omissions and should be presented in a concise and comprehensible form.
(4) The Digital Asset white paper must contain a summary which should be written in brief and non-technical language to provide key information about the offer to the public of a Digital Asset or about the intended admission of a Digital Asset to trading on the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility. The format and content of the summary of a Digital Asset white paper should provide, in conjunction with the Digital Asset white paper, appropriate information about the characteristics of a Digital Asset concerned to assist potential holders of a Digital Asset to make an informed decision.
2.8.8. Publication of key features document
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator may permit a Digital Asset to trading only if it published a key features document on its website about the Digital Asset.
(2) The key features document must include the following:
(a) information about the issuer (if any) and the individuals responsible for designing the Digital Asset;
(b) characteristics of the Digital Asset, including rights attaching to the Digital Asset and any project or venture to be funded (if relevant);
(c) the regulatory status of the Digital Asset in other jurisdictions;
(d) details of Persons responsible for performing obligations associated with the Digital Asset and details of where and against whom rights conferred by the Digital Asset may be exercised;
(e) information on the underlying DLT or similar technology used for the Digital Asset, including details of the technology that is used to issue, store or transfer the Digital Asset and any interoperability with other DLT;
(f) information on the underlying technology used by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator, including protocols and technical standards adhered to;
(g) details about how ownership of the Digital Asset is established, certified or otherwise evidenced;
(h) how the Digital Asset will be valued, and an explanation of how this is carried out and what benchmarks, indices or third parties are relied on;
(i) details of any other facility on which the Digital Asset is traded;
(j) the risks relating to the volatility and unpredictability of the price of the Digital Asset;
(k) in the case of a Fiat stablecoin or Commodity stablecoin, details about the reserves backing that Fiat stablecoin or Commodity stablecoin and the stabilisation and redemption mechanisms;
(l) cyber-security risks associated with the Digital Asset or its underlying technology, including whether there is a risk of loss of the Digital Asset in the event of a cyberattack, and details of steps that have been, or can be taken to mitigate those risks;
(m) the risks relating to fraud, hacking and Financial Crime; and
(n) information related to the principal adverse environmental and climate-related impacts of the consensus mechanism used to issue each Digital Asset; any
(o) other information relevant to the Digital Asset that would reasonably assist the Client to understand the Digital Asset and whether to invest in the Digital Asset, or use the service being offered to the Client.
Guidance:
The Digital Asset white paper is a document outlining the main economic and technical aspects of a specific Digital Asset. The key features document is a document outlining the main characteristics of the Digital Asset in a simple format to provide potential investors with the aims and benefits of the Digital Asset, along with the relevant risks and limitations. The content of the Digital Asset white paper and key features document should not conflict each other.
2.8.9. Ongoing information
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must take reasonable steps to ensure that accurate and up-to-date information is made available about Digital Assets traded on its facility so that users of the facility are able to make informed decisions about trading in the Digital Assets.
(2) Without limiting the generality of (1), the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must as a minimum ensure the following information is readily available for each Digital Asset:
(a) the total number, and market capitalisation, of the Digital Assets traded globally;
(b) whether the supply of the Digital Assets is set to increase or decrease according to a pre-defined path;
(c) details of any inflationary or deflationary mechanisms that are to be used, such as the issuing or burning of the Digital Assets (other than through the normal mining process);
(d) the total number of the Digital Assets held by the developers or issuer of the Digital Asset, held in reserve for rewards or other promotional purposes or otherwise locked away from the total supply of the Digital Assets;
(e) a breakdown of the largest holders of the Digital Assets, in particular holders of 10% or more of the total supply of the Digital Assets; and
(f) in the case of a Fiat stablecoin or Commodity stablecoin, details about the reserves backing that Fiat stablecoin or Commodity stablecoin and the stabilisation and redemption mechanisms.
(3) Under (2)(e), a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator is not required to disclose the identity of the holder if it has identified that a Person holds 10% or more of the Digital Assets but after taking reasonable steps has not been able to establish the holder’s identity.
2.8.10. Risk warnings
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must display prominently on its website the following risk warnings relating to Digital Assets:
(a) that Digital Assets are not legal tender or backed by a government;
(b) that Digital Assets are subject to extreme volatility and the value of the Digital Asset can fall as quickly as it can rise;
(c) that an investor in Digital Assets may lose all, or part, of their money;
(d) that Digital Assets may not always be liquid or transferable;
(e) that investments in Digital Assets may be complex making it hard to understand the risks with buying, selling, holding or lending them;
(f) that Digital Assets can be stolen because of cyber attacks;
(g) that trading in Digital Assets is susceptible to irrational market forces;
(h) that the nature of Digital Assets may lead to an increased risk of Financial Crime;
(i) there being limited or, in some cases, no mechanisms for the recovery of lost or stolen Digital Assets;
(j) the risks of Digital Assets with regard to anonymity, irreversibility of transactions, accidental transactions, transaction recording, and settlement;
(k) that the nature of Digital Assets means that technological difficulties experienced by the Authorised Firm may prevent the access or use of a Client’s Digital Assets; and
(l) that investing in, and holding, Digital Assets is not comparable to investing in traditional investments such as Securities.
(2) Where a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator presents any marketing or educational materials and other communications relating to a Digital Asset on a website, in the general media or as part of a distribution made to existing or potential new Clients, it must include the risk warning referred to in (1) in a prominent place at or near the top of each page of the materials or communication.
(3) If the material referred to in (1) is provided on a website or an application that can be downloaded to a mobile device, the warning must be:
(a) statically fixed and visible at the top of the screen even when a person scrolls up or down the webpage; and
(b) included on each linked webpage on the website.
2.8.11. Forums
If a Digital Asset trading Facility Operator provides a means of communication (a “forum”) for users to discuss Digital Assets, it must:
(a) include a clear and prominent warning on the forum informing users that the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator does not conduct due diligence on information on the forum;
(b) restrict the posting of comments on the forum to Digital Asset Trading Facility members;
(c) ensure that all users of the forum have equal access to information posted on the forum;
(d) require a person posting a comment on the forum to disclose clearly if he is affiliated in any way with a Digital Asset or is being compensated, directly or indirectly, to promote a Digital Asset;
(e) take reasonable steps to monitor and prevent posts on the forum that are potentially misleading or fraudulent or may contravene the Market Abuse provisions (Chapter 5 of the MAR);
(f) immediately take steps to remove a post, or to require a post to be deleted or amended, if the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator becomes aware that (d) or (e) have not been complied with; and
(g) not participate in discussions on the forum except to moderate posts or to take steps referred to in (f).
2.8.12. Undertaking to comply with the Acting Law of the AIFC
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator may not admit a Digital Asset to trading unless the Person who seeks to have Digital Assets admitted to trading:
(a) gives an enforceable undertaking to the AFSA to submit unconditionally to the jurisdiction of the AIFC in relation to any matters which arise out of or which relate to its use of the facilities of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator;
(b) agrees in writing to submit unconditionally to the jurisdiction of the AIFC Court in relation to any disputes, or other proceedings in the AIFC, which arise out of or relate to its use of the facilities of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator; and
(c) agrees in writing to subject itself to the Acting Law of the AIFC in relation to its use of the facilities of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator.
2.8.13. Review of compliance
The Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must maintain arrangements regularly to review whether the Digital Assets admitted to trading on its facilities comply with the Admission to Trading Rules.
2.9.Suspending or removing Digital Assets from trading
2.9.1. Power to suspend or remove a Digital Asset from trading
(1) The rules of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must provide that it has the power to suspend or remove from trading on its facility any Digital Assets with immediate effect or from such date and time as may be specified where it is satisfied that there are circumstances that warrant such action, or it is in the interests of the AIFC.
(2) The AFSA may direct a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator to suspend or remove Digital Assets from trading with immediate effect or from such date and time as may be specified if it is satisfied there are circumstances that:
(a) warrant such action, or
(b) it is in the interests of the AIFC.
(3) The AFSA may withdraw a direction made under (2) at any time.
(4) Digital Assets that are suspended from trading of Digital Assets remain admitted to trading for the purposes of this Chapter.
(5) The AFSA may prescribe any additional requirements or procedures relating to the removal or suspension of Digital Assets from or restoration of Digital Assets to trading.
2.9.2. Limitation on power to suspend or remove Digital Assets from trading
The rules of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must contain provisions for orderly suspension and removal from trading on its facility any Digital Asset which no longer complies with its rules considering the interests of investors and the orderly functioning of the financial market of the AIFC.
2.9.3. Publication of decision
(1) Where the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator suspends or removes any Digital Asset from trading on its facility, it must notify the AFSA in advance and make that decision public by issuing a public notice on its website.
(2) Where the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator lifts a suspension or re-admits any Digital Asset to trading on its facility, it must notify the AFSA in advance and make that decision public by issuing a public notice on its website.
(3) Where a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator has made any decisions on admission, suspension, or removal of Digital Assets from trading on its facility, it must have adequate procedures for notifying users of such decisions.
2.10.Transparency obligations
2.10.1. Pre-trade disclosure
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must disclose to its users the following information relating to trading of Digital Assets on its facility:
(a) the current bid, offer prices and volume of Digital Assets traded on its systems on a continuous basis during normal trading hours;
(b) the depth of trading interest shown at the prices and volumes advertised through its systems for the Digital Assets; and
(c) any other information relating to Digital Assets which would promote transparency relating to trading.
(2) The AFSA may waive or modify the disclosure requirement in DAA 2.10.1 in relation to certain transactions where the order size is predetermined, exceeds a pre-set and published threshold level and details of the exemption are made available to the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s Members and the public.
(3) In assessing whether an exemption from pre-trade disclosure is allowed, the AFSA would regard to such factors as:
(a) the level of an order threshold compared with the normal market size for the Digital Asset;
(b) the impact such an exemption would have on price discovery, fragmentation, fairness and overall market quality;
(c) whether there is sufficient transparency relating to trades executed without pre-trade disclosure (as a result of orders executed on execution platforms without pre-trade transparency), whether or not they are entered in transparent markets;
(d) whether the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator supports transparent orders by giving a priority to transparent orders over dark orders, for example, by executing such orders at the same price as transparent orders; and
(e) whether there is adequate disclosure of details relating to dark orders available to Members and other participants on the Digital Asset Trading Facility to enable them to understand the manner in which their orders are handled and executed on the Digital Asset Trading Facility.
(4) When making disclosure, a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must adopt a technical mechanism showing differentiations between transactions that have been recorded in the central order book and transactions that have been reported to the Digital Asset Trading Facility as off-order book transactions. Any transactions that have been cancelled pursuant to its rules must also be identifiable.
(5) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must use appropriate mechanisms to enable pre-trade information to be made available to users in an easy to access and uninterrupted manner at least during normal trading hours.
2.10.2.Post-Trade Disclosure
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must disclose the price, volume and time of the transactions effected in respect of Digital Assets to users as close to real-time as is technically possible on a non-discretionary basis. The Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must use adequate mechanisms to enable post-trade information to be made available to users in an easy to access and uninterrupted manner at least during business hours.
(2) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must provide price, volume, time and counterparty details to the AFSA within 24 hours of the close of each trading day via a secure electronic feed.
2.10.3. Public notice of suspended or terminated Membership
The Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must promptly issue a public notice on its website in respect of any Member that has a Licence to carry on the Regulated Activities whose Membership is suspended or terminated.
2.10.4. Cooperation with office-holder
The Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must cooperate, by the sharing of information and otherwise, with the AFSA, any relevant office-holder and any other authority or body having responsibility for any matter arising out of, or connected with, the default of a Member of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator.
2.11.Clients
2.11.1. Clients of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator
Members of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator and their clients are Clients of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator.
2.11.2. Investment limits
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must maintain effective systems and controls to ensure that a Retail Client, who is a resident of the Republic of Kazakhstan, complies with any requirements and limits imposed by the Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC.
2.11.3. Calculation of an individual Client’s net assets
(1) For the purposes of calculating an individual Client’s net assets to treat him as an Assessed Professional Client under Rule 2.5.1(a) of the COB, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator:
(a) must exclude the value of the primary residence of the Client;
(b) must exclude Digital Assets belonging to the Client that are not on the List of Digital Assets admitted to trading;
(c) must include only 30% of the market value of a Digital Asset admitted to trading, which belongs to the Client, but must include 100% of the market value of a Fiat stablecoin and Commodity stablecoin, which belongs to the Client; and
(e) may include any other assets held directly or indirectly by that Client.
2.11.4. Additional information for Providing Custody of Digital Assets
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator Providing Custody of Digital Assets must include in the Client Agreement:
(a) a breakdown of all fees and charges payable for a transfer of Digital Assets (a “transfer”) and when they are charged;
(b) the information required to carry out a transfer;
(c) the form and procedures for giving consent to a transfer;
(d) an indication of the time it will normally take to carry out a transfer;
(e) details of when a transfer will be considered to be complete;
(f) how, and in what form, information and communications relating to transfer services will be provided to the Client, including the timing and frequency of communications and the language used and technical requirements for the Client’s equipment and software to receive the communications;
(g) clear policies and procedures relating to unauthorised or incorrectly executed transfers, including when the Client is and is not entitled to redress;
(h) clear policies and procedures relating to situations where the holding or transfer of Digital Assets may have been compromised, such as if there has been hacking, theft or fraud; and
(i) details of the procedures the Digital Asset will follow to contact the Client if there has been suspected or actual hacking, theft or fraud.
2.11.5. Provision of prompt confirmation to Clients
(1) Prior to execution of each transaction in Digital Assets, a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must confirm with its Clients the following terms:
(a) name of the Digital Asset in the proposed transaction;
(b) amount or value of the proposed transaction;
(c) fees and charges to be borne by the Client including applicable exchange rates; and
(d) a warning that once executed the transaction may not be undone.
(2) After a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator has effected a transaction for a Client, it must confirm promptly with the Client the essential features of the transaction. The following information should be included:
(a) name of the Digital Asset in the transaction;
(b) amount or value of the transaction; and
(c) fees and charges borne by the Client including applicable exchange rates.
2.11.6. Provision of statements of account upon request
Where a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator receives a request from a Client for a statement of account as of the date of the request, it must:
(a) prepare a statement of account in respect of the Client which includes the following information:
(i) the name, address and account number of the Client to whom the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator is required to provide the statement of account;
(ii) the date on which the statement of account is prepared;
(iii) the outstanding balance of that account; and
(iv) the quantity, and, in so far as readily ascertainable, the market price and market value of each Client Digital Asset, held for that account.
(b) prepare the requested statement of account to the Client as soon as practicable after the date of the request.
2.11.7. Appropriateness test
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must not carry on a Regulated Activity with or for a Retail Client, who is a non-resident of the Republic of Kazakhstan, unless the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator has carried out an appropriateness test of the Person and formed a reasonable view that the Person has:
(a) adequate skills and expertise to understand the risks involved in trading in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives (as the case may be); and
(b) the ability to absorb potentially significant losses resulting from trading in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives (as the case may be).
Guidance:
(1) To form a reasonable view referred to in DAA 2.11.7. in relation to a Person, a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should consider issues such as whether the Person:
(a) has sufficient knowledge and experience relating to the type of a Digital Asset or Digital Asset Derivative offered, having regard to such factors as:
(i) how often and in what volumes that Person has traded in the relevant type of a Digital Asset or Digital Asset Derivative; and
(ii) the Person’s relevant qualifications, profession or former profession;
(b) understands the characteristics and risks relating to Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives, and the volatility of their prices;
(c) understands the impact of leverage, due to which, there is potential to make significant losses in trading in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives; and
(d) has the ability, particularly in terms of net assets and liquidity available to the Person, to absorb and manage any losses that may result from trading in the Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives offered.
(2) To be able to demonstrate to the AFSA that it complies with DAA 2.11.7., a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should have in place systems and controls that include:
(a) pre-determined and clear criteria against which a Retail Client’s ability to trade in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives can be assessed;
(b) adequate records to demonstrate that the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator has undertaken the appropriateness test for each Retail Client; and
(c) in the case of an existing Retail Client with whom the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator has previously traded in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives, procedures to undertake a fresh appropriateness test if:
(i) a new Digital Asset or Digital Asset Derivative with a materially different risk profile is offered to the Retail Client; or
(ii) there has been a material change in the Retail Client’s circumstances.
(3) If a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator forms the view that it is not appropriate for a Person to trade in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should refrain from offering that service to the Person. As a matter of good practice, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should inform the Person of its decision.
2.12.Conflicts of interest
2.12.1. Conflicts of interest – core obligation
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must take reasonable steps, including the maintenance of adequate systems and controls, governance and internal policies and procedures, to ensure that the performance of its regulatory functions and obligations is not adversely affected by its commercial interests.
Guidance: regulatory functions of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator
The regulatory functions of a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator include, as appropriate:
• its obligations to monitor and enforce compliance with its Business Rules, Admission to Trading Rules, and Membership Rules;
• its obligation to prevent, detect and report Market Abuse or Financial Crime; and
• its obligations in respect of admission of Digital Assets to trading or to clearing.
2.12.2. Conflicts of interest – identification and management
For the purposes of compliance with DAA 2.12.1, a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must:
(a)identify conflicts between the interests of the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator, its shareholders, owners and operators and the interests of the Persons who make use of its facility or the interests of the trading venues operated by it; and
(b)manage or disclose such conflicts so as to avoid adverse consequences for the sound functioning and operation of the trading venues operated by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator and for the Persons who make use of its facility.
2.12.3. Conflicts of interest – personal account transactions
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must establish and maintain adequate policies and procedures to ensure that its Employees do not undertake personal account transactions in Digital Assets in a manner that creates or has the potential to create conflicts of interest.
2.12.4. Conflicts of interest – code of conduct
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must establish a code of conduct that sets out the expected standards of behaviour for its Employees, including clear procedures for addressing conflicts of interest. Such a code must be binding on all of its Employees.
2.13. Other requirements
2.13.1.Measures to prevent, detect and report Market Abuse or Financial Crime
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must:
(a) ensure that appropriate measures (including the monitoring of transactions effected on or through the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility) are adopted to reduce the extent to which the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator’s facility can be used for a purpose connected with Market Abuse, Financial Crime or money laundering, and to facilitate their detection and monitor their incidence; and
(b) immediately report to the AFSA any suspected Market Abuse, Financial Crime or money laundering, along with full details of that information in writing.
2.13.2.Whistleblowing
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must have appropriate procedures and protections for requiring its Employees to disclose any information to the AFSA in a manner which does not expose them to any disadvantage or discrimination as a result of so doing.
2.13.3.Lending and staking
(1)A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must not offer or provide any facility or service that allows a Member or another user of its facility to lend a Digital Asset to another Person unless it is reasonably satisfied that:
(a)the Member or user is a Professional Client; and
(b)the lending is solely for the purpose of the borrower participating in the proof-of-stake consensus mechanism on the DLT or another similar technology that hosts the relevant Digital Asset.
(2)The prohibition in (1) does not apply to the provision of any Digital Asset to an Authorised Firm as Collateral.
2.13.4.Trading of Digital Assets
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must establish and maintain policies and procedures relating to the trading process to prevent or detect errors, omissions, fraud, and other unauthorised or improper activities.
(2) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must execute a trade for a Client only if there are sufficient Fiat Currencies or Fiat stablecoins, which are on the List of Digital Assets admitted to trading, in the Client’s account with the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator to cover that trade except for any off-platform transactions to be conducted by institutional investors which are settled intra-day.
(3) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should not provide any financial assistance for its Clients to acquire Digital Assets. It should ensure, to the extent possible, that no Person within the same Group as the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator does so unless for exceptional circumstances which should be approved by the AFSA on a case-by-case basis.
2.13.5. Trading controls
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must put in place risk management and supervisory controls for the operation of its trading platform. These controls should include:
(a) automated pre-trade controls that are reasonably designed to:
(i) prevent the entry of any orders that would exceed appropriate position limits prescribed for each Client;
(ii) alert the user to the entry of potential erroneous orders and prevent the entry of erroneous orders;
(iii) prevent the entry of order which are not in compliance with regulatory requirements; and
(b) post-trade monitoring to reasonably identify any:
(i) suspicious market manipulative or abusive activities; and
(ii) market events or system deficiencies, such as unintended impact on the market, which call for further risk control measures.
(2) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must be able to:
(a) reject orders that exceed its pre-determined volume and price thresholds, or that are clearly erroneous;
(b) temporarily halt or constrain trading on its facility if necessary or desirable to maintain an orderly market; and
(c) cancel, vary, or correct any order resulting from an erroneous order entry and/or the malfunctioning of the system of a Member.
2.13.6. Settlement and clearing arrangements
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must ensure that satisfactory arrangements are made for securing the timely discharge (whether by performance, compromise or otherwise), clearing and settlement of the rights and liabilities of the parties to transactions effected on the Digital Asset trading facility (being rights and liabilities in relation to those transactions).
(2) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must ensure that clearing and settlement of transactions on its facility take place only by means of Fiat Currencies or Fiat stablecoin which are on the List of Digital Assets admitted to trading.
(3) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator acting as a Digital Asset Custodian must:
(a) have appropriate rules, procedures, and controls, including robust accounting practices, to safeguard the rights of Digital Assets issuers and holders, prevent the unauthorised creation or deletion of Digital Assets, and conduct daily reconciliation of each Digital Asset balance it maintains for issuers and holders;
(b) prohibit overdrafts and debit balances in Digital Assets account;
(c) maintain Digital Assets in an immobilised or dematerialised form for their transfer by book entry;
(d) protect assets against custody risk through appropriate rules and procedures consistent with its legal framework;
(e) ensure segregation between the Digital Asset Custodian’s own assets and the Digital Assets of its participants and segregation among the Digital Assets of participants; and
(f) identify, measure, monitor, and manage its risks from other custody related activities that it may perform.
2.13.7.Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator Providing Custody of Digital Assets
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator which is a Digital wallet Service Provider must ensure that:
(a) any DLT application it uses in Providing Custody of Digital Assets is resilient, reliable and compatible with any relevant facility on which the Digital Assets are traded or cleared;
(b) it is able to clearly identify and segregate the Digital Assets belonging to different Clients;
(c) it has in place appropriate procedures to enable it to confirm Client instructions and transactions, maintain appropriate records and data relating to those instructions and transactions and to conduct a reconciliation of those transactions at appropriate intervals.
(2) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator which is a Digital wallet Service Provider must ensure that, in developing and using DLT applications and other technology to Provide Custody of Digital Assets:
(a) the architecture of any Digital wallet used adequately addresses compatibility issued and associated risks;
(b) the technology used and its associated procedures have adequate security measures (including cyber security) to enable the safe storage and transmission of data relating to the Digital Assets;
(c) the security and integrity of cryptographic keys are maintained through the use of that technology, taking into account the password protection and methods of encryption used;
(d) there are adequate measures to address any risks specific to the methods of usage and storage of cryptographic keys (or their equivalent) available under the DLT application used; and
(e) the technology is compatible with the procedures and protocols on any facility on which the Digital Assets are traded or cleared or both traded and cleared.
2.13.8.Requirements for a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator appointing a Third Party Digital wallet Service Provider
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator which appoints a Third Party Digital wallet Service Provider to Provide Custody of Digital Assets traded on its facility, must ensure that the Person is:
(1) an Authorised Firm appropriately authorised to be a Digital wallet Service Provider; or
(2) a Person which is appropriately regulated by a Financial Services Regulator to an equivalent level of regulation to that provided for under the AFSA regime for Providing Digital wallet Services.
Guidance:
If a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator appoints a non-AIFC firm regulated by a Financial Services Regulator, it must undertake sufficient due diligence to establish that the non-AIFC firm is subject to an equivalent level of regulation as under the AFSA regime in respect of that service.
2.13.9.Requirements in relation to Hot and Cold Digital wallets
A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must ensure that not more than 30 % of the Client Digital Assets are stored in Hot Digital wallets.
2.13.10.Obligation to report transactions
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must report to the AFSA details of transactions in Digital Assets traded on its facility which are executed, or reported, through its systems.
(2) The AFSA may, by written notice or guidance, specify:
(a) the information to be included in reports made under the preceding paragraph; and
(b) the manner in which such reports are to be made.
2.13.11.Obligation to report to the AFSA
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator must submit on a quarterly basis report that should include a financial statement, income statement and calculation of the relevant capital resources and its compliance with these Rules.
(2) The AFSA may request a Digital Asset Trading Facility to submit other returns. The list of returns required to be submitted and returns templates may be prescribed by the AFSA from time to time.
(3) Returns submitted to the AFSA must be signed by two (2) Approved Individuals and one of them must be approved to exercise the Finance Officer function.
2.13.12.Obligation to notify the AFSA
If a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator becomes aware, or has a reasonable ground to believe, that it is or may be (or may be about to be) in breach of any of these Rules, that applies to it, it must:
(a) notify the AFSA in writing about the breach and the relevant circumstances immediately and not later than within 1 business day; and
(b) not make any cash transfers or payments or transfers of liquid assets to its Affiliates or Related Persons, whether by way of dividends or otherwise, without the AFSA’s written consent.
Guidance:
In dealing with a breach, or possible breach, of this part, the AFSA’s primary concern will be the interests of existing and prospective Clients and potential adverse impact on market participants as well as market stability. The AFSA recognises that there will be circumstances in which a problem may be resolved quickly, for example, by support from a parent entity, without jeopardising the interests of Clients and stakeholders. In such circumstances, it will be in the interests of all parties to minimise the disruption to the firm’s business. The AFSA's will normally seek to work cooperatively with the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator in such stressed situations to deal with any problems. There will, however, be circumstances in which it is necessary to take regulatory action to avoid exposing market participants, stakeholders and Clients to the potential adverse consequences of the firm’s Failure, and the AFSA will not hesitate to take appropriate action if it considers this necessary.
2.14. Restrictions
2.14.1. Restriction on own account transactions
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or any of its Associate may execute an Own Account Transaction in a Digital Asset unless it is not expected to materially affect the price of the Digital Asset.
(2) For the purposes of this Rule:
(a) “Own Account Transaction” means a transaction Executed by the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator for its own benefit or for the benefit of its Associate; and
(b) “Execute”, in relation to a transaction, means carrying into effect or performing the transaction, whether as principal or as agent, including instructing another Person to execute the transaction.
2.14.2. Offer of incentives
If a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator offers or provides to a Retail Client any incentive that influences, or is reasonably likely to influence, the Retail Client to trade in a Digital Asset or Digital Asset Derivative, it must comply with the requirements set out in Chapter 3 of the COB.
2.15. Prohibitions
2.15.1.Use of only those Digital Assets which are admitted to trading
(1) If a Person is not admitted to trading, it must not engage in any of the following activities in or from the AIFC relating to Digital Assets:
(a)carrying on a Regulated Activity in relation to the Digital Asset;
(b)making or approving a Financial Promotion relating to the Digital Asset;
(c)carrying on an activity specified in (a) or (b) above in relation to a Fund that invests in the Digital Asset; or
(d)carrying on an activity specified in (a) or (b) in respect of a Derivative or instrument relating to the Digital Asset.
(2) Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator is prohibited to conduct transactions with Digital Asset associated with the new version of the underlying protocol (“hard fork”), except for custody of it, unless it obtains the approval of the AFSA.
2.15.2.Prohibition on use of Privacy Tokens and Privacy Devices
A Person must not in or from the AIFC:
(a)carry on a Regulated Activity relating to a Privacy Token or that involves the use of a Privacy Device;
(b)make or approve a Financial Promotion relating to a Privacy Token; or
(c)offer to the public a Privacy Token.
2.15.3.Prohibition of Digital Asset Derivatives for Retail Clients who are residents of the Republic of Kazakhstan
A Retail Client, who is a resident of the Republic of Kazakhstan, is prohibited to trade Digital Asset Derivatives unless a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator carried out an appropriateness test of the Person and formed a reasonable view that the Person has:
(a) adequate skills and expertise to understand the risks involved in trading Digital Asset Derivatives; and
(b) the ability to absorb potentially significant losses resulting from trading in Digital Asset Derivatives.
Guidance:
(1) To form a reasonable view referred to in DAA 2.15.3. in relation to a Person, a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should consider issues such as whether the Person:
(a) has sufficient knowledge and experience relating to the type of a Digital Asset Derivative offered, having regard to such factors as:
(i) how often and in what volumes that Person has traded in the relevant type of a Digital Asset Derivative; and
(ii) the Person’s relevant qualifications, profession or former profession;
(b) understands the characteristics and risks relating to Digital Asset Derivatives, and the volatility of its prices;
(c) understands the impact of leverage, due to which, there is potential to make significant losses in trading in Digital Asset Derivatives; and
(d) has the ability, particularly in terms of net assets and liquidity available to the Person, to absorb and manage any losses that may result from trading in the Digital Asset Derivatives offered.
(2) To be able to demonstrate to the AFSA that it complies with DAA 2.15.3., a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should have in place systems and controls that include:
(a) pre-determined and clear criteria against which a Retail Client’s ability to trade in Digital Asset Derivatives can be assessed;
(b) adequate records to demonstrate that the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator has undertaken the appropriateness test for each Retail Client, who is a resident of the Republic of Kazakhstan; and
(c) in the case of an existing Retail Client with whom the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator has previously traded in Digital Asset Derivatives, procedures to undertake a fresh appropriateness test if:
(i) a new Digital Asset Derivative with a materially different risk profile is offered to the Retail Client; or
(ii) there has been a material change in the Retail Client’s circumstances.
(3) If a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator forms the view that it is not appropriate for a Person to trade in Digital Asset Derivatives, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should refrain from offering that service to the Person. As a matter of good practice, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should inform the Person of such decision.
2.16. AFSA power to impose requirements
Without limiting the powers available to the AFSA under Part 8 of the Framework Regulations, the AFSA may direct an Authorised Market Institution to do or not do specified things that the AFSA considers are necessary or desirable or to ensure the integrity of the AIFC financial markets, including but not limited to directions imposing on a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator any additional requirements that the AFSA considers appropriate.
Annex 2
FINANCIAL SERVCES FRAMEWORK REGULATIONS
In these Regulations, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
39. Exemption for Authorised Market Institutions
(…)
(3) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility is exempt from the General Prohibition in respect of any Regulated Activity: [intentionally omitted]
(a) which is carried on as a part of the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility's business as a Digital Asset trading facility; or [intentionally omitted]
(b) which is carried on for the purposes of, or in connection with, the provision by the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility of services designed to facilitate the provision of clearing services by another Person. [intentionally omitted]
57. AFSA power to impose requirements on an Authorised Market Institution
Without limiting the powers available to the AFSA under Part 8 (Supervision of Authorised Persons), the AFSA may direct an Authorised Market Institution to do or not do specified things that the AFSA considers are necessary or desirable or to ensure the integrity of the AIFC financial markets, including but not limited to directions:
(a) requiring compliance with any duty, requirement, prohibition, obligation or responsibility applicable to an Authorised Market Institution; or
(b) requiring an Authorised Market Institution to act in a specified manner in relation to a transaction conducted on or through the facilities operated by an Authorised Market Institution, or in relation to a specified class of transactions; or
(c) requiring an Authorised Market Institution to act in a specified manner or to exercise its powers under any rules that the Authorised Market Institution has made.; or
(d) excluding the application of any requirements for engaging in the activity of Operating a Digital Asset Business imposed by the Rules; or [intentionally omitted]
(e) imposing on an Authorised Person engaged in the activity of Operating a Digital Asset Business any additional requirements that the AFSA considers appropriate.[intentionally omitted]
GENERAL RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
1.2. Authorised Market Institutions
Guidance: Definition of Market Activity
Market Activity is defined in the section 18 of the Framework Regulations as:
(a) Operating an Exchange;
(b) Operating a Clearing House;
(c) Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility;[intentionally omitted]
(d) Operating a Loan Crowdfunding Platform;
(e) Operating an Investment Crowdfunding Platform.;
(f) Operating a Private Financing Platform.
(…)
1.2.6. Effective supervision
In assessing whether an applicant is capable of being effectively supervised by the AFSA for the purposes of section 37(1)(c) of the Framework Regulations, the AFSA will consider:
(a) the nature, including the complexity, of the Market Activities that the applicant will carry on;
(b) if the applicant seeks a licence to carry on the Market Activity of Operating an Exchange, a Digital Asset Trading Facility, a Loan Crowdfunding Platform or an Investment Crowdfunding Platform, the size, nature and complexity of any markets in respect of which the applicant will offer its facilities in carrying on that Market Activity;
(…)
1.2.7. Compliance arrangements
(…)
(c) effective arrangements for monitoring and enforcing compliance of its Members with its own rules and, if relevant, its clearing and settlement arrangements; and
(d) if the applicant seeks a licence to carry on the Market Activity of Operating an Exchange, effective arrangements to verify that issuers admitted to trading on its facilities comply with the Market Rules.; and
(e) if the applicant seeks a licence to carry on the Market Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, effective arrangements to verify that members admitted to trading on its facilities comply with the Conduct of Business Rules and the Authorised Market Institution Rules.
(…)
GENERAL RULES. SCHEDULE 1: REGULATED ACTIVITIES
30. Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility means operating a facility which functions regularly and brings together multiple parties (whether as principal or agent) with a view to the entering into of contracts:
(a) to buy, sell or exchange Digital Assets for a Fiat currency; and/or
(b) to exchange one Digital Asset for another Digital Asset, in its Facility, in accordance with its non-discretionary rules.; and/or
(c) to buy, sell or exchange Digital Assets for a commodity.
GENERAL RULES. SCHEDULE 4: MARKET ACTIVITIES
Schedule 4: Market Activities.
(…)
3. Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility means operating a facility which functions regularly and brings together multiple parties (whether as principal or agent) with a view to the entering into of contracts:
(a) to buy, sell or exchange Digital Assets for a Fiat currency; and/or
(b) to exchange one Digital Asset for another Digital Asset, in its Facility, in accordance with its non-discretionary rules. [intentionally omitted]
GLOSSARY
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
GLOSSARY. 1. Application. (t) AIFC Rules on Regulation of Digital Asset Activities (DAA).
(…)
Algorithmic stablecoin | A Digital Asset which uses, or purports to use, an algorithm to increase or decrease the supply of Digital Assets in order to stabilise its price or reduce volatility in its price |
| A Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on the Regulated |
Client Account | In relation to Client Investments or Client Digital Assets is an account which: (a) is held with a Third Party Agent or by an Authorised Firm which is authorised under its Licence to Provide Custody; (b) is established to hold Client Assets; (c) when held by a Third Party Agent, is maintained in the name of: (i) if a Domestic Firm, the Authorised Firm; or (ii) if not a Domestic Firm, a Nominee Company controlled by the Authorised Firm; and (d) includes the words ‘Client Account’ in its title. |
Commodity stablecoin | A Digital Asset whose value purports to be determined by reference to a commodity (e.g., gold, oil). |
Digital Asset Business | Any one or more of the following Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets: (a)Dealing in Investments as Principal; (b)Dealing in Investments as Agent; (c)Managing Investments; (d)Managing a Collective Investment Scheme; (e)Providing Custody; (f)Arranging Custody; (g)Advising on Investments; (h)Arranging Deals in Investments; (i)Providing Money Services; and (j)Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility.
A Person wishing to carry on or more of the above Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets, cannot carry on the Regulated Activities in relation to other types of Investments. |
Digital Asset Derivative | A Derivative the value of which is determined by reference to: (a)a Digital Asset; or (b)an index that includes a Digital Asset. |
DASP | Digital Asset Service Provider |
Digital Asset Service Provider | A Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on one or more of the following Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets: (a)Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility; (b)Dealing in Investments as Principal; (c)Dealing in Investments as Agent; (d)Managing Investments; (e)Providing Custody; (f)Arranging Custody; (g)Advising on Investments; (h)Arranging Deals in Investments; and (i)Providing Money Services.
A Person wishing to carry on one or more of the above Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets, cannot carry on the Regulated Activities in relation to other types of Investments. |
Digital Asset Custodian | Authorised Firm which carries on the Regulated Activity of Providing Custody in relation to Digital Assets. |
DATF | Digital Asset Trading Facility |
Digital Asset Trading Facility | A facility on which Digital Assets, rights or interests in Digital Assets are traded. |
Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator | A Centre Participant which is licensed by the AFSA to carry on the Regulated Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility. |
Digital Asset (or Private Electronic Currency or Private E-money) | A digital representation of value that (1) can be digitally traded and functions as (a) a medium of exchange; or (b) a unit of account; or (c) a store of value; (2) can be exchanged back-and-forth for Fiat Currency, but is neither issued nor guaranteed by the government of any jurisdiction, and (3) fulfils the above functions only by agreement within the community of users of the Digital Asset; and accordingly (4) is to be distinguished from Fiat Currency and E-money.
An Excluded Digital Asset is excluded from the scope of the DAA. |
Digital wallet Service Provider | An Authorised Firm Providing Custody of Digital Assets by holding and controlling the public and private cryptographic keys relating to the Digital Assets. |
Direct Electronic Access | Direct Electronic Access means: (a) an arrangement (called direct market access), through which a Member or a client of a member is able to electronically transmit, using the Member’s trading code, an order relating to a Digital Asset, Security, Unit in a Listed Fund or Qualified Investment directly to the facility operated by the Authorised Market Institution, Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or MTF or OTF Operator. It includes arrangements for the use, by a Person, of the infrastructure (or connecting system) of the Member, client of the Member or another participant; or (b) an arrangement (called sponsored access) through which a Member or a client of a member is able to electronically transmit, using the Member’s trading code, an order to the facility operated by the Authorised Market Institution or MTF or OTF Operator without using the infrastructure (or connecting system) of the Member or another participant or client. |
Distributed Ledger Technology | A class of technologies that support the recording of encrypted data where the data: (a) is held on a distributed ledger; (b) is electronically accessible, from multiple locations, by a network of participants; and (c) can be updated by those participants, based on agreed consensus, protocol or procedures. |
DLT | Distributed Ledger Technology |
Domestic Firm | An Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider which: (a) has its registered and head office in the AIFC; or (b) if it is a subsidiary of an Undertaking whose principal place of business and head office is in a jurisdiction other than the AIFC, has its registered office in the AIFC. |
Excluded Digital Asset | A Digital Asset which is: (a) a Non-Fungible Token; (b) a Utility Token; or (c) a digital currency issued by any government, government agency, central bank, or another monetary authority. |
Execute or Execution | The exercise of a Client order that results in a binding transaction. |
Fiat stablecoin | A Digital Asset whose value purports to be determined by reference to a Fiat Currency or a basket of Fiat Currencies. |
Investment Business | The business of: (a) Dealing in Investments as Principal; (b) Dealing in Investments as Agent; (c) Managing Investments; (d) Managing a Collective Investment Scheme; (e) Providing Custody; (f) Arranging Custody; (g) Acting as the Trustee of a Fund; (h) Advising on Investments; (i) Arranging Deals in Investments; (j) Managing a Restricted Profit Sharing Investment Account; or (k) Operating an Exchange
but not including Digital Asset Business. |
List of Digital Assets admitted to trading | A list of Digital Assets which could be traded in the AIFC and do not require the AFSA’s approval. |
Member | A Person who is entitled, under an arrangement between him and an Authorised Market Institution, a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator, a MTF Operator or an OTF Operator, to use that institution’s or operator’s facilities |
Non-Fungible Token | An Investment which: (a) is unique and not fungible with any other Non-Fungible Token; (b) related to an identified asset; and (c) is used to prove the ownership or provenance of the asset. |
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility | The Regulated |
Privacy Device | Any technology, Digital wallet or another mechanism or device (excluding a VPN), which has any feature or features used, or intended to be used, to hide, anonymise, obscure or prevent the tracing of any of the following information: (a) a Digital Asset transaction; or (b) the identity of the holder of a Digital Asset; or (c) the cryptographic key associated with a Person; or (d) the identity of parties to a Digital Asset transaction; or (e) the value of a Digital Asset transaction; or (f) the beneficial owner of a Digital Asset. |
Privacy Token | A Digital Asset where the Digital Asset or the DLT or another similar technology used for the Digital Asset, has any feature or features that are used, or intended to be used, to hide, anonymise, obscure or prevent the tracing of any of the following information: (a) a Digital Asset transaction; or (b) the identity of the holder of a Digital Asset; or (c) the cryptographic key associated with a Person; or (d) the identity of parties to a Digital Asset transaction; or (e) the value of a Digital Asset transaction; or (f) the beneficial owner of a Digital Asset. |
Safe Custody Digital Assets | Digital Assets held or to be held for safekeeping by an Authorised Firm or Third Party Agent. |
Security Token | A Digital Asset that represents ownership of a Security. |
Self-Custody of Digital Assets | The holding and controlling of Digital Assets by their owner, through the owner holding and controlling the public and private cryptographic keys relating to the Digital Assets. |
Self-hosted Digital Wallet | A software or hardware that enables a person to store and transfer Digital Assets on his own behalf, and in relation to which the public and private cryptographic keys are controlled or held by that Person. |
Third Party Agent | In relation to a Client Account, means an Authorised Firm or Regulated Financial Institution (including a bank, custodian, an intermediate broker, a settlement agent, a clearing house, an exchange and ‘over the counter’ counterparty) that is a separate legal entity from the Authorised Firm that is required under COB to establish the Client Account. |
Third Party Digital wallet Service Provider | (1) A Digital wallet Service Provider other than a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator Providing Custody of Digital Assets traded on its facility; or (2) A Person in another jurisdiction Providing Custody of Digital Assets by holding and controlling the public and private cryptographic keys relating to the Digital Assets, which is authorized and appropriately supervised for that activity by a Financial Services Regulator. |
Travel Rule | Has the meaning given to it in FATF’s Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach for Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers [October 2021], as may be amended from time to time |
Utility Token | A Digital Asset: (a) which can be used by the holder only to pay for, receive a discount on, or access a product or service (whether current or proposed); and (b) the product or service referred to in (a) is provided by the issuer of the Digital Asset or of another entity in the issuer’s Group. |
VPN | A virtual private network that creates a safe, encrypted online connection for internet users. |
AUTHORISED MARKET INSTITUTION RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
6. RULES APPLICABLE TO AN AUTHORISED DIGITAL ASSET TRADING FACILITY…........... 39
6.1. Main requirements relating to trading on the facility ........................................................... 39
6.2. Requirement to prepare Rules ............................................................................................... 39
6.3. Admission of Digital Assets to trading ...................................................................................40
6.4. Suspending or removing Digital Assets from trading ..........................................................42 6.5. Transparency obligations ....................................................................................................... 42 6.6. Additional requirements on technology resources .............................................................. 43 6.7. Clients of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility and Investment limits ..................45 [intentionally omitted]
(…)
Guidance: Purpose and application of AMI
·the licensing requirements, or standards, which an applicant must satisfy to be granted a Licence to carry on either of the Market Activities of Operating an Investment Exchange, Operating Digital Assets Trading Facility and Operating a Clearing House;
(…)
·Chapter 6 contains additional rules and guidance applicable to Authorised Digital Assets Trading Facility.
(…)
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Introduction
1.1.1. Definitions
(1) An Authorised Market Institution is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on one or more Market Activities. An Authorised Market Institution can be an Authorised Investment Exchange, an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility, an Authorised Clearing House and/or an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform.
(7) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on the Market Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility.[intentionally omitted]
(…)
2.4.4. Resources of Members
(…)
(2) The requirements in (1) do not apply to:
(a) an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform (or its Clients).; or
(b) the Member of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility if the Member is a body corporate or an individual (natural person) that carries on the activity solely as principal. [intentionally omitted]
(…)
2.4.7. Testing relating to Members’ technology systems
(…)
(4) The requirements in (1)-(3) do not apply to:
(a) an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform (or its Clients).; or
(b) the Member of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility if the Member is a body corporate or an individual (natural person) that carries on the activity solely as principal.
2.5. Business Rules
2.5.1. Requirement to prepare Business Rules
(…)
(d) Admission to Trading Rules, prepared in accordance with AMI 3.2 or AMI 6.3, or Admission to Clearing Rules, prepared in accordance with AMI 4.1, governing the admission of Securities,or Units in a Listed Fund or Digital Assets to trading, or clearing and settlement, as appropriate to its facilities;
(e) Listing Rules, prepared in accordance with AMI 3.6, setting out the rules and conditions applicable to a Person who wishes to have Securities or Units in a Listed Fund included in an Official List; and
(f) any other matters necessary for the proper functioning of the Authorised Market Institution and the facilities operated by it.
The requirements in (c) and (e) do not apply to the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility.
2.6. Membership
2.6.1. Persons eligible for Membership
(1) An Authorised Market Institution, except an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility, may only admit as a Member a Person who satisfies admission criteria set out in its Membership Rules and who is either:
(a) an Authorised Firm whose Licence permits it to carry on the Regulated Activities of Dealing in Investments; or
(b) a Recognised Non-AIFC Member.
(2) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility may only admit as a Member a Person who satisfies admission criteria set out in its Membership Rules and which is: [intentionally omitted]
(a) an Authorised Firm whose Licence permits it to carry on the Regulated Activities of Dealing in Investments; [intentionally omitted]
(b) a Recognised Non-AIFC Member; or [intentionally omitted]
(c) a body corporate or an individual (natural person) which carries on the activity solely as principal. [intentionally omitted]
2.7. Direct Electronic Access
2.7.1. Direct Electronic Access
Direct Electronic Access means any arrangement, such as the use of the Member's trading code, through which a Member or the clients of that Member are able to transmit electronically orders relating to Securities, or Units in a Listed Fund or Digital Asset directly to the facility provided by the Authorised Market Institution and includes arrangements which involve the use by a Person of the infrastructure of the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility or the Member or participant or client or any connecting system provided by the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility or Member or participant or client, to transmit the orders and arrangements where such an infrastructure is not used by a Person.
(…)
2.9.2. Custody and investment risk
(1) An Authorised Market Institution must have effective means to address risks relating to:
(a) custody of its own assets, in accordance with (2), if it is an Authorised Clearing House; or
(b)investments, in accordance with (3), if it is an Authorised Investment Exchange.; or
(c) Digital Assets, if it is an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility. [intentionally omitted]
(…)
6. RULES APPLICABLE TO AN AUTHORISED DIGITAL ASSET TRADING FACILITY
6.1. Main requirements relating to trading on the facility
(1) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must, at the time a Licence is granted and at all times thereafter, have:
(a) transparent and non-discriminatory rules and procedures to ensure fair and orderly trading of Digital Assets on its facility;
(b) objective criteria governing access to its facility;
(c) objective and transparent criteria for determining the Investments that can be traded on its facility; and
(d) adequate technology resources.
(2) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must maintain effective arrangements to verify that its members comply with requirements set out in COB, AML.
(3) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must not introduce a liquidity incentive scheme other scheme for encouraging bids on a trading venue or to increase the volume of business transacted unless it has obtained the prior approval of the AFSA.
(4) For the purposes of (1), an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must make available to the public, without any charges, data relating to the quality of execution of transactions on the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility on at least an annual basis. Reports must include details about price, costs, speed and likelihood of execution for individual Digital Assets.
6.2. Requirement to prepare Rules
(1) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s Rules must:
(a) be based on objective criteria;
(b) be non-discriminatory;
(c) be clear and fair;
(d) be made publicly available free of charge;
(e) contain provisions for the resolution of Members’ and other participants’ disputes;
(f) contain provisions for penalties or sanctions which may be imposed by the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility for a breach of the Rules; and
(g) contain provisions for an appeal process from the decisions of the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility.
(2) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must seek prior approval of its Rules (Business Rules, Admission to Trading Rules, Membership Rules) and of amendments to its Rules by:
(a) making its Rules available for market consultation for no less than 30 days; and
(b) obtaining approval of the AFSA.
(3) Where an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility has made any amendments to its Rules, it must have adequate procedures for notifying users and the AFSA of such amendments with a notice period of at least 30 days prior to making any amendments to its Rules available for market consultation.
(4) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must have procedures in place to ensure that its Rules are monitored and enforced.
6.3. Admission of Digital Assets to trading
6.3.1. Admission to Trading Rules
(1) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must make clear and transparent rules concerning the admission of Digital Assets to trading on its facilities.
(2) The rules of the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must ensure that:
(a) Digital Assets admitted to trading on an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s facilities are capable of being traded in a fair, orderly and efficient manner; and
(b) Digital Assets admitted to trading on an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s facilities are freely negotiable.
6.3.2. Application for admission of Digital Assets to Trading
(1) Applications for the admission of a Digital Asset to trading can be made to an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility by the issuer of the Digital Asset, by a third party on behalf of and with the consent of the issuer of the Digital Asset, or by a Member of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility.
(2) A Digital Asset can also be admitted to trading on the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s own initiative.
(3) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must, before admitting any Digital Asset to trading:
(a) be satisfied that the applicable requirements, including those in its Admission to Trading Rules, have been or will be fully complied with in respect of such Digital Asset and
(b) obtain approval of the AFSA in respect of such Digital Asset.
(4) For the purposes of (1), an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must notify an applicant in writing of its decision in relation to the application for admission of the Digital Asset to trading. In the case that such decision is to deny the application, the written notice should indicate (i) whether the application has been considered by the AFSA, and if so, (ii) the AFSA’s determination in respect thereof.
(5) For purposes of 3(b), an application to AFSA by Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility shall include:
(a) a copy of the admission application; and
(b) any other information requested by the AFSA.
6.3.3. Decision-making procedures for the AFSA in relation to applications for approval of the admission of Digital Assets to trading
(1) Where an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility applies for approval of the admission of a Digital Asset to trading, the AFSA may:
(a) approve the application;
(b) deny the application; or
(c) approve the application subject to conditions or restrictions.
(2) The AFSA may exercise its powers under (1)(b) where the AFSA reasonably considers that:
(a) granting the Digital Assets admission to trading of Digital Assets would be detrimental to the interests of Persons dealing in the relevant Digital Assets using the facilities of an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility or otherwise; or
(b) any requirements imposed by the AFSA or in the Rules of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility as are applicable have not been or will not be complied with; or
(c) the Issuer of the Digital Assets has failed or will fail to comply with any obligations applying to it including those relating to having its Digital Assets admitted to trading or traded in another jurisdiction.
(3) Where the AFSA denies an application for approval of admission of a Digital Asset to trading pursuant to (2), such Digital Assets must not be admitted by an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility to its facility.
(4) Where the AFSA approves an application for approval of admission of a Digital Asset to trading subject to conditions or restrictions, the Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility is responsible for implanting such conditions and restrictions in admitting the Digital Asset to trading, and such conditions or restrictions may not be varied or removed without the approval of the AFSA.
6.3.4. Undertaking to comply with the acting law of the AIFC
An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility may not admit Digital Asset to trading unless the person who seeks to have Digital Assets admitted to trading:
(a) gives an enforceable undertaking to the AFSA to submit unconditionally to the jurisdiction of the AIFC in relation to any matters which arise out of or which relate to its use of the facilities of the Authorised Market Institution;
(b) agrees in writing to submit unconditionally to the jurisdiction of the AIFC Courts in relation to any disputes, or other proceedings in the AIFC, which arise out of or relate to its use of the facilities of the Authorised Market Institution; and
(c) agrees in writing to subject itself to the acting law of the AIFC in relation to its use of the facilities of the Authorised Market Institution.
6.3.5. Review of compliance
The Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must maintain arrangements regularly to review whether the Digital Assets admitted to trading on its facilities comply with the Admission to Trading Rules.
6.4. Suspending or removing Digital Assets from trading
6.4.1. Power to suspend
(1) The rules of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must provide that the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility have the power to suspend or remove from trading on its facilities any Digital Assets with immediate effect or from such date and time as may be specified where it is satisfied that there are circumstances that warrant such action or it is in the interests of the AIFC.
(2) The AFSA may direct an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility to suspend or remove Digital Assets from trading with immediate effect or from such date and time as may be specified if it is satisfied there are circumstances that warrant such action or it is in the interests of the AIFC.
(3) The AFSA may withdraw a direction made under (2) at any time.
(4) Digital Assets that are suspended from trading of Digital Assets remain admitted to trading for the purposes of this Chapter.
(5) The AFSA may prescribe any additional requirements or procedures relating to the removal or suspension of Digital Assets from or restoration of Digital Assets to trading.
6.4.2. Limitation on power to suspend or remove Digital Assets from trading
The rules of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must contain provisions for orderly suspension and removal from trading on its facilities any Digital Asset which no longer complies with its rules taking into account the interests of investors and the orderly functioning of the financial markets of the AIFC.
6.4.3. Publication of decision
(1) Where the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility suspends or removes any Digital Asset from trading on its facilities, it must notify the AFSA in advance and make that decision public by issuing a public notice on its website.
(2) Where the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility lifts a suspension or re-admits any Digital Asset to trading on its facilities, it must notify the AFSA in advance and make that decision public by issuing a public notice on its website.
(3) Where an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility has made any decisions on admission, suspension, or removal of Digital Assets from trading on its facilities, it must have adequate procedures for notifying users of such decisions.
6.5. Transparency obligations
6.5.1. Trading transparency obligation
An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must make available to the public:
(a) the current bid and offer prices of Digital Assets traded on its systems on a continuous basis during normal trading hours;
(b) the price, volume and time of the transactions executed in respect of Digital Assets traded on its facilities in as close to real-time as technically possible; and
(c) provide price, volume, time and counterparty details to the AFSA within 24 hours of the close of each trading day via a secure electronic feed.
6.5.2. Public notice of suspended or terminated Membership
The Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must promptly issue a public notice on its website in respect of any Member that has a Licence to carry on Market Activities or Regulated Activities whose Membership is suspended or terminated.
6.5.3. Cooperation with office-holder
The Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must cooperate, by the sharing of information and otherwise, with the AFSA, any relevant office-holder and any other authority or body having responsibility for any matter arising out of, or connected with, the default of a Member of the Digital Asset Trading Facility.
6.6. Additional requirements on technology resources
6.6.1. Cyber-security policy
(1) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility shall implement a written cyber security policy setting forth its policies and procedures for the protection of its electronic systems and members and counterparty data stored on those systems, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s governing body at least annually.
(2) The cyber security policy must, as a minimum, address the following areas:
(a) information security;
(b) data governance and classification;
(c) access controls;
(d) business continuity and disaster recovery planning and resources;
(e) capacity and performance planning;
(f) systems operations and availability concerns;
(g) systems and network security;
(h) systems and application development and quality assurance;
(i) physical security and environmental controls;
(j) customer data privacy;
(k) vendor and third-party service provider management; and
(l) incident response.
(3) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must advise the AFSA immediately if it becomes aware, or has reasonable grounds to believe, that a significant breach by any Person of its cyber security policy may have occurred or may be about to occur.
6.6.2. Technology governance
An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must, as a minimum, have in place systems and controls with respect to the procedures describing the creation, management and control of digital wallets and private keys.
6.6.3. Trading controls
An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must be able to:
(a) reject orders that exceed its pre-determined volume and price thresholds, or that are clearly erroneous;
(b) temporarily halt or constrain trading on its facilities if necessary or desirable to maintain an orderly market; and
(c) cancel, vary, or correct any order resulting from an erroneous order entry and/or the malfunctioning of the system of a Member.
6.6.4. Settlement and Clearing facilitation services
(1) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must ensure that satisfactory arrangements are made for securing the timely discharge (whether by performance, compromise or otherwise), clearing and settlement of the rights and liabilities of the parties to transactions effected on the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility (being rights and liabilities in relation to those transactions).
(2) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility acting as a Digital Asset Depository must:
(a) have appropriate rules, procedures, and controls, including robust accounting practices, to safeguard the rights of Digital Assets issuers and holders, prevent the unauthorised creation or deletion of Digital Assets, and conduct periodic and at least daily reconciliation of each Digital Asset balance it maintains for issuers and holders;
(b) prohibit overdrafts and debit balances in Digital Assets accounts;
(c) maintain Digital Assets in an immobilised or dematerialised form for their transfer by book entry;
(d) protect assets against custody risk through appropriate rules and procedures consistent with its legal framework;
(e) ensure segregation between the Digital Asset Depository’s own assets and the Digital Assets of its participants and segregation among the Digital Assets of participants; and
(f) identify, measure, monitor, and manage its risks from other custody related activities that it may perform.
6.7. Clients of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility and Investment limits
(1) Members of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility and their clients will be Clients of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility.
(2) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must maintain effective systems and controls to ensure that a Retail Client using its service does not invest, in respect of all Digital Assets in aggregate calculated over a period of one month, an amount which exceeds the greater of:
(a) USD 1,000; or
(b) the lesser of (i) 10 percent of the annual income; or (ii) 5 percent of the net worth of such Retail Client (excluding the value of the primary residence), up to a maximum aggregate amount of USD100,000.
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
CONTENTS
(…)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2.2. Exclusions in relation to certain categories of Centre Participant
For the avoidance of doubt, the requirements in COB do not apply to:
(a) a Representative Office;
(b) an Authorised Market Institution (other than an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform and an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility), except for COB 3 (Communications with Clients and Financial Promotions); or
(c) an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform, except for COB 3 (Communications with Clients and Financial Promotions), COB 4 (Key Information and Client Agreement), COB 7 (Conflicts of Interest), COB 8 (Client Assets) and COB Schedule 2 (Key Information and Content of Client Agreement); or
(d) an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility, except for COB 2 (Client Classification) and COB 3 (Communications with Clients and Financial Promotions).
(…)
For the purposes of 1.2.2(d), references in COB 2 and COB 3 to:
(a) "Authorised Firms" shall be read as if it were a reference to "an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility "; and
(b) "Regulated Activities" shall be read as if it were a reference to "Market Activities".
(…)
17. OPERATORS OF A DIGITAL ASSET BUSINESS
17.1. Application
This chapter applies to an Authorised Person engaged in the activity of Operating a Digital Asset Business.
Guidance
The following activities do not constitute Operating a Digital Asset Business:
trading of Digital Assets for the Person’s own investment purpose;
the issuance of Digital Assets by a Person and their administration (including sale, redemption);
any other activity or arrangement that is deemed by the AFSA to not constitute Operating a Digital Asset Business, where necessary and appropriate in order for the AFSA to pursue its objectives.
17.2. Rules Applicable to an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator
In addition to all requirements applicable to Authorised Persons in these rules, GEN, and AML, an Authorised Person carrying on the Market Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility must comply with the applicable requirements set out in the AMI, unless the requirements in this chapter expressly provide otherwise.
17.3. Admission of Digital Assets to trading
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility may grant admission of Digital Assets to trading only where it is satisfied that such admission is in accordance with the AMI and an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s Admission to Trading Rules.
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility must not permit trading of Digital Assets on its facilities unless those Digital Assets are admitted to, and not suspended from, trading by the Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility pursuant to Chapter 6 of AMI. [intentionally omitted]
17.4. Additional disclosure requirements
Prior to entering into an initial transaction for, on behalf of, or with a Client, an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business shall disclose in a clear, fair and not misleading manner:
(a) all terms, conditions and risks relating to the Digital Assets that have been admitted to trading and/or is the subject of the transaction;
(b) all material risks associated with its products, services and activities; and
(c) all details on the amount and the purpose of any premiums, fees, charges or taxes payable by the Client, whether or not these are payable to the Operating a Digital Asset Business. [intentionally omitted]
17.5. The risks to be disclosed pursuant to COB 17.4
The risks to be disclosed pursuant to COB 17.4. include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) Digital Assets not being legal tender or backed by a government;
(b) the value, or process for valuation, of Digital Assets, including the risk of a Digital Assets having no value;
(c) the volatility and unpredictability of the price of Digital Assets relative to Fiat Currencies;
(d) that trading in Digital Assets is susceptible to irrational market forces;
(e) that the nature of Digital Assets may lead to an increased risk of Financial Crime;
(f) that the nature of Digital Assets may lead to an increased risk of cyber-attack;
(g) there being limited or, in some cases, no mechanism for the recovery of lost or stolen Digital Assets;
(h) the risks of Digital Assets with regard to anonymity, irreversibility of transactions, accidental transactions, transaction recording, and settlement;
(i) that there is no assurance that a Person who accepts a Digital Asset as payment today will continue to do so in the future;
(j) that the nature of Digital Assets means that technological difficulties experienced by the Authorised Person may prevent the access or use of a Client’s Digital Assets;
(k) any links to Digital Assets related activity outside the AIFC, which may be unregulated or subject to limited regulation; and
(l) any regulatory changes or actions by the AFSA or Non-AIFC Regulator that may adversely affect the use, transfer, exchange, and value of a Digital Asset. [intentionally omitted]
17.6. Complaints
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business shall establish and maintain written policies and procedures to fairly and timely resolve complaints made against it or other parties (including members).
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business must provide, in a clear and conspicuous manner: on its website or websites; in all physical locations; and in any other location as the AFSA may prescribe, the following disclosures:
(a) the mailing address, email address, and telephone number for the receipt of complaints;
(b) a statement that the complainant may also bring his or her complaint to the attention of the AFSA;
(c) the AFSA’s mailing address, website, and telephone number; and
(d) such other information as the AFSA may require.
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business shall report to the AFSA any change in its complaint policies or procedures within ten days.
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business must maintain a record of any complaint made against it or other parties (including members) for a minimum period of six years from the date of receipt of the complaint. [intentionally omitted]
17.7. Obligation to report transactions
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business shall report to the AFSA details of transactions in Digital Assets traded on its facility which are executed, or reported, through its systems.
The AFSA may, by written notice or Guidance, specify:
(a) the information to be included in reports made under the preceding paragraph; and
(b) the manner in which such reports are to be made. [intentionally omitted]
17.8. AFSA power to impose a prohibition or requirement
The AFSA may prohibit an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business from:
(a) entering into certain specified transactions or types of transactions; or
(b) outsourcing any of its functions or activities to a third party.
The AFSA may, by written notice or guidance, set fees payable by an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business to the AFSA on certain specified transactions or types of transactions. [intentionally omitted]
SCHEDULE 2: KEY INFORMATION AND CONTENT OF CLIENT AGREEMENT
1. | CORE INFORMATION |
(…) | (…) |
5. | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR DIGITAL ASSET TRADING FACILITY OPERATORS AND DIGITAL ASSET SERVICE PROVIDERS PROVIDING CUSTODY |
| The additional information required where an Authorised Firm Provides Custody in relation to Digital Assets: |
| a breakdown of all fees and charges payable for a transfer of Digital Assets (a “transfer”) and when they are charged; |
| the information required to carry out a transfer; |
| the form and procedures for giving consent to a transfer; |
| an indication of the time it will normally take to carry out a transfer; |
| details of when a transfer will be considered to be complete; |
| how, and in what form, information and communications relating to transfer services will be provided to the Client, including the timing and frequency of communications and the language used and technical requirements for the Client’s equipment and software to receive the communications; |
| clear policies and procedures relating to unauthorised or incorrectly executed transfers, including when the Client is and is not entitled to redress; |
| clear policies and procedures relating to situations where the holding or transfer of Digital Assets may have been compromised, such as if there has been hacking, theft or fraud; and |
| details of the procedures the Digital Asset will follow to contact the Client if there has been suspected or actual hacking, theft or fraud. |
AIFC FEES RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
SCHEDULE 1: APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA FOR REGULATED ACTIVITIES
1.1Application fees for applying for Licence to carry on Regulated Activities
Regulated Activities | Fee (USD)* |
Operating a Representative Office | 3 000 |
(…) | (…) |
Operating an Organised Trading Facility | 5000 |
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility | 70 000 |
(…)
SCHEDULE 2: APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA FOR MARKET ACTIVITIES
1.2Application fees for applying for Licence to carry on Market Activities
Application fee by activities | Fee (USD) |
Operator of a Clearing House | 125 000 |
Operator of an Investment Exchange | 125 000 |
|
|
Operator of a Crowdfunding Platform | 5 000 |
Operating a Private Financing Platform | 5 000 |
(…)
SCHEDULE 6: ANNUAL SUPERVISION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA
6.1 Annual supervision fees for Regulated Activities
Annual supervision fees for Regulated Activities are determined by the activities the Authorised Firm conducts as set out below:
Regulated Activities | Fee (USD)* |
Operating a Representative Office | 1 000 |
(…) | (…) |
Operating an Organised Trading Facility | • 3 000 USD (fixed); and • trading levy of 0.0006% of the average daily trading value (variable)**. Note: AFSA will not invoice the trading levy (variable) fee unless it exceeds 500 USD |
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility | 35 000 |
(…)
6.2 Annual supervision fees for Market Activities
Annual supervision fees for Market Activities are determined by the activities the Authorised Market Institution conducts as set out below:
Application fee by activities | Fee (USD) |
Operator of a Clearing House | 62 500 |
Operator of an Investment Exchange | 62 500 |
|
|
Operator of a Crowdfunding Platform | 3 000 |
Operating a Private Financing Platform | 3 000 |
(…)
AIFC ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, COUNTER-TERRORIST FINANCING AND SANCTIONS RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
6. CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE
6.1. Conducting Customer Due Diligence
6.1.1. Obligation to conduct Customer Due Diligence
A Relevant Person must:
(a) conduct CDD under AML 6.3.1 for each of its customers including when the customer is
carrying out occasional transactions the value of which singularly or in several linked operations (whether at the time or later), equal or exceed USD 15,000; and
(a-a) conduct CDD under AML 6.3.1 for each of its customers including when the customer is
carrying out occasional transactions with Digital Assets the value of which singularly or in several linked operations (whether at the time or later), equal or exceed USD 1,000; and
(b) in addition to (a) and (a-a), conduct EDD under AML 7.1.1 in respect of:
(i) each customer it has assigned as high risk;
(ii) business relationships and transactions with persons from countries with high geographical risk factors.
(…)
11-1. DIGITAL ASSET TRANSFER (the “Travel Rule”)
11-1.1. Digital Asset transfer definition
(1) A Digital Asset transfer is a transaction carried out:
(a) by a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider (an “ordering institution”) on behalf of an originator by transferring any Digital Assets; and
(b) with a view to making the Digital Assets available
(i) to that Person or another Person (a “beneficiary”); and
(ii) at an institution (a “beneficiary institution”) which may be the ordering institution or another institution, whether or not one or more other institutions (“intermediary institutions”) participate in completion of the transfer of the Digital Assets.
11-1.2. Obligations of Ordering Institution
(1) Before carrying out both a cross-border or domestic Digital Asset transfer of the amount equal to or above USD 1,000, an ordering institution must obtain, record and ensure that the transfers are accompanied by the following information:
(a) the name of the originator;
(b) the number of the originator’s account maintained with the ordering institution and from which the Digital Assets are transferred or, in the absence of such an account, a unique reference number assigned to the Digital Asset transfer by the ordering institution;
(c) the originator’s address, or national identity number, or customer identification number, or date and place of birth;
(d) the name of the beneficiary (recipient); and
(e) the number of the recipient’s account maintained with the beneficiary institution and to which the Digital Assets are transferred or, in the absence of an account number, a unique transaction number assigned to the Digital Asset transfer by the beneficiary institution.
(2) Before carrying out both a cross-border or domestic Digital Asset transfer of the amount below USD 1,000, an ordering institution must obtain, record and ensure that the transfers are accompanied by the following information:
(a) the name of the originator;
(b) the number of the originator’s account maintained with the ordering institution and from which the Digital Assets are transferred or, in the absence of such an account, a unique reference number assigned to the Digital Asset transfer by the ordering institution;
(c) the name of the beneficiary (recipient); and
(d) the number of the recipient’s account maintained with the beneficiary institution and to which the Digital Assets are transferred, or, in the absence of an account number, a unique transaction number assigned to the Digital Asset transfer by the beneficiary institution.
(3) Before transferring Digital Assets, an ordering institution must verify the accuracy of the information referred to in (1) (a) to (c) on the basis of documents, data or information obtained from a reliable and independent sources.
(4) If several individual domestic or cross-border Digital Asset transfers from a single originating institution are bundled in a batch file for te transmission to recipient(s), then a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider that is an ordering institution must ensure that:
(i) the batch file contains the originator information required in (1) and/or (2) respectively;
(ii) it has verified the originator information referred to in (1); and
(iii) the batch file contains the recipient information required under (1) and/or (2) for each recipient and
that information is fully traceable in each recipient’s jurisdiction.
(5) The information referred to in (1), (2), (4) must be submitted in advance of, or simultaneously or concurrently with, the transfer of Digital Assets and in a secure manner and in line
with the requirements of the AIFC rules and regulations on data protection.
Guidance:
(1) The number of the account maintained with the ordering institution or
beneficiary institution from or to which the Digital Assets are transferred referred to in 11-1.2.(1)(b) to (e) and 11-1.2.(2)(b) to (d) could mean:
(a) the originator’s or recipients’ Digital wallet (address), where a transfer of Digital Assets is registered on a network using distributed ledger technology or similar technology or,
(b) the originator’s or beneficiary's account number, where such an account exists and is used to process the Digital Asset transaction if a transfer of Digital Asset is not registered on a network using distributed ledger technology or similar technology;
(b) Where information both in (1) (a) and (b) exists, ordering or beneficiary institutions should obtain, hold and/or send all information.
11-1.3. Obligations of Beneficiary Institution
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider, which acts as a beneficiary institution in a Digital Asset transfer must obtain, record and implement effective procedures, including, where appropriate, monitoring during or after the transfer, in order to detect whether the referred to in 11-1.1(1) and (2) respectively, on the originator and the beneficiary is included in, or follows, the transfer of Digital Assets or batch file transfer.
(2) Before making the Digital Assets available to the beneficiary, for a Digital Asset transfer of amount equal to or above USD 1,000, a beneficiary institution must verify the accuracy of information of the recipient referred to in 11-1.1.(1)(d), on the basis of documents, data or information obtained from a reliable and independent sources.
11-1.4. Transfers of Digital Assets with missing or incomplete information on the originator or the beneficiary
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider of the beneficiary must implement effective risk-based procedures, including procedures based on the risk-sensitive basis, for determining whether to execute or reject or suspend a transfer of Digital Asset that is not accompanied with a required complete originator and beneficiary information and for taking the appropriate follow-up action.
(2) Where the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider of the beneficiary becomes aware that the information referred to in 11-1.1(1) and (2) is missing or incomplete, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider must before making the Digital Assets available to the beneficiary, on a risk-sensitive basis and without undue delay:
(a) reject the transfer or return the transferred Digital Assets to the originator’s account; or
(b) ask for the required information on the originator and the beneficiary before making the Digital Assets available to the beneficiary.
(2) Where a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider repeatedly fails to provide the required information on the originator or the beneficiary, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider of the beneficiary must:
(a) take steps, which may initially include the issuing of warnings and setting of deadlines; or
(b) reject any future transfers of Digital Assets from or to, or restrict or terminate its business relationship with, a provider of Digital Assets transfers that fails to provide the required information. The Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider of the beneficiary must report that failure, and the steps taken, to the competent authority responsible for monitoring compliance with these Rules.
11-1.5. Digital Asset Transfers to or from self-hosted digital wallets
(1) In the case of a transfer of Digital Assets made to or received from on behalf of its a self-hosted digital wallet(s), the Digital Asset Service Provider of the originator or beneficiary must obtain and hold information referred to in in (1) or (2) from clients and ensure that the transfer of Digital Assets can be individually identified.
(2) In case of a Digital Asset transfer whose amount exceeds USD 1,000 or there is a suspicion of money laundering of a transfer to a self-hosted digital wallet Digital Asset Service Provider of the originator or beneficiary must take adequate measures on a risk-sensitive basis to mitigate and manage the ML/TF risks associated with the transfers.
Guidance on risk mitigating measures on transfers to or from self-hosted digital wallets
Digital Asset Service Provider should undertake following measures (non-exhaustive) to ensure compliance with (2):
(a) conduct enhanced monitoring of Digital Asset transfers with self-hosted digital wallets;
(b) accept Digital Asset transfers only from or to self-hosted digital wallets that the Digital Asset Service Provider has assessed to be reliable, having regard to the screening results of the Digital Asset transactions and the associated digital wallets and the assessment results on the ownership or control of the self-hosted digital wallet by the originator or beneficiary; and
(c) impose transaction limits or prohibition.
11-1.6. Rules in Chapter 11-1. comes into operation 12 months after the adoption of the AIFC Rules on Regulation of Digital Asset Activities.
11-2. DIGITAL ASSET TRANSFER COUNTERPARTY DUE DILIGENCE AND ADDITIONAL MEASURES.
11-2.1. General requirements Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence
(1) When an Authorised Person conducts a Digital Asset transfer referred to in Chapter 11-1, the Authorised Person will be exposed to money laundering and terrorist financing risks associated with the institution which may be the ordering institution, intermediary institution or beneficiary institution involved in the Digital asset transfer (“Digital Asset transfer counterparty”).
(2) To avoid sending or receiving Digital Assets to or from illicit actors or designated parties that had not been subject to appropriate CDD and screening measures of a Digital Asset transfer counterparty and to ensure compliance with the Travel Rule, an Authorised Person must conduct due diligence on the Digital Asset transfer counterparty to identify and assess the money laundering and terrorist financing risks associated with the Digital Asset transfers to or from the Digital Asset transfer counterparty and apply appropriate risk-based anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism measures.
(3) An Authorised Person should conduct due diligence measures on a Digital Asset transfer counterparty before conducting a Digital Asset transfer, or making the transferred Digital Assets available to the recipient.
(4) An Authorised Person does not need to undertake the Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence process for every individual Digital Asset transfer when dealing with Digital Asset transfer counterparties that it has already conducted counterparty due diligence on previously, unless when there is a suspicion of money laundering and terrorist financing.
(5) An Authorised Person undertakes reviews of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence records on a regular basis or upon trigger events (e.g., when it becomes aware of a suspicious transaction or other information such as negative news from credible media, public information that the counterparty has been subject to any targeted financial sanction, money laundering and terrorist financing investigation or regulatory action).
(6) Based on the Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence results, the Authorised Person determines if it should continue to conduct Digital Asset transfers with, and submit the required information to, a Digital Asset transfer counterparty, and the extent of anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism measures that it should apply in relation to Digital Asset transfers with the Digital Asset transfer counterparty on a risk-sensitive basis.
11-2.2. Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence procedures
Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence typically involves the following procedures:
(a) determining whether the Digital Asset transfer is or will be with a Digital Asset transfer counterparty or a Self-Hosted Digital wallet;
(b) where applicable, identifying the Digital Asset transfer counterparty (e.g., by making a reference to lists of licensed or registered Digital Asset Service Providers or financial institutions in different jurisdictions); and
(c) assessing whether the Digital Asset transfer counterparty is an eligible counterparty to deal with and to send the required information to.
11-2.3. Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence measures
An Authorised Person applies the following Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence measures before it conducts a Digital Asset transfer with a Digital Asset transfer counterparty:
(a) determines if the respondent entity is licensed or registered;
(b) collects sufficient information about the Digital Asset transfer counterparty to enable it to understand fully the nature of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty’s business;
(c) understands the nature and expected volume and value of Digital Asset transfers with the Digital Asset transfer counterparty;
(d) determines from publicly available information the reputation of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty and the quality and effectiveness of the anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism regulation and supervision over the Digital Asset transfer counterparty by authorities in the jurisdictions in which it operates and/or is incorporated which perform functions similar to those of the competent authorities;
(e) assesses the anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism controls of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty and ensures that the anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism controls of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty are adequate and effective;
(f) assesses whether the Digital Asset transfer counterparty is subject to the Travel Rule similar to that imposed under Chapter 11-1 in the jurisdictions in which the Digital Asset transfer counterparty operates and/or is incorporated;
(g) assesses the adequacy and effectiveness of the anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism controls that the Digital Asset transfer counterparty has put in place for ensuring compliance with the Travel Rule;
(h) assesses whether the Digital Asset transfer counterparty can protect the confidentiality and integrity of personal data (e.g., the required originator and recipient information), taking into account the adequacy and robustness of data privacy and security controls of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty; and
(j) obtains approval from its senior management.
Guidance:
(1) While a relationship with a Digital Asset transfer counterparty is different from a cross-border correspondent relationship referred to in Chapter 10, there are similarities in the due diligence approach which can be of assistance to an Authorised Person. By virtue of this, the Authorised Person should conduct the due diligence measures in Chapter 10, with reference to the requirements set out in AML 10.2.
(2) When assessing money laundering and financing terrorism risks posed by a Digital Asset transfer counterparty, an Authorised Person should take into account relevant factors that may indicate a higher money laundering and financing terrorism risk. Examples of such risk is where a Digital Asset transfer counterparty:
(i) operates or is incorporated in a jurisdiction posing a higher risk or with a weak anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism regime;
(ii) is not (or yet to be) licensed or registered and supervised for anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism purposes in the jurisdictions in which it operates and/or is incorporated by authorities which perform functions similar to those of the competent authorities;
(iii) does not have in place adequate and effective anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism systems, including measures for ensuring compliance with the Travel Rule;
(iv) does not implement adequate measures or safeguards for protecting the confidentiality and integrity of personal data; or
(v) is associated with money laundering and financing terrorism or other illicit activities.
Consultation Paper on AIFC Digital Asset Service Providers Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Introduction
Why are we issuing this Consultation Paper (CP)?
1.The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has issued this Consultation Paper to seek suggestions from the market on the amendments to the AIFC Rules and regulations to enhance the AIFC Digital Asset Trading Facility Framework.
Who should read this CP?
2.The proposals in this paper will be of interest to current and potential AIFC participants dealing with digital assets as well as the market and other stakeholders.
Terminology
3.Defined terms have the initial letter of the word capitalised, or of each word in a phrase. Definitions are set out in the Glossary Rules (GLO). Unless the context otherwise requires, where capitalisation of the initial letter is not used, the expression has its natural meaning.
What are the next steps?
4.We invite comments from interested stakeholders on the proposed framework. All commentsshould be in writing and sent to the addressor email specified below. If sending your comments by email, please use “Consultation Paper AFSA-L-CE-2023-0002” in the subject line. You may, if relevant, identify the organisation you represent when providing your comments. The AFSA reserves the right to publish, including on its website, any comments you provide, unless you expressly request otherwise. Comments supported by reasoning and evidence will be given more weight by the AFSA.
5.The deadline for providing comments on the proposed framework is 2 July 2023. Once we receive your comments, we shall consider if any refinements are required to this proposal.
6.AFSA prefers to receive comments by email at consultation@afsa.kz or posted to:
Policy and Strategy Division
Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA)
55/17 Mangilik El, building C3.2, Astana, Kazakhstan
Structure of this CP
Part I – Background;
Part II – Issues;
Part III – Best Practice;
Part IV – Proposals;
Part V – Public Consultation Questions;
Part VI – Outcomes.
Annex 1 - Draft AIFC Rules on Digital Asset Activities (Digital Asset Service Providers framework);
Annex 2 – Consequential amendments to AIFC Regulations and Rules.
Background
Digital Asset Service Providers (the “DASPs”) are companies or entities that offer digital asset-related services such as exchanges, wallet providers, custody, and transfer services.
A total global market cap of digital assets amounts to $1.24 trillion as of April 2023[1]. The global DASP market is expected to witness significant growth in the coming years due to the increasing adoption of blockchain technology and virtual assets. The increasing demand for cryptocurrencies, digital securities, and other virtual assets is driving the growth of the DASP market.
However, the DASP market faces several challenges, such as regulatory uncertainty, cybersecurity risks, and money laundering concerns. Regulators across the world are introducing new laws and regulations to address these challenges and ensure the safe and secure operation of DASPs.
Regulating Digital Assets Service Providers is challenging and requires a comprehensive regulatory regime consisting of relevant licensing and regulatory requirements for DASPs' operations.
Development of the AIFC Digital Asset Service Providers Framework (the “DASPs Framework”) was prompted by the need to introduce appropriate regulatory regime for persons wishing to provide financial services activities in respect of digital assets.
The DASPs Framework aimed to:
·introduce relevant investor protection requirements in this area, while also facilitating the development of this market in a responsible and prudent manner. Proper regulation can help ensure the security and stability of the digital asset markets, reduce volatility, and provide greater confidence to participants;
·help combat illicit activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing, which are often facilitated through the use of digital assets, and provide the greater transparency and accountability;
·help facilitate the growth and adoption of digital assets as a legitimate means of exchanging value. By establishing clear rules for digital asset service providers, this Framework can provide clarity and certainty to businesses and investors, encouraging innovation and growth in the industry.
As of April 2023, Fintech Lab (Sandbox) has 10 Digital Asset Service Providers carrying on the following Regulated Activities:
·Providing Custody
·Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility
·Arranging Custody
·Dealing in Investments as Principal
·Dealing in Investments as Agent
·Managing Investments
·Advising on Investments, Arranging Deals in Investments
·Operating an Exchange
·Operating a Clearing House
·Providing Money Services
·Arranging Deals in Investments.
Issues
The absence of a clear legal and regulatory framework for digital assets can lead to a lack of investors’ confidence in those assets. Besides, it may also lead to missed opportunities in terms of innovative digital services and new funding sources for AIFC Participants.
The lack of a framework on digital assets can also hinder digital asset service providers to scale up their business. Despite the fact that the digital asset market is still modest in size, it may pose a significant a threat to the AIFC financial stability in future. Therefore, the AFSA developed a framework which will regulate activities of the VASPs.
Best Practice
We took into consideration the directions given by international standard-setters, including the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) in respect of Digital Assets.
The regulatory developments in other jurisdictions, including the DIFC, ADGM, UK and Bahrain, were analyzed.
Primarily, the legal framework of the DIFC is selected as a benchmark due to similar status of international financial centre with risk-based regulation and comprehensive regulatory framework for DASPs embracing many aspects of their activities.
Dubai International Financial Centre (“DIFC”)
In March 2021, the DFSA introduced the Investment Token Framework with the intention of:
a) Clarifying the application of the financial services regime to persons undertaking activities that involve, or relate to, Investment Tokens; and
b) Putting in place a consistent, risk based and proportionate application of financial regulation to products, services and activities involving Investment Tokens.
In March 2022 the Crypto Token Framework was introduced, describing a regulatory regime for persons wishing to provide financial services activities in respect of Crypto Tokens. It requires all entities intending to offer financial services in relation to Crypto Tokens to establish in the DIFC as a Body Corporate and be incorporated under DIFC Law.
The Crypto Token Regime has:
·extended the scope of many existing financial services activities including advising, dealing, arranging, trading and custody, to apply to the provision of products and services in relation to Crypto Tokens;
·implemented a wide range of amendments to existing laws and rulebook modules in the DIFC; and
·limited the use of Crypto Tokens to be those which are “recognised” by the DFSA.
The following Financial Services activities are allowed for the provision of services in relation to Crypto Tokens:
a)Dealing in Investments as Principal;
b) Dealing in Investments as Agent;
c) Arranging Deals in Investments;
d) Managing Assets;
e) Advising on Financial Products;
f) Operating an Exchange;
g) Providing Custody;
h) Arranging Custody;
i) Operating a Clearing House; and
j) Operating an Alternative Trading System.
Abu-Dhabi Global Market (“ADGM”)
The ADGM’s Virtual Asset framework has been designed for Multilateral Trading Facilities using virtual assets, custodians and other intermediaries engaged in virtual asset activities, such as brokers.
Specifically, a licence for a Regulated Activity in relation to virtual assets permits undertaking one or more virtual asset activities, including:
a)buying, selling or exercising any right in accepted virtual assets (whether as principal or agent);
b)managing accepted virtual assets belonging to another person;
c)making arrangements with a view to another person (whether as principal or agent) buying, selling or providing custody of accepted virtual assets;
d)marketing of accepted virtual assets;
e)advising on the merits of buying or selling of accepted virtual assets or any rights conferred by such buying or selling;
f)operating a Multilateral Trading Facility in relation to virtual assets; and/or
g)operating as a Virtual Asset custodian.
Firms wishing to apply for one of the above permissions can only do so in relation to “Accepted virtual assets”. These virtual assets are the ones that fulfil the criteria prescribed by the FSRA. A list of accepted virtual assets is not publicly available. Each applicant must submit an application for each virtual asset they intend to offer, regardless of whether the FSRA may have accepted the virtual asset for another Authorised Firm.
As for now, there are 5 virtual asset firms launched in ADGM:
1.Matrix (operating a regulated virtual asset Multilateral Trading Facility and custody platform);
2.MidChains (operating a regulated virtual asset Multilateral Trading Facility and custody platform);
3.Hayvn (arranging deals in investments and providing custody for accepted virtual assets);
4.Seba Bank (advising on investments or credit, arranging credit and custody, and arranging deals in investments);
5.Yoshi markets (operating a regulated virtual asset Multilateral Trading Facility and custody platform).
Bahrain
The Bahraini framework has also the common financial center feature and is based on the UK financial legal framework. Bahrain adopted its DASPs and DA regulatory framework in 2019. Bahrain established a standalone crypto framework that is comprehensive, convenient in terms of navigation, has some commonalities with ADGM, but at the same time provides for many specific and tailored measures that address the risks of the DASP-related activities.
According to the Central Bank of Bahrain and Financial Institutions Law 2006 regulated crypto-asset services means the conduct of any or any combination of the following types of activities:
a)Reception and Transmission of order;
b)Execution of orders on behalf of clients;
c)Dealing on own account;
d)Portfolio Management;
e)Crypto-asset Custodian;
f)Investment Advice;
g)Crypto-asset exchange.
As of the date of this paper, there are 3 licensed companies in Bahrain:
1.Binance Bahrain B.S.C (other activities auxiliary to financial service activities - Crypto-asset services)
2.Rain Management W.L.L. (trading in accepted crypto-assets as agent; trading in accepted crypto-assets as principal; portfolio management; crypto-asset custody; investment advice)
3.Coinmena B.S.C. (trading in accepted crypto-assets as agent; portfolio management; crypto-asset custody; investment advice; trading in accepted crypto-assets as principal)
The United Arab Emirates (Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority)
On 7 February 2023, the Dubai Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) issued the Virtual Assets and Related Activities Regulations 2023 (VARA Regulations) and accompanying Rulebooks which set out VARA’s Virtual Asset Regime for the Emirate of Dubai (including its commercial freezones but excluding the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC)) in UAE.
Virtual assets are broadly defined as “a digital representation of value that may be digitally traded, transferred, or used as an exchange or payment tool, or for investment purposes. This includes virtual tokens, which are a digital representation of a set of rights that can be digitally offered and traded through a virtual asset platform, and any digital representation of any other value as determined by VARA”.
The regulated virtual asset activities, which will require a licence from VARA are:
a) Advisory Services;
b) Broker-Dealer Services;
c) Custody Services;
d) Exchange Services;
e) Lending and Borrowing Services;
f) Payments and Remittances Services; and
g) VA Management and Investment Services.
During 2022, VARA has been working with established virtual asset service providers (VASPs) including Binance and Crypto.com on a minimum viable product program (MVP Program) to onboard VASPs into the jurisdiction.
VARA has also announced that it plans to only permit the MVP Program licensees to provide services to qualified and/or institutional investors in the initial stages, following which the VASPs will be able to progress to a full market product licence and permission to onboard retail clients.
Hex Trust and Crypto.com have officially launched its operations in Dubai after receiving the MVP Operational Licence from VARA, in February and March respectively.
Proposals
Based on the best practice analysis of the DIFC and ADGM, the following Regulated Activities are proposed to be allowed for carrying on, in or from the AIFC, in relation to Digital Assets:
- (a) Dealing in Investments as Principal;
- (b) Dealing in Investments as Agent;
- (c) Managing Investments;
- (d) Managing a Collective Investment Scheme;
- (e) Providing Custody;
- (f) Arranging Custody;
- (g) Advising on Investments; and
- (h) Arranging Deals in Investments.
After preliminary analysis conducted by the AFSA, it is proposed to introduce the following common requirements related to:
1.Authorisation of Digital Asset Service Providers, including the capital requirement and mandatory appointments applicable to Digital Asset Service Providers;
2.Implementing technology governance, controls and systems requirements;
3.Establishing appropriate internal policies and procedures, as well as public disclosure requirements;
4. Provision of key features document and disclosure of risks;
5. Reconciliation;
6. Investment limits and calculation of net assets for effective client management;
7. Prohibitions on marketing, facilitating investments, and certain activities related to Digital Assets;
8. Regular reporting and breach notification obligations.
Digital Asset Service Provider carrying on any one or more of the Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets should be subject to relevant provisions of AIFC Acts either directly or in respect of its officers and Employees who are Approved or Designated Individuals.
It is also proposed to introduce the following requirements for each Regulated Activity in relation to Digital assets:
1. Digital Asset Service Providers carrying on a Regulated Activity of Advising on Investments and Arranging Deals in Investments are proposed to ensure that the advice provided is free from misleading or false information, and they must verify factual information from reliable sources, while also assessing a diverse range of Digital Assets to meet the client's investment objectives;
2. Digital Asset Service Providers carrying on a Regulated Activity of Providing and Arranging Custody should comply with the applicable requirements for a proper digital wallet management. This includes ensuring resilient and compatible DLT applications, clear segregation of a client’s digital assets, proper cryptographic key management, providing contractual arrangements, making additional disclosures in order to strengthen security and protect client assets;
3.The requirements for Digital Asset Service Providers Managing Investments and a Collective Investment Scheme should include verification of information, providing transparent client reporting and valuation, implementation of risk management and due diligence measures, and maintaining confirmation notes.
4. Digital Asset Service Providers Dealing in Investments as Principal or Agent should also maintain confirmation notes that include information, that ensures transparency and clarity for clients regarding their investment transactions, and conduct appropriateness test.
Public consultation questions
In the course of public consultation, existing and potential market participants will be invited to comment on the following questions:
(1)AFSA invites comments on the draft Rules on Digital Asset Activities related to the Digital Asset Service Providers and consequential amendments.
(2)What is your view on the proposed capital requirements?
(3)What do you think about the proposed requirements in relation to the IT systems and technology governance?
(4)Do you agree with the proposed restrictions and prohibitions?
Outcomes
It is expected that the introduction of the Digital Asset Service Providers framework will help:
1) address and mitigate risks related to the Digital Asset Service Providers’ activities;
2) support innovation and fair competition;
3) maintain the competitiveness of the AIFC on international financial and technological markets; and
4) provide investors with significant benefits in terms of access to cheaper, faster and safer financial services and asset management.
Annex 1
RULES APPLICABLE TO DIGITAL ASSET SERVICE PROVIDERS
This Part 3 applies to a Person carrying on, in or from the AIFC, one or more of the following Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets:
- (a)Dealing in Investments as Principal;
- (b)Dealing in Investments as Agent;
- (c)Managing Investments;
- (d)Managing a Collective Investment Scheme;
- (e)Providing Custody;
- (f)Arranging Custody;
- (g)Advising on Investments; and
- (h)Arranging Deals in Investments.
3.1. Authorisation of Digital Asset Service Providers
A Person wishing to carry on one or more of the Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets in or from the AIFC must be an Authorised Firm licensed by the AFSA.
3.2. Requirements for Digital Asset Service Providers
The AFSA may not grant authorisation or variation to carry on the Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets, except for Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, unless the applicant satisfies all of the following requirements:
(1) general authorisation requirements applicable to the applicant under the Framework Regulations and other applicable rules, and
(2) the applicant must ensure that it maintains at all times capital resources in the amount specified in Table 2 by reference to the activity that the Digital Asset Service Provider is authorised to conduct or, if it is authorised to conduct more than one such activity, the amount that is the higher or highest of the relevant amounts in Table 2.
Table 2
Regulated Activity | Capital requirement (USD) |
Dealing in Investments as Principal, unless such activities are limited to matching client orders and the AFSA determines that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to apply a lower capital requirement | 250,000 |
Dealing in Investments as Principal, where such activities are limited to matching client orders and the AFSA determines that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to apply a lower capital requirement than above | 50,000 |
Dealing in Investments as Agent | 50,000 |
Managing Investments | 100,000 |
Managing a Collective Investment Scheme, which is an externally managed Exempt Fund and has an appointed Eligible Custodian, unless the appointment of an Eligible Custodian is not require | 50,000 |
Managing a Collective Investment Scheme, which is a Non-Exempt Fund | 150,000 |
Managing a Collective Investment Scheme, which is a Self-managed Fund and has an appointed Eligible Custodian, unless the appointment of an Eligible Custodian is not required due to the nature of the Fund and the type of assets which it holds | 200,000 |
Managing a Collective Investment Scheme, which does not have an appointed Eligible Custodian, except where an Eligible Custodian is not required due to the nature of the Fund and type of assets which it holds | 250,000 |
Providing Custody | 250,000 |
Arranging Custody | 10,000 |
Advising on Investments | 10,000 |
Arranging Deals in Investments | 10,000 |
Guidance:
A Digital Asset Service Provider may carry on the Regulated Activities only in relation to Digital Assets and may not carry on the Regulated Activities in relation to other Investments unless for circumstances which could be approved by the AFSA on a case-by-case basis.
3.3. Mandatory appointment
In addition to the mandatory appointments required by GEN 2.1., a Digital Asset Service Provider must appoint a Chief Information Technology Officer, who is an individual responsible for its ongoing information technology (“IT”) operations, maintenance and security oversight to ensure that the Digital Asset Service Provider’s IT systems are reliable and adequately protected from external attack or incident.
3.4. Technology governance, controls and security
3.4.1. Systems and controls
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider must ensure that they implement systems and controls necessary to address the risks, including cybersecurity-related risks, to its business. The relevant systems and controls should take into account such factors that include but not limited to the nature, scale and complexity of the Digital Asset Service Provider’s business, the diversity of its operations, the volume and size of its transactions and the level of risk inherent with its business.
(2) A Digital Asset Service Providers must have adequate systems and controls to enable it to calculate and monitor its capital resources and its compliance with the requirements in DAA 3.2.(2). The systems and controls must be in writing and must be appropriate for the nature, scale and complexity of the Digital Asset Service Provider’s business and its risk profile.
3.4.2. Technology governance and risk assessment framework
(1) Digital Asset Service Providers must implement a technology governance and risk assessment framework which must be comprehensive and proportionate to the nature, scale, and complexity of the risks inherent in their business model.
(2) The technology governance and risk assessment framework must apply to all technologies relevant to a Digital Asset Service Provider’s business and clearly set out the Digital Asset Service Provider’s cybersecurity objectives, including the requirements for the competency of its relevant Employees and, as relevant, end users and clients and clearly defined systems and procedures necessary for managing risks.
(3) Digital Asset Service Providers must ensure that their technology governance and risk assessment is capable of determining the necessary processes and controls that they must implement in order to adequately mitigate any risks identified. In particular, Digital Asset Service Providers must ensure that their technology governance and risk assessment framework includes consideration of international standards and industry best practice codes.
(4) Digital Asset Service Providers must ensure that their technology governance and risk assessment framework addresses appropriate governance policies and system development controls, such as a development, maintenance and testing process for technology systems and operations controls, back-up controls, capacity and performance planning and availability testing.
3.4.3. Cyber-security matters
A Digital Asset Service Provider must take reasonable steps to ensure that its IT systems are reliable and adequately protected from external attack or incident.
3.4.4. Cyber-security policy
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider must create and implement a policy which outline their procedures for the protection of its electronic systems.
(2) A Digital Asset Service Provider must ensure that its cyber-security policy is reviewed at least on an annual basis by its Chief Information Technology Officer.
(3) The cyber-security policy must, as a minimum, address the following areas:
(a) information security;
(b) data governance and classification;
(с) access controls;
(d) business continuity and disaster recovery planning and resources;
(e) capacity and performance planning;
(f) systems operations and availability concerns;
(g) systems and network security, consensus protocol methodology, code and smart contract validation and audit processes;
(h) systems and application development and quality assurance;
(i) physical security and environmental controls, including but not limited to procedures around access to premises and systems;
(j) customer data privacy;
(i) procedures regarding their facilitation of Digital Asset transactions initiated by a Client including, but not limited to, considering multi-factor authentication or any better standard for Digital Asset transactions that—
(i) exceed transaction limits set by the Client, such as accumulative transaction limits over a period of time; and
(ii) are initiated after a change of personal details by the Client, such as the address of a Digital wallet;
(j) procedures regarding Client authentication and session controls including, but not limited to, the maximum incorrect attempts for entering a password, appropriate time-out controls and password validity periods;
(k) procedures establishing adequate authentication checks when a change to a Client’s account information or contact details is requested;
(l) vendor and third-party service provider management;
(m) monitoring and implementing changes to core protocols not directly controlled by the Digital Asset Service Provider, as applicable;
(n) incident response, including but not limited to, root cause analysis and rectification activities to prevent reoccurrence;
(o) governance framework and escalation procedures for effective decision-making and proper management and control of risks and emergency incidents, including but not limited to responses to ransomware and other forms of cyberattacks; and
(p) hardware and infrastructure standards, including but not limited to network lockdown, services/desktop security and firewall standards.
3.4.5. Cryptographic keys and Digital wallets management
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider must ensure that its technology governance and risk assessment framework addresses, to the extent necessary, the generation of cryptographic keys and Digital wallets, the signing and approval of transactions, the storage of cryptographic keys and seed phrases, Digital wallets creation and management thereof.
(2) A Digital Asset Service Provider must:
(a) safeguard access to Digital Assets in accordance with industry best practices and, in particular, ensure that there is no single point of failure in the Digital Asset Service Provider’s access to, or knowledge of, Digital Assets held by the Digital Asset Service Provider;
(b) adopt industry best practices for storing the private keys of Clients, including ensuring that keys stored online or in any one physical location are insufficient to conduct a Digital Asset transaction, unless appropriate controls are in place to render physical access insufficient to conduct such Digital Asset transaction;
(c) ensure that backups of the key and seed phrases are stored in a separate location from the primary key and/or seed phrase;
(d) adopt strict access management controls to manage access to keys, including an audit log detailing each change of access to keys;
(e) adopt procedures designed to immediately revoke a key signatory’s access.
(3) A Digital Asset Service Provider must:
(a) ensure that the key generation process ensures that revoked signatories do not have access to the backup seed phrase or knowledge of the phrase used in the key’s creation;
(b) perform internal audits on a quarterly basis concerning the removal of user access by reviewing access logs and verifying access as appropriate;
(c) implement and maintain a procedure for documenting the onboarding and offboarding of staff;
(d) implement and maintain a procedure for documenting a Digital Asset Service Provider’s permission to grant or revoke access to each role in its key management system; and
(e) regularly assess the security of its IT systems or software integrations with external parties and ensure that the appropriate safeguards are implemented in order to mitigate all relevant risks.
(4) Digital Asset Service Providers should provide information to Clients on measures they can take to protect their keys and/or seed phrases from misuse or unauthorised access, and the consequences of sharing their private keys and other security information.
(5) Digital Asset Service Providers must ensure that access to their systems and data may only be granted to individuals with a demonstrable business need and implement safeguards to ensure the proper identification of all individuals, including the maintenance of an access log.
3.4.6. On-going monitoring
For the purposes of meeting the requirement in DAA 3.4.1, a Digital Asset Service Provider must have adequate procedures and arrangements for the evaluation, selection and on-going maintenance and monitoring of its IT systems. Such procedures and arrangements must, at a minimum, provide for:
(a) problem management and system change;
(b) testing IT systems before live operations in accordance with the requirements in DAA 3.4.7;
(c) real time monitoring and reporting on system performance, availability and integrity; and
(d) adequate measures to ensure:
(i) the IT systems are resilient and not prone to failure;
(ii) business continuity in the event that an IT system fails;
(iii) protection of the IT systems from damage, tampering, misuse or unauthorised access; and
(iv)the integrity of data forming part of, or being processed through, IT systems.
3.4.7. Testing and audit of technology systems
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider must, before commencing live operation of its IT systems or any updates thereto, use development and testing methodologies in line with internationally accepted testing standards in order to test the viability and effectiveness of such systems. For this purpose, the testing must be adequate for the Digital Asset Service Provider to obtain reasonable assurance that, among other things:
(a)the systems enable it to comply with all the applicable requirements on an on-going basis;
(b)the systems can continue to operate effectively in stressed market conditions;
(c)the systems have sufficient electronic capacity to accommodate reasonably foreseeable volumes of messaging and orders; and
(d)any risk management controls embedded within the systems, such as generating automatic error reports, work as intended.
(2) A Digital Asset Service Provider is required to undergo a qualified independent third-party technology governance and IT audit to conduct vulnerability assessments and penetration testing at least on an annual basis.
(2) A Digital Asset Service Providers must engage a qualified independent third-party auditor prior to the introduction of any new systems, applications and products.
(3) A Digital Asset Service Provider must provide the results of technology governance and IT assessments and tests to the AFSA upon its request.
3.4.8. Technology audit reports
(1) This Rule applies to an Authorised Firm that:
(a) holds or controls Digital Assets;
(b) relies on DLT or similar technology to carry on one or more of the following Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets:
(i) Dealing in Investments as Principal;
(ii) Dealing in Investments as Agent;
(iii) Arranging Deals in Investments;
(iv) Managing Investments;
(v) Advising on Investments;
(vi) Providing Custody; or
(vii) Arranging Custody; or
(с) is Managing a Collective Investment Scheme where:
(i) Units of the Fund are Security Tokens; or
(ii) 10% or more of the gross asset value of the Fund Property of the Fund consists of Digital Assets.
(2) The Authorised Firm must:
(a) appoint a suitably qualified independent third-party professional to:
(i) carry out an annual audit of the Authorised Firm’s compliance with the technology resources and governance requirements that apply to it; and
(ii) produce a written report which sets out the methodology and results of that annual audit, confirms whether the requirements referred to in DAA 3.4.8. (i) have been met and lists any recommendations or areas of concern;
(b) submit to the AFSA a copy of the report referred to in DAA 3.4.8. (a)(ii) within 4 months of the Authorised Firm’s financial year end; and
(c) be able to satisfy the AFSA that the independent third party professional appointed to carry out the annual audit has the relevant expertise to do so, and that the Authorised Firm has done proper due diligence to satisfy itself of that fact.
(3) A Digital wallet Service Provider must ensure that the report required under DAA 3.4.8 (a)(ii) includes confirmation as to whether it has complied with the requirements in DAA 3.5.1.
Guidance:
Credentials which indicate a qualified independent third-party auditor is suitable to conduct audit of technology governance and IT systems may include:
(1) designation as a Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA) or Certified Information Security Manager (CISM) by the Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA);
(2) designation as a Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) by the International Information System Security Certification Consortium (ISC); or
(3) accreditation by a recognised and reputable body to certify compliance with relevant ISO/IEC 27000 series standards; or
(4) accreditation by the relevant body to certify compliance with the Kazakhstani standards in the area of information (cyber) security.
3.5. Policies, procedures, and public disclosures
3.5.1. Policies and procedures required for Digital Asset Service Providers
(1) Digital Asset Service Providers carrying on a Regulated Activity of Advising on Investments must establish, implement and enforce appropriate written internal policies and procedures relating to the following:
(a) how they ensure the independent basis of their advice;
(b) how they ensure all Directors and Employees providing the relevant advice are sufficiently competent;
(c) such other policies and procedures as the AFSA may require from time to time.
(2) Digital Asset Service Providers carrying on Regulated Activities of Dealing in Investments as Principal or Agent must establish, implement and enforce appropriate written internal policies and procedures relating to the following:
(a) the prohibition, detection, prevention and/or deterrence of market offences and any other abusive practices within their business or using their services including, but not limited to, relevant internal rules, compliance programmes, sanctioning policies and powers;
(b) Execution and routing of Client orders;
(c) the ability of Clients to have access to and withdraw their Digital Assets including, but not limited to, during periods of high uncertainty and/or extreme volatility; and
(d) such other policies and procedures as the AFSA may require from time to time.
(3) Digital Asset Service Providers carrying on a Regulated Activity of Providing Custody must establish, implement and enforce appropriate written internal policies and procedures relating to the following:
(a) the ability of Clients to have access to and withdraw their Digital Assets including, but not limited to, during periods of high uncertainty and/or extreme volatility; and
(b) such other policies and procedures as the AFSA may require from time to time.
(4) Digital Asset Service Providers carrying on a Regulated Activity of Managing Investments must establish, implement and enforce appropriate written internal policies and procedures relating to the following:
(a) the ability of Clients to have access to and withdraw their Digital Assets including, but not limited to, during periods of high uncertainty and/or extreme volatility;
(b) their assessment of Client suitability for relevant products or services, including but not limited to the nature, features, costs and risks of investment services, Digital Assets or other financial instruments selected for their Clients, while taking into account cost and complexity;
(c) how they ensure all Directors and Employees Managing Investments to Clients are sufficiently competent; and
(d) such other policies and procedures as the AFSA may require from time to time.
(5) All Digital Asset Service Providers specified in (1) to (4) must assess and, in any case, at least yearly review the effectiveness of their policies and procedures and take appropriate measures to address any deficiencies.
3.5.2. Public disclosures
(1) All Digital Asset Service Providers specified in (1) to (4) in DAA 3.5.1. must publish on their website in a prominent place or make available by other publicly accessible means:
(a) a detailed description of any actual or potential conflicts of interest arising out of their activities, and how these are managed; and
(b) their policies and procedures relating to data privacy, whistleblowing and handling of Client complaints.
(2) In addition to (1), Digital Asset Service Providers carrying on a Regulated Activity of Advising on Investments must publish on their website in a prominent place or make available by other publicly accessible means:
(a) a statement of whether the Digital Asset Service Provider refers or introduces Clients to other Persons including, but not limited to, other Digital Asset Service Providers, and if so, a description of the terms of such arrangements, and the monetary or non-monetary benefits received by the Digital Asset Service Provider, including by way of reciprocation for any service or business; and
(b) a statement of whether the Digital Asset Service Provider has accounts, funds or Digital Assets maintained by a third party and if so, provide the identity of that third party.
(3) In addition to (1), Digital Asset Service Providers carrying on Regulated Activities of Dealing in Investments as Principal or Agent must publish on their website in a prominent place or make available by other publicly accessible means:
(a) a statement as to the Digital Asset Service Provider’s arrangements for the protection of Clients’ ownership of assets held by the Digital Asset Service Provider;
(b) a statement of whether the Digital Asset Service Provider refers or introduces Clients to other Persons including, but not limited to, other Digital Asset Service Providers and, if so, a description of the terms of such arrangements and the monetary or non-monetary benefits received by the Digital Asset Service Provider, including by way of reciprocation for any service or business; and
(c) a statement of whether the Digital Asset Service Provider has accounts, funds or Digital Assets maintained by a third party and if so, provide the identity of that third party.
(4) In addition to (1), Digital Asset Service Providers carrying on a Regulated Activity of Providing Custody must publish on their website in a prominent place or make available by other publicly accessible means a statement of whether the Digital Asset Service Provider has accounts, funds or Digital Assets maintained by a third party and if so, provide the identity of that third party.
(5) In addition to (1), Digital Asset Service Providers carrying on a Regulated Activity of Managing Investments must publish on their website in a prominent place or make available by other publicly accessible means:
(a) a statement as to the ability of clients to have access to and withdraw their Digital Assets, particularly in times of extreme volatility;
(b) a statement as to the Digital Asset Service Provider’s arrangements for the protection of Clients’ assets held by the Digital Asset Service Provider and how it determines uses of Client Digital Assets including but not limited to a detailed description of such uses;
(c) a statement as to how they protect Client Digital Assets from counterparty risk;
(d) a statement as to how in the course of Managing Investments, Client Digital Assets are used and how Clients’ interests in respect of those Digital Assets are thereby respected;
(e) a statement explaining that Client Digital Assets used by the Digital Asset Service Provider in the course of Managing Investments may be at risk, including the types and nature of such risks, and a statement on the likelihood and severity of any losses which may be suffered;
(f) a statement in relation to order execution by the Digital Asset Service Provider;
(g) a statement as to how liquidity risk is managed; and
(h) such other information as the AFSA may require from time to time.
3.6. Requirements for Digital Asset Service Providers Advising on Investments and Arranging Deals in Investments
Guidance: A Digital Asset Service Provider which carries on a Regulated Activity of Advising on Investments in relation to Digital Assets is an Authorised Firm to which the following provisions of the GEN, COB, and AML are applicable either directly or in respect of its officers and Employees who are Approved or Designated Individuals:
AML (in whole);
Chapter 2 (Client classification) of the COB;
Chapter 3 (Communication with Clients and Financial Promotions) of the COB;
Chapter 4 (Key information and client agreement) of the COB;
COB 5.2 (Suitability assessment) of the COB;
Chapter 7 (Conflicts of interest) of the COB;
Chapter 10 (Investment research) of the COB;
Chapter 15 (Complaints handling and dispute resolution) of the COB;
Chapter 16 (Record keeping and internal audit) of the COB;
Chapter 2 (Controlled and Designated Functions) of the GEN;
Chapter 3 (Control of Authorised Persons) of the GEN;
Chapter 4 (Core Principles) of the GEN;
Chapter 5 (Systems and Controls) of the GEN;
Chapter 6 (Supervision) of the GEN; and
Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC (in whole).
3.6.1. Verification of information
(1) In addition to requirements set out in Chapter 3 of the COB, Digital Asset Service Providers Advising on Investments must provide advice which does not contain statements, promises, forecasts or other types of information which they know or suspect to be misleading, false or deceptive or which they should have reasonably known to be misleading, false or deceptive at the time of making such statement, promise or forecast.
(2) Prior to making any statement, promise or forecast, a Digital Asset Service Provider Advising on Investments must verify factual information against appropriate and reliable source materials and must use all reasonable endeavours to verify the continued accuracy of such information.
3.6.2. Methodology
A Digital Asset Service Provider in the course of Advising on Investments must assess a broad range of Digital Assets available to the Client which should be sufficiently diverse such that the Client’s investment objectives are met.
3.6.3. Appropriateness test
A Digital Asset Service Provider Arranging Deals in Investments must not carry on a Regulated Activity with or for a Retail Client, who is a non-resident of the Republic of Kazakhstan, unless the Digital Asset Service Provider has carried out an appropriateness test of the Person and formed a reasonable view that the Person has:
(a) adequate skills and expertise to understand the risks involved in trading in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives (as the case may be); and
(b) the ability to absorb potentially significant losses resulting from trading in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives (as the case may be).
Guidance:
(1) To form a reasonable view referred to in DAA 3.6.3. in relation to a Person, a Digital Asset Service Provider should consider issues such as whether the Person:
(a) has sufficient knowledge and experience relating to the type of a Digital Asset or Digital Asset Derivative offered, having regard to such factors as:
(i) how often and in what volumes that Person has traded in the relevant type of a Digital Asset or Digital Asset Derivative; and
(ii) the Person’s relevant qualifications, profession or former profession;
(b) understands the characteristics and risks relating to Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives, and the volatility of their prices;
(c) understands the impact of leverage, due to which, there is potential to make significant losses in trading in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives; and
(d) has the ability, particularly in terms of net assets and liquidity available to the Person, to absorb and manage any losses that may result from trading in the Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives offered.
(2) To be able to demonstrate to the AFSA that it complies with DAA 3.6.3., a Digital Asset Service Provider should have in place systems and controls that include:
(a) pre-determined and clear criteria against which a Retail Client’s ability to trade in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives can be assessed;
(b) adequate records to demonstrate that the Digital Asset Service Provider has undertaken the appropriateness test for each Retail Client; and
(c) in the case of an existing Retail Client with whom the Digital Asset Service Provider has previously traded in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives, procedures to undertake a fresh appropriateness test if:
(i) a new Digital Asset or Digital Asset Derivative with a materially different risk profile is offered to the Retail Client; or
(ii) there has been a material change in the Retail Client’s circumstances.
(3) If a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator forms the view that it is not appropriate for a Person to trade in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should refrain from offering that service to the Person. As a matter of good practice, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should inform the Person of its decision.
3.7. Requirements for Digital Asset Service Providers Providing and Arranging Custody
Guidance: A Digital Asset Service Provider which carries on a Regulated Activity of Providing Custody in relation to Digital Assets is an Authorised Firm to which the following provisions of the GEN, COB, and AML are applicable either directly or in respect of its officers and Employees who are Approved or Designated Individuals:
AML (in whole);
Chapter 2 (Client classification) of the COB;
Chapter 3 (Communication with Clients and Financial Promotions) of the COB;
Chapter 4 (Key information and client agreement) of the COB;
Chapter 7 (Conflicts of interest) of the COB;
Chapter 8 (Client Assets) of the COB;
Chapter 15 (Complaints handling and dispute resolution) of the COB;
Chapter 16 (Record keeping and internal audit) of the COB;
Chapter 2 (Controlled and Designated Functions) of the GEN;
Chapter 3 (Control of Authorised Persons) of the GEN;
Chapter 4 (Core Principles) of the GEN;
Chapter 5 (Systems and Controls) of the GEN;
Chapter 6 (Supervision) of the GEN; and
Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC (in whole).
A Digital Asset Service Provider which carries on a Regulated Activity of Arranging Custody in relation to Digital Assets is an Authorised Firm to which the following provisions of the GEN, COB, and AML are applicable either directly or in respect of its officers and Employees who are Approved or Designated Individuals:
AML (in whole);
Chapter 2 (Client classification) of the COB;
COB 8.3.7 (on assessing the suitability of Third Party Account Providers);
COB 8.3.13 (on disclosure);
COB 8.3.14(2) (on client reporting);
COB 8.3.15 (on record keeping);
Chapter 3 (Control of Authorised Persons) of the GEN;
Chapter 4 (Core Principles) of the GEN;
Chapter 5 (Systems and Controls) of the GEN; and
Chapter 6 (Supervision) of the GEN.
3.7.1. Requirements for Digital Asset Service Providers Providing Custody of Digital Assets
(1) A Digital wallet Service Provider must ensure that:
(a) any DLT application it uses in Providing Custody of Digital Assets is resilient, reliable and compatible with any relevant facility on which the Digital Assets are traded or cleared;
(b) it is able to clearly identify and segregate Digital Assets belonging to different Clients; and
(c) it has in place appropriate procedures to enable it to confirm Client instructions and transactions, maintain appropriate records and data relating to those instructions and transactions and to conduct a reconciliation of those transactions at appropriate intervals.
(2) A Digital wallet Service Provider must ensure that, in developing and using DLT applications and other technology to Provide Custody of Digital Assets:
(a) the architecture of any Digital wallet used adequately addresses compatibility issues and associated risks;
(b) the technology used and its associated procedures have adequate security measures (including cyber security) to enable the safe storage and transmission of data relating to the Digital Assets;
(c) the security and integrity of cryptographic keys are maintained through the use of that technology, taking into account the password protection and methods of encryption used;
(d) there are adequate measures to address any risks specific to the methods of usage and storage of cryptographic keys (or their equivalent) available under the DLT application used; and
(e) the technology is compatible with the procedures and protocols built into the relevant rules or equivalent procedures and protocols on any facility on which the Digital Assets are traded or cleared or both traded and cleared.
(3) Digital Assets held by the Digital Asset Service Provider Providing Custody are not depository liabilities or assets of the Digital Asset Service Provider and must hold them on trust.
Guidance:
Where an Authorised Person which is a Digital wallet Service Provider delegates any functions to a Third Party Digital wallet Service provider, it must ensure that the delegate fully complies with the requirements of DAA 3.7.1. The outsourcing and delegation requirements of GEN 5.2.
3.7.2. Digital wallet management
(1) Requirements in relation to Hot and Cold Digital wallet storage.
(a) A Digital wallet Service Provider must at all times maintain appropriate certifications as may be required under industry best practices applicable to the safekeeping of Digital Assets.
(b) A Digital wallet Service Provider should conduct a risk-based analysis to determine the method of Digital Asset storage including different types of Digital wallets.
(c) A Digital wallet Service Provider should document in detail the methodologies and behaviour determining the transfer of Digital Assets between different types of Digital wallets. The mechanisms for transfer between different types of Digital wallets should be well documented and subject to internal controls and audits performed by an independent third-party auditor in ensuring compliance with DAA 3.6.2 (1).
(2) Seed or key generation, storage, and use.
(a) To ensure a secure generation mechanism, a Digital wallet Service Provider must use industry best standards to create the seed, asymmetric private and public key combinations, or other similar mechanisms.
(b) A Digital wallet Service Provider must consider all risks associated with producing a private key or seed for a signatory including whether the signatory should be involved in the generation process or whether creators of the seed, private key, or other similar mechanism should be prohibited from cryptographically signing any transaction or from having access to any relevant systems.
(c) A Digital wallet Service Provider must adopt industry best practices when using encryption and secure device storage for a Client’s private keys when not in use.
(d) A Digital wallet Service Provider must ensure that any keys stored online or in one physical location are not capable of conducting a Digital Asset transaction, unless appropriate controls are in place to ensure that physical access itself by an individual is insufficient to conduct a transaction.
(e) All key and seed backups must be stored in a separate location from the primary key and seed. Key and seed backups must be stored with encryption at least equal to the encryption used to protect the primary seed and key.
(f) Digital wallet Service Providers must mitigate the risk of collusion between all authorised parties or signatories who are able to authorise the movement, transfer or withdrawal of Virtual Assets held under custody on behalf of clients. The risk of collusion and other internal points of failure should be addressed during recurring operational risk assessments.
(3) Lost or stolen keys.
(1) Digital wallet Service Providers must establish and maintain effective policies and procedures in the event that any seed or cryptographic keys of any Digital wallet are lost or otherwise compromised.
(2) The policy and procedures must address matters including but not limited to:
(a) recovery of affected Digital Assets;
(b) timely communications with all clients and counterparties regarding consequences arising from relevant incidents and measures being taken to remedy such consequences;
(c) cooperation with law enforcement agencies and regulatory bodies; and
(d) if applicable, preparation of winding down arrangements and public disclosure of such arrangements.
3.7.3. Contractual arrangement
A Digital Asset Service Provider that is Providing Custody for a Client should provide such activity based on a contractual arrangement. Under such an arrangement a Client is lawfully in control of, or entitled to control, a Digital Asset, transfers control of the Digital Asset to a Digital Asset Service Provider solely for the purpose of receiving custody services and does not in any way transfer to the Digital Asset Service Provider any legal interest in the Digital Asset or any discretionary authority not stated in the Client Agreement or otherwise agreed to by the Client.
3.7.4. Additional disclosure requirements
Before entering into an initial transaction for, on behalf of, or with a Client, a Digital wallet Service Provider must disclose in a clear, fair and not misleading manner:
(a) all terms, conditions and risks relating to the Digital Assets that have been admitted to trading and/or is the subject of the transaction;
(b) all material risks associated with its products, services and activities; and
(c) all details on the amount and the purpose of any premiums, fees, charges or taxes payable by the Client.
3.7.5. Additional information for a Digital Asset Service Provider Providing Custody of Digital Assets
A Digital Asset Service Provider Providing Custody of Digital Assets must include in the Client Agreement:
(a) a breakdown of all fees and charges payable for a transfer of Digital Assets (a “transfer”) and when they are charged;
(b) the information is required to carry out a transfer;
(с) the form and procedures for giving consent to a transfer;
(d) an indication of the time it will normally take to carry out a transfer;
(е) details of when a transfer will be considered to be complete;
(f) how, and in what form, information and communications relating to transfer services will be provided to the Client, including the timing and frequency of communications and the language used and technical requirements for the Client’s equipment and software to receive the communications;
(g) clear policies and procedures relating to unauthorised or incorrectly executed transfers, including the Client is and is not entitled to redress;
(h) clear policies and procedures relating to situations where the holding or transfer of Digital Assets may have been compromised, such as if there has been hacking, theft or fraud; and
(i) details of the procedures the Authorised Firm will follow to contact the Client if there has been suspected or actual hacking, theft or fraud.
3.7.6. Client accounts in relation to Client Investments or Digital Assets
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider which Provides Custody or holds or controls Client Investments or Client Digital Assets must register or record all Safe Custody Investments in the legal title of:
(a) a Client Account; or
(b) the Digital Asset Service Provider where, due to the nature of the law or market practice, it is not feasible to do otherwise.
(2) A Client Account in relation to Client Investments or Client Digital Assets is an account which:
(a) is held with a Third Party Agent or by a Digital Asset Service Provider which is authorised under its Licence to carry on the Regulated Activity of Providing Custody;
(b) is established to hold Client Assets;
(c) when held by a Third Party Agent, is maintained in the name of;
(i) if a Domestic Firm, the Digital Asset Service Provider; or
(ii) if not a Domestic Firm, a Nominee Company controlled by the Digital Asset Service Provider; and
(d) includes the words ‘Client Account’ in its title.
(3) A Digital Asset Service Provider must maintain a master list of all Client Accounts which must detail:
(a) the name of the account;
(b) the account number;
(c) the location of the account;
(d) whether the account is currently open or closed; and
(e) the date of opening or closure.
(4) A Digital Asset Service Provider must not use a Client’s Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Digital Assets for its own purpose or that of another Person without that Client’s prior written consent.
(5) A Digital Asset Service Provider which intends to use a Client’s Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Digital Assets Tokens for its own purpose or that of another Person, must have systems and controls in place to ensure that:
(a) it obtains that Client’s prior written consent;
(b) adequate records are maintained to protect Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Digital Assets which are applied as collateral or used for stock lending activities;
(c) the equivalent assets are returned to the Client Account of the Client; and
(d) the Client is not disadvantaged by the use of his Safe Custody Investments.
3.7.7. Client disclosure
(1) Before an Authorised Firm Arranges Custody for a Client it must disclose to that Client, if applicable, that the Client’s Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Crypto Tokens may be held in a jurisdiction outside the DIFC and the market practices, insolvency and legal regime applicable in that jurisdiction may differ from the regime applicable in the DIFC.
(2) Before an Authorised Firm Provides Custody for a Client it must disclose to the Client on whose behalf the Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Crypto Tokens will be held:
(a) a statement that the Client is subject to the protections conferred by the Safe Custody Provisions;
(b) the arrangements for recording and registering Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Crypto Tokens, claiming and receiving dividends and other entitlements and interest and the giving and receiving instructions relating to those Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Crypto Tokens;
(c) the obligations the Authorised Firm will have to the Client in relation to exercising rights on behalf of the Client;
(d) the basis and any terms governing the way in which Safe Custody Investments will be held, including any rights which the Authorised Firm may have to realise Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Crypto Tokens held on behalf of the Client in satisfaction of a default by the Client;
(e) the method and frequency upon which the Authorised Firm will report to the Client in relation to his Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Crypto Tokens;
(f) if applicable, a statement that the Authorised Firm intends to mix Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Crypto Tokens with those of other Clients;
(g) if applicable, a statement that the Client’s Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Crypto Tokens may be held in a jurisdiction outside the DIFC and the market practices, insolvency and legal regime applicable in that jurisdiction may differ from the regime applicable in the DIFC;
(h) if applicable, a statement that the Authorised Firm holds or intends to hold Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Crypto Tokens in a Client Account with a Third Party Agent which is in the same Group as the Authorised Firm; and
(i) the extent of the Authorised Firm’s liability in the event of default by a Third Party Agent.
3.7.8. Client reporting
(1) An Authorised Firm which Provides Custody or which holds or controls Client Investments or Client Crypto Tokens for a Client must send a statement to a Retail Client at least every six months or in the case of a Professional Client at other intervals as agreed in writing with the Professional Client.
(2) The statement must include:
(a) a list of that Client’s Safe Custody Investments or Safe Custody Crypto Tokens as at the date of reporting;
(b) a list of that Client’s Collateral and the market value of that Collateral as at the date of reporting; and
(c) details of any Client Money held by the Authorised Firm as at the date of reporting.
(3) The statement sent to the Client must be prepared within 25 business days of the statement date.
3.7.9. Recording, registration and holding requirements
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider which Provides Custody or holds or controls Client Investments or Client Digital Assets must ensure that Safe Custody Digital Assets are recorded, registered and held in an appropriate manner to safeguard and control such property.
(2) A Digital Asset Service Provider which Provides Custody or holds or controls Client Investments or Client Crypto Tokens must record, register and hold Safe Custody Investments separately from its own Investments.
3.8. Requirements for Digital Asset Service Providers Managing Investments and a Collective Investment Scheme
Guidance: A Digital Asset Service Provider which carries on a Regulated Activity of Managing Investments in relation to Digital Assets is an Authorised Firm to which the following provisions of the GEN, COB, and AML are applicable either directly or in respect of its officers and Employees who are Approved or Designated Individuals:
AML (in whole);
Chapter 2 (Client classification) of the COB;
Chapter 3 (Communication with Clients and Financial Promotions) of the COB;
Chapter 4 (Key information and client agreement) of the COB;
COB 5.2 (Suitability assessment);
Chapter 7 (Conflicts of interest) of the COB;
Chapter 15 (Complaints handling and dispute resolution) of the COB;
Chapter 16 (Record keeping and internal audit) of the COB;
Chapter 2 (Controlled and Designated Functions) of the GEN;
Chapter 3 (Control of Authorised Persons) of the GEN;
Chapter 4 (Core Principles) of the GEN;
Chapter 5 (Systems and Controls) of the GEN;
Chapter 6 (Supervision) of the GEN; and
Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC (in whole).
A Digital Asset Service Provider which carries on a Regulated Activity of Managing a Collective Investment Scheme in relation to Digital Assets is an Authorised Firm to which the following provisions of the GEN, COB, and AML are applicable either directly or in respect of its officers and Employees who are Approved or Designated Individuals:
AML (in whole);
Chapter 2 (Client classification) of the COB;
Chapter 3 (Communication with Clients and Financial Promotions) of the COB;
Chapter 4 (Key information and client agreement) of the COB;
Chapter 7 (Conflicts of interest) of the COB;
Chapter 15 (Complaints handling and dispute resolution) of the COB;
Chapter 16 (Record keeping and internal audit) of the COB;
Chapter 2 (Controlled and Designated Functions) of the GEN;
Chapter 3 (Control of Authorised Persons) of the GEN;
Chapter 4 (Core Principles) of the GEN;
Chapter 5 (Systems and Controls) of the GEN;
Chapter 6 (Supervision) of the GEN; and
Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC (in whole).
3.8.1. Verification of information
(1) In addition to requirements set out in Chapter 3 of the COB, Digital Asset Service Providers Managing Investments and/or a Collective Investment Scheme must not provide statements, promises, forecasts or other types of information which they know or suspect to be misleading, false or deceptive or which they should have reasonably known to be misleading, false or deceptive at the time of making such statement, promise or forecast.
(2) Prior to making any statement, promise or forecast, Digital Asset Service Providers Managing Investments and/or a Collective Investment Scheme must verify factual information against appropriate and reliable source materials and must use all reasonable endeavours to verify the continued accuracy of such information.
3.8.2. Client reporting and valuation
(1) Digital Asset Service Providers Managing Investments and/or a Collective Investment Scheme must, at least monthly, provide to each of their Clients a written statement containing the following information:
(a) the total value of Digital Assets in a Client’s account;
(b) all transactions entered into between the Digital Asset Service Provider and the client in the reporting period; and
(c) the change in amount and valuation of Digital Assets in a Client’s account [both total and during the reporting period].
(2) Digital Asset Service Providers Managing Investments and/or a Collective Investment Scheme must ensure that all assets under management are subject to ongoing independent valuation.
(3) Digital Asset Service Providers Managing Investments and/or a Collective Investment Scheme must have comprehensive and well documented valuation policies and procedures in place to ensure the production of timely and accurate valuation in accordance with DAA 3.7.2. (1).
3.8.3. Risk management and due diligence
(1) Digital Asset Service Providers Managing Investments and/or a Collective Investment Scheme must ensure that liquidity risk and market risk are each monitored and tested regularly, and appropriate measures put in place as required to address any such risk in a prompt manner.
(2) All such risk management and due diligence must be audited by an independent third party on an annual basis and provided to the AFSA upon request.
3.8.4. Content of confirmation notes
For the purposes of COB 9.1.3., a Digital Asset Service Provider Managing a Collective Investment Scheme must include the following general information:
(a) the Digital Asset Service Provider’s name and address;
(b) whether the Digital Asset Service Provider executed the Transaction as principal or agent;
(c) the Client’s name, account number or other identifier;
(d) a description of the Digital Asset;
(e) whether the Transaction is a sale or purchase;
(f) the price or unit price at which the Transaction was executed;
(g) if applicable, a statement that the Transaction was executed on an execution-only basis;
(h) the date and time of the Transaction;
(i) the total amount payable and the date on which it is due;
(j) the amount of the Digital Asset Service Provider charges in connection with the Transaction, including Commission charges and the amount of any Mark-up or Mark-down, Fees, taxes or duties;
(k) the amount or basis of any charges shared with another Person or statement that this will be made available on request; and
(l) at statement that the price at which the Transaction has been Executed is on a Historic Price or Forward Price basis, as the case may be.
(2) A Digital Asset Service Provider may combine items (f) and (j) above in respect of a Transaction where the Client has requested a note showing a single price combining both of these items.
3.9. Requirements for Digital Asset Service Providers Dealing in Investments as Principal or Agent
Guidance: A Digital Asset Service Provider which carries on a Regulated Activity of Dealing in Investments as Principal or Agent in relation to Digital Assets is an Authorised Firm to which the following provisions of the GEN, COB, and AML are applicable either directly or in respect of its officers and Employees who are Approved or Designated Individuals:
AML (in whole);
Chapter 2 (Client classification) of the COB;
Chapter 3 (Communication with Clients and Financial Promotions) of the COB;
Chapter 4 (Key information and client agreement) of the COB;
COB 5.3 (Appropriateness assessment);
Chapter 6 (Order execution and order handling) of the COB;
Chapter 7 (Conflicts of interest) of the COB;
Chapter 9 (Reporting to Clients) of the COB;
Chapter 15 (Complaints handling and dispute resolution) of the COB;
Chapter 16 (Record keeping and internal audit) of the COB;
Chapter 2 (Controlled and Designated Functions) of the GEN;
Chapter 3 (Control of Authorised Persons) of the GEN;
Chapter 4 (Core Principles) of the GEN;
Chapter 5 (Systems and Controls) of the GEN;
Chapter 6 (Supervision) of the GEN; and
Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC (in whole).
3.9.1. Content of confirmation notes
For the purposes of COB 9.1.3., a Digital Asset Service Provider must include the following general information:
(a) the Digital Asset Service Provider’s name and address;
(b) whether the Digital Asset Service Provider executed the Transaction as principal or agent;
(c) the Client’s name, account number or other identifier;
(d) a description of the Digital Asset;
(e) whether the Transaction is a sale or purchase;
(f) the price or unit price at which the Transaction was executed;
(g) if applicable, a statement that the Transaction was executed on an execution-only basis;
(h) the date and time of the Transaction;
(i) the total amount payable and the date on which it is due;
(j) the amount of the Digital Asset Service Provider charges in connection with the Transaction, including Commission charges and the amount of any Mark-up or Mark-down, Fees, taxes or duties;
(k) the amount or basis of any charges shared with another Person or statement that this will be made available on request; and
(2) A Digital Asset Service Provider may combine items (f) and (j) above in respect of a Transaction where the Client has requested a note showing a single price combining both of these items.
3.9.2. Appropriateness test
A Digital Asset Service Provider must not carry on a Regulated Activity with or for a Retail Client, who is a non-resident of the Republic of Kazakhstan, unless the Digital Asset Service Provider has carried out an appropriateness test of the Person and formed a reasonable view that the Person has:
(a) adequate skills and expertise to understand the risks involved in trading in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives (as the case may be); and
(b) the ability to absorb potentially significant losses resulting from trading in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives (as the case may be).
Guidance:
(1) To form a reasonable view referred to in DAA 3.9.2. in relation to a Person, a Digital Asset Service Provider should consider issues such as whether the Person:
(a) has sufficient knowledge and experience relating to the type of a Digital Asset or Digital Asset Derivative offered, having regard to such factors as:
(i) how often and in what volumes that Person has traded in the relevant type of a Digital Asset or Digital Asset Derivative; and
(ii) the Person’s relevant qualifications, profession or former profession;
(b) understands the characteristics and risks relating to Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives, and the volatility of their prices;
(c) understands the impact of leverage, due to which, there is potential to make significant losses in trading in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives; and
(d) has the ability, particularly in terms of net assets and liquidity available to the Person, to absorb and manage any losses that may result from trading in the Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives offered.
(2) To be able to demonstrate to the AFSA that it complies with DAA 3.9.2., a Digital Asset Service Provider should have in place systems and controls that include:
(a) pre-determined and clear criteria against which a Retail Client’s ability to trade in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives can be assessed;
(b) adequate records to demonstrate that the Digital Asset Service Provider has undertaken the appropriateness test for each Retail Client; and
(c) in the case of an existing Retail Client with whom the Digital Asset Service Provider has previously traded in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives, procedures to undertake a fresh appropriateness test if:
(i) a new Digital Asset or Digital Asset Derivative with a materially different risk profile is offered to the Retail Client; or
(ii) there has been a material change in the Retail Client’s circumstances.
(3) If a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator forms the view that it is not appropriate for a Person to trade in Digital Assets or Digital Asset Derivatives, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should refrain from offering that service to the Person. As a matter of good practice, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator should inform the Person of its decision.
3.10. Provision of key features document and disclosure of risks
3.10.1. Provision of key features document to Person
(1) An Authorised Firm which carries on any one or more of the following Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets:
(a) Dealing in Investments as Principal;
(b) Dealing in Investments as Agent;
(c) Managing Investments;
(d) Managing a Collective Investment Scheme;
(e) Providing Custody;
(f) Arranging Custody;
(g) Advising on Investments; and
(h) Arranging Deals in Investments.
must not provide that service or services to a Person unless it has provided the Person with a key features document.
(2) The key features document must contain the following information:
(a) risks associated with and essential characteristics of the Issuer (or another Person responsible for discharging the obligations associated with the rights conferred), and guarantor if any, of the Digital Asset, including their assets, liabilities and financial position;
(b) risks associated with and essential characteristics of the Digital Asset, including the rights and obligations conferred and the type and types of Investments which it constitutes;
(с) whether the Digital Asset is or will be admitted to trading and if so, the details relating to the admission, including details of the facility and whether the facility is within the AIFC;
(d) whether the Client can directly access the trading facility, or whether access is only through an intermediary, and the process for accessing the facility;
(е) risks associated with the use of DLT, in particular those relating to Digital wallets and the susceptibility of private cryptographic keys to misappropriation;
(f) whether the Client, the Authorised Firm or a third party is responsible for providing a Digital wallet service in respect of the Digital Asset, and any related risks (including at whose risk the Client’s Digital Assets are held in the Digital wallet, whether it is accessible online or stored offline, what happens if keys to the Digital wallet are lost and what procedures can be followed in such an event);
(g) how the Client may exercise any rights conferred by the Digital Assets such as voting or participation in shareholder actions; and
(h) any other information relevant to the particular Digital Asset which would reasonably assist the Client to understand the product and technology better and to make informed decisions in respect of it.
(3) The key features document must be provided in good time before the relevant service is provided to the Person, to enable that Person to make an informed decision about whether to use the relevant service.
(4) The key features document does not need to be provided to a Person to whom the Authorised Firm has previously provided that information, if there has been no significant change since the information was previously provided.
(5) An Authorised Firm may use a key features document prepared by another Person if it has taken reasonable steps to ensure that the information in that document is complete, accurate and up to date.
(6) If an Authorised Firm provides a Person with a key features document prepared by another Person, the Authorised Firm remains legally accountable to the Person to whom it is provided for the content of the document.
3.10.2. Risk warnings
(1) An Authorised Firm must display prominently on its website the following risk warnings relating to Digital Assets:
(a) that Digital Assets are not legal tender or backed by a government;
(b) that Digital Assets are subject to extreme volatility and the value of the Digital Asset can fall as quickly as it can rise;
(c) that an investor in Digital Assets may lose all, or part, of their money;
(d) that Digital Assets may not always be liquid or transferable;
(e) that investments in Digital Assets may be complex making it hard to understand the risks with buying, selling, holding or lending them;
(f) that Digital Assets can be stolen because of cyber attacks;
(g) that trading in Digital Assets is susceptible to irrational market forces;
(h) that the nature of Digital Assets may lead to an increased risk of Financial Crime;
(i) there being limited or, in some cases, no mechanisms for the recovery of lost or stolen Digital Assets;
(j) the risks of Digital Assets with regard to anonymity, irreversibility of transactions, accidental transactions, transaction recording, and settlement;
(k) that the nature of Digital Assets means that technological difficulties experienced by the Authorised Firm may prevent the access or use of a Client’s Digital Assets; and
(l) that investing in, and holding, Digital Assets is not comparable to investing in traditional investments such as Securities.
(2) Where a Digital Asset Service Provider presents any marketing or educational materials and other communications relating to a Digital Asset on a website, in the general media or as part of a distribution made to existing or potential new Clients, it must include the risk warning referred to in (1) in a prominent place at or near the top of each page of the materials or communication.
(3) If the material referred to in (1) is provided on a website or an application that can be downloaded to a mobile device, the warning must be:
(a) statically fixed and visible at the top of the screen even when a person scrolls up or down the webpage; and
(b) included on each linked webpage on the website.
3.10.3. Past performance and forecasts of Digital Assets
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider must ensure that any information or representation relating to past performance, or any future forecast based on past performance or other assumptions, which is provided to or targeted at Retail Clients:
(a) presents a fair and balanced view of the financial products or financial services to which the information or representation relates;
(b) identifies, in an easy-to-understand manner, the source of information from which the past performance is derived and any key facts and assumptions used in that context are drawn; and
(c) contains a prominent warning that past performance is not necessarily a reliable indicator of future results.
(2) A Digital Asset Service Provider should in providing information about the past performance of a Digital Asset:
(a) consider the knowledge and sophistication of the audience to whom the information is targeted;
(b) fully disclose the source and the nature of the past performance presented;
(с) ensure that the time period used is not an inappropriately short period, or a selective period, that is chosen to show a better performance; and
(d) if a comparison is being made with the same calculation method and period is being used.
3.11. Reconciliation
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider must:
(a) at least every 25 business days, reconcile its records of Client Accounts held with Third Party Agents with monthly statements received from those Third Party Agents;
(b) at least every six months, count all Safe Custody Digital Assets physically held by the Authorised Firm, or its Nominee Company, and reconcile the result of that count to the records of the Authorised Firm; and
(c) at least every six months, reconcile individual Client ledger balances with the Authorised Firm’s records of Safe Custody Digital Asset balances held in Client Accounts.
(2) An Authorised Firm must ensure that the process of reconciliation does not give rise to a conflict of interest.
(3) The Authorised Firm must notify the AFSA where there have been material discrepancies with the reconciliation which have not been rectified.
Guidance
(1) An Authorised firm should maintain a clear separation of duties to ensure that an Employee with responsibility for operating Client Accounts, or an Employee that has authority over Safe Custody Digital Assets, should not perform the reconciliations under DAA 3.11.
(2) Reconciliation performed in accordance with DAA 3.11. must be reviewed by a member of the Authorised Firm who has adequate seniority.
(3) The individual referred to in (2) must provide a written statement confirming that the reconciliation has been undertaken in accordance with the requirements of this section.
(4) A material discrepancy includes discrepancies which have the cumulative effect of being material, such as longstanding discrepancies.
3.12. Clients
3.12.1. Investment limits
A Digital Asset Service Provider must maintain effective systems and controls to ensure compliance with the requirements and limits imposed by the Rules on Currency Regulation and Provision of Information on Currency Transactions in the AIFC when dealing with a Retail Client who is a resident of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
3.12.2. Calculation of an individual Client’s net assets
(1) For the purposes of calculating an individual Client’s net assets to treat him as an Assessed Professional Client under Rule 2.5.1(a) of the COB, the Digital Asset Service Provider:
(a) must exclude the value of the primary residence of the Client;
(b) must exclude Digital Assets belonging to the Client that are not on the List of Digital Assets admitted to trading;
(c) must include only 30% of the market value of a Digital Asset admitted to trading, which belongs to the Client, but must include 100% of the market value of a Fiat stablecoin and Commodity stablecoin, which belongs to the Client; and
(e) may include any other assets held directly or indirectly by that Client.
3.13. Prohibitions
(1) A Representative Office must not market a Digital Asset or a Financial Service related to a Digital Asset.
(2) An Authorised Crowdfunding Platform Operating an Investment Crowdfunding Platform must not facilitate a Person investing in the Digital Assets.
(3) An Authorised Firm may not carry on an activity related to a Utility Token or Non-Fungible Token.
(4) The prohibition in (3) does not apply to a Digital Asset Service Provider:
(a) which is authorised to Provide Custody; and
(b) to the extent that it Provides Custody in relation to a Utility Token or Non-fungible Token.
3.14. Obligations
3.14.1. Obligation to report to the AFSA
(1) A Digital Asset Service Provider must submit on a quarterly basis report that should include a financial statement, income statement and calculation of the relevant capital resources and its compliance with these Rules.
(2) The AFSA may request a Digital Asset Service Provider to submit other returns. The list of returns required to be submitted and returns templates may be prescribed by the AFSA from time to time.
(3) Returns submitted to the AFSA must be signed by two (2) Approved Individuals and one of them must be approved to exercise the Finance Officer function.
3.14.2. Obligation to notify the AFSA
If a Digital Asset Service Provider becomes aware, or has a reasonable ground to believe, that it is or may be (or may be about to be) in breach of any of these Rules, that applies to it, it must:
(a) notify the AFSA in writing about the breach and the relevant circumstances immediately and not later than within 1 business day; and
(b) not make any cash transfers or payments or transfers of liquid assets to its Affiliates or Related Persons, whether by way of dividends or otherwise, without the AFSA’s written consent.
Guidance:
In dealing with a breach, or possible breach, of this part, the AFSA’s primary concern will be the interests of existing and prospective Clients and potential adverse impact on market participants as well as market stability. The AFSA recognises that there will be circumstances in which a problem may be resolved quickly, for example, by support from a parent entity, without jeopardising the interests of Clients and stakeholders. In such circumstances, it will be in the interests of all parties to minimise the disruption to the firm’s business. The AFSA's will normally seek to work cooperatively with the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator in such stressed situations to deal with any problems. There will, however, be circumstances in which it is necessary to take regulatory action to avoid exposing market participants, stakeholders and Clients to the potential adverse consequences of the firm’s Failure, and the AFSA will not hesitate to take appropriate action if it considers this necessary.
3.15. AFSA power to impose requirements
Without limiting the powers available to the AFSA under Part 8 of the Framework Regulations, the AFSA may direct an Authorised Market Institution to do or not do specified things that the AFSA considers are necessary or desirable or to ensure the integrity of the AIFC financial markets, including but not limited to directions imposing on a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator any additional requirements that the AFSA considers appropriate.
Annex 2
FINANCIAL SERVCES FRAMEWORK REGULATIONS
In these Regulations, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
39. Exemption for Authorised Market Institutions
(…)
(3) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility is exempt from the General Prohibition in respect of any Regulated Activity: [intentionally omitted]
(a) which is carried on as a part of the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility's business as a Digital Asset trading facility; or [intentionally omitted]
(b) which is carried on for the purposes of, or in connection with, the provision by the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility of services designed to facilitate the provision of clearing services by another Person. [intentionally omitted]
57. AFSA power to impose requirements on an Authorised Market Institution
Without limiting the powers available to the AFSA under Part 8 (Supervision of Authorised Persons), the AFSA may direct an Authorised Market Institution to do or not do specified things that the AFSA considers are necessary or desirable or to ensure the integrity of the AIFC financial markets, including but not limited to directions:
(a) requiring compliance with any duty, requirement, prohibition, obligation or responsibility applicable to an Authorised Market Institution; or
(b) requiring an Authorised Market Institution to act in a specified manner in relation to a transaction conducted on or through the facilities operated by an Authorised Market Institution, or in relation to a specified class of transactions; or
(c) requiring an Authorised Market Institution to act in a specified manner or to exercise its powers under any rules that the Authorised Market Institution has made.; or
(d) excluding the application of any requirements for engaging in the activity of Operating a Digital Asset Business imposed by the Rules; or [intentionally omitted]
(e) imposing on an Authorised Person engaged in the activity of Operating a Digital Asset Business any additional requirements that the AFSA considers appropriate.[intentionally omitted]
GENERAL RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
1.2. Authorised Market Institutions
Guidance: Definition of Market Activity
Market Activity is defined in the section 18 of the Framework Regulations as:
(a) Operating an Exchange;
(b) Operating a Clearing House;
(c) Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility;[intentionally omitted]
(d) Operating a Loan Crowdfunding Platform;
(e) Operating an Investment Crowdfunding Platform.;
(f) Operating a Private Financing Platform.
(…)
1.2.6. Effective supervision
In assessing whether an applicant is capable of being effectively supervised by the AFSA for the purposes of section 37(1)(c) of the Framework Regulations, the AFSA will consider:
(a) the nature, including the complexity, of the Market Activities that the applicant will carry on;
(b) if the applicant seeks a licence to carry on the Market Activity of Operating an Exchange, a Digital Asset Trading Facility, a Loan Crowdfunding Platform or an Investment Crowdfunding Platform, the size, nature and complexity of any markets in respect of which the applicant will offer its facilities in carrying on that Market Activity;
(…)
1.2.7. Compliance arrangements
(…)
(c) effective arrangements for monitoring and enforcing compliance of its Members with its own rules and, if relevant, its clearing and settlement arrangements; and
(d) if the applicant seeks a licence to carry on the Market Activity of Operating an Exchange, effective arrangements to verify that issuers admitted to trading on its facilities comply with the Market Rules.; and
(e) if the applicant seeks a licence to carry on the Market Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, effective arrangements to verify that members admitted to trading on its facilities comply with the Conduct of Business Rules and the Authorised Market Institution Rules.
(…)
GENERAL RULES. SCHEDULE 1: REGULATED ACTIVITIES
30. Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility means operating a facility which functions regularly and brings together multiple parties (whether as principal or agent) with a view to the entering into of contracts:
(a) to buy, sell or exchange Digital Assets for a Fiat currency; and/or
(b) to exchange one Digital Asset for another Digital Asset, in its Facility, in accordance with its non-discretionary rules.; and/or
(c) to buy, sell or exchange Digital Assets for a commodity.
GENERAL RULES. SCHEDULE 4: MARKET ACTIVITIES
Schedule 4: Market Activities.
(…)
3. Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility means operating a facility which functions regularly and brings together multiple parties (whether as principal or agent) with a view to the entering into of contracts:
(a) to buy, sell or exchange Digital Assets for a Fiat currency; and/or
(b) to exchange one Digital Asset for another Digital Asset, in its Facility, in accordance with its non-discretionary rules. [intentionally omitted]
GLOSSARY
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
GLOSSARY. 1. Application. (t) AIFC Rules on Regulation of Digital Asset Activities (DAA).
(…)
Algorithmic stablecoin | A Digital Asset which uses, or purports to use, an algorithm to increase or decrease the supply of Digital Assets in order to stabilise its price or reduce volatility in its price |
| A Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on the Regulated |
Client Account | In relation to Client Investments or Client Digital Assets is an account which: (a) is held with a Third Party Agent or by an Authorised Firm which is authorised under its Licence to Provide Custody; (b) is established to hold Client Assets; (c) when held by a Third Party Agent, is maintained in the name of: (i) if a Domestic Firm, the Authorised Firm; or (ii) if not a Domestic Firm, a Nominee Company controlled by the Authorised Firm; and (d) includes the words ‘Client Account’ in its title. |
Commodity stablecoin | A Digital Asset whose value purports to be determined by reference to a commodity (e.g., gold, oil). |
Digital Asset Business | Any one or more of the following Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets: (a)Dealing in Investments as Principal; (b)Dealing in Investments as Agent; (c)Managing Investments; (d)Managing a Collective Investment Scheme; (e)Providing Custody; (f)Arranging Custody; (g)Advising on Investments; (h)Arranging Deals in Investments; (i)Providing Money Services; and (j)Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility.
A Person wishing to carry on or more of the above Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets, cannot carry on the Regulated Activities in relation to other types of Investments. |
Digital Asset Derivative | A Derivative the value of which is determined by reference to: (a)a Digital Asset; or (b)an index that includes a Digital Asset. |
DASP | Digital Asset Service Provider |
Digital Asset Service Provider | A Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on one or more of the following Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets: (a)Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility; (b)Dealing in Investments as Principal; (c)Dealing in Investments as Agent; (d)Managing Investments; (e)Providing Custody; (f)Arranging Custody; (g)Advising on Investments; (h)Arranging Deals in Investments; and (i)Providing Money Services.
A Person wishing to carry on one or more of the above Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets, cannot carry on the Regulated Activities in relation to other types of Investments. |
Digital Asset Custodian | Authorised Firm which carries on the Regulated Activity of Providing Custody in relation to Digital Assets. |
DATF | Digital Asset Trading Facility |
Digital Asset Trading Facility | A facility on which Digital Assets, rights or interests in Digital Assets are traded. |
Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator | A Centre Participant which is licensed by the AFSA to carry on the Regulated Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility. |
Digital Asset (or Private Electronic Currency or Private E-money) | A digital representation of value that (1) can be digitally traded and functions as (a) a medium of exchange; or (b) a unit of account; or (c) a store of value; (2) can be exchanged back-and-forth for Fiat Currency, but is neither issued nor guaranteed by the government of any jurisdiction, and (3) fulfils the above functions only by agreement within the community of users of the Digital Asset; and accordingly (4) is to be distinguished from Fiat Currency and E-money.
An Excluded Digital Asset is excluded from the scope of the DAA. |
Digital wallet Service Provider | An Authorised Firm Providing Custody of Digital Assets by holding and controlling the public and private cryptographic keys relating to the Digital Assets. |
Direct Electronic Access | Direct Electronic Access means: (a) an arrangement (called direct market access), through which a Member or a client of a member is able to electronically transmit, using the Member’s trading code, an order relating to a Digital Asset, Security, Unit in a Listed Fund or Qualified Investment directly to the facility operated by the Authorised Market Institution, Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or MTF or OTF Operator. It includes arrangements for the use, by a Person, of the infrastructure (or connecting system) of the Member, client of the Member or another participant; or (b) an arrangement (called sponsored access) through which a Member or a client of a member is able to electronically transmit, using the Member’s trading code, an order to the facility operated by the Authorised Market Institution or MTF or OTF Operator without using the infrastructure (or connecting system) of the Member or another participant or client. |
Distributed Ledger Technology | A class of technologies that support the recording of encrypted data where the data: (a) is held on a distributed ledger; (b) is electronically accessible, from multiple locations, by a network of participants; and (c) can be updated by those participants, based on agreed consensus, protocol or procedures. |
DLT | Distributed Ledger Technology |
Domestic Firm | An Authorised Person or Ancillary Service Provider which: (a) has its registered and head office in the AIFC; or (b) if it is a subsidiary of an Undertaking whose principal place of business and head office is in a jurisdiction other than the AIFC, has its registered office in the AIFC. |
Excluded Digital Asset | A Digital Asset which is: (a) a Non-Fungible Token; (b) a Utility Token; or (c) a digital currency issued by any government, government agency, central bank, or another monetary authority. |
Execute or Execution | The exercise of a Client order that results in a binding transaction. |
Fiat stablecoin | A Digital Asset whose value purports to be determined by reference to a Fiat Currency or a basket of Fiat Currencies. |
Investment Business | The business of: (a) Dealing in Investments as Principal; (b) Dealing in Investments as Agent; (c) Managing Investments; (d) Managing a Collective Investment Scheme; (e) Providing Custody; (f) Arranging Custody; (g) Acting as the Trustee of a Fund; (h) Advising on Investments; (i) Arranging Deals in Investments; (j) Managing a Restricted Profit Sharing Investment Account; or (k) Operating an Exchange
but not including Digital Asset Business. |
List of Digital Assets admitted to trading | A list of Digital Assets which could be traded in the AIFC and do not require the AFSA’s approval. |
Member | A Person who is entitled, under an arrangement between him and an Authorised Market Institution, a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator, a MTF Operator or an OTF Operator, to use that institution’s or operator’s facilities |
Non-Fungible Token | An Investment which: (a) is unique and not fungible with any other Non-Fungible Token; (b) related to an identified asset; and (c) is used to prove the ownership or provenance of the asset. |
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility | The Regulated |
Privacy Device | Any technology, Digital wallet or another mechanism or device (excluding a VPN), which has any feature or features used, or intended to be used, to hide, anonymise, obscure or prevent the tracing of any of the following information: (a) a Digital Asset transaction; or (b) the identity of the holder of a Digital Asset; or (c) the cryptographic key associated with a Person; or (d) the identity of parties to a Digital Asset transaction; or (e) the value of a Digital Asset transaction; or (f) the beneficial owner of a Digital Asset. |
Privacy Token | A Digital Asset where the Digital Asset or the DLT or another similar technology used for the Digital Asset, has any feature or features that are used, or intended to be used, to hide, anonymise, obscure or prevent the tracing of any of the following information: (a) a Digital Asset transaction; or (b) the identity of the holder of a Digital Asset; or (c) the cryptographic key associated with a Person; or (d) the identity of parties to a Digital Asset transaction; or (e) the value of a Digital Asset transaction; or (f) the beneficial owner of a Digital Asset. |
Safe Custody Digital Assets | Digital Assets held or to be held for safekeeping by an Authorised Firm or Third Party Agent. |
Security Token | A Digital Asset that represents ownership of a Security. |
Self-Custody of Digital Assets | The holding and controlling of Digital Assets by their owner, through the owner holding and controlling the public and private cryptographic keys relating to the Digital Assets. |
Self-hosted Digital Wallet | A software or hardware that enables a person to store and transfer Digital Assets on his own behalf, and in relation to which the public and private cryptographic keys are controlled or held by that Person. |
Third Party Agent | In relation to a Client Account, means an Authorised Firm or Regulated Financial Institution (including a bank, custodian, an intermediate broker, a settlement agent, a clearing house, an exchange and ‘over the counter’ counterparty) that is a separate legal entity from the Authorised Firm that is required under COB to establish the Client Account. |
Third Party Digital wallet Service Provider | (1) A Digital wallet Service Provider other than a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator Providing Custody of Digital Assets traded on its facility; or (2) A Person in another jurisdiction Providing Custody of Digital Assets by holding and controlling the public and private cryptographic keys relating to the Digital Assets, which is authorized and appropriately supervised for that activity by a Financial Services Regulator. |
Travel Rule | Has the meaning given to it in FATF’s Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach for Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers [October 2021], as may be amended from time to time |
Utility Token | A Digital Asset: (a) which can be used by the holder only to pay for, receive a discount on, or access a product or service (whether current or proposed); and (b) the product or service referred to in (a) is provided by the issuer of the Digital Asset or of another entity in the issuer’s Group. |
VPN | A virtual private network that creates a safe, encrypted online connection for internet users. |
AUTHORISED MARKET INSTITUTION RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
6. RULES APPLICABLE TO AN AUTHORISED DIGITAL ASSET TRADING FACILITY…........... 39
6.1. Main requirements relating to trading on the facility ........................................................... 39
6.2. Requirement to prepare Rules ............................................................................................... 39
6.3. Admission of Digital Assets to trading ...................................................................................40
6.4. Suspending or removing Digital Assets from trading ..........................................................42 6.5. Transparency obligations ....................................................................................................... 42 6.6. Additional requirements on technology resources .............................................................. 43 6.7. Clients of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility and Investment limits ..................45 [intentionally omitted]
(…)
Guidance: Purpose and application of AMI
·the licensing requirements, or standards, which an applicant must satisfy to be granted a Licence to carry on either of the Market Activities of Operating an Investment Exchange, Operating Digital Assets Trading Facility and Operating a Clearing House;
(…)
·Chapter 6 contains additional rules and guidance applicable to Authorised Digital Assets Trading Facility.
(…)
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Introduction
1.1.1. Definitions
(1) An Authorised Market Institution is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on one or more Market Activities. An Authorised Market Institution can be an Authorised Investment Exchange, an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility, an Authorised Clearing House and/or an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform.
(7) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on the Market Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility.[intentionally omitted]
(…)
2.4.4. Resources of Members
(…)
(2) The requirements in (1) do not apply to:
(a) an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform (or its Clients).; or
(b) the Member of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility if the Member is a body corporate or an individual (natural person) that carries on the activity solely as principal. [intentionally omitted]
(…)
2.4.7. Testing relating to Members’ technology systems
(…)
(4) The requirements in (1)-(3) do not apply to:
(a) an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform (or its Clients).; or
(b) the Member of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility if the Member is a body corporate or an individual (natural person) that carries on the activity solely as principal.
2.5. Business Rules
2.5.1. Requirement to prepare Business Rules
(…)
(d) Admission to Trading Rules, prepared in accordance with AMI 3.2 or AMI 6.3, or Admission to Clearing Rules, prepared in accordance with AMI 4.1, governing the admission of Securities,or Units in a Listed Fund or Digital Assets to trading, or clearing and settlement, as appropriate to its facilities;
(e) Listing Rules, prepared in accordance with AMI 3.6, setting out the rules and conditions applicable to a Person who wishes to have Securities or Units in a Listed Fund included in an Official List; and
(f) any other matters necessary for the proper functioning of the Authorised Market Institution and the facilities operated by it.
The requirements in (c) and (e) do not apply to the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility.
2.6. Membership
2.6.1. Persons eligible for Membership
(1) An Authorised Market Institution, except an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility, may only admit as a Member a Person who satisfies admission criteria set out in its Membership Rules and who is either:
(a) an Authorised Firm whose Licence permits it to carry on the Regulated Activities of Dealing in Investments; or
(b) a Recognised Non-AIFC Member.
(2) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility may only admit as a Member a Person who satisfies admission criteria set out in its Membership Rules and which is: [intentionally omitted]
(a) an Authorised Firm whose Licence permits it to carry on the Regulated Activities of Dealing in Investments; [intentionally omitted]
(b) a Recognised Non-AIFC Member; or [intentionally omitted]
(c) a body corporate or an individual (natural person) which carries on the activity solely as principal. [intentionally omitted]
2.7. Direct Electronic Access
2.7.1. Direct Electronic Access
Direct Electronic Access means any arrangement, such as the use of the Member's trading code, through which a Member or the clients of that Member are able to transmit electronically orders relating to Securities, or Units in a Listed Fund or Digital Asset directly to the facility provided by the Authorised Market Institution and includes arrangements which involve the use by a Person of the infrastructure of the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility or the Member or participant or client or any connecting system provided by the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility or Member or participant or client, to transmit the orders and arrangements where such an infrastructure is not used by a Person.
(…)
2.9.2. Custody and investment risk
(1) An Authorised Market Institution must have effective means to address risks relating to:
(a) custody of its own assets, in accordance with (2), if it is an Authorised Clearing House; or
(b)investments, in accordance with (3), if it is an Authorised Investment Exchange.; or
(c) Digital Assets, if it is an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility. [intentionally omitted]
(…)
6. RULES APPLICABLE TO AN AUTHORISED DIGITAL ASSET TRADING FACILITY
6.1. Main requirements relating to trading on the facility
(1) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must, at the time a Licence is granted and at all times thereafter, have:
(a) transparent and non-discriminatory rules and procedures to ensure fair and orderly trading of Digital Assets on its facility;
(b) objective criteria governing access to its facility;
(c) objective and transparent criteria for determining the Investments that can be traded on its facility; and
(d) adequate technology resources.
(2) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must maintain effective arrangements to verify that its members comply with requirements set out in COB, AML.
(3) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must not introduce a liquidity incentive scheme other scheme for encouraging bids on a trading venue or to increase the volume of business transacted unless it has obtained the prior approval of the AFSA.
(4) For the purposes of (1), an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must make available to the public, without any charges, data relating to the quality of execution of transactions on the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility on at least an annual basis. Reports must include details about price, costs, speed and likelihood of execution for individual Digital Assets.
6.2. Requirement to prepare Rules
(1) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s Rules must:
(a) be based on objective criteria;
(b) be non-discriminatory;
(c) be clear and fair;
(d) be made publicly available free of charge;
(e) contain provisions for the resolution of Members’ and other participants’ disputes;
(f) contain provisions for penalties or sanctions which may be imposed by the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility for a breach of the Rules; and
(g) contain provisions for an appeal process from the decisions of the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility.
(2) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must seek prior approval of its Rules (Business Rules, Admission to Trading Rules, Membership Rules) and of amendments to its Rules by:
(a) making its Rules available for market consultation for no less than 30 days; and
(b) obtaining approval of the AFSA.
(3) Where an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility has made any amendments to its Rules, it must have adequate procedures for notifying users and the AFSA of such amendments with a notice period of at least 30 days prior to making any amendments to its Rules available for market consultation.
(4) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must have procedures in place to ensure that its Rules are monitored and enforced.
6.3. Admission of Digital Assets to trading
6.3.1. Admission to Trading Rules
(1) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must make clear and transparent rules concerning the admission of Digital Assets to trading on its facilities.
(2) The rules of the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must ensure that:
(a) Digital Assets admitted to trading on an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s facilities are capable of being traded in a fair, orderly and efficient manner; and
(b) Digital Assets admitted to trading on an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s facilities are freely negotiable.
6.3.2. Application for admission of Digital Assets to Trading
(1) Applications for the admission of a Digital Asset to trading can be made to an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility by the issuer of the Digital Asset, by a third party on behalf of and with the consent of the issuer of the Digital Asset, or by a Member of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility.
(2) A Digital Asset can also be admitted to trading on the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s own initiative.
(3) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must, before admitting any Digital Asset to trading:
(a) be satisfied that the applicable requirements, including those in its Admission to Trading Rules, have been or will be fully complied with in respect of such Digital Asset and
(b) obtain approval of the AFSA in respect of such Digital Asset.
(4) For the purposes of (1), an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must notify an applicant in writing of its decision in relation to the application for admission of the Digital Asset to trading. In the case that such decision is to deny the application, the written notice should indicate (i) whether the application has been considered by the AFSA, and if so, (ii) the AFSA’s determination in respect thereof.
(5) For purposes of 3(b), an application to AFSA by Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility shall include:
(a) a copy of the admission application; and
(b) any other information requested by the AFSA.
6.3.3. Decision-making procedures for the AFSA in relation to applications for approval of the admission of Digital Assets to trading
(1) Where an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility applies for approval of the admission of a Digital Asset to trading, the AFSA may:
(a) approve the application;
(b) deny the application; or
(c) approve the application subject to conditions or restrictions.
(2) The AFSA may exercise its powers under (1)(b) where the AFSA reasonably considers that:
(a) granting the Digital Assets admission to trading of Digital Assets would be detrimental to the interests of Persons dealing in the relevant Digital Assets using the facilities of an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility or otherwise; or
(b) any requirements imposed by the AFSA or in the Rules of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility as are applicable have not been or will not be complied with; or
(c) the Issuer of the Digital Assets has failed or will fail to comply with any obligations applying to it including those relating to having its Digital Assets admitted to trading or traded in another jurisdiction.
(3) Where the AFSA denies an application for approval of admission of a Digital Asset to trading pursuant to (2), such Digital Assets must not be admitted by an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility to its facility.
(4) Where the AFSA approves an application for approval of admission of a Digital Asset to trading subject to conditions or restrictions, the Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility is responsible for implanting such conditions and restrictions in admitting the Digital Asset to trading, and such conditions or restrictions may not be varied or removed without the approval of the AFSA.
6.3.4. Undertaking to comply with the acting law of the AIFC
An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility may not admit Digital Asset to trading unless the person who seeks to have Digital Assets admitted to trading:
(a) gives an enforceable undertaking to the AFSA to submit unconditionally to the jurisdiction of the AIFC in relation to any matters which arise out of or which relate to its use of the facilities of the Authorised Market Institution;
(b) agrees in writing to submit unconditionally to the jurisdiction of the AIFC Courts in relation to any disputes, or other proceedings in the AIFC, which arise out of or relate to its use of the facilities of the Authorised Market Institution; and
(c) agrees in writing to subject itself to the acting law of the AIFC in relation to its use of the facilities of the Authorised Market Institution.
6.3.5. Review of compliance
The Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must maintain arrangements regularly to review whether the Digital Assets admitted to trading on its facilities comply with the Admission to Trading Rules.
6.4. Suspending or removing Digital Assets from trading
6.4.1. Power to suspend
(1) The rules of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must provide that the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility have the power to suspend or remove from trading on its facilities any Digital Assets with immediate effect or from such date and time as may be specified where it is satisfied that there are circumstances that warrant such action or it is in the interests of the AIFC.
(2) The AFSA may direct an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility to suspend or remove Digital Assets from trading with immediate effect or from such date and time as may be specified if it is satisfied there are circumstances that warrant such action or it is in the interests of the AIFC.
(3) The AFSA may withdraw a direction made under (2) at any time.
(4) Digital Assets that are suspended from trading of Digital Assets remain admitted to trading for the purposes of this Chapter.
(5) The AFSA may prescribe any additional requirements or procedures relating to the removal or suspension of Digital Assets from or restoration of Digital Assets to trading.
6.4.2. Limitation on power to suspend or remove Digital Assets from trading
The rules of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must contain provisions for orderly suspension and removal from trading on its facilities any Digital Asset which no longer complies with its rules taking into account the interests of investors and the orderly functioning of the financial markets of the AIFC.
6.4.3. Publication of decision
(1) Where the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility suspends or removes any Digital Asset from trading on its facilities, it must notify the AFSA in advance and make that decision public by issuing a public notice on its website.
(2) Where the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility lifts a suspension or re-admits any Digital Asset to trading on its facilities, it must notify the AFSA in advance and make that decision public by issuing a public notice on its website.
(3) Where an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility has made any decisions on admission, suspension, or removal of Digital Assets from trading on its facilities, it must have adequate procedures for notifying users of such decisions.
6.5. Transparency obligations
6.5.1. Trading transparency obligation
An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must make available to the public:
(a) the current bid and offer prices of Digital Assets traded on its systems on a continuous basis during normal trading hours;
(b) the price, volume and time of the transactions executed in respect of Digital Assets traded on its facilities in as close to real-time as technically possible; and
(c) provide price, volume, time and counterparty details to the AFSA within 24 hours of the close of each trading day via a secure electronic feed.
6.5.2. Public notice of suspended or terminated Membership
The Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must promptly issue a public notice on its website in respect of any Member that has a Licence to carry on Market Activities or Regulated Activities whose Membership is suspended or terminated.
6.5.3. Cooperation with office-holder
The Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must cooperate, by the sharing of information and otherwise, with the AFSA, any relevant office-holder and any other authority or body having responsibility for any matter arising out of, or connected with, the default of a Member of the Digital Asset Trading Facility.
6.6. Additional requirements on technology resources
6.6.1. Cyber-security policy
(1) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility shall implement a written cyber security policy setting forth its policies and procedures for the protection of its electronic systems and members and counterparty data stored on those systems, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s governing body at least annually.
(2) The cyber security policy must, as a minimum, address the following areas:
(a) information security;
(b) data governance and classification;
(c) access controls;
(d) business continuity and disaster recovery planning and resources;
(e) capacity and performance planning;
(f) systems operations and availability concerns;
(g) systems and network security;
(h) systems and application development and quality assurance;
(i) physical security and environmental controls;
(j) customer data privacy;
(k) vendor and third-party service provider management; and
(l) incident response.
(3) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must advise the AFSA immediately if it becomes aware, or has reasonable grounds to believe, that a significant breach by any Person of its cyber security policy may have occurred or may be about to occur.
6.6.2. Technology governance
An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must, as a minimum, have in place systems and controls with respect to the procedures describing the creation, management and control of digital wallets and private keys.
6.6.3. Trading controls
An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must be able to:
(a) reject orders that exceed its pre-determined volume and price thresholds, or that are clearly erroneous;
(b) temporarily halt or constrain trading on its facilities if necessary or desirable to maintain an orderly market; and
(c) cancel, vary, or correct any order resulting from an erroneous order entry and/or the malfunctioning of the system of a Member.
6.6.4. Settlement and Clearing facilitation services
(1) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must ensure that satisfactory arrangements are made for securing the timely discharge (whether by performance, compromise or otherwise), clearing and settlement of the rights and liabilities of the parties to transactions effected on the Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility (being rights and liabilities in relation to those transactions).
(2) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility acting as a Digital Asset Depository must:
(a) have appropriate rules, procedures, and controls, including robust accounting practices, to safeguard the rights of Digital Assets issuers and holders, prevent the unauthorised creation or deletion of Digital Assets, and conduct periodic and at least daily reconciliation of each Digital Asset balance it maintains for issuers and holders;
(b) prohibit overdrafts and debit balances in Digital Assets accounts;
(c) maintain Digital Assets in an immobilised or dematerialised form for their transfer by book entry;
(d) protect assets against custody risk through appropriate rules and procedures consistent with its legal framework;
(e) ensure segregation between the Digital Asset Depository’s own assets and the Digital Assets of its participants and segregation among the Digital Assets of participants; and
(f) identify, measure, monitor, and manage its risks from other custody related activities that it may perform.
6.7. Clients of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility and Investment limits
(1) Members of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility and their clients will be Clients of an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility.
(2) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility must maintain effective systems and controls to ensure that a Retail Client using its service does not invest, in respect of all Digital Assets in aggregate calculated over a period of one month, an amount which exceeds the greater of:
(a) USD 1,000; or
(b) the lesser of (i) 10 percent of the annual income; or (ii) 5 percent of the net worth of such Retail Client (excluding the value of the primary residence), up to a maximum aggregate amount of USD100,000.
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
CONTENTS
(…)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2.2. Exclusions in relation to certain categories of Centre Participant
For the avoidance of doubt, the requirements in COB do not apply to:
(a) a Representative Office;
(b) an Authorised Market Institution (other than an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform and an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility), except for COB 3 (Communications with Clients and Financial Promotions); or
(c) an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform, except for COB 3 (Communications with Clients and Financial Promotions), COB 4 (Key Information and Client Agreement), COB 7 (Conflicts of Interest), COB 8 (Client Assets) and COB Schedule 2 (Key Information and Content of Client Agreement); or
(d) an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility, except for COB 2 (Client Classification) and COB 3 (Communications with Clients and Financial Promotions).
(…)
For the purposes of 1.2.2(d), references in COB 2 and COB 3 to:
(a) "Authorised Firms" shall be read as if it were a reference to "an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility "; and
(b) "Regulated Activities" shall be read as if it were a reference to "Market Activities".
(…)
17. OPERATORS OF A DIGITAL ASSET BUSINESS
17.1. Application
This chapter applies to an Authorised Person engaged in the activity of Operating a Digital Asset Business.
Guidance
The following activities do not constitute Operating a Digital Asset Business:
trading of Digital Assets for the Person’s own investment purpose;
the issuance of Digital Assets by a Person and their administration (including sale, redemption);
any other activity or arrangement that is deemed by the AFSA to not constitute Operating a Digital Asset Business, where necessary and appropriate in order for the AFSA to pursue its objectives.
17.2. Rules Applicable to an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator
In addition to all requirements applicable to Authorised Persons in these rules, GEN, and AML, an Authorised Person carrying on the Market Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility must comply with the applicable requirements set out in the AMI, unless the requirements in this chapter expressly provide otherwise.
17.3. Admission of Digital Assets to trading
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility may grant admission of Digital Assets to trading only where it is satisfied that such admission is in accordance with the AMI and an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility’s Admission to Trading Rules.
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility must not permit trading of Digital Assets on its facilities unless those Digital Assets are admitted to, and not suspended from, trading by the Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility pursuant to Chapter 6 of AMI. [intentionally omitted]
17.4. Additional disclosure requirements
Prior to entering into an initial transaction for, on behalf of, or with a Client, an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business shall disclose in a clear, fair and not misleading manner:
(a) all terms, conditions and risks relating to the Digital Assets that have been admitted to trading and/or is the subject of the transaction;
(b) all material risks associated with its products, services and activities; and
(c) all details on the amount and the purpose of any premiums, fees, charges or taxes payable by the Client, whether or not these are payable to the Operating a Digital Asset Business. [intentionally omitted]
17.5. The risks to be disclosed pursuant to COB 17.4
The risks to be disclosed pursuant to COB 17.4. include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) Digital Assets not being legal tender or backed by a government;
(b) the value, or process for valuation, of Digital Assets, including the risk of a Digital Assets having no value;
(c) the volatility and unpredictability of the price of Digital Assets relative to Fiat Currencies;
(d) that trading in Digital Assets is susceptible to irrational market forces;
(e) that the nature of Digital Assets may lead to an increased risk of Financial Crime;
(f) that the nature of Digital Assets may lead to an increased risk of cyber-attack;
(g) there being limited or, in some cases, no mechanism for the recovery of lost or stolen Digital Assets;
(h) the risks of Digital Assets with regard to anonymity, irreversibility of transactions, accidental transactions, transaction recording, and settlement;
(i) that there is no assurance that a Person who accepts a Digital Asset as payment today will continue to do so in the future;
(j) that the nature of Digital Assets means that technological difficulties experienced by the Authorised Person may prevent the access or use of a Client’s Digital Assets;
(k) any links to Digital Assets related activity outside the AIFC, which may be unregulated or subject to limited regulation; and
(l) any regulatory changes or actions by the AFSA or Non-AIFC Regulator that may adversely affect the use, transfer, exchange, and value of a Digital Asset. [intentionally omitted]
17.6. Complaints
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business shall establish and maintain written policies and procedures to fairly and timely resolve complaints made against it or other parties (including members).
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business must provide, in a clear and conspicuous manner: on its website or websites; in all physical locations; and in any other location as the AFSA may prescribe, the following disclosures:
(a) the mailing address, email address, and telephone number for the receipt of complaints;
(b) a statement that the complainant may also bring his or her complaint to the attention of the AFSA;
(c) the AFSA’s mailing address, website, and telephone number; and
(d) such other information as the AFSA may require.
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business shall report to the AFSA any change in its complaint policies or procedures within ten days.
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business must maintain a record of any complaint made against it or other parties (including members) for a minimum period of six years from the date of receipt of the complaint. [intentionally omitted]
17.7. Obligation to report transactions
An Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business shall report to the AFSA details of transactions in Digital Assets traded on its facility which are executed, or reported, through its systems.
The AFSA may, by written notice or Guidance, specify:
(a) the information to be included in reports made under the preceding paragraph; and
(b) the manner in which such reports are to be made. [intentionally omitted]
17.8. AFSA power to impose a prohibition or requirement
The AFSA may prohibit an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business from:
(a) entering into certain specified transactions or types of transactions; or
(b) outsourcing any of its functions or activities to a third party.
The AFSA may, by written notice or guidance, set fees payable by an Authorised Person Operating a Digital Asset Business to the AFSA on certain specified transactions or types of transactions. [intentionally omitted]
SCHEDULE 2: KEY INFORMATION AND CONTENT OF CLIENT AGREEMENT
1. | CORE INFORMATION |
(…) | (…) |
5. | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR DIGITAL ASSET TRADING FACILITY OPERATORS AND DIGITAL ASSET SERVICE PROVIDERS PROVIDING CUSTODY |
| The additional information required where an Authorised Firm Provides Custody in relation to Digital Assets: |
| a breakdown of all fees and charges payable for a transfer of Digital Assets (a “transfer”) and when they are charged; |
| the information required to carry out a transfer; |
| the form and procedures for giving consent to a transfer; |
| an indication of the time it will normally take to carry out a transfer; |
| details of when a transfer will be considered to be complete; |
| how, and in what form, information and communications relating to transfer services will be provided to the Client, including the timing and frequency of communications and the language used and technical requirements for the Client’s equipment and software to receive the communications; |
| clear policies and procedures relating to unauthorised or incorrectly executed transfers, including when the Client is and is not entitled to redress; |
| clear policies and procedures relating to situations where the holding or transfer of Digital Assets may have been compromised, such as if there has been hacking, theft or fraud; and |
| details of the procedures the Digital Asset will follow to contact the Client if there has been suspected or actual hacking, theft or fraud. |
AIFC FEES RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
SCHEDULE 1: APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA FOR REGULATED ACTIVITIES
1.1Application fees for applying for Licence to carry on Regulated Activities
Regulated Activities | Fee (USD)* |
Operating a Representative Office | 3 000 |
(…) | (…) |
Operating an Organised Trading Facility | 5000 |
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility | 70 000 |
(…)
SCHEDULE 2: APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA FOR MARKET ACTIVITIES
1.2Application fees for applying for Licence to carry on Market Activities
Application fee by activities | Fee (USD) |
Operator of a Clearing House | 125 000 |
Operator of an Investment Exchange | 125 000 |
|
|
Operator of a Crowdfunding Platform | 5 000 |
Operating a Private Financing Platform | 5 000 |
(…)
SCHEDULE 6: ANNUAL SUPERVISION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA
6.1 Annual supervision fees for Regulated Activities
Annual supervision fees for Regulated Activities are determined by the activities the Authorised Firm conducts as set out below:
Regulated Activities | Fee (USD)* |
Operating a Representative Office | 1 000 |
(…) | (…) |
Operating an Organised Trading Facility | • 3 000 USD (fixed); and • trading levy of 0.0006% of the average daily trading value (variable)**. Note: AFSA will not invoice the trading levy (variable) fee unless it exceeds 500 USD |
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility | 35 000 |
(…)
6.2 Annual supervision fees for Market Activities
Annual supervision fees for Market Activities are determined by the activities the Authorised Market Institution conducts as set out below:
Application fee by activities | Fee (USD) |
Operator of a Clearing House | 62 500 |
Operator of an Investment Exchange | 62 500 |
|
|
Operator of a Crowdfunding Platform | 3 000 |
Operating a Private Financing Platform | 3 000 |
(…)
AIFC ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, COUNTER-TERRORIST FINANCING AND SANCTIONS RULES
In these Rules, underlining indicates a new text and strikethrough indicates a removed text
6. CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE
6.1. Conducting Customer Due Diligence
6.1.1. Obligation to conduct Customer Due Diligence
A Relevant Person must:
(a) conduct CDD under AML 6.3.1 for each of its customers including when the customer is
carrying out occasional transactions the value of which singularly or in several linked operations (whether at the time or later), equal or exceed USD 15,000; and
(a-a) conduct CDD under AML 6.3.1 for each of its customers including when the customer is
carrying out occasional transactions with Digital Assets the value of which singularly or in several linked operations (whether at the time or later), equal or exceed USD 1,000; and
(b) in addition to (a) and (a-a), conduct EDD under AML 7.1.1 in respect of:
(i) each customer it has assigned as high risk;
(ii) business relationships and transactions with persons from countries with high geographical risk factors.
(…)
11-1. DIGITAL ASSET TRANSFER (the “Travel Rule”)
11-1.1. Digital Asset transfer definition
(1) A Digital Asset transfer is a transaction carried out:
(a) by a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider (an “ordering institution”) on behalf of an originator by transferring any Digital Assets; and
(b) with a view to making the Digital Assets available
(i) to that Person or another Person (a “beneficiary”); and
(ii) at an institution (a “beneficiary institution”) which may be the ordering institution or another institution, whether or not one or more other institutions (“intermediary institutions”) participate in completion of the transfer of the Digital Assets.
11-1.2. Obligations of Ordering Institution
(1) Before carrying out both a cross-border or domestic Digital Asset transfer of the amount equal to or above USD 1,000, an ordering institution must obtain, record and ensure that the transfers are accompanied by the following information:
(a) the name of the originator;
(b) the number of the originator’s account maintained with the ordering institution and from which the Digital Assets are transferred or, in the absence of such an account, a unique reference number assigned to the Digital Asset transfer by the ordering institution;
(c) the originator’s address, or national identity number, or customer identification number, or date and place of birth;
(d) the name of the beneficiary (recipient); and
(e) the number of the recipient’s account maintained with the beneficiary institution and to which the Digital Assets are transferred or, in the absence of an account number, a unique transaction number assigned to the Digital Asset transfer by the beneficiary institution.
(2) Before carrying out both a cross-border or domestic Digital Asset transfer of the amount below USD 1,000, an ordering institution must obtain, record and ensure that the transfers are accompanied by the following information:
(a) the name of the originator;
(b) the number of the originator’s account maintained with the ordering institution and from which the Digital Assets are transferred or, in the absence of such an account, a unique reference number assigned to the Digital Asset transfer by the ordering institution;
(c) the name of the beneficiary (recipient); and
(d) the number of the recipient’s account maintained with the beneficiary institution and to which the Digital Assets are transferred, or, in the absence of an account number, a unique transaction number assigned to the Digital Asset transfer by the beneficiary institution.
(3) Before transferring Digital Assets, an ordering institution must verify the accuracy of the information referred to in (1) (a) to (c) on the basis of documents, data or information obtained from a reliable and independent sources.
(4) If several individual domestic or cross-border Digital Asset transfers from a single originating institution are bundled in a batch file for te transmission to recipient(s), then a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider that is an ordering institution must ensure that:
(i) the batch file contains the originator information required in (1) and/or (2) respectively;
(ii) it has verified the originator information referred to in (1); and
(iii) the batch file contains the recipient information required under (1) and/or (2) for each recipient and
that information is fully traceable in each recipient’s jurisdiction.
(5) The information referred to in (1), (2), (4) must be submitted in advance of, or simultaneously or concurrently with, the transfer of Digital Assets and in a secure manner and in line
with the requirements of the AIFC rules and regulations on data protection.
Guidance:
(1) The number of the account maintained with the ordering institution or
beneficiary institution from or to which the Digital Assets are transferred referred to in 11-1.2.(1)(b) to (e) and 11-1.2.(2)(b) to (d) could mean:
(a) the originator’s or recipients’ Digital wallet (address), where a transfer of Digital Assets is registered on a network using distributed ledger technology or similar technology or,
(b) the originator’s or beneficiary's account number, where such an account exists and is used to process the Digital Asset transaction if a transfer of Digital Asset is not registered on a network using distributed ledger technology or similar technology;
(b) Where information both in (1) (a) and (b) exists, ordering or beneficiary institutions should obtain, hold and/or send all information.
11-1.3. Obligations of Beneficiary Institution
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider, which acts as a beneficiary institution in a Digital Asset transfer must obtain, record and implement effective procedures, including, where appropriate, monitoring during or after the transfer, in order to detect whether the referred to in 11-1.1(1) and (2) respectively, on the originator and the beneficiary is included in, or follows, the transfer of Digital Assets or batch file transfer.
(2) Before making the Digital Assets available to the beneficiary, for a Digital Asset transfer of amount equal to or above USD 1,000, a beneficiary institution must verify the accuracy of information of the recipient referred to in 11-1.1.(1)(d), on the basis of documents, data or information obtained from a reliable and independent sources.
11-1.4. Transfers of Digital Assets with missing or incomplete information on the originator or the beneficiary
(1) A Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider of the beneficiary must implement effective risk-based procedures, including procedures based on the risk-sensitive basis, for determining whether to execute or reject or suspend a transfer of Digital Asset that is not accompanied with a required complete originator and beneficiary information and for taking the appropriate follow-up action.
(2) Where the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider of the beneficiary becomes aware that the information referred to in 11-1.1(1) and (2) is missing or incomplete, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider must before making the Digital Assets available to the beneficiary, on a risk-sensitive basis and without undue delay:
(a) reject the transfer or return the transferred Digital Assets to the originator’s account; or
(b) ask for the required information on the originator and the beneficiary before making the Digital Assets available to the beneficiary.
(2) Where a Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider repeatedly fails to provide the required information on the originator or the beneficiary, the Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider of the beneficiary must:
(a) take steps, which may initially include the issuing of warnings and setting of deadlines; or
(b) reject any future transfers of Digital Assets from or to, or restrict or terminate its business relationship with, a provider of Digital Assets transfers that fails to provide the required information. The Digital Asset Trading Facility Operator or Digital Asset Service Provider of the beneficiary must report that failure, and the steps taken, to the competent authority responsible for monitoring compliance with these Rules.
11-1.5. Digital Asset Transfers to or from self-hosted digital wallets
(1) In the case of a transfer of Digital Assets made to or received from on behalf of its a self-hosted digital wallet(s), the Digital Asset Service Provider of the originator or beneficiary must obtain and hold information referred to in in (1) or (2) from clients and ensure that the transfer of Digital Assets can be individually identified.
(2) In case of a Digital Asset transfer whose amount exceeds USD 1,000 or there is a suspicion of money laundering of a transfer to a self-hosted digital wallet Digital Asset Service Provider of the originator or beneficiary must take adequate measures on a risk-sensitive basis to mitigate and manage the ML/TF risks associated with the transfers.
Guidance on risk mitigating measures on transfers to or from self-hosted digital wallets
Digital Asset Service Provider should undertake following measures (non-exhaustive) to ensure compliance with (2):
(a) conduct enhanced monitoring of Digital Asset transfers with self-hosted digital wallets;
(b) accept Digital Asset transfers only from or to self-hosted digital wallets that the Digital Asset Service Provider has assessed to be reliable, having regard to the screening results of the Digital Asset transactions and the associated digital wallets and the assessment results on the ownership or control of the self-hosted digital wallet by the originator or beneficiary; and
(c) impose transaction limits or prohibition.
11-1.6. Rules in Chapter 11-1. comes into operation 12 months after the adoption of the AIFC Rules on Regulation of Digital Asset Activities.
11-2. DIGITAL ASSET TRANSFER COUNTERPARTY DUE DILIGENCE AND ADDITIONAL MEASURES.
11-2.1. General requirements Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence
(1) When an Authorised Person conducts a Digital Asset transfer referred to in Chapter 11-1, the Authorised Person will be exposed to money laundering and terrorist financing risks associated with the institution which may be the ordering institution, intermediary institution or beneficiary institution involved in the Digital asset transfer (“Digital Asset transfer counterparty”).
(2) To avoid sending or receiving Digital Assets to or from illicit actors or designated parties that had not been subject to appropriate CDD and screening measures of a Digital Asset transfer counterparty and to ensure compliance with the Travel Rule, an Authorised Person must conduct due diligence on the Digital Asset transfer counterparty to identify and assess the money laundering and terrorist financing risks associated with the Digital Asset transfers to or from the Digital Asset transfer counterparty and apply appropriate risk-based anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism measures.
(3) An Authorised Person should conduct due diligence measures on a Digital Asset transfer counterparty before conducting a Digital Asset transfer, or making the transferred Digital Assets available to the recipient.
(4) An Authorised Person does not need to undertake the Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence process for every individual Digital Asset transfer when dealing with Digital Asset transfer counterparties that it has already conducted counterparty due diligence on previously, unless when there is a suspicion of money laundering and terrorist financing.
(5) An Authorised Person undertakes reviews of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence records on a regular basis or upon trigger events (e.g., when it becomes aware of a suspicious transaction or other information such as negative news from credible media, public information that the counterparty has been subject to any targeted financial sanction, money laundering and terrorist financing investigation or regulatory action).
(6) Based on the Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence results, the Authorised Person determines if it should continue to conduct Digital Asset transfers with, and submit the required information to, a Digital Asset transfer counterparty, and the extent of anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism measures that it should apply in relation to Digital Asset transfers with the Digital Asset transfer counterparty on a risk-sensitive basis.
11-2.2. Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence procedures
Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence typically involves the following procedures:
(a) determining whether the Digital Asset transfer is or will be with a Digital Asset transfer counterparty or a Self-Hosted Digital wallet;
(b) where applicable, identifying the Digital Asset transfer counterparty (e.g., by making a reference to lists of licensed or registered Digital Asset Service Providers or financial institutions in different jurisdictions); and
(c) assessing whether the Digital Asset transfer counterparty is an eligible counterparty to deal with and to send the required information to.
11-2.3. Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence measures
An Authorised Person applies the following Digital Asset transfer counterparty due diligence measures before it conducts a Digital Asset transfer with a Digital Asset transfer counterparty:
(a) determines if the respondent entity is licensed or registered;
(b) collects sufficient information about the Digital Asset transfer counterparty to enable it to understand fully the nature of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty’s business;
(c) understands the nature and expected volume and value of Digital Asset transfers with the Digital Asset transfer counterparty;
(d) determines from publicly available information the reputation of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty and the quality and effectiveness of the anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism regulation and supervision over the Digital Asset transfer counterparty by authorities in the jurisdictions in which it operates and/or is incorporated which perform functions similar to those of the competent authorities;
(e) assesses the anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism controls of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty and ensures that the anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism controls of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty are adequate and effective;
(f) assesses whether the Digital Asset transfer counterparty is subject to the Travel Rule similar to that imposed under Chapter 11-1 in the jurisdictions in which the Digital Asset transfer counterparty operates and/or is incorporated;
(g) assesses the adequacy and effectiveness of the anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism controls that the Digital Asset transfer counterparty has put in place for ensuring compliance with the Travel Rule;
(h) assesses whether the Digital Asset transfer counterparty can protect the confidentiality and integrity of personal data (e.g., the required originator and recipient information), taking into account the adequacy and robustness of data privacy and security controls of the Digital Asset transfer counterparty; and
(j) obtains approval from its senior management.
Guidance:
(1) While a relationship with a Digital Asset transfer counterparty is different from a cross-border correspondent relationship referred to in Chapter 10, there are similarities in the due diligence approach which can be of assistance to an Authorised Person. By virtue of this, the Authorised Person should conduct the due diligence measures in Chapter 10, with reference to the requirements set out in AML 10.2.
(2) When assessing money laundering and financing terrorism risks posed by a Digital Asset transfer counterparty, an Authorised Person should take into account relevant factors that may indicate a higher money laundering and financing terrorism risk. Examples of such risk is where a Digital Asset transfer counterparty:
(i) operates or is incorporated in a jurisdiction posing a higher risk or with a weak anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism regime;
(ii) is not (or yet to be) licensed or registered and supervised for anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism purposes in the jurisdictions in which it operates and/or is incorporated by authorities which perform functions similar to those of the competent authorities;
(iii) does not have in place adequate and effective anti-money laundering and countering financing terrorism systems, including measures for ensuring compliance with the Travel Rule;
(iv) does not implement adequate measures or safeguards for protecting the confidentiality and integrity of personal data; or
(v) is associated with money laundering and financing terrorism or other illicit activities.
Consultation Paper on Proposed Amendments to AIFC Fees Rules
Introduction
Why are we issuing this Consultation Paper (CP)?
1. The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has issued this Consultation Paper to seek suggestions from the market on the proposed amendments to AIFC Fees Rules.
Who should read this CP?
2. The proposals in this paper will be of interest to current and potential AIFC participants who are interested in exercising business activities in or from the AIFC.
Terminology
3. Defined terms have the initial letter of the word capitalised, or of each word in a phrase. Definitions are set out in the AIFC Glossary (GLO). Unless the context otherwise requires, where capitalisation of the initial letter is not used, the expression has its natural meaning.
What are the next steps?
4. We invite comments from interested stakeholders on the proposed framework. All comments should be in writing and sent to the address or email specified below. If sending your comments by email, please use “Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2023-0004” in the subject line. You may, if relevant, identify the organisation you represent when providing your comments. The AFSA reserves the right to publish, including on its website, any comments you provide, unless you expressly request otherwise. Comments supported by reasoning and evidence will be given more weight by the AFSA.
5. The deadline for providing comments on the proposed framework is 15 September 2023. Once we receive your comments, we shall consider if any refinements are required to this proposal.
6. Comments to be addressed by post:
Policy and Strategy Division
Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA)
55/17 Mangilik El, building C3.2, Kazakhstan
or emailed to: consultation@afsa.kz
Structure of this CP
Part I – Background;
Part II – Key proposals;
Part III – Questions in this consultation paper;
Annex 1 – Draft Amendments to AIFC Fees Rules.
Part I - Background
1. In 2021 and 2022, the AFSA gradually started to charge application and supervision fees for Regulated, Market and Ancillary Services and the fees for recognition of Non-AIFC Market Institutions and Non-AIFC Members.
2. Over the course of 2022 and 2023, the AFSA received various comments and queries regarding the application of AIFC Fees Rules, which highlighted the need of greater clarity and consistency in imposing and calculation of fees.
3. The proposals in this paper are designed to outline the AFSA approach to supervision fees while conducting certain Regulated, Market and FinTech Activities, including those proposed due to the developed or currently being under development new frameworks related to regulation of Digital Assets, to make improvements in FEES based on our lessons and feedback, as well as to make some provisions related to AFSA’s powers more explicit.
4. In making any changes to its fee regime, the AFSA remains committed to:
- careful consideration of the impact of any potential fee change on the supervised (and potential supervised) entities; and
- full public consultation.
5. The proposals include:
- annual supervision fee for Operators of a Multilateral or Organised Trading Facility;
- annual supervision fee for Operators of a Digital Asset Trading Facility;
- annual supervision fee for FinTech Lab Participants;
- annual supervision fee for Operators of a Clearing House;
- fees to be charged in case of combining different types of activities; and
- other amendments to clarify implementation of certain provisions.
6. The proposed amendments are expected to be enacted on 1 January 2024.
Part II - Key proposals
Annual supervision fees for MTF/OTF Operators
7. Current version of FEES captures the following annual supervision fee applicable to MTF/OTF Operators:
- fixed fee – 3,000 USD; and
- variable fee – trading levy of 0.0006% of the average daily trading value (payable quarterly).
The AFSA does not invoice the trading levy (variable) fee unless it exceeds 500 USD.
8. There is a need to improve the formula of the variable part of the supervision fee, which is currently calculated based on the average daily trading value, while the fee is assumed to be charged for the supervision during the corresponding quarter. The use of average daily trading value has prompted queries on how these amounts are to be calculated.
9. The proposed annual supervision fee payable by MTF/OTF Operators is as follows:
- fixed fee – 3,000 USD (paid annually); and
- variable fee:
- trading levy of 0% of the cumulative quarterly trading value, where the quarterly trading value is less than 30 million USD; or
- trading levy of 0.006% of the cumulative quarterly trading value, where the quarterly trading value is 30 million USD and more (paid quarterly).
10. The intention behind the proposal is to encourage the AIFC market to grow and allow firms of different size to come and operate to the AIFC. Thus, a firm with less than 500,000 USD of trading value per day will be exempt from the variable fees payment. Since the variable fee is charged every quarter, the quarterly trading value is 31,500,000 USD, assuming that the number of trading days per quarter is 63 days. It is therefore proposed to introduce the formula based on quarterly trading value with the threshold of 30 million USD.
11. The current threshold of 500 USD for issuing an invoice for payment of the supervision fee is proposed to be removed.
Annual supervision fees for DATF Operators
12. Recently DATF Operators have been proposed to be considered as a firm carrying on Regulated Activity rather than a Market Activity. The proposed amendments are expected to come into force starting from 1 January 2024.
13. With these amendments it is also proposed to reconsider the supervision fee approach to DATF Operators.
14. Taking into account that DATF platforms provide for trading of various instruments, it is proposed to have the supervision fee consisting of two components, i.e., a fixed fee (35,000 USD) and a variable fee of trading levy.
15. The annual supervision fee payable by DATF Operators:
- fixed fee – 35,000 USD (paid annually); and
- variable fee:
- trading levy of 0% of the cumulative quarterly trading value (no variable trading levy), where the quarterly trading value is less than 45 million USD; or
- trading levy of 0.006% of the cumulative quarterly trading value, where the quarterly trading value is 45 million USD and more (paid quarterly).
16. It is proposed to use the same formula for calculation of the variable fee as for MTF/OTF Operators, considering different size of businesses. The firms with the trading value of 500,000 USD or more are expected to pay the variable fee. Thus, based on the assumption that the number of trading days of DATF Operators is 365 days, the threshold is defined as 45 million USD.
Annual supervision fees for FTL Participants
17. It is proposed to reconsider the current approach to supervision fees and start charging the full amount of the fees corresponding to relevant Regulated and/or Market Activities the FTL Participant is licensed to carry on.
18. Meanwhile, the application fee will remain at current 10% of the application fee corresponding to the relevant type of activities.
Annual supervision fees for Operators of Clearing Houses
19. Currently, FEES provide for charging supervision fee from Clearing Houses Operators, which includes the variable fee. The formula for calculation of the said variable part includes the settlement value and depository value fees. The formula does not provide for charging the supervisions fees from an Authorised Person acting as a Central Counterparty.
20. It is proposed to amend the formula of a supervision fee charged from an Authorised Person as follows:
SF=FF+SVF+DVF+CF,
where
SF – Supervision fee
FF – Fixed fee, which is 15 000 USD (paid annually)
SVF – Settlement value fee (excluding On-Exchange Trades on Secondary Market), calculated as 0.001% of settlement volume (paid quarterly)
DVF – Depository value fee, calculated as 0.00005% of depository value (paid quarterly)
CF – Clearing value fee, calculated as 0.001% of clearing value (paid quarterly)
Combination of activities
21. FEES provide that the AFSA charges the highest of any applicable application and supervision fees, when carrying on more than one Regulated or Market Activities, and the highest application fee in case of FinTech Activities.
22. One of the comments the AFSA received was related to lack of clarity in the combination of different activities by a firm and application and supervision fees to be charged in such case.
23. The AFSA conducted a benchmarking analysis of DIFC, ADGM, QFC, UK and Singapore jurisdictions in this regard.
24. The results of the analysis are below:
- The regulators appear to charge the highest fee corresponding to the activities of a firm;
- In some specific circumstances, additional fees are charged for other activities (for example, due to the complexity of a business).
More than one Regulated or Market Activity
25. It is proposed to continue to apply the approach of charging the highest application and supervision fees accordingly related to the activities of a firm.
26. In relation to supervision, it is proposed to additionally charge 50% of fees with regard to each additional activity.
27. Meanwhile, the application and supervisions fees for the activities of Operating an Exchange, Operating a Clearing House, Operating a DATF and Operating a MTF/OTF will be charged separately in full. This common approach is justified noting the complexity of their core business nature and the processes of authorisation and supervision, which are time- and effort- consuming.
Regulated and Market Activities
28. Currently, FEES are silent with regard to application and supervision fees charged when a firm is planning to or conducts both Regulated and Market Activities.
29. It is proposed to follow the approach reflected above and charge the highest application and supervision fees accordingly corresponding to the relevant activities.
30. Additional 50% of the relevant supervision fees will be payable by the firm for carrying on each other type of Regulated or Market Activity.
31. Meanwhile, the application and supervisions fees for the activities of Operating an Exchange, Operating a Clearing House, Operating a DATF and Operating a MTF/OTF will be charged separately in full.
FTL Participants seeking to conduct Regulated and/or Market Activities
32. Considering the amendments proposed to the application and supervision fees above for fully authorised firms, it is consistent to apply a similar approach to FTL Participants.
Application fee
33. Noting that the AFSA currently charges 10% of the application fees for fully authorised firms, the proposed approach is as follows:
34. The highest fee will be defined and charged in the amount of 10% of corresponding fee in the cases of conducting either more than one Regulated or Market Activities or both Regulated and Market Activities;
35. The application fees for the activities of Operating an Exchange, Operating a Clearing House, Operating a DATF and Operating a MTF/OTF will be charged separately in the amount of 10% of corresponding fees.
Supervision fees
36. The highest fee is to be paid in the cases of conducting either more than one Regulated or Market Activities, or both Regulated and Market Activities.
37. Supervision of Operating an Exchange, Operating a Clearing House, Operating a DATF and Operating a MTF/OTF will be charged separately in full amount.
Other amendments
38. There is also a need to clarify the approach in charging application fees for Ancillary Service Providers (ASP). There are provisions on the highest approach adopted for Regulated, Market and FinTech Lab Activities, while FEES do not capture any relevant provisions for ASPs. Currently, the AFSA charges application fee for each Ancillary Service separately, which is consistent with FEES. It is proposed to introduce relevant amendment to FEES to specify the approach being applied.
39. FEES Chapter 6 “Supplementary fees” outlines the right of the AFSA to require an Authorised Firm or applicant to pay a supplementary fee to the AFSA in circumstances where it expects to incur substantial additional costs in dealing with an application or conducting ongoing supervision. However, the current version of the Chapter lacks the AFSA powers in relation to Authorised Market Institutions and Fintech Lab Participants. The provision is proposed to be amended to cover Persons, AIFC Participants and applicants.
Also, FEES do not clearly define powers of the Registrar of Companies to impose supplementary fees to AIFC Participants where such substantial additional costs incur.
The proposed amendments are aimed to clarify the scope of the AFSA’s power to charge supplementary fees.
40. There is a lack of clarity on the power of the AFSA to charge a fee from FTL Participants that are willing to modify their licence, while similar provisions are captured for Authorised Persons. As a general approach, FTL Participants are subject to the requirements, which are similar to those imposed on fully authorised firms. It is therefore proposed to make amendments to Chapter 8 and Schedule 8 of FEES on Fintech Lab fees to clarify this matter and capture the common rule applied by the regulator.
41. Also, FEES should specify the fees to be charged in case of an Authorised Firm modifying its licence to capture a Market Activity(s), or where an Authorised Market Institution is planning to carry on Regulated Activities. While relevant provisions are not envisaged in FEES, the AFSA is proposing to extend the approach already being applied to firms carrying on either Regulated or Market Activities. Amendments on modification fees will be reflected in Schedule 1 “Application fees payable to the AFSA for Regulated Activities” and Schedule 2 “Application fees payable to the AFSA for Market Activities” of FEES.
42. It is proposed to change the “trading volume” to “trading value” in respect of Operator of an Investment Exchange, RNAMIs and RNAMs, as “trading value” refers to the total monetary value of all transactions, while trading volume represents the total number of financial instruments traded during a given time period. This corresponds to the approach the AFSA and relevant firms already take while calculating their supervision fees.
43. Regarding the Market Activities of Operating an Investment Exchange and Clearing House, there is a framework on the Security Token Offering currently under development. One of the proposals made within the framework is to allow an Investment Exchange and Clearing House Operators to admit Retail Clients as Direct Access Members in respect of trading or clearing of Security Tokens. The AFSA has conducted a benchmarking analysis of other jurisdictions and revealed the tendency to charge additional fees from Authorised Market Institutions granting membership to Retail Clients. The approach is deemed to be justified, noting the higher risks for the market and, subsequently, higher supervisory and other regulatory functions burden on the regulator. It is proposed to introduce additional fixed application and annual supervision fees in the amount of 5,000 USD each for such Authorised Market Institutions.
44. Additional editorial amendments to FEES are proposed to specify the terms of payment of late fees, variable parts of fees by relevant entities and other clarifications.
Part III - Questions in this consultation paper
1. Are there any comments on or concerns related to the proposed amendments? Is the level of the proposed fees considered to be appropriate? If not, what alternative is suggested?
2. Do you agree with the reconsideration of the supervision fee for Operators of a Multilateral or Organised Trading Facilities? Does the approach in relation to the revised variable part seem appropriate?
3. Do you agree with the introducing the variable part of the supervision fee for Operators of a Digital Asset Trading Facilities? Is the level of the proposed variable part considered to be appropriate?
4. Does the approach to start charging the full amount of the supervision fees corresponding to relevant Regulated and/or Market Activities from FinTech Lab Participants seem appropriate? If not, why not?
5. Do you agree with the proposed amendments to the formula for calculation of the supervision fee for Operators of a Clearing House?
6. Are there any objections to charging application and supervision fees from firms combining more than one Regulated or Market Activities, both Regulated and Market Activities, FinTech Activities? If so, what are they and how should be they addressed?
7. Are there any concerns about other proposed amendments?
8. Do you have any comments on the proposed timing of the amendments?
Annex to the Consultation Paper on
Proposed amendments to AIFC Fees Rules
Proposed amendments to the AIFC Fees Rules
In these Rules, the underlying indicates a new text and the strikethrough indicates a removed text
(…)
1.2.2-1. Combination of activities
- An applicant seeking to conduct more than one Regulated and/or Market Activities must pay to the AFSA the highest of the corresponding application fees in Schedule 1 and/or Schedule 2.
- An applicant seeking to conduct the Regulated Activities of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility or Operating an Organised Trading Facility must pay to the AFSA an application fee specified in the fees table in Schedule 1 in full.
- An applicant seeking to carry on the Market Activities of Operating an Investment Exchange or Operating a Clearing House must pay to the AFSA an application fee specified in the fees table in Schedule 2 in full.
(…)
3.1.5. Subsequent annual supervision fees
- A standard annual supervision fee must be paid for any period of regulation after the period described in FEES 3.1.4.
- The standard annual supervision fee is:
- the highest of the fees specified in the fees table corresponding to the activities which the relevant entity is licensed to carry on.
(ii) [intentionally omitted].
3.1.6. Combination of activities
- An Authorised Person licensed to conduct more than one Regulated and/or Market Activities, other than specified in (b) and (c), must pay to the AFSA:
-
- the highest of the supervision fees specified in the fees table corresponding to the activities which the relevant entity is licensed to carry on; plus
- 50% of the supervision fees specified in the fees table corresponding to each additional activity which the relevant entity is licensed to carry on.
b. An Authorised Person licensed to carry on the Regulated Activities of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility or Operating an Organised Trading Facility must pay to the AFSA an annual supervision fee specified in the fees table in Schedule 6 in full.
c. An Authorised Market Institution licensed to carry on the Market Activities of Operating an Investment Exchange or Operating a Clearing House must pay to the AFSA an annual supervision fee specified in the fees table in Schedule 6 in full.
(…)
6. SUPPLEMENTARY FEES
6.1.1. AFSA and the Registrar of Companies may require supplementary fees in certain cases
The AFSA and the Registrar of Companies may require an Authorised Firm a Person, AIFC Participant or applicant, to pay a supplementary fee to the AFSA in circumstances where it expects to incur substantial additional costs, in dealing with an application or conducting ongoing supervision.
In such cases the AFSA or the Registrar of Companies will notify the Person, AIFC Participant or applicant as soon as reasonably practicable that a supplementary fee is likely to be required, in order that the Person, AIFC Participant or applicant may make an informed decision as to whether to withdraw or modify its application.
If a supplementary fee is required, the AFSA or the Registrar of Companies will notify the client Person, an AIFC Participant or applicant as soon as reasonably practicable of the amount of the supplementary fee. The Person, AIFC Participant or applicant must pay the supplementary fee within the period specified in the notification.
(…)
8.1.2. Application fees to the FinTech Lab
- In accordance with FINTECH 2.4.3, once the AFSA is satisfied that the Person meets the eligibility criteria, a Person seeking to Test and/or Develop the FinTech Activities within the FinTech Lab must pay to the AFSA the application fees specified in Schedule 8.
- A Person seeking to Test and/or Develop the FinTech Activities of Operating an Investment Exchange, Operating a Clearing House, Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility or Operating an Organised Trading Facility within the FinTech Lab must pay to the AFSA an application fee specified in the fees table in Schedule 8 in full.
(…)
8.1.2-1. Application fees for modification of a Licence
In accordance with FINTECH 2.5.2, a FinTech Lab Participant, which intends to change the scope of its Licence, must pay to the AFSA the application fees specified in Schedule 8.
8.2. Supervision fees payable to the AFSA by the FinTech Lab Participants
A FinTech Lab Participant must pay to the AFSA the supervision fee specified in Schedule 8 corresponding to the activities which the FinTech Lab Participant conducts in accordance with FEES 3.
(…)
8.2-1. Supplementary fees
A FinTech Lab Participant or an applicant seeking to Test and/or Develop the FinTech Activities within the FinTech Lab must pay to the AFSA a supplementary fee required by the AFSA in accordance with FEES 6.
(…)
SCHEDULE 1: APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA FOR REGULATED ACTIVITIES
(…)
1.2 Application fees for modification and withdrawal of a Licence or Approved Individual's registration
(…)
Notes
Fees for initial application — firm to conduct one or more Regulated Activities, or Regulated and Market Activities
An applicant seeking authorisation to conduct one or more Regulated Activities, or Regulated and Market Activities, specified in the fees tables must pay:
- the fee specified for the Regulated Activity in the table above (or, if the applicant intends to carry on more than one Regulated Activity, or Regulated and Market Activities, the highest fee specified in the table for any of those Regulated Activities in accordance with FEES 1.2.2-1); and
- the amount of 200 USD, for each individual for whom Approved Individual status is sought.
(…)
SCHEDULE 2: APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA FOR MARKET ACTIVITIES
-
Application fees for applying for Licence to carry on Market Activities
Application fees are determined by the Market Activities the Authorised Person conducts or intends to conduct, as set out below:
(…)
1.2 Application fees for modification and withdrawal of a Licence or Approved Individual's registration
(…)
Notes
Fees for initial application — firm to conduct one or more Market Activities, or Market and Regulated Activities
An applicant seeking authorisation to conduct one or more Market Activities, or Market and Regulated Activities, specified in the fees table must pay:
- the fee specified for the Market Activity in the table above (or, if the applicant intends to carry on more than one Market Activity, or Market and Regulated Activities, the highest fee specified in the table for any of those Market Activities in accordance with FEES 1.2.2-1); and
- the amount of 200 USD, for each individual for whom Approved Individual status is sought.
(…)
SCHEDULE 3: APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA FOR ANCILLARY SERVICES
(…)
Fees for applications to carry on Ancillary Services
An applicant seeking to carry on one or more Ancillary Services must pay to the AFSA the application fee for each type of Ancillary Services set out in the table 1.1 above.
(…)
SCHEDULE 6: ANNUAL SUPERVISION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA
6.1 Annual supervision fees for Regulated Activities
(…)
(…)
**For Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility, and Organised Trading Facilitiesy or Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, fixed component of the annual supervision fees must be paid in full to the AFSA on a yearly basis on or before 1 January of every calendar year and variable component of the annual supervision fees must be paid in full to the AFSA on a quarterly basis following each quarter (paid within 21 business days after the issuance of an invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter).
6.2 Annual supervision fees for Market Activities
Annual supervision fees for Market Activities are determined by the activities the Authorised Market Institution conducts as set out below:
(…)
Formula 1
SF= FF+TVF+LF,
where
SF – Supervision fee
FF – Fixed fee, which is 15 000 USD (paid annually)
TVF – Trading volume value fee, calculated as 0.003% of trading volume value in one year (paid quarterly within 21 business days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter)
LF – Listing fee, calculated as 2% of all listing fees collected by an Operator of an Investment Exchange in one year (paid quarterly within 21 business days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter)
Formula 2
SF=FF+SVF+DVF+CF,
where
SF – Supervision fee
FF – Fixed fee, which is 15 000 USD (paid annually)
SVF – Settlement value fee (excluding On-Exchange Trades on Secondary Market), calculated as 0.001% of settlement volume value (paid quarterly within 21 business days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter)
DVF – Depository value fee, calculated as 0.00005% of depository value (paid quarterly within 21 business days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter)
CF – Clearing value fee, calculated as 0.001% of clearing value (paid quarterly within 21 business days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter)
(…)
6.4 Annual recognition fees for Recognised Non-AIFC Market Institutions and Recognised Non-AIFC Members
Formula 1
RF= FF+TVF,
where
RF – Annual recognition fee
FF – Fixed fee, which is 1 000 USD pro-rated over a calendar year
TVF – Trading volume value fee, calculated as 0.001% of trading volume value in one year, applicable only to Recognised Non-AIFC Members admitted to trading by Operator of an Investment Exchange, whose trading volume value is over 100 million USD (paid within one month following each corresponding quarter 21 business days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter).
(…)
SCHEDULE 8: FINTECH LAB FEES
(…)
8.2 Application fees
(…)
Notes
Fees for initial application—firm to conduct one or more activities within the FinTech Lab
(a) An applicant seeking authorisation to conduct one or more activities specified in the fees table must pay:
(ai) the fee specified for the activity in the table above (or, if the applicant intends to carry on more than one activity, the highest fee specified in the table for any of those activities 10% of the application fee specified in FEES 1.2.2-1); and
(bii) the amount of 50 USD for each individual for whom Approved Individual status is sought.
(b) An applicant seeking to conduct the FinTech Activities of Operating an Investment Exchange, Operating a Clearing House, Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility or Operating an Organised Trading Facility within the FinTech Lab must pay to the AFSA an application fee specified in the fees table above in full.
(…)
8.4 Supervision fees payable to the AFSA by FinTech Lab Participants
(…)
(…)
*****Fixed component of the annual supervision fees must be paid in full to the AFSA on a yearly basis on or before 1 January of every calendar year and variable component of the annual supervision fees must be paid in full to the AFSA on a quarterly basis following each quarter.
(…)
8.5. Application fees for modification of a Licence
An application fee equal to 10% of the application fee for modification of a Licence specified in table 1.2 of Schedule 1 of FEES or table 1.2 of Schedule 2 of FEES.
(…)
8.3 Migration fees to full authorisation
Migration fees payable to the AFSA by FinTech Lab Participants are determined by the activities the FinTech Lab Participant conducts as set out below:
(…)
SCHEDULE 10: LATE FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA*
10.1 Late fees for failure to provide notification, report or return
A Person falling within FEES 7.1 must pay to the AFSA a late fee in the amount of 300 USD within 3-business days after the contravention occurs, if the Person fails to provide notification, report or return within 3 business days after it has committed a contravention. Non-payment of the late fee within 30 calendar days incurs a further late payment fee equal to 10% of the late fee for each calendar day.
10.2 Late fees for failure to comply with direction issued by the AFSA
A Person falling within FEES 7.4 must pay to the AFSA a late fee in the amount of 300 USD within 3-business days after the contravention occurs, if the Person fails to comply with direction issued by the AFSA within 3 business days after such failure. Non-payment of the late fee within 30 calendar days incurs a further late payment fee equal to 10% of the late fee for each calendar day.
(…)
SCHEDULE 11: LATE FILING FEES PAYABLE TO THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES*
101. A Person failing to provide annual return, annual confirmation statement or annual accounts to the Registrar of the Companies within the periods specified in the AIFC Companies Regulations A Person falling within FEES 7.6 must pay to the Registrar of Companies a late fee in the amount of 50 USD within 5 business days after the contravention occurs, if the Person fails to provide annual return, annual confirmation statement or annual accounts within 5 business days after it has committed a contravention. Non-payment of the late fee within 30 calendar days incurs a further late payment fee equal to 5% of the late fee for each calendar day.
*Late filing fees for failure to provide annual return, annual confirmation statement or accounts in relation to each financial year payable to the Registrar of Companies are applied from 1 April 2023.
Consultation Paper on Rules and mechanisms of cooperation of Unbacked Digital Asset Exchanges and/or the Centre Participants authorized to carry out digital assets-related activities with second-tier bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper on List, timing and procedure of report submission by digital asset exchanges of the Astana International Financial Centre
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Revised Proposed Amendments to AIFC Fees Rules 02
Introduction
Why are we issuing this Consultation Paper (CP)?
1. The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has issued this Consultation Paper to continue to seek suggestions from the market on the reconsidered proposals regarding the AIFC Fees Rules in continuation of its proposals published in Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2023-0004. The AFSA gives due consideration to the public consultations comments. Given the market feedback to the previous proposals and the resulting revisions to the previous proposals, the AFSA considers it appropriate to undertake further public consultation on these proposals.
Who should read this CP?
2. The proposals in this paper will be of interest to current and potential AIFC participants who are interested in exercising business activities in or from the AIFC.
Terminology
3. Defined terms have the initial letter of the word capitalised, or of each word in a phrase. Definitions are set out in the AIFC Glossary (GLO). Unless the context otherwise requires, where capitalisation of the initial letter is not used, the expression has its natural meaning.
What are the next steps?
4. We invite comments from interested stakeholders on the proposed framework. All comments should be in writing and sent to the address or email specified below. If sending your comments by email, please use “Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2023-0007" in the subject line. You may, if relevant, identify the organisation you represent when providing your comments. The AFSA reserves the right to publish, including on its website, any comments you provide, unless you expressly request otherwise. Comments supported by reasoning and evidence will be given more weight by the AFSA.
5. The deadline for providing comments on the proposed framework is 2 December 2023. Once we receive your comments, we shall consider if any refinements are required to this proposal.
6. Comments to be addressed by post:
Policy and Strategy Division
Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA)
55/17 Mangilik El, building C3.2, Kazakhstan
or emailed to: consultation@afsa.kz
Structure of this CP
Part I – Background;
Part II – Key proposals;
Part III – Questions in this consultation paper;
Annex 1 – Draft Amendments to AIFC Fees Rules (new amendments are colored in red).
Part 1. Background
7. On 11 August 2023, the AFSA released Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2023-0004 on proposed amendments to AIFC Fees Rules for public comment. The consultation period closed on 15 September 2023, and we received various external comments and queries from a wide range of interested parties. The AFSA is grateful to all those who have contributed to the consultation process.
8. The AFSA has considered the feedback and now is consulting on the revised proposals on application, supervision fees and other fees payable by AIFC Participants.
9. As was previously communicated, in making any changes to its fee regime, the AFSA remains committed to careful consideration of the impact of any potential fee change on the supervised (and potential supervised) entities.
10. Having said that, the AFSA, being a risk based financial services regulator, is also of the view that these proposals appropriately reflect resource impact of the growth in the scope and the scale of the maintenance of the AFSA’s regulatory objectives.
11. The proposals include:
a) annual supervision fee for Operators of a Multilateral or Organised Trading Facility;
b) annual supervision fee for Operators of a Digital Asset Trading Facility;
c) annual supervision fee for FinTech Lab Participants;
d) annual supervision fee for Operators of a Clearing House;
e) annual recognition fee for a Recognised Clearing House;
f) annual recognition fee for a Recognised Non-AIFC Member;
g) fees to be charged in case of combining different types of activities;
h) other fees payable to the AFSA; and
i) other fees payable to the Registrar of Companies
12. The proposed amendments are expected to be enacted on 1 January 2024.
Part 2. Key Proposals
Annual supervision fees for MTF/OTF Operators
1. The AFSA has developed 2 possible approaches:
Option 1
2. Option 1 is to keep the currently applied approach to supervision fee (fixed fee of 3 000 USD and variable fee of 0.0006% of ADTV).
3. The AFSA suggests clarifying the way of calculation of the trading levy. The current AFSA approach is to calculate the variable fee based on the quarterly volumes, i.e., the average daily trading value is multiplied by the number of active trading days in quarter.
Option 2
4. Option 2 is to keep the currently applied approach to supervision fee (fixed fee of 3 000 USD and variable fee of 0.0006% of ADTV) but introduce the minimum threshold for charging the variable part of the annual supervision fee:
· fixed fee – 3 000 USD; and
· variable fee calculated on a quarterly basis:
• where the average daily trading value is less than 500 000 USD, is not applicable;
• where the average daily trading value is more than 500 000 USD:
- trading levy of 0.0006% of the average daily trading value; or
- 2 500 USD,
whichever is greater.
5. Meanwhile, in order to encourage firms to grow, the AFSA is proposing to set one of the following additional thresholds for annual variable fee:
a) the maximum threshold for the annual variable fee of 700 000 USD; or
b) trading levy of 0.0003% of ADTV on ADTV in excess of the threshold of 500 million USD.
6. This option ensures that the expenses borne by Operators of MTF or OTF would be proportionate to their trading value, while introduction of the minimum threshold would allow the AFSA to cover its regulatory costs. In terms of the additional thresholds, it is proposed to set the fixed maximum threshold, as this may be more cost-effective for firms in the long-term perspective in comparison with paying the reduced trading levy rate.
7. Also, it is proposed to include the guidance on how the variable fee is calculated, as provided in Option 1.
Option 3
8. In addition to the existing fixed fee of 3 000 USD, it is proposed to introduce the table of variable fees based on the trading value of MTF/OTF Operators.
Average daily trading value |
Variable fee |
Less than 500 000 USD |
- |
500 000 USD or more and less than 1 million USD |
10 000 USD |
1 million USD or more and less than 10 million USD |
50 000 USD |
10 million USD or more and less than 50 million USD |
100 000 USD |
50 million USD or more and less than 150 million USD |
200 000 USD |
150 million USD or more and less than 350 million USD |
400 000 USD |
350 million USD and more |
700 000 USD |
Notes:
1. The amounts given in the second column of the table indicate the annual variable fees.
2. Variable fee is calculated on a quarterly basis by pro-rating the annual variable fee, that would have been payable based on the average daily trading value, for the relevant quarter.
As such, the amount of the variable fee payable each quarter may vary depending on the average daily trading value of that quarter.
Example:
a. Average daily trading value of a firm is 450 000 USD in quarter 1, the variable fee will not be applied in quarter 1;
b. Average daily trading value of a firm is 500 000 USD in quarter 2, the variable fee will be 2 500 USD for quarter 2;
c. Average daily trading value of a firm is 5 million USD in quarter 3, the variable fee will be 12 500 USD for quarter 3;
d. Average daily trading value of a firm is 10 million USD in quarter 4, the variable fee will be 25 000 USD for quarter 4.
Thus, the firm must pay 40 000 USD as the variable fee for that year.
3. Variable fee is paid quarterly.
4. The AFSA does not invoice the variable fee in excess of 700 000 USD in one year.
9. This option would ensure ease of calculation and transparency in terms of the annual supervision fees to be paid, which will allow firms to forecast future costs. Also, this approach would still allow firms with ADTV less than 500 000 USD to grow their business first without being required to pay the variable fee.
Annual supervision fees for DATF Operators
10. The AFSA is proposing applying similar approaches to DATF Operators.
Option 1
11. Option 1 is to reduce the currently applied fixed fee (35 000 USD) and introduce the variable fee with the minimum threshold:
· fixed fee – 25 000 USD; and
· variable fee calculated on a quarterly basis:
a. where the average daily trading value is less than 500 000 USD, is not applicable;
b. where the average daily trading value is more than 500 000 USD:
i. trading levy of 0.0006% of the average daily trading value; or
ii. 5 000 USD,
whichever is greater.
12. Meanwhile, in order to encourage firms to grow, the AFSA is proposing to set the maximum threshold for the annual variable fee of 1 000 000 USD.
13. Option 1 ensures that the expenses borne by Operators of MTF or OTF would be proportionate to their trading value, while introduction of the minimum threshold would allow the AFSA to cover its regulatory costs. Meanwhile, the fixed maximum threshold would encourage firms to grow.
14. Furthermore, the approach outlined in Option 1 might be favorable for DATF Operators noting that the following may cause additional costs:
a) the DATF business model adopted by most platform operators requires carrying on the Regulatory Activity of Providing Custody; and
b) the established scope of services of DATF operating in or outside the AIFC covers other activities, including Managing Investments, Advising on Investments and other services.
Option 2
15. It is proposed to reconsider the fixed amount of the supervision fee formula and introduce the table of variable fees based on the trading value of DATF Operators:
· fixed fee – 25 000 USD; and
· variable fee:
Average daily trading value |
Variable fee |
Less than 500 000 USD |
- |
500 000 USD or more and less than 1 million USD |
20 000 USD |
1 million USD or more and less than 5 million USD |
25 000 USD |
5 million USD or more and less than 10 million USD |
35 000 USD |
10 million USD or more and less than 20 million USD |
45 000 USD |
20 million USD or more and less than 50 million USD |
90 000 USD |
50 million USD or more and less than 80 million USD |
150 000 USD |
80 million USD or more and less than 150 million USD |
250 000 USD |
150 million USD or more and less than 350 million USD |
550 000 USD |
350 million USD or more |
1 000 000 USD |
Notes:
1. The amounts given in the second column of the table indicate the annual variable fees.
2. Variable fee is calculated on a quarterly basis by pro-rating the annual variable fee, that would have been payable based on the average daily trading value, for the relevant quarter.
As such, the amount of the variable fee payable each quarter may vary depending on the average daily trading value of that quarter.
Example:
a. Average daily trading value of a firm is 450 000 USD in quarter 1, the variable fee will not be applied in quarter 1;
b. Average daily trading value of a firm is 500 000 USD in quarter 2, the variable fee will be 5 000 USD for quarter 2;
c. Average daily trading value of a firm is 5 million USD in quarter 3, the variable fee will be 8 750 USD for quarter 3;
d. Average daily trading value of a firm is 10 million USD in quarter 4, the variable fee will be 11 250 USD for quarter 4.
Thus, the firm must pay 25 000 USD as the variable fee for that year.
3. Variable fee is paid quarterly.
4. The AFSA does not invoice the variable fee in excess of 1 000 000 USD in one year.
16. This option would ensure ease of calculation and transparency in terms of the annual supervision fees to be paid, which will allow firms and the AFSA to forecast future costs and income.
Annual supervision fees for FTL Participants
17. In August the AFSA made the proposal to start charging the full amount of the fees corresponding to relevant Regulated and/or Market Activities the FTL Participant is licensed to carry on. The rationale for such amendments was to encourage firms to grow their business and migrate to full authorisation after expiration of their FinTech licences.
18. Following consideration of comments received during the public consultations, the AFSA is proposing to start charging a full supervision fee after 2 years of being in the FinTech Lab.
19. Relevant amendments are proposed to be made in table 8.4 of Schedule 8 on “Supervision fees payable to the AFSA by the FinTech Lab Participants”.
Annual supervision fees for Operators of Clearing Houses
20. The AFSA has also received comments on the proposed amendments to the calculation formula of the annual supervision fees for Operators of Clearing Houses, which implies including the Clearing value fee.
21. Following consideration of comments of market participants, the AFSA is proposing to specify that the clearing value fee will be applicable to Clearing Houses acting as Central Counterparties:
SF=FF+SVF+DVF+CVF,
where
SF – Supervision fee
FF – Fixed fee, which is 15 000 USD (paid annually)
SVF – Settlement value fee (excluding On-Exchange Trades on Secondary Market), calculated as 0.001% of settlement volume (paid quarterly)
DVF – Depository value fee, calculated as 0.00005% of depository value (paid quarterly)
CVF – Clearing value fee, calculated as 0.001% of clearing value, applicable only to an Operator of a Clearing House acting as a Central Counterparty (paid quarterly)
22. Additionally, it is proposed to exempt a Clearing House, which carries on the clearing or settlement functions for the trading facility in its Group, including an Investment Exchange, Multilateral or Organised Trading Facilities from payment of clearing and clearing value fees.
Annual recognition fees for Recognised Non-AIFC Market Institution operating as a Clearing House
23. It is proposed to align the approach on the annual recognition fee payable by a Recognised Non-AIFC Clearing Houses with the proposals made to the annual supervision fee for an Authorised Clearing House.
24. The annual recognition fee for such Recognised Non-AIFC Clearing House would be as follows:
a. Fixed fee – 15,000 USD, and
b. Variable recognition fee: 0.001% of settlement value + 0.00005% of depositary value + 0.001% of clearing value generated for Authorised Market Institutions, Multilateral or Organised Trading Facilities.
Meanwhile, clearing value will be applicable to a Clearing House acting as a Central Counterparty.
25. In accordance with the approach above, it is proposed to exempt a Recognised Non-AIFC Clearing House, which carries on the clearing or settlement functions for the trading facility in its Group from payment of clearing and clearing value fees.
Annual recognition fees for Recognised Non-AIFC Members
26. Current formula for calculation of the annual recognition fee for a Recognised Non-AIFC Member (RNAM) refers to its membership in an Authorised Investment Exchange. Meanwhile, MTF/OTF and DATF Operators may also admit RNAMs to trading, which is not reflected in FEES.
27. Also, as the variable part of the annual recognition fee for RNAMs depends on the annual trading value but is charged quarterly, the AFSA received a proposal to clarify the quarterly trading value in the fee formula.
28. It is therefore proposed to amend the annual recognition fee as follows:
· For Recognised Non-AIFC Members that are admitted to trading by an Authorised Investment Exchange, Multilateral or Organised Trading Facility or Digital Asset Trading Facility: calculated according to formula 1 below;
RF= FF+TVF,
where
RF – Annual recognition fee
FF – Fixed fee, which is 1 000 USD pro-rated over a calendar year
TVF – Trading value fee, calculated as 0.001% of trading value in one year, applicable only to Recognised Non-AIFC Members admitted to trading by Operator of an Investment Exchange, Multilateral or Organised Trading Facility or Digital Asset Trading Facility, whose trading volume is over 100 25 million USD per quarter on each trading platform;
· For Recognised Non-AIFC Members that are not admitted to trading by an Authorised Investment Exchange, Multilateral or Organised Trading Facility or Digital Asset Trading Facility, or whose trading value is lower than 100 25 million USD per quarter on each trading platform: a fixed amount of 1 000 USD pro-rated over a calendar year.
Combination of activities
Application fees in case of combination of activities
29. Earlier the AFSA proposed to introduce additional criteria when calculating the application fees payable by firms planning to combine more than one activity in its licence: to charge application fees for the activities of Operating an Exchange, Operating a Clearing House, Operating a DATF or Operating an MTF/OTF in full.
30. In order to clearly outline the calculation method based on the approach above, it is proposed to add clarifying revisions on the application fees payable by firms for initial licence in case of conducting multiple activities in Notes on fees for initial application in Schedules 1 and 2 of FEES.
Supervision fees in case of combination of activities
31. The AFSA is proposing to apply the following approach when charging the supervision fee from a firm combining more than one activity in its licence:
· The highest supervision fee, plus
· 50% of fees with regard to each additional activity.
32. Meanwhile, relevant fees for the activities of Operating an Exchange, Operating a Clearing House, Operating a DATF or Operating a MTF/OTF would be charged in full.
33. However, it was not clear for some market participants, whether these five distinguished types of activities would be excluded from the formula of defining the highest supervision fee. It is therefore proposed to amend FEES 3.1.6. “Combination of activities” and specify that the listed activities would be charged separately and not taken into account when calculating the supervision fees according to the formula above.
Other fees payable to the AFSA
34. During the consultation period there have been additional proposals raised internally and externally.
Additional fees in relation to Digital Assets
35. One of the issues raised during the consultation period was related to the higher risks associated with supervising firms conducting Regulated or Market Activities in relation to Digital Assets. The increased regulatory burden arising from overseeing such activities results in excess costs borne by the AFSA.
36. The AFSA is proposing to introduce the application and supervision fees of 5 000 USD and 3 000 USD, respectively, for AIFC Participants conducting Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets. Relevant amendments are proposed to be captured in Rule 1.1-1 of Schedule 1 and Rule 6.1-1 of Schedule 6 of FEES.
Supplementary fees in case of particular supervisory events
37. Based on its prior supervisory experience, the AFSA has identified that there are applications or supervisory events not regarded as regular and are therefore outside the scope of general supervisory activities. Thus, such events may require additional significant resources to process and complete. Considering that these are standalone events, it would not be appropriate to include them in the annual supervision fee. It is proposed to assign supplementary fees payable on a particular supervisory event. In addition, it is also proposed to provide applicants with an opportunity to give their views on the decision of the AFSA or Register of Companies on the supplementary fee.
38. The main point of having the supplementary fee for supervisory events is to enable AFSA to cover the costs it incurs. It is not intended as a general revenue-raising measure or for the AFSA to make a profit from the particular case.
39. The provision is proposed to be included in Chapter 6 of FEES “Supplementary fees”.
Application fees for modification of a Licence
40. When a firm applies for modifying its licence, the AFSA charges the difference between the application fee for the new activity(s) and the application fee paid at the authorisation stage.
41. To be consistent with the approach to charging application fees in case of multiple activities, it is proposed to charge the highest application fee corresponding to the additional activities a firm is applying for. The relevant amendments will be reflected in Schedules 1 and 2 on application fees payable by Authorised Firms and Authorised Market Institutions.
42. Also, as discussed earlier, the activities of Operating an Exchange, Operating a Clearing House, Operating a DATF or Operating a MTF/OTF are not taken into account when calculating the application fee. The said activities would not therefore be included in calculations when defining the fee for modification of a licence. This approach would be applied in both cases, when: (a) a firm is seeking to obtain a Licence to carry on one or more of the activities mentioned above, or (b) a firm already performs functions corresponding to the activities under its current Licence. Relevant amendments are to be made in tables 1.2 on “Application fees for modification and withdrawal of a Licence or Approved Individual's registration” in Schedules 1 and 2 on application fees payable for Regulated and Market Activities, respectively.
Application fees for change of control
43. The AFSA receives numerous applications on change of control, while no relevant fees are captured in FEES.
44. Consideration of such applications may require significant additional AFSA resources, as the majority of applications are complex cases that require conducting thorough analysis and due diligence, as well as engaging profile divisions. Repetitive reviews of applications is also usually required.
45. Noting the above, the AFSA proposes to charge 1 000 USD for reviewing applications on change on control.
46. The new amendments are proposed to be included in Schedules 1 and 2 of FEES outlining the application fees payable by Authorised Firms and Authorised Market Institutions.
Application fees for changes to Fund Documentation
47. The AFSA receives numerous applications on change of Fund Documentation (Constitution and Offering Materials), while no relevant fees are captured in FEES.
48. The AFSA proposes to introduce the fee for making changes in the Fund's Constitution and Offering Materials for Non-Exempt Funds only. The amount of the fee is suggested to be 500 USD. Introduction of the fee is considered reasonable noting the type of clients engaged in operations of such Funds (Retail Clients).
49. The new amendments are proposed to be included in FEES 9 (“Other fees”) and Schedule 9.
Application fees for approval or modification of an Approved Individual's status
50. The AFSA receives numerous applications for modifying the Approved Individual status. The current fee (200 USD, Schedules 1 and 2 of FEES) does not correspond to the workload caused by reviewing the applications, which also often implies engaging other divisions for conducting detailed due diligence.
51. Noting the amount of application received and complexity of certain cases, the application fee for modification of the Approved Individual’s status is proposed to be reconsidered and increased to 300 USD.
52. In order to maintain a uniform approach at the authorisation and supervision stages, it is also proposed to increase the application fee for approving Approved Individual’s status at the authorisation stage to 300 USD, as well.
Migration fees from FTL to full authorisation
53. Current version of FEES does not fully reflect the AFSA’s approach on what the application and further supervision fees should be payable to the AFSA by firms migrating from the FinTech sandbox regime to full authorisation.
a. FEES provisions do not capture the newly proposed approach on application fees payable in case of combination of Regulated and Market Activities, which distinguishes certain types of activities. Relevant amendments have been made to table 8.3 of Schedule 8 of FEES on “Migration fees to full authorisation” to address the scenario.
b. Noting that firms usually graduate from the FinTech sandbox throughout the year and FTL supervision fees for that year have already been paid, FEES are silent on how further supervision fee should be calculated. It is therefore proposed to extend the approach and calculation principle applied to the migration fee. Thus, once a FTL participant is granted a full licence, it should pay the difference between the annual supervision fee already paid for its time being in the FinTech Lab and the initial annual supervision fee applicable to the participant with a full licence.
Other fees payable to the Registrar of Companies
Application fees in respect of waivers and/or modifications
54. Current legislation does not provide for charging fees for reviewing applications on granting a waiver or modification. Meanwhile, the assessment of applications requires deep legislation analysis and may take up to 1 month.
55. As FEES contain Chapter 2 listing regular application fees payable to the Registrar of Companies, it is proposed to introduce a new provision (Rule 2.7) allowing the Register of Companies to determine the fees in respect of waivers and/or modifications.
Application fees for transfer of incorporation to/from AIFC
56. The transfer of incorporation is a complicated process which requires long time for consideration and thorough assessment of the firm. The overall re-domiciliation process may take from 1 to 9 months. No relevant fee is captured in FEES.
57. Noting the complexity of the process, it is proposed to introduce an application fee for transfer of incorporation of Companies or Partnerships to/from the AIFC in the amount of 3 000 USD. The amendments will be reflected in FEES Rule 2.1.2 “Application fees payable to the Registrar of Companies in respect of a Foreign Company” and Schedule 5 “Fees payable to the Registrar of Companies”.
58. The new amendments are proposed to be included in Schedules 1 and 2 of FEES outlining the application fees payable by Authorised Firms and Authorised Market Institutions.
Application fees for changes to Fund Documentation
59. The AFSA receives numerous applications on change of Fund Documentation (Constitution and Offering Materials), while no relevant fees are captured in FEES.
60. The AFSA proposes to introduce the fee for making changes in the Fund's Constitution and Offering Materials for Non-Exempt Funds only. The amount of the fee is suggested to be 500 USD. Introduction of the fee is considered reasonable noting the type of clients engaged in operations of such Funds (Retail Clients).
61. The new amendments are proposed to be included in FEES 9 (“Other fees”) and Schedule 9.
Application fees for approval or modification of an Approved Individual's status
62. The AFSA receives numerous applications for modifying the Approved Individual status. The current fee (200 USD, Schedules 1 and 2 of FEES) does not correspond to the workload caused by reviewing the applications, which also often implies engaging other divisions for conducting detailed due diligence.
63. Noting the amount of application received and complexity of certain cases, the application fee for modification of the Approved Individual’s status is proposed to be reconsidered and increased to 300 USD.
64. In order to maintain a uniform approach at the authorisation and supervision stages, it is also proposed to increase the application fee for approving Approved Individual’s status at the authorisation stage to 300 USD, as well.
Migration fees from FTL to full authorisation
65. Current version of FEES does not fully reflect the AFSA’s approach on what the application and further supervision fees should be payable to the AFSA by firms migrating from the FinTech sandbox regime to full authorisation.
a. FEES provisions do not capture the newly proposed approach on application fees payable in case of combination of Regulated and Market Activities, which distinguishes certain types of activities. Relevant amendments have been made to table 8.3 of Schedule 8 of FEES on “Migration fees to full authorisation” to address the scenario.
b. Noting that firms usually graduate from the FinTech sandbox throughout the year and FTL supervision fees for that year have already been paid, FEES are silent on how further supervision fee should be calculated. It is therefore proposed to extend the approach and calculation principle applied to the migration fee. Thus, once a FTL participant is granted a full licence, it should pay the difference between the annual supervision fee already paid for its time being in the FinTech Lab and the initial annual supervision fee applicable to the participant with a full licence.
Other fees payable to the Registrar of Companies
Application fees in respect of waivers and/or modifications
66. Current legislation does not provide for charging fees for reviewing applications on granting a waiver or modification. Meanwhile, the assessment of applications requires deep legislation analysis and may take up to 1 month.
67. As FEES contain Chapter 2 listing regular application fees payable to the Registrar of Companies, it is proposed to introduce a new provision (Rule 2.7) allowing the Register of Companies to determine the fees in respect of waivers and/or modifications.
Application fees for transfer of incorporation to/from AIFC
68. The transfer of incorporation is a complicated process which requires long time for consideration and thorough assessment of the firm. The overall re-domiciliation process may take from 1 to 9 months. No relevant fee is captured in FEES.
69. Noting the complexity of the process, it is proposed to introduce an application fee for transfer of incorporation of Companies or Partnerships to/from the AIFC in the amount of 3 000 USD. The amendments will be reflected in FEES Rule 2.1.2 “Application fees payable to the Registrar of Companies in respect of a Foreign Company” and Schedule 5 “Fees payable to the Registrar of Companies”.
Part 3. Questions in this consultation paper
1. Are there any comments on or concerns related to the proposed amendments? Is the level of the proposed fees considered to be appropriate? If not, what alternative is suggested?
2. What are your views on the proposed options for the supervision fee for Operators of a Multilateral or Organised Trading Facilities? What approach in relation to the revised variable fee seems appropriate?
3. What are your views on the proposed options for the supervision fee for Operators of a Digital Asset Trading Facilities? What approach in relation to the revised variable fee seems appropriate?
4. Do you find the clarifications on how the AFSA will charge the application and supervision fees for firms combining more than one Regulated or Market Activities, both Regulated and Market Activities, FinTech Activities clear?
5. Do you agree with the proposed additional application and supervision fees for firms carrying on Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets?
6. What are your views on the proposals to introduce other new fees?
Annex to the Consultation Paper on Proposed amendments to AIFC Fees Rules
Proposed amendments to the AIFC Fees Rules
In these Rules, the underlying indicates a new text and the strikethrough indicates a removed text
(…)
1. APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA
1.2.2-1. Combination of activities
(a) An applicant seeking to conduct more than one Regulated and/or Market Activities must pay to the AFSA the highest of the corresponding application fees in Schedule 1 and/or Schedule 2.
(b) An applicant seeking to conduct the Regulated Activities of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility or Operating an Organised Trading Facility must pay to the AFSA an application fee specified in the fees table in Schedule 1 in full.
(c) An applicant seeking to carry on the Market Activities of Operating an Investment Exchange or Operating a Clearing House must pay to the AFSA an application fee specified in the fees table in Schedule 2 in full.
(…)
2. APPLICATION AND OTHER FEES PAYABLE TO THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
(…)
2.1.2. Application fees payable to the Registrar of Companies in respect of a Foreign Company or Partnership incorporated outside the AIFC
An applicant on behalf of a Foreign Company or Partnership incorporated outside the AIFC seeking recognition as a Recognised Company or Partnership or continuation in order to carry on business in the AIFC and applying for a Certificate relevant certificate of, must pay to the Registrar of Companies the application fees specified in Schedule 5.
(…)
2.1.3. Application fees payable to the Registrar of Companies in respect of transfer of incorporation from the AIFC
A Company or Partnership registered in the AIFC seeking to transfer its incorporation from the AIFC must pay to the Registrar of Companies the application fee specified in Schedule 5.
(…)
2.7. Application fees payable to the Registrar of Companies in respect of waivers and/or modifications
An applicant seeking decision of the Registrar of Companies on waiver and/or modification under the Companies Regulations, must pay the fee prescribed by the Registrar of Companies from time to time.
(…)
3. ANNUAL SUPERVISION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA
(…)
3.1.5. Subsequent annual supervision fees
(a) A standard annual supervision fee must be paid for any period of regulation after the period described in FEES 3.1.4.
(b) The standard annual supervision fee is:
(a) the highest of the fees specified in the fees table corresponding to the activities which the relevant entity is licensed to carry on.
(ii) [intentionally omitted].
3.1.6. Combination of activities
(a) An Authorised Person licensed to conduct more than one Regulated and/or Market Activities, other than specified in (b) and (c), must pay to the AFSA:
(i) the highest of the supervision fees specified in the fees table corresponding to the activities which the relevant entity is licensed to carry on; plus
(ii) 50% of the supervision fees specified in the fees table corresponding to each additional activity which the relevant entity is licensed to carry on.
(b) An Authorised Person licensed to carry on the Regulated Activities of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility or Operating an Organised Trading Facility must pay to the AFSA an annual supervision fee specified in the fees table in Schedule 6 in full.
(c) An Authorised Market Institution licensed to carry on the Market Activities of Operating an Investment Exchange or Operating a Clearing House must pay to the AFSA an annual supervision fee specified in the fees table in Schedule 6 in full.
(…)
6. SUPPLEMENTARY FEES
6.1.1. AFSA and the Registrar of Companies may require supplementary fees in certain cases
6.1.1.The AFSA and the Registrar of Companies may require an Authorised Firm a Person, AIFC Participant or applicant, to pay a supplementary fee to the AFSA or the Registrar of Companies in circumstances where it expects to incur substantial additional costs are expected to be incurred when in dealing with an application, or conducting ongoing supervision or dealing with a particular supervisory event.
6.1.2. In such cases case of application the AFSA or the Registrar of Companies will notify the applicant as soon as reasonably practicable that a supplementary fee is likely to be may be required, in order that the applicant may make an informed decision as to whether to make representations, withdraw or modify its application.
6.1.3. If a supplementary fee is required, the AFSA or the Registrar of Companies will notify the client Person, AIFC Participant or applicant as soon as reasonably practicable of the amount of the supplementary fee. The Person, AIFC Participant or applicant must pay the supplementary fee within the period specified in the notification.
6.1.4. The AFSA may issue guidance on supplementary fees required from AIFC Participants when conducting ongoing supervision or dealing with a particular supervisory event.
(…)
8. FINTECH LAB FEES
(…)
8.1.2-1. Application fees for modification of a Licence
In accordance with FINTECH 2.5.2, a FinTech Lab Participant, which intends to change the scope of its Licence, must pay to the AFSA the application fees specified in Schedule 8.
(…)
8.2. Supervision fees payable to the AFSA by the FinTech Lab Participants
1. A FinTech Lab Participant must pay to the AFSA the supervision fee specified in Schedule 8.
2. A FinTech Lab Participant, which applies to extend the Licence, must pay to the AFSA the supervision fee specified in accordance with FEES 3.
8.2-1. Supplementary fees
A FinTech Lab Participant or an applicant seeking to Test and/or Develop the FinTech Activities within the FinTech Lab must pay to the AFSA a supplementary fee required by the AFSA in accordance with FEES 6.
(…)
9. Other FEES
(…)
9.3. Application to make amendments to the Constitution or Offering Materials of a Non-Exempt Fund
A Domestic Fund Manager seeking to make amendments to the Constitution or Offering Materials of a Non-Exempt Fund must pay to the AFSA the application fee specified in Schedule 9.
(…)
SCHEDULE 1: APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA FOR REGULATED ACTIVITIES
(…)
1.1-1 Application fee in relation to Digital Assets
An applicant seeking to conduct Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets must pay to the AFSA an additional application fee in the amount of 5 000 USD.
(…)
1.2 Application fees for modification and withdrawal of a Licence or Approved Individual's registration
Application to Modify |
Fee (USD)* |
Modification of an Authorised Firm's Licence |
(a) An application fee equal to the highest of the corresponding application fees payable under table 1.1 of Schedule 1 or table 1.1 of Schedule 2 of FEES for additional activities. (b) An Authorised Firm applying to the AFSA to change the scope of its Licence and seeking to conduct the Regulated Activities of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility or Operating an Organised Trading Facility must pay to the AFSA an application fee specified in the fees table above in full. (c) An Authorised Firm applying to the AFSA to change the scope of its Licence and seeking to carry on the Market Activities of Operating an Investment Exchange or Operating a Clearing House must pay to the AFSA an application fee specified in the fees table in Schedule 2 in full. (d) An Authorised Firm applying to the AFSA to change the scope of its Licence and seeking to carry on the Regulated Activities in respect of Digital Assets must pay to the AFSA an application fee specified in 1.1-1 of Schedule 1 of FEES above in full. (e) For the avoidance of doubt, the formula in (a) does not apply to the activities specified in (b), (c) and (d). |
Modification of an Approved Individual's registration |
|
(…)
Notes
Fees for initial application — firm to conduct one or more Regulated Activities, or Regulated and Market Activities
An applicant seeking authorisation to conduct one or more Regulated Activities, or Regulated and Market Activities, specified in the fees tables must pay:
(a) the fee specified for the Regulated Activity in the table above (or, if the applicant intends to carry on more than one Regulated Activity, or Regulated and Market Activities, the highest fee specified in the table for any of those Regulated Activities in accordance with FEES 1.2.2-1); and
(b) the fee amount of 200 USD, for each individual for whom Approved Individual status is sought, specified below.; and
(c) if the applicant intends to carry on Regulated Activities in respect of Digital Assets, the fee specified in 1.1-1 above.
Application fee for Approval of Individuals
An Authorised Firm submitting applications on behalf of additional individuals seeking Approved Individual status must pay an application fee in the amount of 200 300 USD in respect of each additional Approved Individual application.
Application fee for change of control
An Authorised Firm applying for change of control must pay to the AFSA an application fee in the amount of 1 000 USD.
(…)
SCHEDULE 2: APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA FOR MARKET ACTIVITIES
1.1 Application fees for applying for Licence to carry on Market Activities
Application fees are determined by the Market Activities the Authorised Person conducts or intends to conduct, as set out below:
Application fee by activities |
Fee (USD) |
Operator of a Clearing House |
125 000; and an additional application fee in the amount of 5 000 USD if intends to clear Security Tokens and have Direct Access Members |
Operator of an Investment Exchange |
125 000; and an additional application fee in the amount of 5 000 USD if intends to trade Security Tokens and have Direct Access Members |
(…)
1.2 Application fees for modification and withdrawal of a Licence or Approved Individual's registration
Application to Modify |
Fee (USD)* |
Modification of an Authorised Market Institution's Licence |
(a) An application fee equal to the highest of the corresponding application fees for additional activities payable under table 1.1 of Schedule 2 or table 1.1 of Schedule 1 of FEES. (b) An Authorised Market Institution applying to the AFSA to change the scope of its Licence and seeking to carry on the Market Activities of Operating an Investment Exchange or Operating a Clearing House must pay to the AFSA an application fee specified in the fees table in Schedule 2 in full. (c) An Authorised Market Institution applying to the AFSA to change the scope of its Licence and seeking to conduct the Regulated Activities of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility or Operating an Organised Trading Facility must pay to the AFSA an application fee specified in the fees table above in full. (d) For the avoidance of doubt, the formula in (a) does not apply to the activities specified in (b) and (c). |
Modification of an Approved Individual's registration |
|
(…)
Notes
Fees for initial application — firm to conduct one or more Market Activities, or Market and Regulated Activities
An applicant seeking authorisation to conduct one or more Market Activities, or Market and Regulated Activities, specified in the fees table must pay:
(a) the fee specified for the Market Activity in the table above (or, if the applicant intends to carry on more than one Market Activity, or Market and Regulated Activities, the highest fee specified in the table for any of those Market Activities in accordance with FEES 1.2.2-1); and
(b) the fee amount of 200 USD, for each individual for whom Approved Individual status is sought, specified below.
Application fee for Approval of Individuals
An Authorised Market Institution submitting applications on behalf of additional individuals seeking Approved Individual status must pay an application fee in the amount of 200 300 USD in respect of each additional Approved Individual application.
Application fee for change of control
An Authorised Market Institution applying for change of control must pay to the AFSA an application fee in the amount of 1 000 USD.
(…)
SCHEDULE 3: APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA FOR ANCILLARY SERVICES
(…)
Fees for applications to carry on Ancillary Services
An applicant seeking to carry on one or more Ancillary Services must pay to the AFSA the application fee for each type of Ancillary Services set out in the table 1.1 above.
(…)
SCHEDULE 5: FEES PAYABLE TO THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
(…)
5.1 An applicant seeking registration or recognition must pay the following fees to the Registrar of Companies:
(…)
Foundations |
1 000 |
1 700 |
5.2 Company or Partnership seeking to transfer its incorporation to or from the AIFC must pay to the Registrar of Companies an application fee in the amount of 3 000 USD.
(…)
SCHEDULE 6: ANNUAL SUPERVISION FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA
6.1 Annual supervision fees for Regulated Activities
(…)
Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility |
Option 1 • 3 000 USD (fixed); and • trading levy of 0.0006% of the average daily trading value (variable)**. Note: AFSA will not invoice the trading levy (variable) fee unless it exceeds 500 USD Please see Notes for Option 1 below the table. Option 2 · fixed fee – 3 000 USD; and · variable fee calculated on a quarterly basis: • where the average daily trading value is less than 500 000 USD, is not applicable; • where the average daily trading value is more than 500 000 USD: - trading levy of 0.0006% of the average daily trading value; or - 2 500 USD, whichever is greater. Additional thresholds: a) The AFSA does not invoice the variable fee in excess of 700 000 USD in one year; or b) Where the average daily trading value is more than 500 million USD, the variable fee is trading levy of 0.0003% of the average daily trading value in excess of 500 million USD. Please see Notes for Option 2 below the table. Option 3 · fixed fee – 3 000 USD; and · variable fee:
Please see Notes for Option 3 below the table. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating an Organised Trading Facility |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility |
Option 1 · fixed fee – 25 000 USD; and · variable fee calculated on a quarterly basis: • where the average daily trading value is less than 500 000 USD, is not applicable; • where the average daily trading value is more than 500 000 USD: - trading levy of 0.0006% of the average daily trading value; or - 5 000 USD, whichever is greater. The AFSA does not invoice the variable fee in excess of 1 000 000 USD in one year. Please see Notes for Option 1 below the table. Option 2 · fixed fee – 25 000 USD; and · variable fee:
Please see Notes for Option 2 below the table. |
(…)
*Supervision fees prescribed herein are applied from 1 May 2022. Before 1 May 2022, these fees are not applied.
**For Operating a Multilateral and Organised Trading Facilities, fixed component of the annual supervision fees must be paid in full to the AFSA on a yearly basis on or before 1 January of every calendar year and variable component of the annual supervision fees must be paid in full to the AFSA on a quarterly basis following each quarter.
Notes for Option 1
For Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility, Organised Trading Facility or Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, variable fee is calculated on a quarterly basis by multiplying the average daily trading value by the active trading days in the relevant quarter.
Notes for Option 2 for Operators of MTF/OTF / Option 1 for Operators of DATF
1. For Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility, Organised Trading Facility or Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, variable fee is calculated on a quarterly basis by multiplying the average daily trading value by the active trading days in the relevant quarter.
Example:
a) Average daily trading value of a Multilateral Trading Facility is 450 000 USD in quarter 1, the variable fee will not be applied in quarter 1;
b) Average daily trading value of the firm is 1 million USD in quarter 2, the variable fee will be calculated as follows: 1 million * 63 (average trading days in quarter) * 0.0006% = 378 USD. As 2 500 USD is more than 378 USD, the variable fee will be 2 500 USD for quarter 2;
c) Average daily trading value of the firm is 5 million USD in quarter 3, the variable fee will be 1 890 USD. As 2 500 USD is more than 1 890 USD, the variable fee will be 2 500 USD for quarter 3;
d) Average daily trading value of the firm is 10 million USD in quarter 4, the variable fee will be 3 780 USD for quarter 4.
Thus, the firm must pay 8 780 USD as the variable fee for that year.
2. Variable fee is paid quarterly (paid within 21 days after the issuance of an invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter).
3. Additional thresholds for Operators of MTF/OTF:
a) The AFSA does not invoice the variable fee for Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility, Organised Trading Facility in excess of 700 000 USD in one year; or
b) Where the average daily trading value is more than 500 million USD, the variable fee will be calculated separately for the average daily trading value of less or equal to 500 million USD (trading value of 0.0006%) and the average daily trading value of more than 500 million USD (trading value of 0.0003%).
Example:
Where the average daily trading value of the firm is 600 million USD in a quarter, the variable fee will be 207 900 USD for that quarter (0.0006% of 500 million USD and 0.0003% of 100 million USD).
4. The AFSA does not invoice the variable fee for Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility in excess of 700 000 USD in one year.
Notes for Option 3 Operators of MTF/OTF / Option 2 for Operators of DATF
1. For Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility, Organised Trading Facility or Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, the amounts of variable fees given in the second column of the table indicate the annual variable fees.
2. Variable fee is calculated on a quarterly basis by pro-rating the annual variable fee, that would have been payable based on the average daily trading value, for the relevant quarter.
As such, the amount of the variable fee payable each quarter may vary depending on the average daily trading value of that quarter.
Example:
e) Average daily trading value of a Multilateral Trading Facility is 450 000 USD in quarter 1, the variable fee will not be applied in quarter 1;
f) Average daily trading value of the firm is 500 000 USD in quarter 2, the variable fee will be 2 500 USD for quarter 2;
g) Average daily trading value of the firm is 5 million USD in quarter 3, the variable fee will be 12 500 USD for quarter 3;
h) Average daily trading value of the firm is 10 million USD in quarter 4, the variable fee will be 25 000 USD for quarter 4.
Thus, the firm must pay 40 000 USD as the variable fee for that year.
3. Variable fee is paid quarterly (paid within 21 days after the issuance of an invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter).
4. The AFSA does not invoice the variable fee for Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility, Organised Trading Facility in excess of 700 000 USD in one year.
5. The AFSA does not invoice the variable fee for Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility in excess of 1 000 000 USD in one year.
6.1-1 Annual supervision fee in relation to Digital Assets
An Authorised Firm conducting Regulated Activities in relation to Digital Assets must pay to the AFSA an additional annual supervision fee in the amount of 3 000 USD.
6.2 Annual supervision fees for Market Activities
Annual supervision fees for Market Activities are determined by the activities the Authorised Market Institution conducts as set out below:
Market Activities |
Fee (USD)*** |
Operator of an Investment Exchange |
Calculated according to formula 1 below; and an additional annual supervision fee in the amount of 5 000 USD if intends to trade Security Tokens and have Direct Access Members |
Operator of a Clearing House |
Calculated according to formula 2 below; and an additional annual supervision fee in the amount of 5 000 USD if intends to clear Security Tokens and have Direct Access Members
|
(…)
Formula 1
SF= FF+TVF+LF,
where
SF – Supervision fee
FF – Fixed fee, which is 15 000 USD (paid annually)
TVF – Trading volume value fee, calculated as 0.003% of trading volume value in one year (paid quarterly within 21 days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter)
LF – Listing fee, calculated as 2% of all listing fees collected by an Operator of an Investment Exchange in one year (paid quarterly within 21 days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter)
Formula 2
SF=FF+SVF+DVF+CVF,
where
SF – Supervision fee
FF – Fixed fee, which is 15 000 USD (paid annually)
SVF – Settlement value fee (excluding On-Exchange Trades on Secondary Market), calculated as 0.001% of settlement volume value (paid quarterly within 21 days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter)
DVF – Depository value fee, calculated as 0.00005% of depository value (paid quarterly within 21 days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter)
CF – Clearing value fee, calculated as 0.001% of clearing value, applicable only to an Operator of a Clearing House acting as a Central Counterparty (paid quarterly within 21 days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter)
Notes
Where an Operator of a Clearing House carries on a clearing or settlement function for the trading facility operated by a member of its Group, relevant clearing and settlement fee is not applied.
(…)
6.4 Annual recognition fees for Recognised Non-AIFC Market Institutions and Recognised Non-AIFC Members
Recognition fee |
Fee (USD) |
|||||||||
Recognised Non-AIFC Market Institution |
|
|||||||||
Recognised Non-AIFC Member |
For Recognised Non-AIFC Members that are admitted to trading by an Authorised Investment Exchange, Multilateral or Organised Trading Facility or Digital Asset Trading Facility: calculated according to formula 1 below. For Recognised Non-AIFC Members that are not admitted to trading by an Authorised Investment Exchange, Multilateral or Organised Trading Facility or Digital Asset Trading Facility, or whose trading |
Formula 1
RF= FF+TVF,
where
RF – Annual recognition fee
FF – Fixed fee, which is 1 000 USD pro-rated over a calendar year
TVF – Trading volume value fee, calculated as 0.001% of trading volume value in one year, applicable only to Recognised Non-AIFC Members admitted to trading by Operator of an Investment Exchange, Multilateral or Organised Trading Facility or Digital Asset Trading Facility, whose trading volume value is over 100 25 million USD per quarter on each trading platform (paid within one month following each corresponding quarter 21 days after the issuance of invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter).
Notes
Where a Recognised Non-AIFC Market Institution operating as a Clearing House carries on a clearing or settlement function for the trading facility operated by a member of its Group, relevant clearing and settlement fee is not applied.
(…)
SCHEDULE 8: FINTECH LAB FEES
(…)
8.2 Application fees
(…)
Notes
Fees for initial application—firm to conduct one or more activities within the FinTech Lab
An applicant seeking authorisation to conduct one or more activities specified in the fees table must pay:
(a) the fee specified for the activity in the table above (or, if the applicant intends to carry on more than one activity, the highest fee specified in the table for any of those activities 10% of the application fee specified in FEES 1.2.2-1); and
(b) the amount of 50 USD for each individual for whom Approved Individual status is sought.
(…)
8.3 Migration fees to full authorisation
1. Migration fees payable to the AFSA by FinTech Lab Participants are determined by the activities the FinTech Lab Participant conducts as set out below:
Applications |
Fee (USD)*** |
Regulated Activities |
A migration fee equal to the difference between: (a) the application fee which would be payable under table 1.1 of Schedule 1 of FEES if it were an applicant for a full Licence; and (b) the application fee under |
Market Activities |
A migration fee equal to the difference between: (a) the application fee which would be payable under table 1.1 of Schedule 2 of FEES if it were an applicant for a full Licence; and (b) the application fee under |
Regulated and Market Activities |
A migration fee equal to the difference between: (a) the application fee which would be payable under FEES 1.2.2-1; and (b) the application fee under Schedule 8 of FEES. |
2. The initial supervision fee payable to the AFSA by a FinTech Lab Participant, which migrated to the full supervisory regime, is the difference between:
(a) the initial annual supervision fee which would be payable under FEES 3; and
(b) the annual supervision fee which was paid under Schedule 8 of FEES.
(…)
8.4 Supervision fees payable to the AFSA by FinTech Lab Participants
(…)
Activities within the FinTech Lab |
|
Fee |
Regulated Activities |
|
20% of the supervision fees under table 6.1 of Schedule 6 of FEES |
Market Activities |
|
• 10% of the supervision fees under table 6.2 of Schedule 6 of FEES (fixed); and • trading levy of 0.001% of the average daily trading value (variable)***** Note: AFSA will not invoice the trading levy (variable) fee unless it exceeds 200 USD |
(…)
*****Fixed component of the annual supervision fees must be paid in full to the AFSA on a yearly basis on or before 1 January of every calendar year and variable component of the annual supervision fees must be paid in full to the AFSA on a quarterly basis following each quarter is paid quarterly (paid within 21 days after the issuance of an invoice by the AFSA, but no later than within 1 month following each corresponding quarter.
Notes
1. A FinTech Lab Participant licensed to conduct more than one Regulated and/or Market Activities, other than specified below, must pay to the AFSA the highest of the supervision fees specified in table 8.4.
2. A FinTech Lab Participant licensed to carry on:
(a) the Market Activity of Operating an Investment Exchange or Operating a Clearing House; or
(b) the Regulated Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, Operating a Multilateral Trading Facility or Operating an Organised Trading Facility;
must pay to the AFSA an annual supervision fee specified in table 8.4 for each such activity.
(…)
8.5. Application fees for modification of a Licence
An application fee equal to the difference between:
(a) the application fee which would be payable under table 8.2 of Schedule 8 of FEES if it were an applicant for a Licence in terms of currently being sought; and
(b) the application fee which was paid or would be payable under table 8.2 of Schedule 8 of FEES if it were an applicant for a Licence in terms of that currently held.
(…)
SCHEDULE 9: OTHER FEES
9.1 Application to register a Non-Exempt Fund and Exempt Fund or provide notification for an Exempt Fund
(…)
9.2 Application to make amendments to the Constitution or Offering Materials of a Non-Exempt Fund
A Domestic Fund Manager that intends to make amendments to the Constitution or Offering Materials of a Non-Exempt Fund must pay to the AFSA an application fee in the amount of 500 USD.
(…)
SCHEDULE 10: LATE FEES PAYABLE TO THE AFSA*
10.1 Late fees for failure to provide notification, report or return
A Person falling within FEES 7.1 must pay to the AFSA a late fee in the amount of 300 USD within 3-business days after the contravention occurs, if the Person fails to provide notification, report or return within 3 business days after it has committed a contravention. Non-payment of the late fee within 30 calendar days incurs a further late payment fee equal to 10% of the late fee for each calendar day.
10.2 Late fees for failure to comply with direction issued by the AFSA
A Person falling within FEES 7.4 must pay to the AFSA a late fee in the amount of 300 USD within 3-business days after the contravention occurs, if the Person fails to comply with direction issued by the AFSA within 3 business days after such failure. Non-payment of the late fee within 30 calendar days incurs a further late payment fee equal to 10% of the late fee for each calendar day.
(…)
SCHEDULE 11: LATE FILING FEES PAYABLE TO THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES*
101. A Person failing to provide annual return, annual confirmation statement or annual accounts to the Registrar of the Companies within the periods specified in the AIFC Companies Regulations A Person falling within FEES 7.6 must pay to the Registrar of Companies a late fee in the amount of 50 USD within 5 business days after the contravention occurs, if the Person fails to provide annual return, annual confirmation statement or annual accounts within 5 business days after it has committed a contravention. Non-payment of the late fee within 30 calendar days incurs a further late payment fee equal to 5% of the late fee for each calendar day.
*Late filing fees for failure to provide annual return, annual confirmation statement or accounts in relation to each financial year payable to the Registrar of Companies are applied from 1 April 2023.
Proposed Amendments to the AIFC Collective Investment Scheme Rules on Environmental, Social and Governance ESG FUNDS
Introduction
Why are we issuing this Consultation Paper (CP)?
1. The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has issued this Consultation Paper to seek suggestions from the market on the proposed amendments to the AIFC Collective Investment Scheme Rules on ESG Funds.
Who should read this CP?
2. The proposals in this paper will be of interest to current and potential AIFC participants who are interested in asset and fund management activities in or from the AIFC.
Terminology
3. Defined terms have the initial letter of the word capitalised, or of each word in a phrase. Definitions are set out in the AIFC Glossary (GLO). Unless the context otherwise requires, where capitalisation of the initial letter is not used, the expression has its natural meaning.
What are the next steps?
4. We invite comments from interested stakeholders on the proposed framework. All comments should be in writing and sent to the address or email specified below. If sending your comments by email, please use “Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2023-0008” in the subject line. You may, if relevant, identify the organisation you represent when providing your comments. The AFSA reserves the right to publish, including on its website, any comments you provide, unless you expressly request otherwise. Comments supported by reasoning and evidence will be given more weight by the AFSA.
5. The deadline for providing comments on the proposed framework is 2 December 2023. Once we receive your comments, we shall consider if any refinements are required to this proposal.
6. AFSA prefers to receive comments by email at consultation@afsa.kz or posted to:
Policy and Strategy Division
Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA)
55/17 Mangilik El, building C3.2, Astana, Kazakhstan
Structure of this CP
Part I – Background;
Part II – Best Practice;
Part III – Proposals;
Part IV – Public Consultation Questions;
Annex 1 – Draft Amendments to AIFC Collective Investment Scheme Rules (CIS);
Annex 2 – Draft Amendments to AIFC Glossary (GLO);
Background
1. The Astana Financial Services Authority ("AFSA") intends to enhance the Collective Investment Scheme (“CIS”) legal framework to reflect our prioritisation of a shift towards a more responsible and forward-thinking approach to investing and finance.
2. As environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) related investment products continue to gain attraction globally, regulatory bodies in various jurisdictions are placing greater emphasis on ESG reporting and disclosure. This has prompted companies and investors to integrate ESG factors into their decision-making processes to ensure compliance and transparency.
3. According to a recent report, despite the lower global net inflows and challenging investment climate, global sustainable fund assets hit nearly $2.8 trillion at the end of June 2023[1].
4. The growing market interest in ESG funds indicates a more extensive transition towards responsible and sustainable investing, which is also backed up by interest of several AIFC Participants to establish such type of funds. As such, the AFSA intends to issue these proposals as part of a broader initiative to enhance the ESG related frameworks at the AIFC.
5. Obtaining a status of an ESG fund holds significant importance since it enables investors to support companies that prioritise sustainability and responsible practices, but also offers potential financial benefits and risk mitigation.
6. It is important to note that sustainable finance is one of the strategic priorities for the Astana International financial Centre (“AIFC”) given the following:
· The AIFC declared its commitment to the principles of sustainable financing, which contribute to strengthening and actively encouraging stakeholders to harmonize their activities with the priorities of sustainable development of Kazakhstan[2].
· To improve the investment ecosystem in 2022, the government has adopted a new Concept of Investment Policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2026[3], which provides for a set of measures aimed at increasing investment in the manufacturing industry, production of high value-added goods, as well as stimulating investment in sustainable development projects in the context of increasing ESG standards, and global energy and technological transitions. The AIFC actively participates in the implementation of the policy to achieve Kazakhstan’s investment priorities.
· According to the President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev`s State of the Nation Address "Economic course of a Just Kazakhstan" the adoption of ESG principles has become standard practice in the financial sector. To align with this trend, the AIFC must become the primary platform for attracting "green" funding in the region.
7. Including ESG funds in the AFSA’s regulatory perimeter would contribute to significant reduction of greenwashing risks, by ensuring that funds adhere to genuine ESG criteria and accurately represent their sustainability efforts.
8. The AFSA has considered the international standard setting, particularly the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), and have considered the numerous jurisdictions’ regulatory approaches in relation to ESG Funds.
9. In November 2022 IOSCO issued a Call for Action to “counter the risk of greenwashing related to asset managers and ESG rating and data providers[1].” According to IOSCO's recommendations the following actions should be taken to improve ESG guidance and disclosures and prevent greenwashing:
· Establish policies, procedures, and practices covering the classification of material risks and opportunities;
· Include product-level disclosures that provide transparency of material sustainability-related risks and opportunities;
· Standardize sustainable finance and ESG-related terms to provide consistency across the global asset management industry;
· Promote related investor education;
· Set clear expectations for due diligence of ESG ratings and data products used in internal processes.
10. The regulatory approaches of the following jurisdictions were considered by the AFSA:
European Union (The European Securities and Markets Authority “ESMA”)
11. Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) is a cornerstone of the EU's sustainable finance agenda. It requires financial market participants, including fund managers, to disclose information about the sustainability of their investments. This regulation aims to improve transparency and prevent greenwashing. Under the SFDR, funds that promote environmental or social characteristics (so-called light green funds) are categorized as Article Eight funds, while funds that have sustainable investment as their objective are categorized as Article Nine funds.
12. The main requirements to ESG funds are indicated in the Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability‐related disclosures in the financial services sector and the Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088.
13. The 2021 released the EU Sustainable Finance Strategy aims to support the financing of the transition to a sustainable economy by proposing action in four number of areas: transition finance, inclusiveness, resilience and contribution of the financial system and global ambition.
United Kingdom (The Financial Conduct Authority “FCA”)
14. According to FCA’s strategy for 2023 the finalised Sustainable Disclosure Requirements will be available by the end of 2023. The proposals aim to cover the following main areas:
· Sustainable investment labels to help consumers navigate the investment product landscape and enhance consumer trust;
· Consumer‑facing disclosures to help consumers understand the key sustainability-related features of a product;
· Detailed disclosures targeted at a wider audience;
· Naming and marketing rules;
· Requirements for distributors;
· A general ‘anti‑greenwashing’ rule applied to all regulated firms which reiterates existing rules to clarify that sustainability-related claims must be clear, fair and not misleading.
Singapore (Monetary Authority of Singapore)
15. Published in July 2022 the Circular on Disclosure and Reporting Guidelines for Retail ESG Funds sets out Monetary Authority of Singapore’ expectations on how existing requirements under the Code on Collective Investment Schemes and the Securities and Futures Regulations apply to retail ESG funds, and the disclosure and reporting guidelines applicable to these funds. Items covered in the guidelines include governance and strategy, research and portfolio construction, portfolio risk management, stewardship, and disclosure of environmental risk information
16. ESG Fund is defined as a fund which uses or includes ESG factors as its key investment focus and strategy, and represents itself as an ESG-focused scheme. In Singapore, at least two-thirds of the fund’s net asset value should be invested in green or sustainable companies.
Hong Kong (Securities and Futures Commission “SFC”)
17. In April 2019, the SFC issued the Circular to management companies of SFC-authorized unit trusts and mutual funds – Green or ESG funds (“2019 Circular”)
18. In view of local and international market and regulatory developments, in June 2021 the SFC revised the 2019 Circular to provide further guidance on enhanced disclosure including periodic assessment and reporting for ESG funds and with additional guidance for funds with climate-related focus. This circular applies to SFC-authorized funds which incorporate ESG factors as their key investment focus and reflect such in the investment objective and/or strategy. To be qualified as an ESG fund in Hong Kong, the fund should invest at least 70% of its net asset value in the companies that satisfy green or sustainable requirements.
Abu-Dhabi Global Market (“ADGM”)
19. In July 2023 ADGM has implemented its sustainable finance regulatory framework, comprising the comprehensive ESG disclosure requirements and a regulatory framework for funds, discretionary managed portfolios, bonds and sukuks designed to accelerate the transition of the UAE to net zero greenhouse gas emissions.
20. According to the ADGM Funds Rules Green Fund must be a Domestic Fund that meets the Green Fund Investment Requirement and the Green Fund Attestation Requirement.
Dubai International Financial Centre (“DIFC”)
21. The DIFC regulatory framework does not provide any special provisions regarding ESG funds, however establishment of green Funds is indicated as one of the milestones in their Sustainable Finance Roadmap 2021-2024.
22. In September 2023 DIFC published its Sustainable Finance Framework with a positive Second Party Opinion review by S&P Global Ratings, which sets out fundraising principles for investments in its environmental and social projects that enable sustainable business operations.
23. In light of the emerging need to align with the principles of sustainable financing it is proposed to introduce the amendments the AIFC Collective Scheme Framework and the AIFC Glossary to include ESG Funds as a separate type of Specialist Funds.
24. The following provisions are proposed to be included in:
· Definition;
· General investment powers and limits;
· Content requirements for Offering Materials;
· Enhanced reporting requirements.
Public consultation questions
In the course of public consultation, existing and potential market participants will be invited to comment on the following questions:
(1) Do you agree with the proposed amendments to AIFC Collective Investment Scheme Rules? If not, what are your concerns, and how should they be addressed?
(2) Do you agree with the definition of an ESG Fund proposed to be introduced in the AIFC Glossary? If not, what are your concerns, and how should they be addressed?
Annex 1
Proposed amendments to the AIFC Collective Investment Scheme Rules
In these Rules, the underlining indicates a new text and the strikethrough indicates a removed text
(…)
2.4-1. Other Specialist Funds
(…)
(e) An ESG Fund, is a Fund where:
(i) its main investment focus incorporates ESG factors; and
(ii) at least 70 % of net asset value of the Fund Property is invested in accordance with the investment strategy.
(…)
5.3. Content requirements for Offering Materials
(…)
(m) Information relating to an ESG Fund:
(i) a description of the investment objective, policy and strategy incorporating an ESG Fund’s investment focus;
(ii) a Fund Manager of an ESG Fund must ensure that Offering Materials do not refer to an “ESG Fund”, or otherwise includes or uses ESG-related or similar terms, unless the Fund meets the criteria in 2.4-1(e);
(iii) a list of ESG criteria used to measure the attainment of the Fund’s ESG focus;
(iv) a description of the sustainable investment strategy used by the Fund to achieve its ESG focus, the binding elements of that strategy in the investment process, and how the strategy is implemented in the investment process on a continuous basis;
(v) where the Fund uses a benchmark index to measure the attainment of its ESG focus, an explanation of how the benchmark index is consistent with or relevant to its investment focus;
(vi) where the Fund uses a benchmark index for financial performance measurement only, a statement of that fact; and
(vii) risks associated with the Fund’s investment focus and strategy;
(viii) any ESG-related terms used must be clearly defined.
(…)
10.5-1. Fund Manager’s report
The matters set out in (a) to (hi) must be included in any Fund Manager’s report:
(…)
(i) for a report on an ESG Fund, the information containing:
(i) how the Fund’s investment focus has been met during the financial year, including a comparison with the previous year (if any); and
(ii) the actual proportion of investments that meet the Fund’s investment focus (if applicable); and
(iii) any action taken by the Fund in attaining the Fund’s ESG focus.
(iii)
(…)
Consultation Paper on Proposed Astana International Financial Centre Security Token Offering Framework
Introduction
Why are we issuing this Consultation Paper (CP)?
1. The Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) has issued this Consultation Paper to seek suggestions from the market on the Policy paper and proposed AIFC Security Token Offering Framework.
Who should read this CP?
2. The proposals in this paper will be of interest to current and potential AIFC participants dealing with Security Tokens as well as the market and other stakeholders.
Terminology
3. Defined terms have the initial letter of the word capitalised, or of each word in a phrase. Definitions are set out in the AIFC Glossary (GLO). Unless the context otherwise requires, where capitalisation of the initial letter is not used, the expression has its natural meaning.
What are the next steps?
4. We invite comments from interested stakeholders on the proposed framework. All comments should be in writing and sent to the address or email specified below. If sending your comments by email, please use “Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2023-0006” in the subject line. You may, if relevant, identify the organisation you represent when providing your comments. The AFSA reserves the right to publish, including on its website, any comments you provide, unless you expressly request otherwise. Comments supported by reasoning and evidence will be given more weight by the AFSA.
5. The deadline for providing comments on the proposed framework is 15 September 2023. Once we receive your comments, we shall consider if any refinements are required to this proposal.
6. AFSA prefers to receive comments by email at consultation@afsa.kz or posted to:
Policy and Strategy Division
Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA)
55/17 Mangilik El, building C3.2, Astana, Kazakhstan
Structure of this CP
Part I – Background;
Part II – Issues and Risks;
Part III – Benefits;
Part IV – Best Practice;
Part V – Proposals;
Part VI – Public Consultation Questions;
Annex 1 – Draft Amendments to AIFC Financial Services Framework Regulations (FSFR);
Annex 2 – Draft Amendments to AIFC Glossary (GLO);
Annex 3 – Draft Amendments to AIFC Authorised Market Institutions Rules (AMI);
Annex 4 – Draft Amendments to AIFC Market Rules (MAR); and
Annex 5 – Draft Amendments to AIFC Conduct of Business Rules (COB).
Background
1. A Security Token represents a distinct class of assets and its issuance process, the security token offering (STO), represents a unique method of financing ventures. A Security Token is a digital representation of an investment product, recorded on a distributed ledger, subject to regulation under securities laws. Tokenisation is the process of recording claims on real or financial assets that exist on a traditional ledger onto a programmable platform.
2. Current Security Token projects commonly use distributed ledger technology (DLT). A distributed ledger (DL) is a record of transactions held across a network of computers (nodes) where each node has a synchronised copy. A DL usually relies on cryptography to allow nodes to securely propose, validate and record state changes (or updates) to the synchronized ledger without necessarily the need for a central authority.
3. According to BIS Quarterly Review, there are a few distinctions between book-entry and tokenised securities:
1) Verification Process:
* for book-entry securities, transfer authorisation ultimately depends on the Central Securities Depositary (CSD) verifying the identity of the account holder;
* for digital tokens authorisation depends on “validation” of the token.
2) Degree of centralization:
* a CSD is highly centralized, which means that there can be only one entity that updates the central ledger and sees all transaction histories;
* DLT platforms for tokenised securities exhibit different degrees of decentralization.
4. The global market for STOs is still in its nascent stages, but it is expected to see significant growth in the next few years, as the regulatory landscape becomes clearer, and more businesses and investors become aware of the benefits of STOs.
5. STOs can provide businesses with access to capital and a global pool of investors, while investors can benefit from liquidity, diversification, and transparency. However, STOs are subject to regulatory scrutiny and compliance requirements.
6. Tokenising securities on a DLT has the potential to reduce some of the costs and complexities in clearing and settlement, but it is not without risks. Tokenisation does not change the underlying risks in the settlement cycle, but it may transform some of them and change how they are managed. It may also have implications for the role of intermediaries in securities clearing and settlement.
7. Development of the AIFC Security Token Offering Framework (the “STO Framework”) was prompted by the need to introduce appropriate regulatory regime for Persons undertaking activities that involve or relate to Security Tokens.
Issues and Risks
8. There are several regulatory issues surrounding security tokens that tend to arise:
-
One of the primary regulatory challenges is determining whether security tokens fall under the definition of securities in a particular jurisdiction. If they are deemed to be securities, they are subject to securities regulations, including registration, disclosure, and compliance requirements.
-
Regulatory frameworks for security tokens are often designed to protect investors. This might include rules regarding accredited investors (investors meeting certain financial criteria), investment limits, and providing investors with accurate and transparent information.
-
Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations are typically applicable to security token offerings. Issuers and platforms may need to verify the identity of their investors and ensure compliance with AML regulations.
-
Depending on the jurisdiction and the specific activities involved (issuing, trading, custody, etc.), entities dealing with security tokens may need to obtain specific licenses or approvals from regulatory bodies.
-
Security tokens can be traded globally, leading to challenges related to cross-border regulations and compliance. This involves understanding how different jurisdictions treat security tokens and ensuring compliance in all relevant regions.
-
Regulatory considerations extend beyond just the tokens themselves. The platforms and exchanges facilitating trading of security tokens may also need to adhere to specific regulations, such as market surveillance and fair trading practices.
-
Regulators need to understand the underlying blockchain technology, smart contracts, and other technical aspects to ensure that the regulatory framework appropriately addresses the unique features of security tokens.
9. Consequently, STOs are associated with the following important risks:
-
STOs are subject to securities laws, which means that businesses must comply with a complex and ever-changing regulatory environment, which can be costly and time-consuming.
-
STOs are a new and relatively untested investment product, and there is no guarantee that security tokens will hold their value.
-
STOs could be subject to greater regulation in the future, which could limit their usefulness as a fundraising tool.
10. Given that the regulatory landscape for security tokens is still evolving and considering the above-mentioned issues and risks, which need to be addressed, the AFSA considers crucial to develop the AIFC Security Token Offering Framework (the “STO Framework”) to introduce appropriate regulatory regime for Persons undertaking activities that involve or relate to Security Tokens.
Benefits
11. The STOs offer the following potential benefits that are widely acknowledged by industry experts:
-
STOs are compliant with securities laws and regulations, making them a secure investment option for both investors and issuers.
-
STOs can provide liquidity to investors, allowing them to sell their securities on a regulated secondary market.
-
Tokenisation has the potential to enhance the liquidity of certain financial assets, e.g., unlisted shares or syndicated loans, by making transfer of ownership easier and faster.
-
Tokenisation may also reduce the need for intermediaries.
-
DLT facilitates the use of smart contracts, which automate the execution of contract obligations, thereby potentially reducing risks and costs. This could in turn provide positive outcomes for both market participants and end-consumers.
-
DLT supports the wider distribution of ownership records and transaction histories. In principle, having a single ledger that is held by all parties reduces the need for reconciliation and confirmation of trade details between back offices post-trade.
-
The use of blockchain technology for STOs makes it possible to provide greater transparency, since investors can have access to real-time information about the investment and trading activity.
Best Practice
12. The AFSA has considered the international standard setting, particularly IOSCO, and have considered the numerous jurisdictions’ regulatory approaches in relation to the Security Token. Our main goal was to determine whether Security Tokens are similar in nature to traditional assets and can therefore fit into the existing regulatory framework for securities.
13. According to IOSCO's recommendations, regulators may consider applying existing regulations that govern traditional financial instruments, such as securities, to certain crypto-assets if they are found to behave similarly to or act as substitutes for regulated financial instruments.
14. In addition, IOSCO's approach to retail investor participation in crypto-asset markets emphasizes the need for additional protections and requirements, including well-constructed suitability assessments, transparent disclosures, and efficient complaint handling mechanisms. These measures are intended to mitigate the unique risks posed by these markets and ensure that retail investors are adequately informed and safeguarded in their participation.
15. Some international regulatory authorities (European Securities and Markets Authority, FCA, BaFin, Financial Market Authority of Switzerland) have adopted a token classification dividing cryptoassets into three broad categories, typically:
-
Payment/exchange tokens or cryptocurrencies: a means of value exchange;
-
Utility tokens: granting access to a digital platform or service;
-
Security tokens: an investment instrument.
16. According to the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance’s study a prevalent regulatory approach to date (82 % of 108 selected jurisdictions) is to draw a clear distinction between cryptoassets that qualify as securities and those that do not (please see Figure 1 below).
Figure 1: Regulatory approaches to cryptoasset classification
17. The regulatory developments of the following jurisdictions were analysed:
Dubai International Financial Centre (“DIFC”)
18. In October 2021, the DFSA introduced the Investment Token Framework. The DFSA has adopted an approach that involves incorporating Investment Tokens within the existing regulatory framework for 'Investments,' instead of creating a completely separate regime. This approach required certain modifications to take into account the unique characteristics of investment tokens. For completeness it is noted that the definitions of investments is different from the way that the term is more broadly defined to include digital assets at the AIFC.
19. A Security Token is considered an Investment Token, which is either a Security or an instrument that confers rights and obligations similar to a Security, or has a purpose or effect comparable to a Security. It is important to note that this type of tokens fall under the broader category of Investment Tokens, which also includes Derivative Tokens.
20. In DIFC Security Tokens may be offered on both traditional exchange and multilateral trading facility (MTF)/organised trading facility (OTF) platforms. The DIFC approach to regulation of security tokens appears to be an important precedent for the AIFC, given the similar status of the financial centres and the treatment of security tokens within the existing regime for authorised market institutions.
Abu-Dhabi Global Market (“ADGM”)
21. In ADGM, Security Tokens are defined as virtual tokens that have the features and characteristics of a Security under the FSMR (such as Shares, Debentures, Units in a Collective Investment Fund). Deemed to be Securities pursuant to Paragraph 58(2)(b) of FSMR. The ADGM has a high focus on promotion of the tokenisation regimes through their Multilateral Trading Platforms offering.
22. All financial services activities in relation to Security Tokens, such as operating primary/secondary markets, dealing, trading, managing investments in or advising on such tokens, will be subject to the relevant regulatory requirements under the FSMR.
23. Market intermediaries and market operators dealing or managing investments in Security Tokens need to be approved by FSRA as Financial Services Permission holders, Recognised Investment Exchanges or Recognised Clearing Houses, as applicable.
24. Where an Offer involves Retail Clients participation, it would qualify as an Exempt Offer if it is directed at no more than 200 Retail Clients, in circumstances where the Securities are offered within a Private Financing Planforms or Multilateral Trading Facilities.
Singapore
25. In Singapore, there is no specific regulatory regime applicable to security tokens. Security tokens are generally regulated in the same way as other types of traditional securities.
26. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) defines a Digital Token as a cryptographically-secured representation of a token-holder’s rights to receive a benefit or to perform specified functions in several of its statements.
27. Offers or issues of digital tokens may be regulated by MAS if the digital tokens are capital markets products under the Securities and Futures Act. Capital markets products include any securities, units in a collective investment scheme, derivatives contracts, and spot foreign exchange contracts for purposes of leveraged foreign exchange trading.
The United Kingdom
28. The HM Treasury published its consultation on Future financial services regulatory regime for cryptoassets, which provides industry with an explanation of where cryptoassets interact with its regulatory perimeter. This consultation ran from 1 February 2023 to 30 April 2023.
29. Security tokens defined as cryptoassets which use a technology such as DLT to support the recording or storage of data and already meet the definition of a specified investment under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and are therefore already subject to regulation.
30. The FCA already has powers to implement regulatory requirements for activities relating to security tokens , which meet the definition of a specified investment. Security tokens are allowed to be offered on a Regulated Market or a primary MTF.
Hong Kong
31. Under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO) and the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (AMLO), centralised virtual asset trading platforms carrying on their businesses in Hong Kong, or actively marketing their services to Hong Kong investors, are required to be licensed and regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC).
32. Definition of “virtual assets” include any virtual asset and security token. Security token means a cryptographically secured digital representation of value which constitutes “securities” as defined in Chapter 571 of SFO.
33. Trading platforms intending to provide trading in security tokens need to be licensed under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (the SFO) for regulated activities Type 1 (dealing in securities) and Type 7 (providing automated trading services).
34. On June 1, 2023, Hong Kong implemented a new licensing regime for Virtual Asset Trading Platforms (VATPs). The VATP regime will operate in parallel with the SFO regime. VATPs engaging in the trading of security tokens will be regulated under the SFO, and those in the trading of non-security tokens under the VATP regime.
35. As required by its licensing conditions a Platform Operator should provide its security token trading services only to professional investors.
European Union
36. The EU treats security tokens as financial instruments, provided that they fall into the MiFID II definition. According to this definition, transferable securities qualify as financial instruments; the term ‘transferable securities’ is defined as follows:
(a) shares in companies and other securities equivalent to shares in companies, partnerships or other entities, and depositary receipts in respect of shares;
(b) bonds or other forms of securitised debt, including depositary receipts in respect of such securities;
(c) any other securities giving the right to acquire or sell any such transferable securities or giving rise to a cash settlement determined by reference to transferable securities, currencies, interest rates or yields, commodities or other indices or measures.
37. If security tokens meet the criteria outlined by MiFID II and fall within the scope of transferable securities, they are considered to be financial instruments under EU regulations.
38. The EU adopted a Pilot Regime for tokenized securities, which took effect on 23 March 2023 for an initial three-year period, extendable for an additional three years. The pilot regime allows for certain DLT market infrastructures to be temporarily exempted from some of the specific requirements of Union financial services legislation that could otherwise prevent operators from developing solutions for the trading and settlement of transactions in crypto-assets that qualify as financial instruments, without weakening any existing requirements or safeguards applied to traditional market infrastructures.
39. The DLT Pilot Regime allows for DLT trading and settlement systems and DLT MTFs to provide for direct retail participation with no broker intermediation.
Proposals
Approach to bringing Security Tokens within AFSA regulation.
40. After the analysis of various approaches to Security Tokens regulation, we can conclude that this type of Investment is already a subject to the existing AFSA Legal Acts since Security Tokens are similar in nature, effect or purpose to traditional Securities.
41. Therefore, we propose to cover the Security Tokens regulation within scope of the existing framework for Securities, subject to certain changes.
42. In light of the above consideration, we propose to extend the current definition of Security in the AIFC Glossary by defining Security Token as a digital representation of Security, that is issued, transferred and stored using DLT or other similar technology.
The type of Licence needed to operate a facility for trading and/or clearing Security Tokens.
43. Since the AFSA regulatory approach to Security Tokens proposed to be similar to Securities, we consider that our regulatory regime for Investment Exchanges, as well as for Clearing Houses should continue to apply to platforms that trade and/or clear Security Tokens.
44. Hence, Investment Exchange was selected as a primary platform for offering of Security Tokens rather than MTF/OTF, since it provides a controlled environment that can help maintain a certain level of investor protection and compliance.
45. Consequently, we propose to include in the AIFC GLO the definition of Operating a Facility for Security Tokens, which means Operating an Investment Exchange on which Security Tokens are traded and Operating a Clearing House on which Security Tokens are cleared.
46. Accordingly, a holder of an AMI licence will be permitted to operate an Investment Exchange for the trading of Security Tokens and Clearing House to clear and settle transactions in Security Tokens, subject to the additional requirements.
Access to facilities for trading and clearing Security Tokens
47. Nowadays, the platform solutions which offer reduced total transaction costs, expedited clearing and settlement cycles, as well as efficient post-trade reporting opportunities, are becoming a challenge for the traditional intermediated model.
48. We propose to allow a direct access of Persons to the facility on which Security Tokens are to be traded and cleared, which means that there would be no orders coming through the regulated firm. This allows direct access to buyers and sellers of Security Tokens on the platform, regardless of whether such buyers and sellers are retail or professional, or individual or institutional.
49. Table 1 below shows the main risks and benefits of allowing direct access to trading in Security Tokens:
Table 1: Risk and benefits of direct access
50. However, an operator of a facility on which are to be traded will be required to demonstrate to the AFSA that it has adequate systems and controls to address market integrity, AML/CTF and investor protection risks.
Enhanced requirements for trading and clearing Security Tokens.
51. Considering that Security Token is a digital representation of Security an additional layer of regulation is needed to address issues and concerns relating to the use of DLT or similar technologies that underpin Security Tokens.
52. After preliminary analysis conducted by the AFSA, it is proposed to introduce the following requirements related to AMIs operating a facility for Security Tokens:
-
Technology and governance requirements;
-
Additional requirements applicable to AMIs operating a facility for Security Tokens that permits direct access;
-
Safe custody of Security Tokens;
-
Technology audit reports;
53. Also, it is proposed to the additional content information in the case of a Prospectus relating to a Security Token.
54. Considering direct market access in relation to trading and clearing of Security Tokens, the relevant provisions of AIFC COB Rules proposed to be applied to an AMI operating a facility for Security Tokens.
55. We propose that Authorised Firms who offer Financial Services to clients in respect of Security Tokens be required to, in addition to entering into a Client Agreement with such clients, provide to those clients a key features document relating to Security Tokens.
56. To implement the proposals above the following Act are subject to amendments set out in Annexes 1-5:
-
AIFC Financial Services Framework Regulations (FSFR)
-
AIFC Authorised Market Institution Rules (AMI)
-
AIFC Market Rules (MAR)
-
AIFC Conduct of Business Rules (COB)
-
AIFC Glossary (GLO).
57. It is proposed to introduce additional fixed application and annual supervision fees for Authorised Market Institutions admitting Retail Clients as Direct Access Members in respect of trading and/or clearing of Security Tokens. The additional information on this proposal can be found in the Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2023-0004 on proposed Amendments to the AIFC Fees Rules.
Public Consultation Questions
58. In the course of public consultation, existing and potential market participants will be invited to comment on the following questions:
-
Do you agree with our proposal to treat Security Tokens as Securities and to extend the current definition of Security in the AIFC Glossary by defining Security Token as a digital representation of Security, that is issued, transferred and stored using DLT or other similar technology? If not, why not?
-
Do you agree with our proposal to allow AMI operators to operate facilities to trade Security Tokens, subject to the additional requirements proposed in this paper? If not, why not?
-
Do you agree with our proposals to allow only an AMI holding a licence to Operate a Clearing House to clear Security Tokens? If not, why not?
-
Do you agree with our proposal to include in the AIFC GLO the definition of Operating a Facility for Security Tokens, which means Operating an Investment Exchange on which Security Tokens are traded and Operating a Clearing House on which Security Tokens are cleared? If not, why not?
-
Do you agree with our proposal to allow a direct access of Persons to the facility on which Security Tokens are to be traded and cleared? If not, why not?
-
Do you have any concerns related to the amendments proposed to introduce a new category of Members of AMI, Persons with access to the facility, on which Security Tokens are traded or cleared or both traded and cleared, in respect of only trading or clearing of Security Tokens?
-
Should we confine direct access to trading in Security Tokens for Professional Clients only? If so, what are your reasons?
-
Should we limit the participation of Retail Clients in these markets, as an investor protection measure, by placing limits on the volume of their trading activity? If not, why not?
-
Do you agree that the AFSA considered all the main risks and benefits of allowing direct access to trading in Security Tokens? If not, what ae additional risks or benefits that can be included?
-
Do you think that the term Security Token is appropriate if the token confers rights and obligations that are the same as, or similar in nature to, those conferred by Units? If not, should they be referred to as Unit Tokens? Please explain your thinking.
-
Should the AFSA allow the conversion of Security tokens to Securities and vice-versa?
-
Do you agree with our proposals to introduce the additional application and annual supervision fee for the AMIs dealing in Security Tokens?
-
Do you agree with the proposed amendments to AIFC Rules and Regulations set out in Annexes 1-5? If not, what are your concerns, and how should they be addressed?
-
Are there any other issues that need to be addressed regarding the regulation of Security Tokens? If so, what are they, and why and how should they be addressed?
Annex 1
SECURITY TOKEN OFFERING FRAMEWORK
Proposed amendments to the AIFC Financial Services Framework Regulations
In these Regulations, the underlying indicates a new text and the strikethrough indicates a removed text
(…)
55. Persons eligible for Membership
-
Subject to such further admission criteria as the AFSA may prescribe by Rules, an Authorised Market Institution may only admit as a Member:
-
an Authorised Firm; or
-
a Recognised Non-AIFC Member; or
-
a Person that is a Body Corporate which intends to undertake Commodity Derivative or Environmental Instrument transactions on the relevant Authorised Market Institution by carrying on such activities for its own account or for another Body Corporate which is in the same Group as the Person, provided that any such member of the Group for which the Person intends to act is a wholly-owned Subsidiary of a Holding Company within the Group or is the Holding Company itself; or
-
a Person not referred to in (a),(b), and (c) with access to the facility, on which Security Tokens are traded or cleared or both traded and cleared, in respect of only trading or clearing of Security Tokens.
(…)
Annex 2
Proposed amendments to the AIFC Glossary
In these Rules, the underlying indicates a new text and the strikethrough indicates a removed text
-
INTERPRETATION
Annex 3
Proposed amendments to the AIFC Authorised Market Institutions Rules
In these Rules, the underlying indicates a new text and the strikethrough indicates a removed text
(…)
Guidance: Purpose and application of AMI
(…)
The application of the rules in AMI is as follows:
-
Chapter 1 contains introductory provisions applicable to all Authorised Market Institutions.
-
Chapter 2 contains rules and guidance applicable to all Authorised Market Institutions.
-
Chapter 2-1 contains rules and guidance applicable to Authorised Market Institutions Operating a facility for Security Tokens.
-
Chapter 3 contains additional rules and guidance applicable to Authorised Investment Exchanges.
-
Chapter 4 contains additional rules and guidance applicable to Authorised Clearing Houses (including Authorised Central Counterparties).
-
Chapter 5 contains rules in relation to the supervision of Authorised Market Institutions.
-
Chapter 6 contains additional rules and guidance applicable to Authorised Digital Assets Trading Facility.
-
Chapter 7 contains additional rules and guidance applicable to Authorised Crowdfunding Platforms.
(…)
-
INTRODUCTION
-
Introduction
-
Definitions
(1) An Authorised Market Institution is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on one or more Market Activities. An Authorised Market Institution can be an Authorised Investment Exchange, an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility, an Authorised Clearing House and/or an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform.
(2) An Authorised Investment Exchange is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on the Market Activity of Operating an Investment Exchange.
(3) An Authorised Clearing House is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on the Market Activity of Operating a Clearing House.
(4) A central counterparty is a legal Person that interposes itself between the counterparties to the contracts traded on one or more financial markets, becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer.
(5) An Authorised Central Counterparty is a central counterparty which is declared by an order made by the AFSA under these Rules for the time being in force to be an Authorised Central Counterparty.
(6) A Member of an Authorised Market Institution is a Person who is entitled, under an arrangement or agreement between him and the Authorised Market Institution, to use that institution’s facilities.
(7) An Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on the Market Activity of Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility.
(8) An Authorised Crowdfunding Platform is a Centre Participant which has been licensed by the AFSA to carry on the Market Activity of Operating a Loan Crowdfunding Platform and/or Operating an Investment Crowdfunding Platform.
(9) Operating a Facility for Security Tokens in relation to an Authorised Market Institution means Operating an Investment Exchange on which Security Tokens are traded and Operating a Clearing House on which Security Tokens are cleared.
(…)
2.5.1. Requirement to prepare Business Rules
(…)
-
An Authorised Market Institution must incorporate into its Business Rules the substance of any additional provisions to be found in the COB Rules, with any modifications which seem to the Institution to be appropriate, for the purpose of regulating the conduct of business of a Person referred to in AMI 2.6.1(1)(c) as a Member of the Institution for the purposes of dealing in Commodity Derivatives or Environmental Instruments.
-
An Authorised Market Institution must incorporate into its Business Rules the substance of additional provisions to be found in the COB Rules, for the purpose of regulating the conduct of business of a Person referred to in AMI 2.6.1(1)(d) as a Member of the Institution for the purposes of dealing in Security Tokens.
(…)
2.6. Membership
2.6.1. Persons eligible for Membership
-
An Authorised Market Institution, except an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility, may only admit as a Member a Person who satisfies admission criteria set out in its Membership Rules and who is categorised as either:
-
an Authorised Firm whose Licence permits it to carry on the Regulated Activities of Dealing in Investments; or
-
a Recognised Non-AIFC Member;
-
a Person intending to deal in Commodity Derivatives or Environmental Instruments who meets the criteria in GEN 1.1.14; or
-
a Person not referred to in (a), (b), and (c) with access to the facility, on which Security Tokens are traded or cleared or both traded and cleared, in respect of only trading or clearing of Security Tokens.
-
An Authorised Market Institution must ensure that a Member who is a Person referred to in (1)(c) is a Professional Client and treat the Person as such.
For the purposes of this rule, Professional Client has the same meaning as defined in COB Chapter 2.
-
Before admitting a Person referred to in (1)(c) as a Member, an Authorised Market Institution must undertake due diligence to ensure that such a Person:
-
is of sufficient good repute;
-
has a sufficient level of competence, experience and understanding of relevant Investments, Financial Services, transactions and any associated risks, including appropriate standards of conduct for its staff permitted to use its order entry system; and
-
has adequate organisational arrangements, including financial and technological resources, which are appropriate to allow it to discharge its obligations in respect of their category of membership at the Authorised Market Institution.
-
An Authorised Market Institution must keep records of the procedures which it has followed under (3), including any documents that evidence the Person’s assessment. The records must be kept for at least six years from the date on which the business relationship with a Person ended.
-
Before admitting a Person referred to in (1)(d), an Authorised Market Institution must undertake due diligence to ensure that the Person:
(a) is of sufficient good repute;
(b) has a sufficient level of competence, experience and understanding of relevant Investments, Financial Services, transactions and any associated risks, including appropriate standards of conduct for its staff permitted to use its order entry system;
(c) has adequate financial and technological resources to meet the Business Rules of the facility; and
(d) does not pose any operational risks to the orderly and efficient functioning of the facility’s trading or clearing systems.
(…)
2-1. RULES APPLICABLE TO AUTHORISED MARKET INSTITUTIONS OPERATING A FACILITY FOR SECURITY TOKENS
Guidance
Operating a facility for Security Tokens is defined in GLO as Operating an Exchange and Operating a Clearing House on which Security Tokens are traded, cleared, or both traded and cleared.
2-1.1. Technology and governance requirements
2-1.1.1. Without limiting the generality of the technology resources requirements in AMI 2.4, an Authorised Market Institution must:
(a) ensure that any DLT application used in connection with the facility operates on the basis of ‘permissioned’ access, such that it allows the operator to have and maintain adequate control over the Persons who are permitted to access and update records held on that DLT application;
(b) establish and maintain adequate measures to ensure that the DLT application it uses, and the associated rules and protocols, contain:
(i) clear criteria governing Persons who are permitted to access and update records for the purposes of trading or clearing Security Tokens on the facility, including criteria about the integrity, credentials and competencies appropriate to the roles played by such persons;
(ii) measures to address risks, including to network security and network compatibility, that may arise through systems used by Persons permitted to update the records on the DLT application; and
(iii) processes to ensure that the Authorised Market Institutions undertakes sufficient due diligence and adequate monitoring of ongoing compliance, relating to the matters referred to in (i) and (ii);
(c) ensure any DLT application used for its facility is fit for purpose; and
(d) have regard to industry best practices in developing its technology design and technology governance relating to DLT that is used by the facility.
Guidance
1. To be fit for purpose, the technology design of the DLT application used by an Authorised Market Institution Operating a facility for Security Tokens should be able to address how the rights and obligations relating to the Security Tokens traded on that facility are properly managed and capable of being exercised or performed. For example, where a Security Token confers rights and obligations substantially similar to those conferred by a Share in a company, the DLT application would generally need to enable the management and exercise of the shareholder’s rights. These may, for example, include the right to receive notice of, and vote in, shareholder meetings, receive any declared dividends and participate in the assets of the company in a winding up.
2. To ensure the technology governance of any DLT application used on its facility is fit for purpose, an Authorised Market Institution should, as a minimum, have regard to the following:
a. careful maintenance and development of the relevant systems and architecture in terms of its code version control, implementation of updates, issue resolution, and regular internal and third party testing;
b. security measures and procedures for the safe storage and transmission of data in accordance with agreed protocols;
c. procedures to address changes in the protocol which result in the splitting of the underlying distributed ledger into two or more separate ledgers (often referred to as a ‘fork’), whether or not the new protocol is backwards compatible with the previous version (soft fork) or not (hard fork), and access to information where such a fork is created;
d. procedures to deal with system outages, whether planned or not;
e. decision-making protocols and accountability for decisions;
f. procedures for the establishing and managing interfaces with providers of digital wallets; and
g. whether the protocols, smart contracts and other inbuilt features of the DLT application meet at least a minimum acceptable level of reliability and safety requirements, including to deal with a cyber or hacking attack, and how any resulting disruptions would be resolved.
2-1.2. Operating a facility for Security Tokens that permits direct access
2-1.2.1. An Authorised Market Institution must ensure that:
(1) it treats each Direct Access Member as its Client;
(2) its Business Rules clearly set out:
(a) the duties owed by the Authorised Market Institution to the Direct Access Member and how the Authorised Market Institution is held accountable for any failure to fulfil those duties; and
(b) the duties owed by the Direct Access Member to the Authorised Market Institution and how the Direct Access Member is held accountable for any failure to fulfil those duties;
(3) appropriate investor redress mechanisms are available, and disclosed, to each Member permitted to trade or clear Security Tokens on its facility; and
(4) its facility contains a prominent disclosure of the risks associated with the use of DLT for trading and clearing Investments, particularly those relating to Digital Wallets and the susceptibility of private cryptographic keys to misappropriation.
2-1.2.2. (1) Without limiting the generality of the systems and controls obligations of the Authorised Market Institution, an Authorised Market Institution must have in place adequate systems and controls to address market integrity, AML, CTF and investor protection risks in permitting a Direct Access Member to access its facility, including procedures to:
(a) identify the ultimate beneficial owner of a Direct Access Member, where the Member is a Body Corporate;
(b) ensure that appropriate customer due diligence sufficient to address AML and CTF risks has been conducted on each Direct Access Member, before permitting that Member to access its facility;
(c) detect and address market manipulation and abuse; and
(d) ensure that there is adequate disclosure relating to the Security Tokens that are traded on the facility, through prospectus and ongoing disclosure under chapters 1 and 6 of MAR.
(2) An Authorised Market Institution must have adequate controls and procedures to ensure that trading in Security Tokens by Direct Access Members does not pose any risks to the orderly and efficient functioning of the facility’s trading system, including controls and procedures to:
(a) mitigate counterparty risks that may arise from defaults by Direct Access Members, through adequate collateral management measures, such as margin requirements, based on the settlement cycle adopted by the Authorised Market Institution;
(b) identify and distinguish orders that are placed by Direct Access Members, and, if necessary, enable the Authorised Market Institution to stop orders of, or trading by, such Members;
(c) prevent Direct Access Members from allowing any other Persons to access the facility through that Member’s access; and
(d) ensure that Direct Access Members fully comply with the Business Rules of the facility and promptly address any gaps and deficiencies that are identified.
(3) An Authorised Market Institution must have adequate resources and mechanisms to carry out front-line monitoring of the trading activities of Direct Access Members.
(4) An Authorised Market Institution must ensure that, to the extent that any of the systems and controls referred to in (1) are embedded within, or otherwise facilitated through DLT, they must be included within the scope of the annual audit and written report required under AMI 2-1.5.
2-1.2.3. When an Authorised Market Institution Executes a Transaction in Security Tokens for a Direct Access Member, the Authorised Market Institution must comply with the requirements relating to confirmation notes that would apply to an Authorised Firm under COB 9.1.2, 9.1.3 and 9.1.5.
2-1.3. Safe custody of Security Tokens
2-1.3.1. Without limiting the generality of AMI 2.9, where an Authorised Market Institution’s obligations include making provision for the safeguarding and administration of Security Tokens belonging to Members and other participants on its facility, it must ensure that:
(1) where its safe custody arrangements involve acting as a Digital Wallet Service Provider, it complies with the Client Asset provisions in COB 8.2 and 8.3 and the following requirements for firms Providing Custody of Security Tokens:
-
Digital Wallet Service Provider must ensure that:
-
any DLT applications it uses in Providing Custody of Security Tokens are resilient, reliable and compatible with any relevant facility on which those Security Tokens are traded or cleared;
-
it has the ability to clearly identify and segregate Security Tokens belonging to different Clients; and
-
it has in place appropriate procedures to enable it to confirm Client instructions and transactions, maintain appropriate records and data relating to those instructions and transactions and to conduct a reconciliation of those transactions at appropriate intervals.
-
A Digital Wallet Service Provider, in developing and using DLT applications and other technology to Provide Custody of Security Tokens, must ensure that:
-
the architecture of any Digital Wallets used adequately addresses compatibility issues and associated risks;
-
the technology used and its associated procedures have adequate security measures (including cyber security) to enable the safe storage and transmission of data relating to the Security Tokens;
-
the security and integrity of cryptographic keys are maintained through the use of that technology, taking into account the password protection and methods of encryption used;
-
there are adequate measures to address any risks specific to the methods of usage and storage of cryptographic keys (or their equivalent) available under the DLT application used; and
the technology is compatible with the procedures and protocols built into the Operating Rules or equivalent on any facility on which the Security Tokens are traded or cleared or both traded and cleared.
(2) where it appoints a Third Party Digital Wallet Service Provider to Provide Custody for SecurityTokens traded or cleared on its facility, that person is either:
(a) an Authorised Firm permitted to be a Digital Wallet Service Provider; or
(b) a firm that is regulated by a Financial Services Regulator to an equivalent level as that provided for under the AFSA regime for Providing Digital Wallet Services.
2-1.4. Technology audit reports
2-1.4.1. An Authorised Market Institution must:
(a) appoint a suitably qualified independent third party professional to:
(i) carry out an annual audit of the Authorised Market Institution’s compliance with the technology resources and governance requirements that apply to it; and
(ii) produce a written report which sets out the methodology and results of that annual audit, confirms whether the requirements referred to in (i) have been met and lists any recommendations or areas of concern;
(b) submit to the AFSA a copy of the report referred to in (a)(ii) within 4 months of the Authorised Market Institution’s financial year end; and
(c) be able to satisfy the AFSA that the independent third party professional who undertakes the annual audit has the relevant expertise to do so, including by reference to the due diligence undertaken by the Authorised Market Institution to satisfy itself of that fact.
Guidance
An Authorised Market Institution may appoint an Auditor to carry out the functions specified in (a)(i) and (ii), provided it has satisfied itself that Auditor has the relevant expertise required to do so.
(…)
Annex 4
Proposed amendments to the AIFC Market Rules
In these Rules, the underlying indicates a new text and the strikethrough indicates a removed text
(…)
SCHEDULE 1: REGISTRATION DOCUMENT*
(…)
* In the case of a Prospectus relating to a Security Token the Registration Document must include the additional content information set out in Schedule 4.
(…)
SCHEDULE 2: SECURITIES NOTE*
(…)
*In the case of a Prospectus relating to a Security Token the Securities Note must include the additional content information set out in Schedule 4.
(…)
SCHEDULE 4: ADDITIONAL CONTENT OF A PROSPECTUS FOR SECURITY TOKENS
1. A Person producing a Prospectus in relation to a Security Token must ensure that:
(a) the Prospectus contains:
(i) information specified in paragraph 2; and
(ii) a statement confirming the matters specified in paragraph 3 made by a suitably qualified independent third party professional, who has given consent under MAR 1.9.3 for that statement to be included in the Prospectus; and
(b) in the case of a Security Token which will be admitted to trading on an Authorised Market Institution, the Prospectus contains the information specified in paragraph 4.
2. The following information is specified for the purposes of paragraph 1(a)(i):
(a) the essential characteristics of the Security Token, including the rights and obligations conferred by it and details of the Person or Persons responsible for meeting such obligations and against whom such rights can be exercised;
(b) the type of Security which the Security Token constitutes and a clear analysis as to how the Security Token meets the definition of such type of Security;
(c) details of the Distributed Ledger Technology that is used to issue, store or transfer the Security Token;
(d) how the holder of a Security Token may exercise any rights conferred by it, such as voting or participation in shareholder actions;
(e) if the capital to be raised through issuing of the Security Token is to be used to fund the creation of a new Token, detailed information about:
(i) the project or venture to be funded;
(ii) whether it is the Issuer or a third party who will receive and apply the capital raised towards that project or venture (and if a third party, what rights and obligations a holder of the Security Token has in respect of that third party);
(iii) the features of that new Token and any rights and obligations attaching to it;
(iv) the terms and conditions relevant to the delivery or establishment of the project or venture, including any right of a Security Token holder to have their contribution refunded if any funding requirement is not met, the expected timetable for completion, any milestones included in that timetable and an explanation of the consequences if the timetable is not met; and
(v) the risks associated with the project or venture, including those associated with the technology used to deliver or facilitate its completion or the Token’s ongoing use;
(f) how title to the Security Tokens is established, certified or otherwise evidenced;
(g) cybersecurity risks associated with the Security Token or its underlying technology, including whether there is a risk of loss of the Security Token in the event of a cyber attack, and details of steps that have been, or can be taken to mitigate such risks;
(h) details of other risks associated with the use of the DLT application, particularly those relating to Digital Wallets and the susceptibility of private cryptographic keys to misappropriation; and
(i) any other information relevant to the Security Token that would reasonably assist a prospective investor in making an informed decision about investing in the Security Token.
3. The matters to be confirmed in the statement referred to in paragraph 1(a)(ii) are that:
(a) the DLT application, used to issue, store or transfer the Security Tokens offered under the Prospectus, is an authentic, valid and workable solution capable of meeting its intended purpose; and
(b) the Prospectus accurately describes the architecture, functionality, effect, risks and vulnerabilities of the DLT application, including its compatibility with other technologies, applications and services with which it is intended to interact.
4. The following information is specified for the purposes of paragraph 1(b):
(a) details of a facility on which the Security Token is admitted to trading or cleared including:
(i) the Person responsible for operating an AMI;
(ii) details of each DLT application used by the operator to facilitate trading or clearing of the Security Token and the functionality provided by that DLT application;
(iii) details as to how the operator of the facility meets the technology and governance requirements set out in AMI 2-1.2;
(b) details of the custody arrangements for the Security Token that are permitted or required by the operator of facility, including, in respect of each such arrangement:
(i) the Person who carries out the function of the Digital Wallet service provider;
(ii) the Person who is responsible for the safe custody of the Security Token when held in the Digital Wallet; and
(iii) risks associated with the Digital Wallet, such as the consequences of the loss of cryptographic keys (private and public), cyber security risks associated with Digital Wallets held online, loss, theft or destruction of Digital Wallets held offline, and whether and how such risks are addressed;
(c) whether smart contracts are being used or executed on the facility and, if so:
(i) what form those smart contracts take;
(ii) how the legal rights and obligations arising under the smart contracts are performed, including when contract or settlement finality occurs, (whether by the smart contract itself, an underlying natural language contract or a combination of both); and
(iii) details of the relationship between those smart contracts and any underlying natural language contract.
Annex 5
Proposed amendments to the AIFC Conduct of Business Rules
In these Rules, the underlying indicates a new text and the strikethrough indicates a removed text
(…)
Guidance: Purpose of this rulebook
(…)
Chapter 1 (Application) states that the requirements in the COB rulebook generally apply to Authorised Firms licensed to carry on a Regulated Activity. Some requirements may be modified or disapplied altogether depending on the type of Authorised Firm involved, the nature of its activities, and/or the classification of the Client to whom the Authorised Firm provides services.
In particular, the majority of the COB rules do not apply to Insurance Intermediaries, Trust Service Providers, or Ancillary Service Providers, which are instead required to comply with the requirements set out in Chapters 11, 12 or 13 of COB respectively.
For the avoidance of doubt, COB does not apply to Representative Offices or Authorised Market Institutions, unless otherwise provided under Rules made by the AFSA.
(…)
1. APPLICATION
1.1. General application rule
The requirements in COB apply to an Authorised Firm with respect to any Regulated Activity carried on by an Authorised Firm operating within the jurisdiction of the AIFC as specified in Part 1 of the Framework Regulations.
(…)
1.2.2. Exclusions in relation to certain categories of Centre Participant
For the avoidance of doubt, the requirements in COB do not apply to:
(a) a Representative Office;
(b) an Authorised Market Institution (other than an Authorised Crowdfunding Platform and an Authorised Digital Asset Trading Facility), except for COB 3 (Communications with Clients and Financial Promotions), unless otherwise provided under Rules made by the AFSA.
(…)
4. KEY INFORMATION AND CLIENT AGREEMENT
(…)
4.6. Provision of key features document relating to Security Tokens
-
An Authorised Firm must not provide a Financial Service to which this section applies to a Person unless it has provided that Person with a key features document containing the information in (2).
-
The key features document must contain the following information in respect of each Security Token relevant to the Financial Services that the Authorised Firm will provide to the Person:
(a) the risks associated with and essential characteristics of the Issuer (or other Person responsible for discharging the obligations associated with the rights conferred), and guarantor if any, of the Security Token, including their assets, liabilities and financial position;
(b) the risks associated with and essential characteristics of the Security Token, including the rights and obligations conferred and the type or types of Investment which it constitutes;
(c) whether the Security Token is or will be admitted to trading and if so, the details relating to such admission, including details of the facility and whether the facility is within the AIFC;
(d) whether the Client can directly access the trading facility, or whether access is only through an intermediary, and the process for accessing the facility;
(e) risks associated with the use of DLT, particularly those relating to Digital Wallets and the susceptibility of private cryptographic keys to misappropriation;
(f) whether the Client, the Authorised Firm or a third party is responsible for providing a Digital Wallet service in respect of the Security Token, and any related risks (for example, at whose risk the Client’s Security Tokens are held in the Digital Wallet, whether it is accessible online or stored offline, what happens if keys to the Digital Wallet are lost and what procedures can be followed in such an event);
(g) how the Client may exercise any rights conferred by the Security Tokens such as voting or participation in shareholder actions; and
(h) any other information relevant to the particular Security Token that would reasonably assist the Client to understand the product and technology better and to make informed decisions in respect of it.
-
The key features document must be provided in good time before the relevant Financial Service is provided to the Person, to enable that Person to make an informed decision about whether to use the relevant Financial Service.
-
The key features document does not need to be provided to a Person to whom the Authorised Firm has previously provided that information, if there has been no significant change since the information was previously provided.
(…)
Consultation Paper on Proposed AIFC Tokenised Commodities Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper on the AIFC Family Offices Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper on Proposed Enhancements to the AIFC Asset Management Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper on Proposed Astana International Financial Centre Venture Studio Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper on Proposal to Derivatives Framework, Enabling Margin Trading, Short Selling and High Frequency Trading
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper AFSA-O-CE-2024-0700 on Proposed Amendments to the AIFC Legal Entities Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2024-0006 from 01 July 2024 on Enabling trading of tokenised Investments and Qualified Investments and proposed enhancements to the AIFC Multilateral and Organised Trading Facilities Rules
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2024-0008 from 28 June 2024 on the Proposals to the AIFC ESG Debentures
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2024-0007 from 27 June 2024 on the Proposals to Enhancements to Credit Rating Agencies Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2024-0005 from 26 June 2024 on the AIFC Treasury Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2024-0009 from 2 August 2024 on Proposed Enhancements to the AIFC Asset Management Framework
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2024-0010 from 5 August 2024 on Consultation Paper on the AIFC Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure Guidance
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper AFSA-P-CE-2024-0011 from 16 August 2024 on Proposed Amendments to the AIFC Act No.GR009 of 2017 Concerning Qualifications Necessary for Employment in the AIFC
Please, press “PDF” button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper AFSA-L-CE-2024-0002 from 19 September 2024 on Proposed Amendments to the AIFC Special Purpose Company Rules
Please, press "PDF" button above to download a Consultation Paper
Consultation Paper AFSA-L-CE-2024-0003 from 19 September 2024 on Proposed Amendments to the AIFC Insolvency Framework
Please, press "PDF" button above to download a Consultation Paper